The Tyler rationale: A reappraisal and rereading
For over 70 years, Ralph W. Tyler’s Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction has been the subject of considerable debate among curriculum scholars. This article offers a different reading of the Tyler rationale, juxtaposed with Foucault’s Discipline and Punish . The author suggests that Tyler’...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Prospects (Paris) 2024-03, Vol.54 (1), p.121-135 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 135 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 121 |
container_title | Prospects (Paris) |
container_volume | 54 |
creator | Burns, James P. |
description | For over 70 years, Ralph W. Tyler’s
Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction
has been the subject of considerable debate among curriculum scholars. This article offers a different reading of the Tyler rationale, juxtaposed with Foucault’s
Discipline and Punish
. The author suggests that Tyler’s rationale shares many of the carceral logics described by Foucault in his genealogy of disciplinary power. This reappraisal of the Tyler rationale is significant in the current education policy environment. Tyler’s emphasis on the attainment of assessable predetermined objectives has helped institutionalize punitive accountability regimes and may assist revanchist political actors in manufacturing moral panics around issues of gender, sexuality, racial history, and civics education. The logics of Tyler’s curriculum protocol have been institutionalized as common sense in kindergarten through 12th grade and university education and are antithetical to crucial deliberation over the pressing existential issues we all face, including autocratic threats to education itself. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11125-023-09643-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3066168077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3066168077</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185y-701fd2301d97423eb072573982889ddf3be587ef30be9989e97c04ed516846ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Fz9GZpG0Sb8viFyx4qeeQbqZrl9rWZPfQf2-0gjdPwwzP-zI8jF0j3CKAuouIKAoOQnIwZS75dMIWWCjJDRg4ZQsAKTkWUp-zixj3AKhywAWD6p2yauooZMEd2qF3Hd1nqyyQG8fg2ui6zPU-7eni2353yc4a10W6-p1L9vb4UK2f-eb16WW92vAt6mLiCrDxQgJ6o3IhqQYl0jtGC62N942sqdCKGgk1GaMNGbWFnHyBpc5LV8slu5l7xzB8Hike7H44hvRetBLKMmGgVKLETG3DEGOgxo6h_XBhsgj224ydzdhkxv6YsVMKyTkUE9zvKPxV_5P6AiwuZJY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3066168077</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Tyler rationale: A reappraisal and rereading</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Burns, James P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burns, James P.</creatorcontrib><description>For over 70 years, Ralph W. Tyler’s
Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction
has been the subject of considerable debate among curriculum scholars. This article offers a different reading of the Tyler rationale, juxtaposed with Foucault’s
Discipline and Punish
. The author suggests that Tyler’s rationale shares many of the carceral logics described by Foucault in his genealogy of disciplinary power. This reappraisal of the Tyler rationale is significant in the current education policy environment. Tyler’s emphasis on the attainment of assessable predetermined objectives has helped institutionalize punitive accountability regimes and may assist revanchist political actors in manufacturing moral panics around issues of gender, sexuality, racial history, and civics education. The logics of Tyler’s curriculum protocol have been institutionalized as common sense in kindergarten through 12th grade and university education and are antithetical to crucial deliberation over the pressing existential issues we all face, including autocratic threats to education itself.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-1538</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-9090</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11125-023-09643-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Curricula ; Education ; Education policy ; Educational philosophy ; Educational theory ; International and Comparative Education ; Open File ; Tyler, Ralph Waldo (1860-1921)</subject><ispartof>Prospects (Paris), 2024-03, Vol.54 (1), p.121-135</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) under exclusive licence to UNESCO International Bureau of Education 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c185y-701fd2301d97423eb072573982889ddf3be587ef30be9989e97c04ed516846ab3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8087-9542</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11125-023-09643-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11125-023-09643-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burns, James P.</creatorcontrib><title>The Tyler rationale: A reappraisal and rereading</title><title>Prospects (Paris)</title><addtitle>Prospects</addtitle><description>For over 70 years, Ralph W. Tyler’s
Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction
has been the subject of considerable debate among curriculum scholars. This article offers a different reading of the Tyler rationale, juxtaposed with Foucault’s
Discipline and Punish
. The author suggests that Tyler’s rationale shares many of the carceral logics described by Foucault in his genealogy of disciplinary power. This reappraisal of the Tyler rationale is significant in the current education policy environment. Tyler’s emphasis on the attainment of assessable predetermined objectives has helped institutionalize punitive accountability regimes and may assist revanchist political actors in manufacturing moral panics around issues of gender, sexuality, racial history, and civics education. The logics of Tyler’s curriculum protocol have been institutionalized as common sense in kindergarten through 12th grade and university education and are antithetical to crucial deliberation over the pressing existential issues we all face, including autocratic threats to education itself.</description><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational philosophy</subject><subject>Educational theory</subject><subject>International and Comparative Education</subject><subject>Open File</subject><subject>Tyler, Ralph Waldo (1860-1921)</subject><issn>0033-1538</issn><issn>1573-9090</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AU8Fz9GZpG0Sb8viFyx4qeeQbqZrl9rWZPfQf2-0gjdPwwzP-zI8jF0j3CKAuouIKAoOQnIwZS75dMIWWCjJDRg4ZQsAKTkWUp-zixj3AKhywAWD6p2yauooZMEd2qF3Hd1nqyyQG8fg2ui6zPU-7eni2353yc4a10W6-p1L9vb4UK2f-eb16WW92vAt6mLiCrDxQgJ6o3IhqQYl0jtGC62N942sqdCKGgk1GaMNGbWFnHyBpc5LV8slu5l7xzB8Hike7H44hvRetBLKMmGgVKLETG3DEGOgxo6h_XBhsgj224ydzdhkxv6YsVMKyTkUE9zvKPxV_5P6AiwuZJY</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Burns, James P.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-9542</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>The Tyler rationale: A reappraisal and rereading</title><author>Burns, James P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c185y-701fd2301d97423eb072573982889ddf3be587ef30be9989e97c04ed516846ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational philosophy</topic><topic>Educational theory</topic><topic>International and Comparative Education</topic><topic>Open File</topic><topic>Tyler, Ralph Waldo (1860-1921)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burns, James P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Prospects (Paris)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burns, James P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Tyler rationale: A reappraisal and rereading</atitle><jtitle>Prospects (Paris)</jtitle><stitle>Prospects</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>121</spage><epage>135</epage><pages>121-135</pages><issn>0033-1538</issn><eissn>1573-9090</eissn><abstract>For over 70 years, Ralph W. Tyler’s
Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction
has been the subject of considerable debate among curriculum scholars. This article offers a different reading of the Tyler rationale, juxtaposed with Foucault’s
Discipline and Punish
. The author suggests that Tyler’s rationale shares many of the carceral logics described by Foucault in his genealogy of disciplinary power. This reappraisal of the Tyler rationale is significant in the current education policy environment. Tyler’s emphasis on the attainment of assessable predetermined objectives has helped institutionalize punitive accountability regimes and may assist revanchist political actors in manufacturing moral panics around issues of gender, sexuality, racial history, and civics education. The logics of Tyler’s curriculum protocol have been institutionalized as common sense in kindergarten through 12th grade and university education and are antithetical to crucial deliberation over the pressing existential issues we all face, including autocratic threats to education itself.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11125-023-09643-y</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8087-9542</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0033-1538 |
ispartof | Prospects (Paris), 2024-03, Vol.54 (1), p.121-135 |
issn | 0033-1538 1573-9090 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3066168077 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Curricula Education Education policy Educational philosophy Educational theory International and Comparative Education Open File Tyler, Ralph Waldo (1860-1921) |
title | The Tyler rationale: A reappraisal and rereading |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T16%3A44%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Tyler%20rationale:%20A%20reappraisal%20and%20rereading&rft.jtitle=Prospects%20(Paris)&rft.au=Burns,%20James%20P.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=121&rft.epage=135&rft.pages=121-135&rft.issn=0033-1538&rft.eissn=1573-9090&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11125-023-09643-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3066168077%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3066168077&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |