Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering

Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universiti...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nature reviews bioengineering 2024-06, Vol.2 (6), p.521-530
Hauptverfasser: Linnes, Jacqueline C., Moore, Erika, Porras, Ana Maria, Wayne, Elizabeth, Boyle, Patrick M., Chow, Lesley W., Maisel, Katharina, Peyton, Shelly R., Stabenfeldt, Sarah E., Stevens, Kelly R., Winter, Jessica O., Willits, Rebecca Kuntz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 530
container_issue 6
container_start_page 521
container_title Nature reviews bioengineering
container_volume 2
creator Linnes, Jacqueline C.
Moore, Erika
Porras, Ana Maria
Wayne, Elizabeth
Boyle, Patrick M.
Chow, Lesley W.
Maisel, Katharina
Peyton, Shelly R.
Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.
Stevens, Kelly R.
Winter, Jessica O.
Willits, Rebecca Kuntz
description Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universities have crafted strategic plans to increase diversity; however, university-wide policies often fail to result in notable changes in microcommunities, such as departments and undergraduate or graduate programs. Therefore, departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific DEI goals. In this Perspective, we present a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and to make departments more inclusive, including the collection of demographic data, the establishment and assessment of DEI plans, specific goal setting and assessment of achievements, with specific examples and guidelines, which will ultimately help departments to become inclusive working environments.University departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific goals. This Perspective presents a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and make departments more inclusive.
doi_str_mv 10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3068273020</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068273020</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-7e54144737792903d859fa48886ee5337bb52df4bc2850eafe8733ae3d7bad6b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWLR_wNOC5-ibr032KMWqUPCi55DdfVNSt5uapJX-e1frwdPMYZhhHkJuGNwxEOY-S8k5p8AlBWBGUHlGZlwLRmto-Pk_f0nmOW8AgBvOmBIzslwmt8WvmD4qH1PV486lssWx0AEPOFSu6-J-LK4NQyjHqsSqDwdMOfhjheM6jIgpjOtrcuHdkHH-p1fkffn4tnimq9enl8XDinZM1YVqVJJJqYXWDW9A9EY13kljTI2ohNBtq3jvZdtxowCdR6OFcCh63bq-bsUVuT317lL83GMudhP3aZwmrYDaTEeBw5Tip1SXYs4Jvd2lsHXpaBnYH2T2hMxOyOwvMivFN8YoXrk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068273020</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering</title><source>Nature</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Linnes, Jacqueline C. ; Moore, Erika ; Porras, Ana Maria ; Wayne, Elizabeth ; Boyle, Patrick M. ; Chow, Lesley W. ; Maisel, Katharina ; Peyton, Shelly R. ; Stabenfeldt, Sarah E. ; Stevens, Kelly R. ; Winter, Jessica O. ; Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creator><creatorcontrib>Linnes, Jacqueline C. ; Moore, Erika ; Porras, Ana Maria ; Wayne, Elizabeth ; Boyle, Patrick M. ; Chow, Lesley W. ; Maisel, Katharina ; Peyton, Shelly R. ; Stabenfeldt, Sarah E. ; Stevens, Kelly R. ; Winter, Jessica O. ; Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creatorcontrib><description>Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universities have crafted strategic plans to increase diversity; however, university-wide policies often fail to result in notable changes in microcommunities, such as departments and undergraduate or graduate programs. Therefore, departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific DEI goals. In this Perspective, we present a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and to make departments more inclusive, including the collection of demographic data, the establishment and assessment of DEI plans, specific goal setting and assessment of achievements, with specific examples and guidelines, which will ultimately help departments to become inclusive working environments.University departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific goals. This Perspective presents a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and make departments more inclusive.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2731-6092</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2731-6092</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin: Nature Publishing Group</publisher><subject>Accountability ; African Americans ; Bioengineering ; Black people ; Careers ; Diversity equity &amp; inclusion ; Engineering ; Gender equity ; Guidelines ; Higher education ; Mathematics ; Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism ; Population ; Recruitment ; STEM education ; Students ; Workplace diversity</subject><ispartof>Nature reviews bioengineering, 2024-06, Vol.2 (6), p.521-530</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature Limited 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-7e54144737792903d859fa48886ee5337bb52df4bc2850eafe8733ae3d7bad6b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4962-0908 ; 0000-0001-5252-2239 ; 0000-0001-9048-1239 ; 0000-0001-8226-623X ; 0000-0002-1866-6789 ; 0000-0003-3606-026X ; 0000-0003-2192-6147</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linnes, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porras, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Lesley W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maisel, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyton, Shelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jessica O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creatorcontrib><title>Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering</title><title>Nature reviews bioengineering</title><description>Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universities have crafted strategic plans to increase diversity; however, university-wide policies often fail to result in notable changes in microcommunities, such as departments and undergraduate or graduate programs. Therefore, departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific DEI goals. In this Perspective, we present a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and to make departments more inclusive, including the collection of demographic data, the establishment and assessment of DEI plans, specific goal setting and assessment of achievements, with specific examples and guidelines, which will ultimately help departments to become inclusive working environments.University departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific goals. This Perspective presents a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and make departments more inclusive.