The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum
The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the proj...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a 2024-01, Vol.68 (6), p.52-60 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng ; rus |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 60 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 52 |
container_title | Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Golub, Y. Shenin, S. |
description | The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the project. In the context of the American strategy “Pivot to Asia”, differences in views of these groups on the content of AUKUS and its prospects are shown. Special attention is paid to the study of the American experts’ and politicians’ ideas about the potential of using nuclear submarines in the Indo-Pacific region by Australia with regard to “containing” China, as well as technological cooperation between the partnership member countries in order to expand a common industrial base. While the Conservative Republicans believe that it is necessary to focus only on creating a fleet of submarines for Australia (the “first pillar”), Conservative Democrats and Moderate Republicans demand to concentrate exclusively on technological cooperation not merely of the three AUKUS countries (the “second pillar”), but also attracting other players to it – Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada. Only the Centrist Democrats, who are the most loyal supporters of the administration, are confident that the alliance countries will be able to “pull through” the implementation of both “pillars” of the project. The authors underscore that the coalition of the “second pillar” looks preferable today. It is concluded that the radical divergence of the elite groups’ views makes the future fate of the AUKUS quite uncertain, and the partnership can acquire different configurations depending on the balance of forces within the U.S. political establishment. |
doi_str_mv | 10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-52-60 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3068460995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068460995</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c164t-5cb228bde863ee1a046177d20ccb820fea975fa4524fe80c3185742326e87e573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo90M1KAzEUhuEgCpbaewi6jp6c_La7oVgVBQu26zCTZjDSTmpmKrjrhejN9Upsrbg6m4fzwUvIJYdrBCXxBrjgDBENQ0DJtGWaKWQaTkgPjUUmhYBT0vt352TQtrECAMm10bpHJrPXQHfbr2n8SB3tEi3aWO623yNazB_nLzQ2tNuLacg-rLuYGppqWqxCjr5s6DQtYxf9ZnVBzupy2YbB3-2T-eR2Nr5nT893D-PiiXmuZceUrxBttQhWixB4CVJzYxYI3lcWoQ7l0Ki6lAplHSx4wa0yEgXqYE1QRvTJ1fHvOqf3TWg795Y2udlPOgHaSg3Dodqr0VH5nNo2h9qtc1yV-dNxcL_p3CGJOyRxh3ROW6edQqdB_AAhLmER</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068460995</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum</title><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Online Serials From Russia/NIS Available from East View (UDB-IND)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Golub, Y. ; Shenin, S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Golub, Y. ; Shenin, S.</creatorcontrib><description>The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the project. In the context of the American strategy “Pivot to Asia”, differences in views of these groups on the content of AUKUS and its prospects are shown. Special attention is paid to the study of the American experts’ and politicians’ ideas about the potential of using nuclear submarines in the Indo-Pacific region by Australia with regard to “containing” China, as well as technological cooperation between the partnership member countries in order to expand a common industrial base. While the Conservative Republicans believe that it is necessary to focus only on creating a fleet of submarines for Australia (the “first pillar”), Conservative Democrats and Moderate Republicans demand to concentrate exclusively on technological cooperation not merely of the three AUKUS countries (the “second pillar”), but also attracting other players to it – Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada. Only the Centrist Democrats, who are the most loyal supporters of the administration, are confident that the alliance countries will be able to “pull through” the implementation of both “pillars” of the project. The authors underscore that the coalition of the “second pillar” looks preferable today. It is concluded that the radical divergence of the elite groups’ views makes the future fate of the AUKUS quite uncertain, and the partnership can acquire different configurations depending on the balance of forces within the U.S. political establishment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0131-2227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2782-4330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-52-60</identifier><language>eng ; rus</language><publisher>Moscow: MAIK Nauka - Interperiodica</publisher><subject>Centrism ; Conservatism ; Cooperation ; Geopolitics ; International cooperation ; Management ; Political elites ; Radicalism ; Ruling class ; Submarines ; Supporters</subject><ispartof>Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a, 2024-01, Vol.68 (6), p.52-60</ispartof><rights>Copyright MAIK Nauka - Interperiodica 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-9819-7494 ; 0000-0002-4503-5923</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Golub, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenin, S.