Pink Purslane ( Portulaca pilosa ) Control with Postemergence Herbicides

Pink purslane is often ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in vegetable production systems in Georgia. Pink purslane encroachment along the field edges and in-field of agronomic crops has recently increased. Postemergence (POST) herbicides are an effective component of agronomic crop weed ma...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2024-05, Vol.38, p.1-19
Hauptverfasser: Shay, Nicholas J., Prostko, Eric P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 19
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 38
creator Shay, Nicholas J.
Prostko, Eric P.
description Pink purslane is often ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in vegetable production systems in Georgia. Pink purslane encroachment along the field edges and in-field of agronomic crops has recently increased. Postemergence (POST) herbicides are an effective component of agronomic crop weed management. However, little research has addressed pink purslane control in agronomic crops. Therefore, greenhouse and field studies were conducted from 2022 to 2023 in Tifton, Georgia, to evaluate the response of pink purslane to POST herbicides commonly used in agronomic crops. Greenhouse screening provided preliminary evidence whereby 13 of the 21 POST herbicides evaluated provided ≥ 80% above-ground biomass reductions. These 13 herbicides were then used for field studies. Results from the field studies, pooled across two locations, indicated only 3 of the 13 herbicides provided above-ground biomass reductions ≥ 70% compared to the non-treated control. These herbicides included atrazine at 1682 g ai ha -1 , glufosinate at 656 g ai ha -1 , and lactofen at 219 g ai ha -1 with 79%, 70%, and 83% biomass reduction, respectively ( P < 0.05). This research suggests that many of the POST herbicides used in agronomic crops will not effectively control pink purslane. Thus, when trying to manage pink purslane with POST herbicides in agronomic crops, growers should plant crops/cultivars tolerant of either atrazine, glufosinate, and/or lactofen.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/wet.2024.28
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3063994614</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3063994614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-8d5ef84c21104d64bfc617f5f9d560d61863d5643155af82c5711f8f83014f583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsnv0DAiyJb38u_zR6lqBUK9qDgLaTZRLeum5rsUvz2bqmnGZhh3uNHyCXCDAHLu53vZwyYmDF9RCYoJRSsFHBMJqArKICX76fkLOcNACrGYEIWq6b7oqsh5dZ2nl7TVUz90Fpn6bZpY7b0hs5j16fY0l3Tf4557v23Tx--c54ufFo3rql9PicnwbbZX_zrlLw9PrzOF8Xy5el5fr8sHJOqL3QtfdDCMUQQtRLr4BSWQYaqlgpqhVrx0Qk-Pm-DZk6WiEEHzQFFkJpPydVhd5viz-BzbzZxSN140nBQvKqEQjG2bg8tl2LOyQezTc23Tb8GwexRmRGV2aMyTPM_mVJajg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3063994614</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pink Purslane ( Portulaca pilosa ) Control with Postemergence Herbicides</title><source>Cambridge Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Shay, Nicholas J. ; Prostko, Eric P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Shay, Nicholas J. ; Prostko, Eric P.</creatorcontrib><description>Pink purslane is often ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in vegetable production systems in Georgia. Pink purslane encroachment along the field edges and in-field of agronomic crops has recently increased. Postemergence (POST) herbicides are an effective component of agronomic crop weed management. However, little research has addressed pink purslane control in agronomic crops. Therefore, greenhouse and field studies were conducted from 2022 to 2023 in Tifton, Georgia, to evaluate the response of pink purslane to POST herbicides commonly used in agronomic crops. Greenhouse screening provided preliminary evidence whereby 13 of the 21 POST herbicides evaluated provided ≥ 80% above-ground biomass reductions. These 13 herbicides were then used for field studies. Results from the field studies, pooled across two locations, indicated only 3 of the 13 herbicides provided above-ground biomass reductions ≥ 70% compared to the non-treated control. These herbicides included atrazine at 1682 g ai ha -1 , glufosinate at 656 g ai ha -1 , and lactofen at 219 g ai ha -1 with 79%, 70%, and 83% biomass reduction, respectively ( P &lt; 0.05). This research suggests that many of the POST herbicides used in agronomic crops will not effectively control pink purslane. Thus, when trying to manage pink purslane with POST herbicides in agronomic crops, growers should plant crops/cultivars tolerant of either atrazine, glufosinate, and/or lactofen.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2024.28</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Agronomic crops ; Agronomy ; Atrazine ; Biomass ; Crop management ; Crop production ; Crops ; Cultivars ; Encroachment ; Glufosinate ; Greenhouses ; Herbicides ; Seeds ; Soil sciences ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2024-05, Vol.38, p.1-19</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited. (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-7896-5545 ; 0000-0002-6638-580X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Shay, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prostko, Eric P.</creatorcontrib><title>Pink Purslane ( Portulaca pilosa ) Control with Postemergence Herbicides</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Pink purslane is often ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in vegetable production systems in Georgia. Pink purslane encroachment along the field edges and in-field of agronomic crops has recently increased. Postemergence (POST) herbicides are an effective component of agronomic crop weed management. However, little research has addressed pink purslane control in agronomic crops. Therefore, greenhouse and field studies were conducted from 2022 to 2023 in Tifton, Georgia, to evaluate the response of pink purslane to POST herbicides commonly used in agronomic crops. Greenhouse screening provided preliminary evidence whereby 13 of the 21 POST herbicides evaluated provided ≥ 80% above-ground biomass reductions. These 13 herbicides were then used for field studies. Results from the field studies, pooled across two locations, indicated only 3 of the 13 herbicides provided above-ground biomass reductions ≥ 70% compared to the non-treated control. These herbicides included atrazine at 1682 g ai ha -1 , glufosinate at 656 g ai ha -1 , and lactofen at 219 g ai ha -1 with 79%, 70%, and 83% biomass reduction, respectively ( P &lt; 0.05). This research suggests that many of the POST herbicides used in agronomic crops will not effectively control pink purslane. Thus, when trying to manage pink purslane with POST herbicides in agronomic crops, growers should plant crops/cultivars tolerant of either atrazine, glufosinate, and/or lactofen.</description><subject>Agronomic crops</subject><subject>Agronomy</subject><subject>Atrazine</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Crop management</subject><subject>Crop production</subject><subject>Crops</subject><subject>Cultivars</subject><subject>Encroachment</subject><subject>Glufosinate</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Seeds</subject><subject>Soil sciences</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNotkE9LAzEUxIMoWKsnv0DAiyJb38u_zR6lqBUK9qDgLaTZRLeum5rsUvz2bqmnGZhh3uNHyCXCDAHLu53vZwyYmDF9RCYoJRSsFHBMJqArKICX76fkLOcNACrGYEIWq6b7oqsh5dZ2nl7TVUz90Fpn6bZpY7b0hs5j16fY0l3Tf4557v23Tx--c54ufFo3rql9PicnwbbZX_zrlLw9PrzOF8Xy5el5fr8sHJOqL3QtfdDCMUQQtRLr4BSWQYaqlgpqhVrx0Qk-Pm-DZk6WiEEHzQFFkJpPydVhd5viz-BzbzZxSN140nBQvKqEQjG2bg8tl2LOyQezTc23Tb8GwexRmRGV2aMyTPM_mVJajg</recordid><startdate>20240516</startdate><enddate>20240516</enddate><creator>Shay, Nicholas J.</creator><creator>Prostko, Eric P.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-580X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240516</creationdate><title>Pink Purslane ( Portulaca pilosa ) Control with Postemergence Herbicides</title><author>Shay, Nicholas J. ; Prostko, Eric P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c256t-8d5ef84c21104d64bfc617f5f9d560d61863d5643155af82c5711f8f83014f583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agronomic crops</topic><topic>Agronomy</topic><topic>Atrazine</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Crop management</topic><topic>Crop production</topic><topic>Crops</topic><topic>Cultivars</topic><topic>Encroachment</topic><topic>Glufosinate</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Seeds</topic><topic>Soil sciences</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Shay, Nicholas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prostko, Eric P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Shay, Nicholas J.</au><au>Prostko, Eric P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pink Purslane ( Portulaca pilosa ) Control with Postemergence Herbicides</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2024-05-16</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>19</epage><pages>1-19</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Pink purslane is often ranked as one of the most troublesome weeds in vegetable production systems in Georgia. Pink purslane encroachment along the field edges and in-field of agronomic crops has recently increased. Postemergence (POST) herbicides are an effective component of agronomic crop weed management. However, little research has addressed pink purslane control in agronomic crops. Therefore, greenhouse and field studies were conducted from 2022 to 2023 in Tifton, Georgia, to evaluate the response of pink purslane to POST herbicides commonly used in agronomic crops. Greenhouse screening provided preliminary evidence whereby 13 of the 21 POST herbicides evaluated provided ≥ 80% above-ground biomass reductions. These 13 herbicides were then used for field studies. Results from the field studies, pooled across two locations, indicated only 3 of the 13 herbicides provided above-ground biomass reductions ≥ 70% compared to the non-treated control. These herbicides included atrazine at 1682 g ai ha -1 , glufosinate at 656 g ai ha -1 , and lactofen at 219 g ai ha -1 with 79%, 70%, and 83% biomass reduction, respectively ( P &lt; 0.05). This research suggests that many of the POST herbicides used in agronomic crops will not effectively control pink purslane. Thus, when trying to manage pink purslane with POST herbicides in agronomic crops, growers should plant crops/cultivars tolerant of either atrazine, glufosinate, and/or lactofen.</abstract><cop>Lawrence</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2024.28</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7896-5545</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6638-580X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2024-05, Vol.38, p.1-19
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3063994614
source Cambridge Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Agronomic crops
Agronomy
Atrazine
Biomass
Crop management
Crop production
Crops
Cultivars
Encroachment
Glufosinate
Greenhouses
Herbicides
Seeds
Soil sciences
Weed control
Weeds
title Pink Purslane ( Portulaca pilosa ) Control with Postemergence Herbicides
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A09%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pink%20Purslane%20(%20Portulaca%20pilosa%20)%20Control%20with%20Postemergence%20Herbicides&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Shay,%20Nicholas%20J.&rft.date=2024-05-16&rft.volume=38&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=19&rft.pages=1-19&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2024.28&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3063994614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3063994614&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true