Impact of carbon pricing on comparative advantage in environmental goods export in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence of asymmetries from South Africa

This paper examines the asymmetric link between carbon pricing and the comparative advantage in environmental goods exports in South Africa from 1995 to 2021. The non‐linear autoregressive distributed lag model is utilized to investigate the effects of both minor and major positive and negative fluc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:African development review 2024-06, Vol.36 (2), p.173-186
Hauptverfasser: Anisiuba, Chika A., Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu, Takon, Samuel Manyo, Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma, Ibe, Godwin Imo, Egbo, Obiamaka P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 186
container_issue 2
container_start_page 173
container_title African development review
container_volume 36
creator Anisiuba, Chika A.
Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu
Takon, Samuel Manyo
Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma
Ibe, Godwin Imo
Egbo, Obiamaka P.
description This paper examines the asymmetric link between carbon pricing and the comparative advantage in environmental goods exports in South Africa from 1995 to 2021. The non‐linear autoregressive distributed lag model is utilized to investigate the effects of both minor and major positive and negative fluctuations in carbon taxes, technological innovation, and energy transition on comparative advantage. The results reveal that carbon taxes have an asymmetric effect on comparative advantage in both the short and long runs, with positive shocks exerting a greater beneficial influence than negative shocks. Specifically, it is found that a 1% reduction in carbon taxes corresponds to a 1.24% decline in the response variable, whereas a 1% increase in carbon taxes is associated with a 2.72% increase in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, which is twice as large. The study also uncovers evidence of an asymmetric relationship between low‐carbon technological innovation and comparative advantage in environmental goods exports. However, strong evidence of a long‐run asymmetric linkage between the energy transition and comparative advantage is not established. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that a positive shift in energy transition is linked with a 0.32% rise in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, whereas a negative shift in energy transition corresponds to a 0.11% decrease. The practical policy implications are also discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1467-8268.12742
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3072044782</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3072044782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2702-7be437fa13255a4cab2eb868ae5503451d40d5d996297c5bf2e8bddca305e383</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkLFOwzAQhiMEEqUws1piTus4TpyyVaWFSpWQaHfLcS5tqsYOdhLoxiMgHpEnwSEVK7fc6e7__5M-z7sN8ChwNQ5ozPyExMkoIIySM2_wtzl3Mw6YHzNGLr0ra_cYY0oJHXhfy7ISskY6R1KYVCtUmUIWaovcKLU7GlEXLSCRtULVYguoUAhUWxitSnCbA9pqnVkE75U2dXe1Tfr98bkWO-dVaJq7QHGP5m2RgZLQvRL2WJZQmwIsyo0u0Vo39e4kvfYucnGwcHPqQ2-zmG9mT_7q-XE5m658SRgmPkuBhiwXQUiiSFApUgJpEicCogiHNAoyirMom0xiMmEySnMCSZplUoQ4gjAJh95dH1sZ_dqArfleN0a5jzzEjDg-LCFONe5V0mhrDeTc8SmFOfIA84477yjzjjL_5e4cce94Kw5w_E_Op4uHl974AyaRiDE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072044782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of carbon pricing on comparative advantage in environmental goods export in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence of asymmetries from South Africa</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Anisiuba, Chika A. ; Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu ; Takon, Samuel Manyo ; Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma ; Ibe, Godwin Imo ; Egbo, Obiamaka P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Anisiuba, Chika A. ; Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu ; Takon, Samuel Manyo ; Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma ; Ibe, Godwin Imo ; Egbo, Obiamaka P.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper examines the asymmetric link between carbon pricing and the comparative advantage in environmental goods exports in South Africa from 1995 to 2021. The non‐linear autoregressive distributed lag model is utilized to investigate the effects of both minor and major positive and negative fluctuations in carbon taxes, technological innovation, and energy transition on comparative advantage. The results reveal that carbon taxes have an asymmetric effect on comparative advantage in both the short and long runs, with positive shocks exerting a greater beneficial influence than negative shocks. Specifically, it is found that a 1% reduction in carbon taxes corresponds to a 1.24% decline in the response variable, whereas a 1% increase in carbon taxes is associated with a 2.72% increase in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, which is twice as large. The study also uncovers evidence of an asymmetric relationship between low‐carbon technological innovation and comparative advantage in environmental goods exports. However, strong evidence of a long‐run asymmetric linkage between the energy transition and comparative advantage is not established. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that a positive shift in energy transition is linked with a 0.32% rise in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, whereas a negative shift in energy transition corresponds to a 0.11% decrease. The practical policy implications are also discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1017-6772</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8268</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1467-8268.12742</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Advantages ; Asymmetry ; Carbon ; carbon pricing ; Comparative advantage ; Energy ; environmental goods ; Environmental tax ; Exports ; Innovations ; Taxation ; Technological change ; Time series</subject><ispartof>African development review, 2024-06, Vol.36 (2), p.173-186</ispartof><rights>2024 African Development Bank.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2702-7be437fa13255a4cab2eb868ae5503451d40d5d996297c5bf2e8bddca305e383</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3611-108X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2F1467-8268.12742$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2F1467-8268.12742$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27865,27923,27924,30998,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Anisiuba, Chika A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takon, Samuel Manyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibe, Godwin Imo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbo, Obiamaka P.</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of carbon pricing on comparative advantage in environmental goods export in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence of asymmetries from South Africa</title><title>African development review</title><description>This paper examines the asymmetric link between carbon pricing and the comparative advantage in environmental goods exports in South Africa from 1995 to 2021. The non‐linear autoregressive distributed lag model is utilized to investigate the effects of both minor and major positive and negative fluctuations in carbon taxes, technological innovation, and energy transition on comparative advantage. The results reveal that carbon taxes have an asymmetric effect on comparative advantage in both the short and long runs, with positive shocks exerting a greater beneficial influence than negative shocks. Specifically, it is found that a 1% reduction in carbon taxes corresponds to a 1.24% decline in the response variable, whereas a 1% increase in carbon taxes is associated with a 2.72% increase in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, which is twice as large. The study also uncovers evidence of an asymmetric relationship between low‐carbon technological innovation and comparative advantage in environmental goods exports. However, strong evidence of a long‐run asymmetric linkage between the energy transition and comparative advantage is not established. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that a positive shift in energy transition is linked with a 0.32% rise in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, whereas a negative shift in energy transition corresponds to a 0.11% decrease. The practical policy implications are also discussed.</description><subject>Advantages</subject><subject>Asymmetry</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>carbon pricing</subject><subject>Comparative advantage</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>environmental goods</subject><subject>Environmental tax</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Taxation</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1017-6772</issn><issn>1467-8268</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkLFOwzAQhiMEEqUws1piTus4TpyyVaWFSpWQaHfLcS5tqsYOdhLoxiMgHpEnwSEVK7fc6e7__5M-z7sN8ChwNQ5ozPyExMkoIIySM2_wtzl3Mw6YHzNGLr0ra_cYY0oJHXhfy7ISskY6R1KYVCtUmUIWaovcKLU7GlEXLSCRtULVYguoUAhUWxitSnCbA9pqnVkE75U2dXe1Tfr98bkWO-dVaJq7QHGP5m2RgZLQvRL2WJZQmwIsyo0u0Vo39e4kvfYucnGwcHPqQ2-zmG9mT_7q-XE5m658SRgmPkuBhiwXQUiiSFApUgJpEicCogiHNAoyirMom0xiMmEySnMCSZplUoQ4gjAJh95dH1sZ_dqArfleN0a5jzzEjDg-LCFONe5V0mhrDeTc8SmFOfIA84477yjzjjL_5e4cce94Kw5w_E_Op4uHl974AyaRiDE</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Anisiuba, Chika A.</creator><creator>Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu</creator><creator>Takon, Samuel Manyo</creator><creator>Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma</creator><creator>Ibe, Godwin Imo</creator><creator>Egbo, Obiamaka P.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-108X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Impact of carbon pricing on comparative advantage in environmental goods export in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence of asymmetries from South Africa</title><author>Anisiuba, Chika A. ; Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu ; Takon, Samuel Manyo ; Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma ; Ibe, Godwin Imo ; Egbo, Obiamaka P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2702-7be437fa13255a4cab2eb868ae5503451d40d5d996297c5bf2e8bddca305e383</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Advantages</topic><topic>Asymmetry</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>carbon pricing</topic><topic>Comparative advantage</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>environmental goods</topic><topic>Environmental tax</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Taxation</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Anisiuba, Chika A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takon, Samuel Manyo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibe, Godwin Imo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Egbo, Obiamaka P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>African development review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Anisiuba, Chika A.</au><au>Ezeaku, Hillary Chijindu</au><au>Takon, Samuel Manyo</au><au>Iyke‐Ofoedu, Maureen Ifeoma</au><au>Ibe, Godwin Imo</au><au>Egbo, Obiamaka P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impact of carbon pricing on comparative advantage in environmental goods export in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence of asymmetries from South Africa</atitle><jtitle>African development review</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>173-186</pages><issn>1017-6772</issn><eissn>1467-8268</eissn><abstract>This paper examines the asymmetric link between carbon pricing and the comparative advantage in environmental goods exports in South Africa from 1995 to 2021. The non‐linear autoregressive distributed lag model is utilized to investigate the effects of both minor and major positive and negative fluctuations in carbon taxes, technological innovation, and energy transition on comparative advantage. The results reveal that carbon taxes have an asymmetric effect on comparative advantage in both the short and long runs, with positive shocks exerting a greater beneficial influence than negative shocks. Specifically, it is found that a 1% reduction in carbon taxes corresponds to a 1.24% decline in the response variable, whereas a 1% increase in carbon taxes is associated with a 2.72% increase in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, which is twice as large. The study also uncovers evidence of an asymmetric relationship between low‐carbon technological innovation and comparative advantage in environmental goods exports. However, strong evidence of a long‐run asymmetric linkage between the energy transition and comparative advantage is not established. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that a positive shift in energy transition is linked with a 0.32% rise in comparative advantage in environmental goods exports, whereas a negative shift in energy transition corresponds to a 0.11% decrease. The practical policy implications are also discussed.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1467-8268.12742</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-108X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1017-6772
ispartof African development review, 2024-06, Vol.36 (2), p.173-186
issn 1017-6772
1467-8268
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3072044782
source PAIS Index; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Advantages
Asymmetry
Carbon
carbon pricing
Comparative advantage
Energy
environmental goods
Environmental tax
Exports
Innovations
Taxation
Technological change
Time series
title Impact of carbon pricing on comparative advantage in environmental goods export in sub‐Saharan Africa: Evidence of asymmetries from South Africa
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T20%3A47%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20carbon%20pricing%20on%20comparative%20advantage%20in%20environmental%20goods%20export%20in%20sub%E2%80%90Saharan%20Africa:%20Evidence%20of%20asymmetries%20from%20South%20Africa&rft.jtitle=African%20development%20review&rft.au=Anisiuba,%20Chika%20A.&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=173-186&rft.issn=1017-6772&rft.eissn=1467-8268&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1467-8268.12742&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3072044782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072044782&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true