</creatorcontrib><title>The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum</title><title>Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a</title><description>The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the project. In the context of the American strategy “Pivot to Asia”, differences in views of these groups on the content of AUKUS and its prospects are shown. Special attention is paid to the study of the American experts’ and politicians’ ideas about the potential of using nuclear submarines in the Indo-Pacific region by Australia with regard to “containing” China, as well as technological cooperation between the partnership member countries in order to expand a common industrial base. While the Conservative Republicans believe that it is necessary to focus only on creating a fleet of submarines for Australia (the “first pillar”), Conservative Democrats and Moderate Republicans demand to concentrate exclusively on technological cooperation not merely of the three AUKUS countries (the “second pillar”), but also attracting other players to it – Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada. Only the Centrist Democrats, who are the most loyal supporters of the administration, are confident that the alliance countries will be able to “pull through” the implementation of both “pillars” of the project. The authors underscore that the coalition of the “second pillar” looks preferable today. It is concluded that the radical divergence of the elite groups’ views makes the future fate of the AUKUS quite uncertain, and the partnership can acquire different configurations depending on the balance of forces within the U.S. political establishment.</description><subject>Centrism</subject><subject>Conservatism</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Geopolitics</subject><subject>International cooperation</subject><subject>Management</subject><subject>Political elites</subject><subject>Radicalism</subject><subject>Ruling class</subject><subject>Submarines</subject><subject>Supporters</subject><issn>0131-2227</issn><issn>2782-4330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNo90M1KAzEUhuEgCpbaewi6jp6c_La7oVgVBQu26zCTZjDSTmpmKrjrhejN9Upsrbg6m4fzwUvIJYdrBCXxBrjgDBENQ0DJtGWaKWQaTkgPjUUmhYBT0vt352TQtrECAMm10bpHJrPXQHfbr2n8SB3tEi3aWO623yNazB_nLzQ2tNuLacg-rLuYGppqWqxCjr5s6DQtYxf9ZnVBzupy2YbB3-2T-eR2Nr5nT893D-PiiXmuZceUrxBttQhWixB4CVJzYxYI3lcWoQ7l0Ki6lAplHSx4wa0yEgXqYE1QRvTJ1fHvOqf3TWg795Y2udlPOgHaSg3Dodqr0VH5nNo2h9qtc1yV-dNxcL_p3CGJOyRxh3ROW6edQqdB_AAhLmER</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Golub, Y.</creator><creator>Shenin, S.</creator><general>MAIK Nauka - Interperiodica</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9819-7494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-5923</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum</title><author>Golub, Y. ; Shenin, S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c164t-5cb228bde863ee1a046177d20ccb820fea975fa4524fe80c3185742326e87e573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; rus</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Centrism</topic><topic>Conservatism</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Geopolitics</topic><topic>International cooperation</topic><topic>Management</topic><topic>Political elites</topic><topic>Radicalism</topic><topic>Ruling class</topic><topic>Submarines</topic><topic>Supporters</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Golub, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shenin, S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Golub, Y.</au><au>Shenin, S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum</atitle><jtitle>Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>52</spage><epage>60</epage><pages>52-60</pages><issn>0131-2227</issn><eissn>2782-4330</eissn><abstract>The article is devoted to forecasting the ways of further evolution of the Western partnership called AUKUS, taking into account the geopolitical plans of J. Biden administration, and based on an analysis of the approaches of the most influential groups among the American political elite to the project. In the context of the American strategy “Pivot to Asia”, differences in views of these groups on the content of AUKUS and its prospects are shown. Special attention is paid to the study of the American experts’ and politicians’ ideas about the potential of using nuclear submarines in the Indo-Pacific region by Australia with regard to “containing” China, as well as technological cooperation between the partnership member countries in order to expand a common industrial base. While the Conservative Republicans believe that it is necessary to focus only on creating a fleet of submarines for Australia (the “first pillar”), Conservative Democrats and Moderate Republicans demand to concentrate exclusively on technological cooperation not merely of the three AUKUS countries (the “second pillar”), but also attracting other players to it – Japan, New Zealand, South Korea, Canada. Only the Centrist Democrats, who are the most loyal supporters of the administration, are confident that the alliance countries will be able to “pull through” the implementation of both “pillars” of the project. The authors underscore that the coalition of the “second pillar” looks preferable today. It is concluded that the radical divergence of the elite groups’ views makes the future fate of the AUKUS quite uncertain, and the partnership can acquire different configurations depending on the balance of forces within the U.S. political establishment.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>MAIK Nauka - Interperiodica</pub><doi>10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-52-60</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9819-7494</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4503-5923</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0131-2227 |
ispartof | Mirovai︠a︡ Ėkonomika i Mezhdunarodnye Otnoshenii︠a, 2024-01, Vol.68 (6), p.52-60 |
issn | 0131-2227 2782-4330 |
language | eng ; rus |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3068460995 |
source | Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Online Serials From Russia/NIS Available from East View (UDB-IND); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Centrism Conservatism Cooperation Geopolitics International cooperation Management Political elites Radicalism Ruling class Submarines Supporters |
title | The “Pivot to Asia”: AUKUS in the Perception of American Politicum |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T14%3A38%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20%E2%80%9CPivot%20to%20Asia%E2%80%9D:%20AUKUS%20in%20the%20Perception%20of%20American%20Politicum&rft.jtitle=Mirovai%EF%B8%A0a%EF%B8%A1%20%C4%96konomika%20i%20Mezhdunarodnye%20Otnoshenii%EF%B8%A0a&rft.au=Golub,%20Y.&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=52&rft.epage=60&rft.pages=52-60&rft.issn=0131-2227&rft.eissn=2782-4330&rft_id=info:doi/10.20542/0131-2227-2024-68-6-52-60&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068460995%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068460995&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |