Dynamic marine spatial planning for conservation and fisheries benefits
The increasing global demand for marine resources raises concerns about sustainable resource management and biodiversity conservation. Spatial closures, such as marine protected areas, can be valuable tools for maintaining and restoring exploited populations. When these spatial closures adopt a dyna...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) England), 2024-07, Vol.25 (4), p.630-646 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 646 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 630 |
container_title | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England) |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Vigo, Maria Hermoso, Virgilio Navarro, Joan Sala‐Coromina, Joan Company, Joan B. Giakoumi, Sylvaine |
description | The increasing global demand for marine resources raises concerns about sustainable resource management and biodiversity conservation. Spatial closures, such as marine protected areas, can be valuable tools for maintaining and restoring exploited populations. When these spatial closures adopt a dynamic nature being adapted to the changing environment, they can effectively account for factors such as shifting species distributions, which enhances their potential to achieve ecological and socio‐economic objectives. Here, we adapted a decision‐support tool (the software Marxan), typically used for selecting static and permanent areas, to produce management recommendations that integrate permanent and temporal closures to fisheries. Our aim was to compare the outputs of a static network of permanent no‐take reserves with four other dynamic scenarios, including permanent and temporal closures that account for seasonal variations in the populations of species. All scenarios prioritized sites for the conservation of one of the most valuable European fishing stocks, the Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus). Additionally, we considered 12 other commercially exploited species captured by the Norway lobster fishery. The assessed outputs included retained biomass, area extent, closure type (permanent and seasonal) and opportunity costs within each scenario. We observed that all dynamic scenarios required fewer management areas permanently closed than the static scenario. This resulted in a lower opportunity cost for fisheries but also a higher capacity for biodiversity conservation. Therefore, complementing permanent with temporal closures could enhance biodiversity conservation and fisheries management. The novel dynamic planning method presented here could be applicable to other species, ecosystems and socio‐economic contexts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/faf.12830 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3067149914</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3067149914</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-ce19408b3d7e1ffe936875b2400d096b1cbee1f5da2938c54f6d6df92e7c5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsH3yDgRQ_bJptsdnMs1Vah4EHvIZudaMo2uyZdpW9vdMWD4Fxm4P9mGD6ELimZ0VRzq-2M5hUjR2hCuSizXJby-HcW5BSdxbglhIiK8gla3x683jmDdzo4Dzj2eu90i_tWe-_8C7ZdwKbzEcJ7SjqPtW-wdfEVgoOIa_Bg3T6eoxOr2wgXP32KnlZ3z8v7bPO4flguNplheUEyA1RyUtWsKYFaC5KJqizqnBPSEClqampIQdHoXLLKFNyKRjRW5lCaAtgUXY9X-9C9DRD3aueigTY9C90QFaMFE6SqqEzo1R902w3Bp98UI6KkXErKE3UzUiZ0MQawqg8uqTgoStSXUJWEqm-hiZ2P7Idr4fA_qFaL1bjxCQdHdu8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3067149914</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic marine spatial planning for conservation and fisheries benefits</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Vigo, Maria ; Hermoso, Virgilio ; Navarro, Joan ; Sala‐Coromina, Joan ; Company, Joan B. ; Giakoumi, Sylvaine</creator><creatorcontrib>Vigo, Maria ; Hermoso, Virgilio ; Navarro, Joan ; Sala‐Coromina, Joan ; Company, Joan B. ; Giakoumi, Sylvaine</creatorcontrib><description>The increasing global demand for marine resources raises concerns about sustainable resource management and biodiversity conservation. Spatial closures, such as marine protected areas, can be valuable tools for maintaining and restoring exploited populations. When these spatial closures adopt a dynamic nature being adapted to the changing environment, they can effectively account for factors such as shifting species distributions, which enhances their potential to achieve ecological and socio‐economic objectives. Here, we adapted a decision‐support tool (the software Marxan), typically used for selecting static and permanent areas, to produce management recommendations that integrate permanent and temporal closures to fisheries. Our aim was to compare the outputs of a static network of permanent no‐take reserves with four other dynamic scenarios, including permanent and temporal closures that account for seasonal variations in the populations of species. All scenarios prioritized sites for the conservation of one of the most valuable European fishing stocks, the Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus). Additionally, we considered 12 other commercially exploited species captured by the Norway lobster fishery. The assessed outputs included retained biomass, area extent, closure type (permanent and seasonal) and opportunity costs within each scenario. We observed that all dynamic scenarios required fewer management areas permanently closed than the static scenario. This resulted in a lower opportunity cost for fisheries but also a higher capacity for biodiversity conservation. Therefore, complementing permanent with temporal closures could enhance biodiversity conservation and fisheries management. The novel dynamic planning method presented here could be applicable to other species, ecosystems and socio‐economic contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-2960</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-2979</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/faf.12830</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; biodiversity conservation ; biomass ; Changing environments ; computer software ; Conservation ; decision support systems ; dynamic planning ; Economics ; Environmental changes ; Environmental planning ; Exploitation ; fish ; Fish stocks ; Fisheries ; Fisheries management ; Fishery management ; Fishing ; Lobster fisheries ; Lobsters ; Marine crustaceans ; Marine protected areas ; Marine resources ; marine spatial planning ; Marxan software ; Nephrops norvegicus ; no‐take marine reserves ; Opportunity costs ; Populations ; Protected areas ; Resource management ; Seasonal variation ; Seasonal variations ; Shellfish ; socioeconomics ; Software ; Spatial planning ; species ; temporal closures</subject><ispartof>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2024-07, Vol.25 (4), p.630-646</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-ce19408b3d7e1ffe936875b2400d096b1cbee1f5da2938c54f6d6df92e7c5e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4267-0160 ; 0000-0002-5756-9543</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffaf.12830$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffaf.12830$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,1413,27906,27907,45556,45557</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vigo, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermoso, Virgilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala‐Coromina, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Company, Joan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giakoumi, Sylvaine</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic marine spatial planning for conservation and fisheries benefits</title><title>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</title><description>The increasing global demand for marine resources raises concerns about sustainable resource management and biodiversity conservation. Spatial closures, such as marine protected areas, can be valuable tools for maintaining and restoring exploited populations. When these spatial closures adopt a dynamic nature being adapted to the changing environment, they can effectively account for factors such as shifting species distributions, which enhances their potential to achieve ecological and socio‐economic objectives. Here, we adapted a decision‐support tool (the software Marxan), typically used for selecting static and permanent areas, to produce management recommendations that integrate permanent and temporal closures to fisheries. Our aim was to compare the outputs of a static network of permanent no‐take reserves with four other dynamic scenarios, including permanent and temporal closures that account for seasonal variations in the populations of species. All scenarios prioritized sites for the conservation of one of the most valuable European fishing stocks, the Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus). Additionally, we considered 12 other commercially exploited species captured by the Norway lobster fishery. The assessed outputs included retained biomass, area extent, closure type (permanent and seasonal) and opportunity costs within each scenario. We observed that all dynamic scenarios required fewer management areas permanently closed than the static scenario. This resulted in a lower opportunity cost for fisheries but also a higher capacity for biodiversity conservation. Therefore, complementing permanent with temporal closures could enhance biodiversity conservation and fisheries management. The novel dynamic planning method presented here could be applicable to other species, ecosystems and socio‐economic contexts.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>biodiversity conservation</subject><subject>biomass</subject><subject>Changing environments</subject><subject>computer software</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>decision support systems</subject><subject>dynamic planning</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Environmental changes</subject><subject>Environmental planning</subject><subject>Exploitation</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>Fish stocks</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fisheries management</subject><subject>Fishery management</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Lobster fisheries</subject><subject>Lobsters</subject><subject>Marine crustaceans</subject><subject>Marine protected areas</subject><subject>Marine resources</subject><subject>marine spatial planning</subject><subject>Marxan software</subject><subject>Nephrops norvegicus</subject><subject>no‐take marine reserves</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>Seasonal variation</subject><subject>Seasonal variations</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>socioeconomics</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Spatial planning</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>temporal closures</subject><issn>1467-2960</issn><issn>1467-2979</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsH3yDgRQ_bJptsdnMs1Vah4EHvIZudaMo2uyZdpW9vdMWD4Fxm4P9mGD6ELimZ0VRzq-2M5hUjR2hCuSizXJby-HcW5BSdxbglhIiK8gla3x683jmDdzo4Dzj2eu90i_tWe-_8C7ZdwKbzEcJ7SjqPtW-wdfEVgoOIa_Bg3T6eoxOr2wgXP32KnlZ3z8v7bPO4flguNplheUEyA1RyUtWsKYFaC5KJqizqnBPSEClqampIQdHoXLLKFNyKRjRW5lCaAtgUXY9X-9C9DRD3aueigTY9C90QFaMFE6SqqEzo1R902w3Bp98UI6KkXErKE3UzUiZ0MQawqg8uqTgoStSXUJWEqm-hiZ2P7Idr4fA_qFaL1bjxCQdHdu8</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Vigo, Maria</creator><creator>Hermoso, Virgilio</creator><creator>Navarro, Joan</creator><creator>Sala‐Coromina, Joan</creator><creator>Company, Joan B.</creator><creator>Giakoumi, Sylvaine</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-0160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-9543</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Dynamic marine spatial planning for conservation and fisheries benefits</title><author>Vigo, Maria ; Hermoso, Virgilio ; Navarro, Joan ; Sala‐Coromina, Joan ; Company, Joan B. ; Giakoumi, Sylvaine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3250-ce19408b3d7e1ffe936875b2400d096b1cbee1f5da2938c54f6d6df92e7c5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>biodiversity conservation</topic><topic>biomass</topic><topic>Changing environments</topic><topic>computer software</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>decision support systems</topic><topic>dynamic planning</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Environmental changes</topic><topic>Environmental planning</topic><topic>Exploitation</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>Fish stocks</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fisheries management</topic><topic>Fishery management</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Lobster fisheries</topic><topic>Lobsters</topic><topic>Marine crustaceans</topic><topic>Marine protected areas</topic><topic>Marine resources</topic><topic>marine spatial planning</topic><topic>Marxan software</topic><topic>Nephrops norvegicus</topic><topic>no‐take marine reserves</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>Seasonal variation</topic><topic>Seasonal variations</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>socioeconomics</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Spatial planning</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>temporal closures</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vigo, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermoso, Virgilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Navarro, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sala‐Coromina, Joan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Company, Joan B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giakoumi, Sylvaine</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vigo, Maria</au><au>Hermoso, Virgilio</au><au>Navarro, Joan</au><au>Sala‐Coromina, Joan</au><au>Company, Joan B.</au><au>Giakoumi, Sylvaine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic marine spatial planning for conservation and fisheries benefits</atitle><jtitle>Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England)</jtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>630</spage><epage>646</epage><pages>630-646</pages><issn>1467-2960</issn><eissn>1467-2979</eissn><abstract>The increasing global demand for marine resources raises concerns about sustainable resource management and biodiversity conservation. Spatial closures, such as marine protected areas, can be valuable tools for maintaining and restoring exploited populations. When these spatial closures adopt a dynamic nature being adapted to the changing environment, they can effectively account for factors such as shifting species distributions, which enhances their potential to achieve ecological and socio‐economic objectives. Here, we adapted a decision‐support tool (the software Marxan), typically used for selecting static and permanent areas, to produce management recommendations that integrate permanent and temporal closures to fisheries. Our aim was to compare the outputs of a static network of permanent no‐take reserves with four other dynamic scenarios, including permanent and temporal closures that account for seasonal variations in the populations of species. All scenarios prioritized sites for the conservation of one of the most valuable European fishing stocks, the Norway lobster (Nephrops norvegicus). Additionally, we considered 12 other commercially exploited species captured by the Norway lobster fishery. The assessed outputs included retained biomass, area extent, closure type (permanent and seasonal) and opportunity costs within each scenario. We observed that all dynamic scenarios required fewer management areas permanently closed than the static scenario. This resulted in a lower opportunity cost for fisheries but also a higher capacity for biodiversity conservation. Therefore, complementing permanent with temporal closures could enhance biodiversity conservation and fisheries management. The novel dynamic planning method presented here could be applicable to other species, ecosystems and socio‐economic contexts.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/faf.12830</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4267-0160</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5756-9543</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-2960 |
ispartof | Fish and fisheries (Oxford, England), 2024-07, Vol.25 (4), p.630-646 |
issn | 1467-2960 1467-2979 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3067149914 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Biodiversity biodiversity conservation biomass Changing environments computer software Conservation decision support systems dynamic planning Economics Environmental changes Environmental planning Exploitation fish Fish stocks Fisheries Fisheries management Fishery management Fishing Lobster fisheries Lobsters Marine crustaceans Marine protected areas Marine resources marine spatial planning Marxan software Nephrops norvegicus no‐take marine reserves Opportunity costs Populations Protected areas Resource management Seasonal variation Seasonal variations Shellfish socioeconomics Software Spatial planning species temporal closures |
title | Dynamic marine spatial planning for conservation and fisheries benefits |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T10%3A34%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20marine%20spatial%20planning%20for%20conservation%20and%20fisheries%20benefits&rft.jtitle=Fish%20and%20fisheries%20(Oxford,%20England)&rft.au=Vigo,%20Maria&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=630&rft.epage=646&rft.pages=630-646&rft.issn=1467-2960&rft.eissn=1467-2979&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/faf.12830&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3067149914%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3067149914&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |