Optimizing exposure data collection for plant protection products: identifying ideal collectors with the fluorescent dye pyranine
When approving plant protection products, exposure data are required for risk analysis. Exposure data can be collected for various exposure pathways, such as dermal, inhalation or ground sediment. For measuring exposures, pyranine, a fluorescent dye, and a collector can be used. However, the choice...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit 2024-06, Vol.19 (2), p.245-253 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 253 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 245 |
| container_title | Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Ehmke, Annika Wegener, Jens Karl Melfsen, Andreas Hartung, Eberhard |
| description | When approving plant protection products, exposure data are required for risk analysis. Exposure data can be collected for various exposure pathways, such as dermal, inhalation or ground sediment. For measuring exposures, pyranine, a fluorescent dye, and a collector can be used. However, the choice of collector material depends on the specific exposure pathway. This study aims to determine the most suitable collector, in combination with the tracer pyranine, for recording exposure through different pathways in practical trials.
Seven different collectors (Tyvek
®
, labels, plastic patches, paper patches, nylon filters, fibreglass filters, petri dishes) were subjected to laboratory and field tests to assess various quality parameters. Blank values, recovery rates, storability, and fluorescence degradation under UV-radiation were measured. Based on the results, a matrix was created summarizing which collector might be best suited to capture each exposure pathway. Almost all collectors demonstrated high recovery rates (Tyvek
®
100%; labels 100%; plastic patches 100%; paper patches 100%; nylon filters 95%; fiberglass filters 60.9%) as well as good storability. Furthermore, all plastic-based collectors (labels, Tyvek
®
, plastic patches, petri dishes) showed a very good recovery rate above 95% when exposed to UV-radiation. However, nylon filters were not suitable for utilization under field conditions due to the rapid degradation of fluorescence under UV-radiation (recovery rate: 20–56%). Nevertheless, nylon filters showed stable recoveries under protected conditions and can be used to assess inhalation exposures under these conditions. Fibreglass filters, with recovery rates of 84–86%, were well-suited for testing inhalative exposures outdoors when a correction factor was applied. Tyvek
®
was the most suitable material for detecting total dermal exposure under field conditions. This is due to its quality characteristics and availability in a variety of sizes. Finally, petri dishes were ideal for collecting ground sediments. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00003-024-01498-5 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3071257147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3153664157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-37261bb9863493a022d8741932ef2bd32b7619e5c3d39f2508e52d234ebeb5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc9LwzAcxYsoOKf_gKeAFy_V_Gia1psMf4Gwy-6hbb7dMrqkJik6b_7nZnZD8GAueYTPe7zwkuSS4BuCsbj1OB6WYpqlmGRlkfKjZELynKS8yMXxQQtOTpMz79cYc1EINkm-5n3QG_2pzRLBR2_94ACpKlSosV0HTdDWoNY61HeVCah3Nuwfo1RDE_wd0gpM0O12lxF11R281nn0rsMKhRWgthusA99EFqktoH7rKqMNnCcnbdV5uNjf02Tx-LCYPaev86eX2f1r2rBMhJQJmpO6LoucZSWrMKWqEBkpGYWW1orRWuSkBN4wxcqWclwAp4qyDGqoObBpcj3Gxt5vA_ggNzqW6eK3wA5eMsJZnmeEi4he_UHXdnAmlpMMC0K5INmOoiPVOOu9g1b2Tm8qt5UEy90ochxFxlHkzyiSRxMbTT7CZgnuN_of1zfCO5Gl</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3071257147</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Optimizing exposure data collection for plant protection products: identifying ideal collectors with the fluorescent dye pyranine</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ehmke, Annika ; Wegener, Jens Karl ; Melfsen, Andreas ; Hartung, Eberhard</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehmke, Annika ; Wegener, Jens Karl ; Melfsen, Andreas ; Hartung, Eberhard</creatorcontrib><description>When approving plant protection products, exposure data are required for risk analysis. Exposure data can be collected for various exposure pathways, such as dermal, inhalation or ground sediment. For measuring exposures, pyranine, a fluorescent dye, and a collector can be used. However, the choice of collector material depends on the specific exposure pathway. This study aims to determine the most suitable collector, in combination with the tracer pyranine, for recording exposure through different pathways in practical trials.
Seven different collectors (Tyvek
®
, labels, plastic patches, paper patches, nylon filters, fibreglass filters, petri dishes) were subjected to laboratory and field tests to assess various quality parameters. Blank values, recovery rates, storability, and fluorescence degradation under UV-radiation were measured. Based on the results, a matrix was created summarizing which collector might be best suited to capture each exposure pathway. Almost all collectors demonstrated high recovery rates (Tyvek
®
100%; labels 100%; plastic patches 100%; paper patches 100%; nylon filters 95%; fiberglass filters 60.9%) as well as good storability. Furthermore, all plastic-based collectors (labels, Tyvek
®
, plastic patches, petri dishes) showed a very good recovery rate above 95% when exposed to UV-radiation. However, nylon filters were not suitable for utilization under field conditions due to the rapid degradation of fluorescence under UV-radiation (recovery rate: 20–56%). Nevertheless, nylon filters showed stable recoveries under protected conditions and can be used to assess inhalation exposures under these conditions. Fibreglass filters, with recovery rates of 84–86%, were well-suited for testing inhalative exposures outdoors when a correction factor was applied. Tyvek
®
was the most suitable material for detecting total dermal exposure under field conditions. This is due to its quality characteristics and availability in a variety of sizes. Finally, petri dishes were ideal for collecting ground sediments.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1661-5751</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1661-5867</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00003-024-01498-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology ; Chemistry/Food Science ; Collectors ; Data collection ; Degradation ; dermal exposure ; Dyes ; Exposure ; Fiberglass ; Field tests ; Filters ; Fluorescence ; Fluorescent dyes ; Fluorescent indicators ; Food Science ; Glass fiber reinforced plastics ; Inhalation ; Labels ; Life Sciences ; Methods ; Nylon ; Plant Genetics and Genomics ; Plant protection ; Plastics ; Radiation ; Radiation measurement ; Recovery ; Respiration ; Risk analysis ; Sediments ; storage quality ; Ultraviolet radiation</subject><ispartof>Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 2024-06, Vol.19 (2), p.245-253</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-37261bb9863493a022d8741932ef2bd32b7619e5c3d39f2508e52d234ebeb5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0891-5892</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00003-024-01498-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00003-024-01498-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehmke, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Jens Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melfsen, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartung, Eberhard</creatorcontrib><title>Optimizing exposure data collection for plant protection products: identifying ideal collectors with the fluorescent dye pyranine</title><title>Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit</title><addtitle>J Consum Prot Food Saf</addtitle><description>When approving plant protection products, exposure data are required for risk analysis. Exposure data can be collected for various exposure pathways, such as dermal, inhalation or ground sediment. For measuring exposures, pyranine, a fluorescent dye, and a collector can be used. However, the choice of collector material depends on the specific exposure pathway. This study aims to determine the most suitable collector, in combination with the tracer pyranine, for recording exposure through different pathways in practical trials.
Seven different collectors (Tyvek
®
, labels, plastic patches, paper patches, nylon filters, fibreglass filters, petri dishes) were subjected to laboratory and field tests to assess various quality parameters. Blank values, recovery rates, storability, and fluorescence degradation under UV-radiation were measured. Based on the results, a matrix was created summarizing which collector might be best suited to capture each exposure pathway. Almost all collectors demonstrated high recovery rates (Tyvek
®
100%; labels 100%; plastic patches 100%; paper patches 100%; nylon filters 95%; fiberglass filters 60.9%) as well as good storability. Furthermore, all plastic-based collectors (labels, Tyvek
®
, plastic patches, petri dishes) showed a very good recovery rate above 95% when exposed to UV-radiation. However, nylon filters were not suitable for utilization under field conditions due to the rapid degradation of fluorescence under UV-radiation (recovery rate: 20–56%). Nevertheless, nylon filters showed stable recoveries under protected conditions and can be used to assess inhalation exposures under these conditions. Fibreglass filters, with recovery rates of 84–86%, were well-suited for testing inhalative exposures outdoors when a correction factor was applied. Tyvek
®
was the most suitable material for detecting total dermal exposure under field conditions. This is due to its quality characteristics and availability in a variety of sizes. Finally, petri dishes were ideal for collecting ground sediments.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Chemistry/Food Science</subject><subject>Collectors</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Degradation</subject><subject>dermal exposure</subject><subject>Dyes</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Fiberglass</subject><subject>Field tests</subject><subject>Filters</subject><subject>Fluorescence</subject><subject>Fluorescent dyes</subject><subject>Fluorescent indicators</subject><subject>Food Science</subject><subject>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Inhalation</subject><subject>Labels</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Nylon</subject><subject>Plant Genetics and Genomics</subject><subject>Plant protection</subject><subject>Plastics</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation measurement</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Respiration</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>storage quality</subject><subject>Ultraviolet radiation</subject><issn>1661-5751</issn><issn>1661-5867</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc9LwzAcxYsoOKf_gKeAFy_V_Gia1psMf4Gwy-6hbb7dMrqkJik6b_7nZnZD8GAueYTPe7zwkuSS4BuCsbj1OB6WYpqlmGRlkfKjZELynKS8yMXxQQtOTpMz79cYc1EINkm-5n3QG_2pzRLBR2_94ACpKlSosV0HTdDWoNY61HeVCah3Nuwfo1RDE_wd0gpM0O12lxF11R281nn0rsMKhRWgthusA99EFqktoH7rKqMNnCcnbdV5uNjf02Tx-LCYPaev86eX2f1r2rBMhJQJmpO6LoucZSWrMKWqEBkpGYWW1orRWuSkBN4wxcqWclwAp4qyDGqoObBpcj3Gxt5vA_ggNzqW6eK3wA5eMsJZnmeEi4he_UHXdnAmlpMMC0K5INmOoiPVOOu9g1b2Tm8qt5UEy90ochxFxlHkzyiSRxMbTT7CZgnuN_of1zfCO5Gl</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Ehmke, Annika</creator><creator>Wegener, Jens Karl</creator><creator>Melfsen, Andreas</creator><creator>Hartung, Eberhard</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-5892</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Optimizing exposure data collection for plant protection products: identifying ideal collectors with the fluorescent dye pyranine</title><author>Ehmke, Annika ; Wegener, Jens Karl ; Melfsen, Andreas ; Hartung, Eberhard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c347t-37261bb9863493a022d8741932ef2bd32b7619e5c3d39f2508e52d234ebeb5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Chemistry/Food Science</topic><topic>Collectors</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Degradation</topic><topic>dermal exposure</topic><topic>Dyes</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Fiberglass</topic><topic>Field tests</topic><topic>Filters</topic><topic>Fluorescence</topic><topic>Fluorescent dyes</topic><topic>Fluorescent indicators</topic><topic>Food Science</topic><topic>Glass fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Inhalation</topic><topic>Labels</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Nylon</topic><topic>Plant Genetics and Genomics</topic><topic>Plant protection</topic><topic>Plastics</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation measurement</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Respiration</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>storage quality</topic><topic>Ultraviolet radiation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehmke, Annika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wegener, Jens Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melfsen, Andreas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hartung, Eberhard</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehmke, Annika</au><au>Wegener, Jens Karl</au><au>Melfsen, Andreas</au><au>Hartung, Eberhard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Optimizing exposure data collection for plant protection products: identifying ideal collectors with the fluorescent dye pyranine</atitle><jtitle>Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit</jtitle><stitle>J Consum Prot Food Saf</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>245</spage><epage>253</epage><pages>245-253</pages><issn>1661-5751</issn><eissn>1661-5867</eissn><abstract>When approving plant protection products, exposure data are required for risk analysis. Exposure data can be collected for various exposure pathways, such as dermal, inhalation or ground sediment. For measuring exposures, pyranine, a fluorescent dye, and a collector can be used. However, the choice of collector material depends on the specific exposure pathway. This study aims to determine the most suitable collector, in combination with the tracer pyranine, for recording exposure through different pathways in practical trials.
Seven different collectors (Tyvek
®
, labels, plastic patches, paper patches, nylon filters, fibreglass filters, petri dishes) were subjected to laboratory and field tests to assess various quality parameters. Blank values, recovery rates, storability, and fluorescence degradation under UV-radiation were measured. Based on the results, a matrix was created summarizing which collector might be best suited to capture each exposure pathway. Almost all collectors demonstrated high recovery rates (Tyvek
®
100%; labels 100%; plastic patches 100%; paper patches 100%; nylon filters 95%; fiberglass filters 60.9%) as well as good storability. Furthermore, all plastic-based collectors (labels, Tyvek
®
, plastic patches, petri dishes) showed a very good recovery rate above 95% when exposed to UV-radiation. However, nylon filters were not suitable for utilization under field conditions due to the rapid degradation of fluorescence under UV-radiation (recovery rate: 20–56%). Nevertheless, nylon filters showed stable recoveries under protected conditions and can be used to assess inhalation exposures under these conditions. Fibreglass filters, with recovery rates of 84–86%, were well-suited for testing inhalative exposures outdoors when a correction factor was applied. Tyvek
®
was the most suitable material for detecting total dermal exposure under field conditions. This is due to its quality characteristics and availability in a variety of sizes. Finally, petri dishes were ideal for collecting ground sediments.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s00003-024-01498-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0891-5892</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1661-5751 |
| ispartof | Journal für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit, 2024-06, Vol.19 (2), p.245-253 |
| issn | 1661-5751 1661-5867 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3071257147 |
| source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Agriculture Biomedical and Life Sciences Biotechnology Chemistry/Food Science Collectors Data collection Degradation dermal exposure Dyes Exposure Fiberglass Field tests Filters Fluorescence Fluorescent dyes Fluorescent indicators Food Science Glass fiber reinforced plastics Inhalation Labels Life Sciences Methods Nylon Plant Genetics and Genomics Plant protection Plastics Radiation Radiation measurement Recovery Respiration Risk analysis Sediments storage quality Ultraviolet radiation |
| title | Optimizing exposure data collection for plant protection products: identifying ideal collectors with the fluorescent dye pyranine |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A44%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Optimizing%20exposure%20data%20collection%20for%20plant%20protection%20products:%20identifying%20ideal%20collectors%20with%20the%20fluorescent%20dye%20pyranine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20fu%CC%88r%20Verbraucherschutz%20und%20Lebensmittelsicherheit&rft.au=Ehmke,%20Annika&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=245&rft.epage=253&rft.pages=245-253&rft.issn=1661-5751&rft.eissn=1661-5867&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00003-024-01498-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153664157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3071257147&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |