Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering
Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universiti...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews bioengineering 2024-06, Vol.2 (6), p.521-530 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 530 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 521 |
container_title | Nature reviews bioengineering |
container_volume | 2 |
creator | Linnes, Jacqueline C. Moore, Erika Porras, Ana Maria Wayne, Elizabeth Boyle, Patrick M. Chow, Lesley W. Maisel, Katharina Peyton, Shelly R. Stabenfeldt, Sarah E. Stevens, Kelly R. Winter, Jessica O. Willits, Rebecca Kuntz |
description | Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universities have crafted strategic plans to increase diversity; however, university-wide policies often fail to result in notable changes in microcommunities, such as departments and undergraduate or graduate programs. Therefore, departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific DEI goals. In this Perspective, we present a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and to make departments more inclusive, including the collection of demographic data, the establishment and assessment of DEI plans, specific goal setting and assessment of achievements, with specific examples and guidelines, which will ultimately help departments to become inclusive working environments.University departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific goals. This Perspective presents a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and make departments more inclusive. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3068273020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068273020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-7e54144737792903d859fa48886ee5337bb52df4bc2850eafe8733ae3d7bad6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWLR_wNOC5-ibr032KMWqUPCi55DdfVNSt5uapJX-e1frwdPMYZhhHkJuGNwxEOY-S8k5p8AlBWBGUHlGZlwLRmto-Pk_f0nmOW8AgBvOmBIzslwmt8WvmD4qH1PV486lssWx0AEPOFSu6-J-LK4NQyjHqsSqDwdMOfhjheM6jIgpjOtrcuHdkHH-p1fkffn4tnimq9enl8XDinZM1YVqVJJJqYXWDW9A9EY13kljTI2ohNBtq3jvZdtxowCdR6OFcCh63bq-bsUVuT317lL83GMudhP3aZwmrYDaTEeBw5Tip1SXYs4Jvd2lsHXpaBnYH2T2hMxOyOwvMivFN8YoXrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068273020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering</title><source>Nature</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Linnes, Jacqueline C. ; Moore, Erika ; Porras, Ana Maria ; Wayne, Elizabeth ; Boyle, Patrick M. ; Chow, Lesley W. ; Maisel, Katharina ; Peyton, Shelly R. ; Stabenfeldt, Sarah E. ; Stevens, Kelly R. ; Winter, Jessica O. ; Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creator><creatorcontrib>Linnes, Jacqueline C. ; Moore, Erika ; Porras, Ana Maria ; Wayne, Elizabeth ; Boyle, Patrick M. ; Chow, Lesley W. ; Maisel, Katharina ; Peyton, Shelly R. ; Stabenfeldt, Sarah E. ; Stevens, Kelly R. ; Winter, Jessica O. ; Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creatorcontrib><description>Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universities have crafted strategic plans to increase diversity; however, university-wide policies often fail to result in notable changes in microcommunities, such as departments and undergraduate or graduate programs. Therefore, departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific DEI goals. In this Perspective, we present a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and to make departments more inclusive, including the collection of demographic data, the establishment and assessment of DEI plans, specific goal setting and assessment of achievements, with specific examples and guidelines, which will ultimately help departments to become inclusive working environments.University departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific goals. This Perspective presents a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and make departments more inclusive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2731-6092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2731-6092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Accountability ; African Americans ; Bioengineering ; Black people ; Careers ; Diversity equity & inclusion ; Engineering ; Gender equity ; Guidelines ; Higher education ; Mathematics ; Multiculturalism & pluralism ; Population ; Recruitment ; STEM education ; Students ; Workplace diversity</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews bioengineering, 2024-06, Vol.2 (6), p.521-530</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-7e54144737792903d859fa48886ee5337bb52df4bc2850eafe8733ae3d7bad6b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4962-0908 ; 0000-0001-5252-2239 ; 0000-0001-9048-1239 ; 0000-0001-8226-623X ; 0000-0002-1866-6789 ; 0000-0003-3606-026X ; 0000-0003-2192-6147</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linnes, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porras, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Lesley W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maisel, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyton, Shelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jessica O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creatorcontrib><title>Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering</title><title>Nature reviews bioengineering</title><description>Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universities have crafted strategic plans to increase diversity; however, university-wide policies often fail to result in notable changes in microcommunities, such as departments and undergraduate or graduate programs. Therefore, departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific DEI goals. In this Perspective, we present a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and to make departments more inclusive, including the collection of demographic data, the establishment and assessment of DEI plans, specific goal setting and assessment of achievements, with specific examples and guidelines, which will ultimately help departments to become inclusive working environments.University departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific goals. This Perspective presents a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and make departments more inclusive.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Diversity equity & inclusion</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Multiculturalism & pluralism</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>STEM education</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Workplace diversity</subject><issn>2731-6092</issn><issn>2731-6092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWLR_wNOC5-ibr032KMWqUPCi55DdfVNSt5uapJX-e1frwdPMYZhhHkJuGNwxEOY-S8k5p8AlBWBGUHlGZlwLRmto-Pk_f0nmOW8AgBvOmBIzslwmt8WvmD4qH1PV486lssWx0AEPOFSu6-J-LK4NQyjHqsSqDwdMOfhjheM6jIgpjOtrcuHdkHH-p1fkffn4tnimq9enl8XDinZM1YVqVJJJqYXWDW9A9EY13kljTI2ohNBtq3jvZdtxowCdR6OFcCh63bq-bsUVuT317lL83GMudhP3aZwmrYDaTEeBw5Tip1SXYs4Jvd2lsHXpaBnYH2T2hMxOyOwvMivFN8YoXrk</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Linnes, Jacqueline C.</creator><creator>Moore, Erika</creator><creator>Porras, Ana Maria</creator><creator>Wayne, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Boyle, Patrick M.</creator><creator>Chow, Lesley W.</creator><creator>Maisel, Katharina</creator><creator>Peyton, Shelly R.</creator><creator>Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.</creator><creator>Stevens, Kelly R.</creator><creator>Winter, Jessica O.</creator><creator>Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4962-0908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-2239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-1239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-623X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-6789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-026X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2192-6147</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering</title><author>Linnes, Jacqueline C. ; Moore, Erika ; Porras, Ana Maria ; Wayne, Elizabeth ; Boyle, Patrick M. ; Chow, Lesley W. ; Maisel, Katharina ; Peyton, Shelly R. ; Stabenfeldt, Sarah E. ; Stevens, Kelly R. ; Winter, Jessica O. ; Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-7e54144737792903d859fa48886ee5337bb52df4bc2850eafe8733ae3d7bad6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Diversity equity & inclusion</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Multiculturalism & pluralism</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>STEM education</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Workplace diversity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linnes, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porras, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Lesley W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maisel, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyton, Shelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jessica O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linnes, Jacqueline C.</au><au>Moore, Erika</au><au>Porras, Ana Maria</au><au>Wayne, Elizabeth</au><au>Boyle, Patrick M.</au><au>Chow, Lesley W.</au><au>Maisel, Katharina</au><au>Peyton, Shelly R.</au><au>Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.</au><au>Stevens, Kelly R.</au><au>Winter, Jessica O.</au><au>Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews bioengineering</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>521-530</pages><issn>2731-6092</issn><eissn>2731-6092</eissn><abstract>Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universities have crafted strategic plans to increase diversity; however, university-wide policies often fail to result in notable changes in microcommunities, such as departments and undergraduate or graduate programs. Therefore, departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific DEI goals. In this Perspective, we present a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and to make departments more inclusive, including the collection of demographic data, the establishment and assessment of DEI plans, specific goal setting and assessment of achievements, with specific examples and guidelines, which will ultimately help departments to become inclusive working environments.University departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific goals. This Perspective presents a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and make departments more inclusive.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4962-0908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-2239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-1239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-623X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-6789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-026X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2192-6147</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2731-6092 |
ispartof | Nature reviews bioengineering, 2024-06, Vol.2 (6), p.521-530 |
issn | 2731-6092 2731-6092 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3068273020 |
source | Nature; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Accountability African Americans Bioengineering Black people Careers Diversity equity & inclusion Engineering Gender equity Guidelines Higher education Mathematics Multiculturalism & pluralism Population Recruitment STEM education Students Workplace diversity |
title | Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A32%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Framework%20for%20department-level%20accountability%20to%20diversify%20engineering&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews%20bioengineering&rft.au=Linnes,%20Jacqueline%20C.&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=521-530&rft.issn=2731-6092&rft.eissn=2731-6092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068273020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068273020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |