Soil science research in Brazilian terrestrial biomes: A review of evolution, collaboration, current topics, and impact

Purpose Brazilian territory is divided into six biomes (Amazon, Atlantic Forest, Cerrado, Caatinga, Pantanal, and Pampa) that represent important global biodiversity hotspots. Research into soil science in these environments has increased in recent years, but a quantitative and qualitative mapping o...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of soils and sediments 2024-05, Vol.24 (5), p.2023-2039
1. Verfasser: Oliveira Filho, José de Souza
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Brazilian territory is divided into six biomes (Amazon, Atlantic Forest, Cerrado, Caatinga, Pantanal, and Pampa) that represent important global biodiversity hotspots. Research into soil science in these environments has increased in recent years, but a quantitative and qualitative mapping of research into the soils of Brazilian biomes has never been carried out. In this study, research on soil science in the Brazilian biomes were analyzed to map the evolution, scientific collaboration, current status, research trends and impact over the last 50 years (1972–2022). Methods The database was obtained from the Core Collection of Web of Science. The data was quantitatively analyzed through descriptive statistics and linear regression using Microsoft Excel, and qualitatively using the bibliometric software VOSviewer. Results A total of 11,231 papers were obtained. The results indicated a significant increase in soil science research across all biomes (polynomial growth), with greater emphasis for research in the Cerrado (R 2  = 0.9361), Amazon (R 2  = 0.9170) and Atlantic Forest (R 2  = 0.9104) biomes. Soil science research in the Amazon accounted for 47.0% of the research conducted in all Brazilian biomes. While in the Amazon (38.8%), Atlantic Forest (34.8%), and Pantanal (36.7%), most of the research was related to environmental sciences and ecology, in the Cerrado (47.4%), Caatinga (58.2%), and Pampa biome (48.9%), research in the field of agriculture was more significant. For all biomes, except for the Caatinga (a dry climate biome), a significant participation of international researchers and institutions was evident in the overall publications. This demonstrates a lower global interest in soil science research in the Brazilian dry ecosystem. Conclusion Soil science research in the Brazilian biomes is disproportionate, with greater interest in the soils of the larger forest biomes and less interest in the dry and flooded areas. The results of this study can be useful for the development of public policies, research and scientific collaboration aimed at soil conservation in Brazilian terrestrial biomes.
ISSN:1439-0108
1614-7480
DOI:10.1007/s11368-024-03778-x