Contaminant Transport Modeling and Source Attribution With Attention‐Based Graph Neural Network
Groundwater contamination induced by anthropogenic activities has long been a global issue. Characterizing and modeling contaminant transport processes is crucial to groundwater protection and management. However, challenges still exist in process complexity, data constraint, and computational cost....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water resources research 2024-06, Vol.60 (6), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Water resources research |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Pang, Min Du, Erhu Zheng, Chunmiao |
description | Groundwater contamination induced by anthropogenic activities has long been a global issue. Characterizing and modeling contaminant transport processes is crucial to groundwater protection and management. However, challenges still exist in process complexity, data constraint, and computational cost. In the era of big data, the growth of machine learning has led to new opportunities in studying contaminant transport in groundwater systems. In this work, we introduce a new attention‐based graph neural network (aGNN) for modeling contaminant transport with limited monitoring data and quantifying causal connections between contaminant sources (drivers) and their spreading (outcomes). In five synthetic case studies that involve varying monitoring networks in heterogeneous aquifers, aGNN is shown to outperform LSTM‐based (long‐short term memory) and CNN‐ based (convolutional neural network) methods in multistep predictions (i.e., transductive learning). It also demonstrates a high level of applicability in inferring observations for unmonitored sites (i.e., inductive learning). Furthermore, an explanatory analysis based on aGNN quantifies the influence of each contaminant source, which has been validated by a physics‐based model with consistent outcomes with an R2 value exceeding 92%. The major advantage of aGNN is that it not only has a high level of predictive power in multiple scenario evaluations but also substantially reduces computational cost. Overall, this study shows that aGNN is efficient and robust for highly nonlinear spatiotemporal learning in subsurface contaminant transport, and provides a promising tool for groundwater management involving contaminant source attribution.
Plain Language Summary
Groundwater contamination caused by human activities is a longstanding global challenge. Accurately characterizing and modeling the movement of contaminants is crucial for the protection and management of groundwater resources. However, the complexity of the processes, limitations in data availability, and high computational demands pose significant challenges. In the age of big data, machine learning offers new avenues for exploring contaminant transport in groundwater. In this study, we introduce a novel machine learning model called an attention‐based graph neural network (aGNN) designed to model contaminant transport with sparse monitoring data and to analyze the causal relationships between contaminant sources and observed concentrations at specific lo |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2023WR035278 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3072087139</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3072087139</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2554-1403aee118e1147b89b2319d11a1f913f1374b05f99c6b739274a1039fa5e4393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqWw4wCR2BLweJw6XpYKClIBqRR1GTmNQ1OCHWxHVXccgTNyElLKghWL0deMnv4ffUJOgV4AZfKSUYbzKcWEiXSP9EByHgspcJ_0KOUYA0pxSI68X1EKPBmIHlEja4J6q4wyIZo5ZXxjXYjubaHryrxEyhTRk23dQkfDEFyVt6GyJppXYbk9aLNdvz4-r5TXRTR2qllGD7p1qu4krK17PSYHpaq9PvnVPnm-uZ6NbuPJ4_huNJzEiiUJj4FTVFoDpN1wkacyZwiyAFBQSsASUPCcJqWUi0EuUDLBFVCUpUo0R4l9crbzbZx9b7UP2ar723SRGVLBaCrghzrfUQtnvXe6zBpXvSm3yYBm2xKzvyV2OO7wdVXrzb9sNp-OpkywAcdv4ANzZw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072087139</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contaminant Transport Modeling and Source Attribution With Attention‐Based Graph Neural Network</title><source>Wiley Open Access Journals</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals</source><creator>Pang, Min ; Du, Erhu ; Zheng, Chunmiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Pang, Min ; Du, Erhu ; Zheng, Chunmiao</creatorcontrib><description>Groundwater contamination induced by anthropogenic activities has long been a global issue. Characterizing and modeling contaminant transport processes is crucial to groundwater protection and management. However, challenges still exist in process complexity, data constraint, and computational cost. In the era of big data, the growth of machine learning has led to new opportunities in studying contaminant transport in groundwater systems. In this work, we introduce a new attention‐based graph neural network (aGNN) for modeling contaminant transport with limited monitoring data and quantifying causal connections between contaminant sources (drivers) and their spreading (outcomes). In five synthetic case studies that involve varying monitoring networks in heterogeneous aquifers, aGNN is shown to outperform LSTM‐based (long‐short term memory) and CNN‐ based (convolutional neural network) methods in multistep predictions (i.e., transductive learning). It also demonstrates a high level of applicability in inferring observations for unmonitored sites (i.e., inductive learning). Furthermore, an explanatory analysis based on aGNN quantifies the influence of each contaminant source, which has been validated by a physics‐based model with consistent outcomes with an R2 value exceeding 92%. The major advantage of aGNN is that it not only has a high level of predictive power in multiple scenario evaluations but also substantially reduces computational cost. Overall, this study shows that aGNN is efficient and robust for highly nonlinear spatiotemporal learning in subsurface contaminant transport, and provides a promising tool for groundwater management involving contaminant source attribution.
Plain Language Summary
Groundwater contamination caused by human activities is a longstanding global challenge. Accurately characterizing and modeling the movement of contaminants is crucial for the protection and management of groundwater resources. However, the complexity of the processes, limitations in data availability, and high computational demands pose significant challenges. In the age of big data, machine learning offers new avenues for exploring contaminant transport in groundwater. In this study, we introduce a novel machine learning model called an attention‐based graph neural network (aGNN) designed to model contaminant transport with sparse monitoring data and to analyze the causal relationships between contaminant sources and observed concentrations at specific locations. We conducted five synthetic case studies across diverse aquifer systems with varying monitoring setups, where aGNN demonstrated superior performance over models based on other approaches. It also proved highly capable of making inferences about pollution levels at unmonitored sites. Moreover, an explanatory analysis using aGNN effectively quantified the impact of each contaminant source, with results validated by a physics‐based model. Overall, this study establishes aGNN as an efficient and robust method for complex spatiotemporal learning in subsurface contaminant transport, making it a valuable tool for groundwater management and contaminant source identification.
Key Points
A novel graph‐based deep learning method is proposed for modeling contaminant transport constrained by monitoring data
The proposed model quantifies the contribution of each potential contaminant source to the observed concentration at an arbitrary location
The deep learning method substantially reduces the computational cost compared with a physics‐based contaminant transport model</description><identifier>ISSN: 0043-1397</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-7973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2023WR035278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Aquifer systems ; Aquifers ; Artificial neural networks ; Big Data ; Case studies ; Complexity ; Computational efficiency ; Computer applications ; Computing costs ; contaminant transport modeling ; Contaminants ; Contamination ; deep learning ; graph neural network ; Graph neural networks ; Groundwater ; groundwater contamination ; Groundwater management ; Groundwater pollution ; Groundwater protection ; Groundwater resources ; Human influences ; Learning algorithms ; Machine learning ; Modelling ; Monitoring ; Neural networks ; Observational learning ; Physics ; Pollution ; Pollution levels ; Pollution transport ; Robustness ; Short term memory ; source attribution ; Transport processes ; Water protection ; Water resources</subject><ispartof>Water resources research, 2024-06, Vol.60 (6), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024. The Authors.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a2554-1403aee118e1147b89b2319d11a1f913f1374b05f99c6b739274a1039fa5e4393</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0086-2394 ; 0000-0001-5839-1305</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2023WR035278$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2023WR035278$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,11513,11561,27923,27924,45573,45574,46051,46467,46475,46891</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pang, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Erhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Chunmiao</creatorcontrib><title>Contaminant Transport Modeling and Source Attribution With Attention‐Based Graph Neural Network</title><title>Water resources research</title><description>Groundwater contamination induced by anthropogenic activities has long been a global issue. Characterizing and modeling contaminant transport processes is crucial to groundwater protection and management. However, challenges still exist in process complexity, data constraint, and computational cost. In the era of big data, the growth of machine learning has led to new opportunities in studying contaminant transport in groundwater systems. In this work, we introduce a new attention‐based graph neural network (aGNN) for modeling contaminant transport with limited monitoring data and quantifying causal connections between contaminant sources (drivers) and their spreading (outcomes). In five synthetic case studies that involve varying monitoring networks in heterogeneous aquifers, aGNN is shown to outperform LSTM‐based (long‐short term memory) and CNN‐ based (convolutional neural network) methods in multistep predictions (i.e., transductive learning). It also demonstrates a high level of applicability in inferring observations for unmonitored sites (i.e., inductive learning). Furthermore, an explanatory analysis based on aGNN quantifies the influence of each contaminant source, which has been validated by a physics‐based model with consistent outcomes with an R2 value exceeding 92%. The major advantage of aGNN is that it not only has a high level of predictive power in multiple scenario evaluations but also substantially reduces computational cost. Overall, this study shows that aGNN is efficient and robust for highly nonlinear spatiotemporal learning in subsurface contaminant transport, and provides a promising tool for groundwater management involving contaminant source attribution.
Plain Language Summary
Groundwater contamination caused by human activities is a longstanding global challenge. Accurately characterizing and modeling the movement of contaminants is crucial for the protection and management of groundwater resources. However, the complexity of the processes, limitations in data availability, and high computational demands pose significant challenges. In the age of big data, machine learning offers new avenues for exploring contaminant transport in groundwater. In this study, we introduce a novel machine learning model called an attention‐based graph neural network (aGNN) designed to model contaminant transport with sparse monitoring data and to analyze the causal relationships between contaminant sources and observed concentrations at specific locations. We conducted five synthetic case studies across diverse aquifer systems with varying monitoring setups, where aGNN demonstrated superior performance over models based on other approaches. It also proved highly capable of making inferences about pollution levels at unmonitored sites. Moreover, an explanatory analysis using aGNN effectively quantified the impact of each contaminant source, with results validated by a physics‐based model. Overall, this study establishes aGNN as an efficient and robust method for complex spatiotemporal learning in subsurface contaminant transport, making it a valuable tool for groundwater management and contaminant source identification.
Key Points
A novel graph‐based deep learning method is proposed for modeling contaminant transport constrained by monitoring data
The proposed model quantifies the contribution of each potential contaminant source to the observed concentration at an arbitrary location
The deep learning method substantially reduces the computational cost compared with a physics‐based contaminant transport model</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquifer systems</subject><subject>Aquifers</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Computational efficiency</subject><subject>Computer applications</subject><subject>Computing costs</subject><subject>contaminant transport modeling</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Contamination</subject><subject>deep learning</subject><subject>graph neural network</subject><subject>Graph neural networks</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>groundwater contamination</subject><subject>Groundwater management</subject><subject>Groundwater pollution</subject><subject>Groundwater protection</subject><subject>Groundwater resources</subject><subject>Human influences</subject><subject>Learning algorithms</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Observational learning</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution levels</subject><subject>Pollution transport</subject><subject>Robustness</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>source attribution</subject><subject>Transport processes</subject><subject>Water protection</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><issn>0043-1397</issn><issn>1944-7973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqWw4wCR2BLweJw6XpYKClIBqRR1GTmNQ1OCHWxHVXccgTNyElLKghWL0deMnv4ffUJOgV4AZfKSUYbzKcWEiXSP9EByHgspcJ_0KOUYA0pxSI68X1EKPBmIHlEja4J6q4wyIZo5ZXxjXYjubaHryrxEyhTRk23dQkfDEFyVt6GyJppXYbk9aLNdvz4-r5TXRTR2qllGD7p1qu4krK17PSYHpaq9PvnVPnm-uZ6NbuPJ4_huNJzEiiUJj4FTVFoDpN1wkacyZwiyAFBQSsASUPCcJqWUi0EuUDLBFVCUpUo0R4l9crbzbZx9b7UP2ar723SRGVLBaCrghzrfUQtnvXe6zBpXvSm3yYBm2xKzvyV2OO7wdVXrzb9sNp-OpkywAcdv4ANzZw</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Pang, Min</creator><creator>Du, Erhu</creator><creator>Zheng, Chunmiao</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0086-2394</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5839-1305</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Contaminant Transport Modeling and Source Attribution With Attention‐Based Graph Neural Network</title><author>Pang, Min ; Du, Erhu ; Zheng, Chunmiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a2554-1403aee118e1147b89b2319d11a1f913f1374b05f99c6b739274a1039fa5e4393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquifer systems</topic><topic>Aquifers</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Computational efficiency</topic><topic>Computer applications</topic><topic>Computing costs</topic><topic>contaminant transport modeling</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Contamination</topic><topic>deep learning</topic><topic>graph neural network</topic><topic>Graph neural networks</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>groundwater contamination</topic><topic>Groundwater management</topic><topic>Groundwater pollution</topic><topic>Groundwater protection</topic><topic>Groundwater resources</topic><topic>Human influences</topic><topic>Learning algorithms</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Observational learning</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution levels</topic><topic>Pollution transport</topic><topic>Robustness</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>source attribution</topic><topic>Transport processes</topic><topic>Water protection</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pang, Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Du, Erhu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Chunmiao</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access Journals</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pang, Min</au><au>Du, Erhu</au><au>Zheng, Chunmiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contaminant Transport Modeling and Source Attribution With Attention‐Based Graph Neural Network</atitle><jtitle>Water resources research</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>60</volume><issue>6</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0043-1397</issn><eissn>1944-7973</eissn><abstract>Groundwater contamination induced by anthropogenic activities has long been a global issue. Characterizing and modeling contaminant transport processes is crucial to groundwater protection and management. However, challenges still exist in process complexity, data constraint, and computational cost. In the era of big data, the growth of machine learning has led to new opportunities in studying contaminant transport in groundwater systems. In this work, we introduce a new attention‐based graph neural network (aGNN) for modeling contaminant transport with limited monitoring data and quantifying causal connections between contaminant sources (drivers) and their spreading (outcomes). In five synthetic case studies that involve varying monitoring networks in heterogeneous aquifers, aGNN is shown to outperform LSTM‐based (long‐short term memory) and CNN‐ based (convolutional neural network) methods in multistep predictions (i.e., transductive learning). It also demonstrates a high level of applicability in inferring observations for unmonitored sites (i.e., inductive learning). Furthermore, an explanatory analysis based on aGNN quantifies the influence of each contaminant source, which has been validated by a physics‐based model with consistent outcomes with an R2 value exceeding 92%. The major advantage of aGNN is that it not only has a high level of predictive power in multiple scenario evaluations but also substantially reduces computational cost. Overall, this study shows that aGNN is efficient and robust for highly nonlinear spatiotemporal learning in subsurface contaminant transport, and provides a promising tool for groundwater management involving contaminant source attribution.
Plain Language Summary
Groundwater contamination caused by human activities is a longstanding global challenge. Accurately characterizing and modeling the movement of contaminants is crucial for the protection and management of groundwater resources. However, the complexity of the processes, limitations in data availability, and high computational demands pose significant challenges. In the age of big data, machine learning offers new avenues for exploring contaminant transport in groundwater. In this study, we introduce a novel machine learning model called an attention‐based graph neural network (aGNN) designed to model contaminant transport with sparse monitoring data and to analyze the causal relationships between contaminant sources and observed concentrations at specific locations. We conducted five synthetic case studies across diverse aquifer systems with varying monitoring setups, where aGNN demonstrated superior performance over models based on other approaches. It also proved highly capable of making inferences about pollution levels at unmonitored sites. Moreover, an explanatory analysis using aGNN effectively quantified the impact of each contaminant source, with results validated by a physics‐based model. Overall, this study establishes aGNN as an efficient and robust method for complex spatiotemporal learning in subsurface contaminant transport, making it a valuable tool for groundwater management and contaminant source identification.
Key Points
A novel graph‐based deep learning method is proposed for modeling contaminant transport constrained by monitoring data
The proposed model quantifies the contribution of each potential contaminant source to the observed concentration at an arbitrary location
The deep learning method substantially reduces the computational cost compared with a physics‐based contaminant transport model</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><doi>10.1029/2023WR035278</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0086-2394</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5839-1305</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0043-1397 |
ispartof | Water resources research, 2024-06, Vol.60 (6), p.n/a |
issn | 0043-1397 1944-7973 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3072087139 |
source | Wiley Open Access Journals; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library Journals |
subjects | Anthropogenic factors Aquifer systems Aquifers Artificial neural networks Big Data Case studies Complexity Computational efficiency Computer applications Computing costs contaminant transport modeling Contaminants Contamination deep learning graph neural network Graph neural networks Groundwater groundwater contamination Groundwater management Groundwater pollution Groundwater protection Groundwater resources Human influences Learning algorithms Machine learning Modelling Monitoring Neural networks Observational learning Physics Pollution Pollution levels Pollution transport Robustness Short term memory source attribution Transport processes Water protection Water resources |
title | Contaminant Transport Modeling and Source Attribution With Attention‐Based Graph Neural Network |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T18%3A37%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contaminant%20Transport%20Modeling%20and%20Source%20Attribution%20With%20Attention%E2%80%90Based%20Graph%20Neural%20Network&rft.jtitle=Water%20resources%20research&rft.au=Pang,%20Min&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=60&rft.issue=6&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0043-1397&rft.eissn=1944-7973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2023WR035278&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3072087139%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072087139&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |