THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD
Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at s...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Harvard environmental law review : HELR 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.118 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 118 |
container_title | The Harvard environmental law review : HELR |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Salzman, James Weisbach, David |
description | Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at stake offer valuable lessons for managing lack of additionality in offsets. The article sets out the current efforts to prove offset additionality, explains why major government programs present comparable additionality challenges, and show why other programs' problems of additionality are perceived as significantly different than those for offsets. We examine the toolkit used to address additionality in subsidies and show how this can be usefully applied to offsets. Offsets are central to many climate pledges, so it is critically important they be credible. But the challenge of managing offset additionality need not be understood in isolation. It is, in fact, a common problem with tested solutions. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3069265225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3069265225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30692652253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDQx17UwMjXnYOAqLs4yMDAwNzIx4mRQDPFwVXB0cfEM8fT3c_TxDIlUcPEPdfJxVQgOcfRzcQxy4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeGMDM0sjM1MjI1Nj4lQBAF_jKXs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069265225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Salzman, James ; Weisbach, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Salzman, James ; Weisbach, David</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at stake offer valuable lessons for managing lack of additionality in offsets. The article sets out the current efforts to prove offset additionality, explains why major government programs present comparable additionality challenges, and show why other programs' problems of additionality are perceived as significantly different than those for offsets. We examine the toolkit used to address additionality in subsidies and show how this can be usefully applied to offsets. Offsets are central to many climate pledges, so it is critically important they be credible. But the challenge of managing offset additionality need not be understood in isolation. It is, in fact, a common problem with tested solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard Law School</publisher><subject>Carbon offsets ; Emissions trading ; Government programs ; Money ; Offsets</subject><ispartof>The Harvard environmental law review : HELR, 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.118</ispartof><rights>Copyright Harvard Law School 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salzman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisbach, David</creatorcontrib><title>THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD</title><title>The Harvard environmental law review : HELR</title><description>Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at stake offer valuable lessons for managing lack of additionality in offsets. The article sets out the current efforts to prove offset additionality, explains why major government programs present comparable additionality challenges, and show why other programs' problems of additionality are perceived as significantly different than those for offsets. We examine the toolkit used to address additionality in subsidies and show how this can be usefully applied to offsets. Offsets are central to many climate pledges, so it is critically important they be credible. But the challenge of managing offset additionality need not be understood in isolation. It is, in fact, a common problem with tested solutions.</description><subject>Carbon offsets</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Offsets</subject><issn>0147-8257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDQx17UwMjXnYOAqLs4yMDAwNzIx4mRQDPFwVXB0cfEM8fT3c_TxDIlUcPEPdfJxVQgOcfRzcQxy4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeGMDM0sjM1MjI1Nj4lQBAF_jKXs</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Salzman, James</creator><creator>Weisbach, David</creator><general>Harvard Law School</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD</title><author>Salzman, James ; Weisbach, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30692652253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Carbon offsets</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Offsets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salzman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisbach, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Harvard environmental law review : HELR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salzman, James</au><au>Weisbach, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD</atitle><jtitle>The Harvard environmental law review : HELR</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>118</spage><pages>118-</pages><issn>0147-8257</issn><abstract>Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at stake offer valuable lessons for managing lack of additionality in offsets. The article sets out the current efforts to prove offset additionality, explains why major government programs present comparable additionality challenges, and show why other programs' problems of additionality are perceived as significantly different than those for offsets. We examine the toolkit used to address additionality in subsidies and show how this can be usefully applied to offsets. Offsets are central to many climate pledges, so it is critically important they be credible. But the challenge of managing offset additionality need not be understood in isolation. It is, in fact, a common problem with tested solutions.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard Law School</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0147-8257 |
ispartof | The Harvard environmental law review : HELR, 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.118 |
issn | 0147-8257 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3069265225 |
source | PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Carbon offsets Emissions trading Government programs Money Offsets |
title | THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20ADDITIONALITY%20DOUBLE%20STANDARD&rft.jtitle=The%20Harvard%20environmental%20law%20review%20:%20HELR&rft.au=Salzman,%20James&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=118&rft.pages=118-&rft.issn=0147-8257&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3069265225%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069265225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |