THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD

Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Harvard environmental law review : HELR 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.118
Hauptverfasser: Salzman, James, Weisbach, David
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 118
container_title The Harvard environmental law review : HELR
container_volume 48
creator Salzman, James
Weisbach, David
description Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at stake offer valuable lessons for managing lack of additionality in offsets. The article sets out the current efforts to prove offset additionality, explains why major government programs present comparable additionality challenges, and show why other programs' problems of additionality are perceived as significantly different than those for offsets. We examine the toolkit used to address additionality in subsidies and show how this can be usefully applied to offsets. Offsets are central to many climate pledges, so it is critically important they be credible. But the challenge of managing offset additionality need not be understood in isolation. It is, in fact, a common problem with tested solutions.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3069265225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3069265225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30692652253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDQx17UwMjXnYOAqLs4yMDAwNzIx4mRQDPFwVXB0cfEM8fT3c_TxDIlUcPEPdfJxVQgOcfRzcQxy4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeGMDM0sjM1MjI1Nj4lQBAF_jKXs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069265225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Salzman, James ; Weisbach, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Salzman, James ; Weisbach, David</creatorcontrib><description>Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at stake offer valuable lessons for managing lack of additionality in offsets. The article sets out the current efforts to prove offset additionality, explains why major government programs present comparable additionality challenges, and show why other programs' problems of additionality are perceived as significantly different than those for offsets. We examine the toolkit used to address additionality in subsidies and show how this can be usefully applied to offsets. Offsets are central to many climate pledges, so it is critically important they be credible. But the challenge of managing offset additionality need not be understood in isolation. It is, in fact, a common problem with tested solutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0147-8257</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge: Harvard Law School</publisher><subject>Carbon offsets ; Emissions trading ; Government programs ; Money ; Offsets</subject><ispartof>The Harvard environmental law review : HELR, 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.118</ispartof><rights>Copyright Harvard Law School 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salzman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisbach, David</creatorcontrib><title>THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD</title><title>The Harvard environmental law review : HELR</title><description>Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at stake offer valuable lessons for managing lack of additionality in offsets. The article sets out the current efforts to prove offset additionality, explains why major government programs present comparable additionality challenges, and show why other programs' problems of additionality are perceived as significantly different than those for offsets. We examine the toolkit used to address additionality in subsidies and show how this can be usefully applied to offsets. Offsets are central to many climate pledges, so it is critically important they be credible. But the challenge of managing offset additionality need not be understood in isolation. It is, in fact, a common problem with tested solutions.</description><subject>Carbon offsets</subject><subject>Emissions trading</subject><subject>Government programs</subject><subject>Money</subject><subject>Offsets</subject><issn>0147-8257</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDQx17UwMjXnYOAqLs4yMDAwNzIx4mRQDPFwVXB0cfEM8fT3c_TxDIlUcPEPdfJxVQgOcfRzcQxy4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDMpuriHOHroFRfmFpanFJfFZ-aVFeUCpeGMDM0sjM1MjI1Nj4lQBAF_jKXs</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Salzman, James</creator><creator>Weisbach, David</creator><general>Harvard Law School</general><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD</title><author>Salzman, James ; Weisbach, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30692652253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Carbon offsets</topic><topic>Emissions trading</topic><topic>Government programs</topic><topic>Money</topic><topic>Offsets</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salzman, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weisbach, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Harvard environmental law review : HELR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salzman, James</au><au>Weisbach, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD</atitle><jtitle>The Harvard environmental law review : HELR</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>118</spage><pages>118-</pages><issn>0147-8257</issn><abstract>Carbon offsets are widely criticized for lacking additionality. The public debate, however, has failed to recognize that the problem of additionality goes far beyond offsets. It arises any time the government subsidizes an activity. Programs with longer histories than offsets and far more money at stake offer valuable lessons for managing lack of additionality in offsets. The article sets out the current efforts to prove offset additionality, explains why major government programs present comparable additionality challenges, and show why other programs' problems of additionality are perceived as significantly different than those for offsets. We examine the toolkit used to address additionality in subsidies and show how this can be usefully applied to offsets. Offsets are central to many climate pledges, so it is critically important they be credible. But the challenge of managing offset additionality need not be understood in isolation. It is, in fact, a common problem with tested solutions.</abstract><cop>Cambridge</cop><pub>Harvard Law School</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0147-8257
ispartof The Harvard environmental law review : HELR, 2024-01, Vol.48 (1), p.118
issn 0147-8257
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3069265225
source PAIS Index; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Carbon offsets
Emissions trading
Government programs
Money
Offsets
title THE ADDITIONALITY DOUBLE STANDARD
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=THE%20ADDITIONALITY%20DOUBLE%20STANDARD&rft.jtitle=The%20Harvard%20environmental%20law%20review%20:%20HELR&rft.au=Salzman,%20James&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=118&rft.pages=118-&rft.issn=0147-8257&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3069265225%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069265225&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true