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>African Americans</subject><subject>Bioengineering</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Careers</subject><subject>Diversity equity &amp; inclusion</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Gender equity</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Recruitment</subject><subject>STEM education</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Workplace diversity</subject><issn>2731-6092</issn><issn>2731-6092</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE1LAzEYhIMoWLR_wNOC5-ibr032KMWqUPCi55DdfVNSt5uapJX-e1frwdPMYZhhHkJuGNwxEOY-S8k5p8AlBWBGUHlGZlwLRmto-Pk_f0nmOW8AgBvOmBIzslwmt8WvmD4qH1PV486lssWx0AEPOFSu6-J-LK4NQyjHqsSqDwdMOfhjheM6jIgpjOtrcuHdkHH-p1fkffn4tnimq9enl8XDinZM1YVqVJJJqYXWDW9A9EY13kljTI2ohNBtq3jvZdtxowCdR6OFcCh63bq-bsUVuT317lL83GMudhP3aZwmrYDaTEeBw5Tip1SXYs4Jvd2lsHXpaBnYH2T2hMxOyOwvMivFN8YoXrk</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Linnes, Jacqueline C.</creator><creator>Moore, Erika</creator><creator>Porras, Ana Maria</creator><creator>Wayne, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Boyle, Patrick M.</creator><creator>Chow, Lesley W.</creator><creator>Maisel, Katharina</creator><creator>Peyton, Shelly R.</creator><creator>Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.</creator><creator>Stevens, Kelly R.</creator><creator>Winter, Jessica O.</creator><creator>Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4962-0908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-2239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-1239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-623X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-6789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-026X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2192-6147</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering</title><author>Linnes, Jacqueline C. ; Moore, Erika ; Porras, Ana Maria ; Wayne, Elizabeth ; Boyle, Patrick M. ; Chow, Lesley W. ; Maisel, Katharina ; Peyton, Shelly R. ; Stabenfeldt, Sarah E. ; Stevens, Kelly R. ; Winter, Jessica O. ; Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c156t-7e54144737792903d859fa48886ee5337bb52df4bc2850eafe8733ae3d7bad6b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>African Americans</topic><topic>Bioengineering</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Careers</topic><topic>Diversity equity &amp; inclusion</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Gender equity</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Multiculturalism &amp; pluralism</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Recruitment</topic><topic>STEM education</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Workplace diversity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linnes, Jacqueline C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Erika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Porras, Ana Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wayne, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boyle, Patrick M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chow, Lesley W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maisel, Katharina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peyton, Shelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevens, Kelly R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winter, Jessica O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nature reviews bioengineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linnes, Jacqueline C.</au><au>Moore, Erika</au><au>Porras, Ana Maria</au><au>Wayne, Elizabeth</au><au>Boyle, Patrick M.</au><au>Chow, Lesley W.</au><au>Maisel, Katharina</au><au>Peyton, Shelly R.</au><au>Stabenfeldt, Sarah E.</au><au>Stevens, Kelly R.</au><au>Winter, Jessica O.</au><au>Willits, Rebecca Kuntz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering</atitle><jtitle>Nature reviews bioengineering</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>521</spage><epage>530</epage><pages>521-530</pages><issn>2731-6092</issn><eissn>2731-6092</eissn><abstract>Diverse teams are more innovative and creative. Nevertheless, science, technology, engineering and mathematics disciplines, including bioengineering, continue to fall short in increasing representation from persons from groups historically excluded because of their ethnicity or race. Many universities have crafted strategic plans to increase diversity; however, university-wide policies often fail to result in notable changes in microcommunities, such as departments and undergraduate or graduate programs. Therefore, departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific DEI goals. In this Perspective, we present a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and to make departments more inclusive, including the collection of demographic data, the establishment and assessment of DEI plans, specific goal setting and assessment of achievements, with specific examples and guidelines, which will ultimately help departments to become inclusive working environments.University departments may benefit from guidelines not only to craft effective diversity, equity and inclusion plans, but also to measure progress towards achieving specific goals. This Perspective presents a framework for building, assessing and continuously improving strategic plans to improve recruitment and retention and make departments more inclusive.</abstract><cop>Berlin</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group</pub><doi>10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4962-0908</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5252-2239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9048-1239</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8226-623X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1866-6789</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3606-026X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2192-6147</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2731-6092
ispartof Nature reviews bioengineering, 2024-06, Vol.2 (6), p.521-530
issn 2731-6092
2731-6092
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3068273020
source Nature; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Accountability
African Americans
Bioengineering
Black people
Careers
Diversity equity & inclusion
Engineering
Gender equity
Guidelines
Higher education
Mathematics
Multiculturalism & pluralism
Population
Recruitment
STEM education
Students
Workplace diversity
title Framework for department-level accountability to diversify engineering
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T21%3A32%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Framework%20for%20department-level%20accountability%20to%20diversify%20engineering&rft.jtitle=Nature%20reviews%20bioengineering&rft.au=Linnes,%20Jacqueline%20C.&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=521&rft.epage=530&rft.pages=521-530&rft.issn=2731-6092&rft.eissn=2731-6092&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s44222-024-00183-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068273020%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068273020&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true