Water sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Pathways to pluralist, legitimate and sustainable water laws in settler colonial states
In settler colonial states, the doctrine of discovery that dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of their lands also took their waters. The original water theft of colonization was underpinned by the erroneous assumption of ‘aqua nullius’ and remains almost entirely unacknowledged and largely unaddressed....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PLOS water 2023-11, Vol.2 (11), p.e0000144 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | e0000144 |
container_title | PLOS water |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | O’Donnell, Erin |
description | In settler colonial states, the doctrine of discovery that dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of their lands also took their waters. The original water theft of colonization was underpinned by the erroneous assumption of ‘aqua nullius’ and remains almost entirely unacknowledged and largely unaddressed. Scholarly literature has focused on the injustice of this water theft and the human rights of Indigenous Peoples (under UNDRIP as well as their human right to water). This review shows that aqua nullius also renders settler state water law not fit for purpose in two important ways. Firstly, the legitimacy of settler state water laws is contested, presenting a foundational challenge to water governance, and failing to acknowledge the plurality of water laws in settler colonial states. Secondly, settler water law is experiencing a more widespread failure to deliver ecologically sustainable water management. In responding to the injustice of aqua nullius, foundational reform of settler state water laws can enable the settler state to learn from Indigenous laws that have supported thriving communities and genuinely sustainable water management for millennia. Drawing on examples from Aotearoa New Zealand, the USA, Canada, and Australia, this review shows how acknowledging, and challenging, the false assumption of aqua nullius creates novel pathways for reform, enabling pluralist water laws and water governance models that improve both legitimacy and sustainability of settler state water governance. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000144 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3069190612</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3069190612</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1704-a4a07b936bbbe80144558e8705681930530f60601cc36150deabbdf4e3b9cf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-Aw8LXk3dzSabxJsUPwoFeyh4DJtkUresu3FnY-jRf25qKziXmYFnXpiHkGvO5lxk_G7nem-VmXeDCnM2Fk-SMzKJM5lFIubF-b_5kswQdyMTZ0XCCj4h328qgKfovsCD3tqwp63zdGkbvQXreqRrcJ0BvKdrFd4HtUcaHO1M75XRGG6pga0O-mOMoco2FHsMSltVGaDDb7ZRA1JtKUIIZtxrZ5zVytARDIBX5KJVBmF26lOyeXrcLF6i1evzcvGwimqesSRSiWJZVQhZVRXkhyfTNIc8Y6nMeSFYKlgrmWS8roXkKWtAVVXTJiCqom6FmJKbY2zn3WcPGMqTOCwFkwUvmOTxSCVHqvYO0UNbdn78ze9LzsqD7r-r8qC7POkWP7YxeRU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3069190612</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Water sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Pathways to pluralist, legitimate and sustainable water laws in settler colonial states</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>O’Donnell, Erin</creator><contributor>Shafiee-Jood, Majid</contributor><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, Erin ; Shafiee-Jood, Majid</creatorcontrib><description>In settler colonial states, the doctrine of discovery that dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of their lands also took their waters. The original water theft of colonization was underpinned by the erroneous assumption of ‘aqua nullius’ and remains almost entirely unacknowledged and largely unaddressed. Scholarly literature has focused on the injustice of this water theft and the human rights of Indigenous Peoples (under UNDRIP as well as their human right to water). This review shows that aqua nullius also renders settler state water law not fit for purpose in two important ways. Firstly, the legitimacy of settler state water laws is contested, presenting a foundational challenge to water governance, and failing to acknowledge the plurality of water laws in settler colonial states. Secondly, settler water law is experiencing a more widespread failure to deliver ecologically sustainable water management. In responding to the injustice of aqua nullius, foundational reform of settler state water laws can enable the settler state to learn from Indigenous laws that have supported thriving communities and genuinely sustainable water management for millennia. Drawing on examples from Aotearoa New Zealand, the USA, Canada, and Australia, this review shows how acknowledging, and challenging, the false assumption of aqua nullius creates novel pathways for reform, enabling pluralist water laws and water governance models that improve both legitimacy and sustainability of settler state water governance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2767-3219</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2767-3219</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pwat.0000144</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Colonialism ; Community ; Economic development ; Human rights ; Indigenous peoples ; Law ; Native peoples ; Native rights ; Rivers ; Sovereignty ; State government ; Sustainability management ; Theft ; Treaties ; Water ; Water governance ; Water law ; Water management ; Water rights</subject><ispartof>PLOS water, 2023-11, Vol.2 (11), p.e0000144</ispartof><rights>2023 Erin O’Donnell. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1704-a4a07b936bbbe80144558e8705681930530f60601cc36150deabbdf4e3b9cf33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1704-a4a07b936bbbe80144558e8705681930530f60601cc36150deabbdf4e3b9cf33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2615-8012</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,2928,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Shafiee-Jood, Majid</contributor><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, Erin</creatorcontrib><title>Water sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Pathways to pluralist, legitimate and sustainable water laws in settler colonial states</title><title>PLOS water</title><description>In settler colonial states, the doctrine of discovery that dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of their lands also took their waters. The original water theft of colonization was underpinned by the erroneous assumption of ‘aqua nullius’ and remains almost entirely unacknowledged and largely unaddressed. Scholarly literature has focused on the injustice of this water theft and the human rights of Indigenous Peoples (under UNDRIP as well as their human right to water). This review shows that aqua nullius also renders settler state water law not fit for purpose in two important ways. Firstly, the legitimacy of settler state water laws is contested, presenting a foundational challenge to water governance, and failing to acknowledge the plurality of water laws in settler colonial states. Secondly, settler water law is experiencing a more widespread failure to deliver ecologically sustainable water management. In responding to the injustice of aqua nullius, foundational reform of settler state water laws can enable the settler state to learn from Indigenous laws that have supported thriving communities and genuinely sustainable water management for millennia. Drawing on examples from Aotearoa New Zealand, the USA, Canada, and Australia, this review shows how acknowledging, and challenging, the false assumption of aqua nullius creates novel pathways for reform, enabling pluralist water laws and water governance models that improve both legitimacy and sustainability of settler state water governance.</description><subject>Colonialism</subject><subject>Community</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Human rights</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Native rights</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>State government</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Theft</subject><subject>Treaties</subject><subject>Water</subject><subject>Water governance</subject><subject>Water law</subject><subject>Water management</subject><subject>Water rights</subject><issn>2767-3219</issn><issn>2767-3219</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkE1Lw0AQhhdRsNT-Aw8LXk3dzSabxJsUPwoFeyh4DJtkUresu3FnY-jRf25qKziXmYFnXpiHkGvO5lxk_G7nem-VmXeDCnM2Fk-SMzKJM5lFIubF-b_5kswQdyMTZ0XCCj4h328qgKfovsCD3tqwp63zdGkbvQXreqRrcJ0BvKdrFd4HtUcaHO1M75XRGG6pga0O-mOMoco2FHsMSltVGaDDb7ZRA1JtKUIIZtxrZ5zVytARDIBX5KJVBmF26lOyeXrcLF6i1evzcvGwimqesSRSiWJZVQhZVRXkhyfTNIc8Y6nMeSFYKlgrmWS8roXkKWtAVVXTJiCqom6FmJKbY2zn3WcPGMqTOCwFkwUvmOTxSCVHqvYO0UNbdn78ze9LzsqD7r-r8qC7POkWP7YxeRU</recordid><startdate>20231121</startdate><enddate>20231121</enddate><creator>O’Donnell, Erin</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2615-8012</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231121</creationdate><title>Water sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Pathways to pluralist, legitimate and sustainable water laws in settler colonial states</title><author>O’Donnell, Erin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1704-a4a07b936bbbe80144558e8705681930530f60601cc36150deabbdf4e3b9cf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Colonialism</topic><topic>Community</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Human rights</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Native rights</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>State government</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Theft</topic><topic>Treaties</topic><topic>Water</topic><topic>Water governance</topic><topic>Water law</topic><topic>Water management</topic><topic>Water rights</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>O’Donnell, Erin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>PLOS water</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>O’Donnell, Erin</au><au>Shafiee-Jood, Majid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Water sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Pathways to pluralist, legitimate and sustainable water laws in settler colonial states</atitle><jtitle>PLOS water</jtitle><date>2023-11-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>e0000144</spage><pages>e0000144-</pages><issn>2767-3219</issn><eissn>2767-3219</eissn><abstract>In settler colonial states, the doctrine of discovery that dispossessed Indigenous Peoples of their lands also took their waters. The original water theft of colonization was underpinned by the erroneous assumption of ‘aqua nullius’ and remains almost entirely unacknowledged and largely unaddressed. Scholarly literature has focused on the injustice of this water theft and the human rights of Indigenous Peoples (under UNDRIP as well as their human right to water). This review shows that aqua nullius also renders settler state water law not fit for purpose in two important ways. Firstly, the legitimacy of settler state water laws is contested, presenting a foundational challenge to water governance, and failing to acknowledge the plurality of water laws in settler colonial states. Secondly, settler water law is experiencing a more widespread failure to deliver ecologically sustainable water management. In responding to the injustice of aqua nullius, foundational reform of settler state water laws can enable the settler state to learn from Indigenous laws that have supported thriving communities and genuinely sustainable water management for millennia. Drawing on examples from Aotearoa New Zealand, the USA, Canada, and Australia, this review shows how acknowledging, and challenging, the false assumption of aqua nullius creates novel pathways for reform, enabling pluralist water laws and water governance models that improve both legitimacy and sustainability of settler state water governance.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pwat.0000144</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2615-8012</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2767-3219 |
ispartof | PLOS water, 2023-11, Vol.2 (11), p.e0000144 |
issn | 2767-3219 2767-3219 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3069190612 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Colonialism Community Economic development Human rights Indigenous peoples Law Native peoples Native rights Rivers Sovereignty State government Sustainability management Theft Treaties Water Water governance Water law Water management Water rights |
title | Water sovereignty for Indigenous Peoples: Pathways to pluralist, legitimate and sustainable water laws in settler colonial states |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T09%3A45%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Water%20sovereignty%20for%20Indigenous%20Peoples:%20Pathways%20to%20pluralist,%20legitimate%20and%20sustainable%20water%20laws%20in%20settler%20colonial%20states&rft.jtitle=PLOS%20water&rft.au=O%E2%80%99Donnell,%20Erin&rft.date=2023-11-21&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=e0000144&rft.pages=e0000144-&rft.issn=2767-3219&rft.eissn=2767-3219&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pwat.0000144&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3069190612%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3069190612&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |