Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model
Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Russian meteorology and hydrology 2024-03, Vol.49 (3), p.183-194 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 194 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 183 |
container_title | Russian meteorology and hydrology |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Resnyanskii, Yu. D. Zelen’ko, A. A. Strukov, B. S. Stepanov, V. N. Khan, V. M. Vorob’eva, V. V. Tarasevich, M. A. Gritsun, A. S. Volodin, E. M. |
description | Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model climate bias. A degree of consistency with the control data significantly increases when comparing anomalies counted from the individual normals of each of the compared data types. In particular, the forecasts of SST anomalies for the Niño-3.4 region with a lead time up to six months appear to be quite successful. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3103/S1068373924030014 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3061234360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3061234360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-dc0043818906d50b3752c92d23527714f7ede006fb79e23b1a21ff7988281d8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UF1LwzAULaLgnP4A3wI-V2-SNk0fx9h0sDlw7rm0ye2WsbU1yYT-ezMn-CA-3cs9H5dzouiewiOnwJ9WFITkGc9ZAhyAJhfRgOY8iSXk4jLsAY5P-HV049wOIBUsyQZRP3IOnTtg40lbE79F8oadbfVRmcrsje9P56XCsmk3tuy2RpGpwb12xDSB6m3rOlTefCKZthZV6bwja2eazbfZ7HURjxcpmZTWb8mqdx4PZNFq3N9GV3W5d3j3M4fRejp5H7_E8-XzbDyax4oJ6WOtABIuqcxB6BQqnqVM5UwznrIso0mdoUYAUVdZjoxXtGS0rrNcSiaplpoPo4ezb0j1cUTni117tE14WXAQlPGECwgsemapEMhZrIvOmkNp-4JCcWq4-NNw0LCzxgVus0H76_y_6AvkAHxu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3061234360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Resnyanskii, Yu. D. ; Zelen’ko, A. A. ; Strukov, B. S. ; Stepanov, V. N. ; Khan, V. M. ; Vorob’eva, V. V. ; Tarasevich, M. A. ; Gritsun, A. S. ; Volodin, E. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Resnyanskii, Yu. D. ; Zelen’ko, A. A. ; Strukov, B. S. ; Stepanov, V. N. ; Khan, V. M. ; Vorob’eva, V. V. ; Tarasevich, M. A. ; Gritsun, A. S. ; Volodin, E. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model climate bias. A degree of consistency with the control data significantly increases when comparing anomalies counted from the individual normals of each of the compared data types. In particular, the forecasts of SST anomalies for the Niño-3.4 region with a lead time up to six months appear to be quite successful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-3739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3103/S1068373924030014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Climate ; Climate models ; Control data (computers) ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Lead time ; Meteorology ; Reproducibility ; Sea surface ; Sea surface temperature anomalies</subject><ispartof>Russian meteorology and hydrology, 2024-03, Vol.49 (3), p.183-194</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2024</rights><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-dc0043818906d50b3752c92d23527714f7ede006fb79e23b1a21ff7988281d8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3103/S1068373924030014$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3103/S1068373924030014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Resnyanskii, Yu. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelen’ko, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strukov, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanov, V. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorob’eva, V. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarasevich, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gritsun, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volodin, E. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model</title><title>Russian meteorology and hydrology</title><addtitle>Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol</addtitle><description>Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model climate bias. A degree of consistency with the control data significantly increases when comparing anomalies counted from the individual normals of each of the compared data types. In particular, the forecasts of SST anomalies for the Niño-3.4 region with a lead time up to six months appear to be quite successful.</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Control data (computers)</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Lead time</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Sea surface</subject><subject>Sea surface temperature anomalies</subject><issn>1068-3739</issn><issn>1934-8096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UF1LwzAULaLgnP4A3wI-V2-SNk0fx9h0sDlw7rm0ye2WsbU1yYT-ezMn-CA-3cs9H5dzouiewiOnwJ9WFITkGc9ZAhyAJhfRgOY8iSXk4jLsAY5P-HV049wOIBUsyQZRP3IOnTtg40lbE79F8oadbfVRmcrsje9P56XCsmk3tuy2RpGpwb12xDSB6m3rOlTefCKZthZV6bwja2eazbfZ7HURjxcpmZTWb8mqdx4PZNFq3N9GV3W5d3j3M4fRejp5H7_E8-XzbDyax4oJ6WOtABIuqcxB6BQqnqVM5UwznrIso0mdoUYAUVdZjoxXtGS0rrNcSiaplpoPo4ezb0j1cUTni117tE14WXAQlPGECwgsemapEMhZrIvOmkNp-4JCcWq4-NNw0LCzxgVus0H76_y_6AvkAHxu</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Resnyanskii, Yu. D.</creator><creator>Zelen’ko, A. A.</creator><creator>Strukov, B. S.</creator><creator>Stepanov, V. N.</creator><creator>Khan, V. M.</creator><creator>Vorob’eva, V. V.</creator><creator>Tarasevich, M. A.</creator><creator>Gritsun, A. S.</creator><creator>Volodin, E. M.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model</title><author>Resnyanskii, Yu. D. ; Zelen’ko, A. A. ; Strukov, B. S. ; Stepanov, V. N. ; Khan, V. M. ; Vorob’eva, V. V. ; Tarasevich, M. A. ; Gritsun, A. S. ; Volodin, E. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-dc0043818906d50b3752c92d23527714f7ede006fb79e23b1a21ff7988281d8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Control data (computers)</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Lead time</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Sea surface</topic><topic>Sea surface temperature anomalies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Resnyanskii, Yu. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelen’ko, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strukov, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanov, V. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorob’eva, V. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarasevich, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gritsun, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volodin, E. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Russian meteorology and hydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Resnyanskii, Yu. D.</au><au>Zelen’ko, A. A.</au><au>Strukov, B. S.</au><au>Stepanov, V. N.</au><au>Khan, V. M.</au><au>Vorob’eva, V. V.</au><au>Tarasevich, M. A.</au><au>Gritsun, A. S.</au><au>Volodin, E. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model</atitle><jtitle>Russian meteorology and hydrology</jtitle><stitle>Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>183-194</pages><issn>1068-3739</issn><eissn>1934-8096</eissn><abstract>Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model climate bias. A degree of consistency with the control data significantly increases when comparing anomalies counted from the individual normals of each of the compared data types. In particular, the forecasts of SST anomalies for the Niño-3.4 region with a lead time up to six months appear to be quite successful.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.3103/S1068373924030014</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1068-3739 |
ispartof | Russian meteorology and hydrology, 2024-03, Vol.49 (3), p.183-194 |
issn | 1068-3739 1934-8096 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3061234360 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Anomalies Atmospheric Sciences Climate Climate models Control data (computers) Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Lead time Meteorology Reproducibility Sea surface Sea surface temperature anomalies |
title | Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20Reproducibility%20of%20Oceanographic%20Fields%20in%20Retrospective%20Forecasts%20Using%20the%20INM-CM5%20Earth%20System%20Model&rft.jtitle=Russian%20meteorology%20and%20hydrology&rft.au=Resnyanskii,%20Yu.%20D.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=183-194&rft.issn=1068-3739&rft.eissn=1934-8096&rft_id=info:doi/10.3103/S1068373924030014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3061234360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3061234360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |