The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum

The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the proj...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a 2024-01, Vol.68 (6), p.52-60
Hauptverfasser: Golub, Y., Shenin, S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; rus
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 60
container_issue 6
container_start_page 52
container_title Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a
container_volume 68
creator Golub, Y.
Shenin, S.
description The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the project. In the context of the American strategy “Pivot to Asia”, differences in views of these groups on the content of AUKUS and its prospects are shown. Special attention is paid to the study of the American experts’ and politicians’ ideas about the potential of using nuclear submarines in the Indo-Pacific region by Australia with regard to “containing” China, as well as technological cooperation between the partnership member countries in order to expand a common industrial base. While the Conservative Republicans believe that it is necessary to focus only on creating a fleet of submarines for Australia (the “first pillar”), Conservative Democrats and Moderate Republicans demand to concentrate exclusively on technological cooperation not merely of the three AUKUS countries (the “second pillar”), but also attracting other players to it – Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada. Only the Centrist Democrats, who are the most loyal supporters of the administration, are confident that the alliance countries will be able to “pull through” the implementation of both “pillars” of the project. The authors underscore that the coalition of the “second pillar” looks preferable today. It is concluded that the radical divergence of the elite groups’ views makes the future fate of the AUKUS quite uncertain, and the partnership can acquire different configurations depending on the balance of forces within the U.S. political establishment.
doi_str_mv 10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-52-60
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3068460995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068460995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164t-5cb228bde863ee1a046177d20ccb820fea975fa4524fe80c3185742326e87e573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90M1KAzEUhuEgCpbaewi6jp6c_La7oVgVBQu26zCTZjDSTmpmKrjrhejN9Upsrbg6m4fzwUvIJYdrBCXxBrjgDBENQ0DJtGWaKWQaTkgPjUUmhYBT0vt352TQtrECAMm10bpHJrPXQHfbr2n8SB3tEi3aWO623yNazB_nLzQ2tNuLacg-rLuYGppqWqxCjr5s6DQtYxf9ZnVBzupy2YbB3-2T-eR2Nr5nT893D-PiiXmuZceUrxBttQhWixB4CVJzYxYI3lcWoQ7l0Ki6lAplHSx4wa0yEgXqYE1QRvTJ1fHvOqf3TWg795Y2udlPOgHaSg3Dodqr0VH5nNo2h9qtc1yV-dNxcL_p3CGJOyRxh3ROW6edQqdB_AAhLmER</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068460995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Online Serials From Russia/NIS Available from East View (UDB-IND)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Golub, Y. ; Shenin, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Golub, Y. ; Shenin, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the project. In the context of the American strategy “Pivot to Asia”, differences in views of these groups on the content of AUKUS and its prospects are shown. Special attention is paid to the study of the American experts’ and politicians’ ideas about the potential of using nuclear submarines in the Indo-Pacific region by Australia with regard to “containing” China, as well as technological cooperation between the partnership member countries in order to expand a common industrial base. While the Conservative Republicans believe that it is necessary to focus only on creating a fleet of submarines for Australia (the “first pillar”), Conservative Democrats and Moderate Republicans demand to concentrate exclusively on technological cooperation not merely of the three AUKUS countries (the “second pillar”), but also attracting other players to it – Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada. Only the Centrist Democrats, who are the most loyal supporters of the administration, are confident that the alliance countries will be able to “pull through” the implementation of both “pillars” of the project. The authors underscore that the coalition of the “second pillar” looks preferable today. It is concluded that the radical divergence of the elite groups’ views makes the future fate of the AUKUS quite uncertain, and the partnership can acquire different configurations depending on the balance of forces within the U.S. political establishment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0131-2227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2782-4330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-52-60</identifier><language>eng ; rus</language><publisher>Moscow: MAIK Nauka - Interperiodica</publisher><subject>Centrism ; Conservatism ; Cooperation ; Geopolitics ; International cooperation ; Management ; Political elites ; Radicalism ; Ruling class ; Submarines ; Supporters</subject><ispartof>Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a, 2024-01, Vol.68 (6), p.52-60</ispartof><rights>Copyright MAIK Nauka - Interperiodica 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-9819-7494 ; 0000-0002-4503-5923</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Golub, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenin, S.</creatorcontrib><title>The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum</title><title>Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a</title><description>The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the project. In the context of the American strategy “Pivot to Asia”, differences in views of these groups on the content of AUKUS and its prospects are shown. Special attention is paid to the study of the American experts’ and politicians’ ideas about the potential of using nuclear submarines in the Indo-Pacific region by Australia with regard to “containing” China, as well as technological cooperation between the partnership member countries in order to expand a common industrial base. While the Conservative Republicans believe that it is necessary to focus only on creating a fleet of submarines for Australia (the “first pillar”), Conservative Democrats and Moderate Republicans demand to concentrate exclusively on technological cooperation not merely of the three AUKUS countries (the “second pillar”), but also attracting other players to it – Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada. Only the Centrist Democrats, who are the most loyal supporters of the administration, are confident that the alliance countries will be able to “pull through” the implementation of both “pillars” of the project. The authors underscore that the coalition of the “second pillar” looks preferable today. It is concluded that the radical divergence of the elite groups’ views makes the future fate of the AUKUS quite uncertain, and the partnership can acquire different configurations depending on the balance of forces within the U.S. political establishment.</description><subject>Centrism</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Political elites</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Ruling class</subject><subject>Submarines</subject><subject>Supporters</subject><issn>0131-2227</issn><issn>2782-4330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNo90M1KAzEUhuEgCpbaewi6jp6c_La7oVgVBQu26zCTZjDSTmpmKrjrhejN9Upsrbg6m4fzwUvIJYdrBCXxBrjgDBENQ0DJtGWaKWQaTkgPjUUmhYBT0vt352TQtrECAMm10bpHJrPXQHfbr2n8SB3tEi3aWO623yNazB_nLzQ2tNuLacg-rLuYGppqWqxCjr5s6DQtYxf9ZnVBzupy2YbB3-2T-eR2Nr5nT893D-PiiXmuZceUrxBttQhWixB4CVJzYxYI3lcWoQ7l0Ki6lAplHSx4wa0yEgXqYE1QRvTJ1fHvOqf3TWg795Y2udlPOgHaSg3Dodqr0VH5nNo2h9qtc1yV-dNxcL_p3CGJOyRxh3ROW6edQqdB_AAhLmER</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Golub, Y.</creator><creator>Shenin, S.</creator><general>MAIK Nauka - Interperiodica</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9819-7494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-5923</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum</title><author>Golub, Y. ; Shenin, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164t-5cb228bde863ee1a046177d20ccb820fea975fa4524fe80c3185742326e87e573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; rus</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Centrism</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Political elites</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Ruling class</topic><topic>Submarines</topic><topic>Supporters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Golub, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenin, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Golub, Y.</au><au>Shenin, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum</atitle><jtitle>Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>52-60</pages><issn>0131-2227</issn><eissn>2782-4330</eissn><abstract>The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the project. In the context of the American strategy “Pivot to Asia”, differences in views of these groups on the content of AUKUS and its prospects are shown. Special attention is paid to the study of the American experts’ and politicians’ ideas about the potential of using nuclear submarines in the Indo-Pacific region by Australia with regard to “containing” China, as well as technological cooperation between the partnership member countries in order to expand a common industrial base. While the Conservative Republicans believe that it is necessary to focus only on creating a fleet of submarines for Australia (the “first pillar”), Conservative Democrats and Moderate Republicans demand to concentrate exclusively on technological cooperation not merely of the three AUKUS countries (the “second pillar”), but also attracting other players to it – Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada. Only the Centrist Democrats, who are the most loyal supporters of the administration, are confident that the alliance countries will be able to “pull through” the implementation of both “pillars” of the project. The authors underscore that the coalition of the “second pillar” looks preferable today. It is concluded that the radical divergence of the elite groups’ views makes the future fate of the AUKUS quite uncertain, and the partnership can acquire different configurations depending on the balance of forces within the U.S. political establishment.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>MAIK Nauka - Interperiodica</pub><doi>10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-52-60</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9819-7494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-5923</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0131-2227
ispartof Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a, 2024-01, Vol.68 (6), p.52-60
issn 0131-2227
2782-4330
language eng ; rus
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3068460995
source Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Online Serials From Russia/NIS Available from East View (UDB-IND); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Centrism
Conservatism
Cooperation
Geopolitics
International cooperation
Management
Political elites
Radicalism
Ruling class
Submarines
Supporters
title The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A38%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%9CPivot%20to%20Asia%E2%80%9D:%20AUKUS%20in%20the%20Perception%20of%20American%20Politicum&rft.jtitle=Mirovai%EF%B8%A0a%EF%B8%A1%20%C4%96konomika%20i%20Mezhdunarodnye%20Otnoshenii%EF%B8%A0a&rft.au=Golub,%20Y.&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=52-60&rft.issn=0131-2227&rft.eissn=2782-4330&rft_id=info:doi/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-52-60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068460995%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068460995&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true