Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model

Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Russian meteorology and hydrology 2024-03, Vol.49 (3), p.183-194
Hauptverfasser: Resnyanskii, Yu. D., Zelen’ko, A. A., Strukov, B. S., Stepanov, V. N., Khan, V. M., Vorob’eva, V. V., Tarasevich, M. A., Gritsun, A. S., Volodin, E. M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 3
container_start_page 183
container_title Russian meteorology and hydrology
container_volume 49
creator Resnyanskii, Yu. D.
Zelen’ko, A. A.
Strukov, B. S.
Stepanov, V. N.
Khan, V. M.
Vorob’eva, V. V.
Tarasevich, M. A.
Gritsun, A. S.
Volodin, E. M.
description Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model climate bias. A degree of consistency with the control data significantly increases when comparing anomalies counted from the individual normals of each of the compared data types. In particular, the forecasts of SST anomalies for the Niño-3.4 region with a lead time up to six months appear to be quite successful.
doi_str_mv 10.3103/S1068373924030014
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3061234360</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3061234360</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-dc0043818906d50b3752c92d23527714f7ede006fb79e23b1a21ff7988281d8d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UF1LwzAULaLgnP4A3wI-V2-SNk0fx9h0sDlw7rm0ye2WsbU1yYT-ezMn-CA-3cs9H5dzouiewiOnwJ9WFITkGc9ZAhyAJhfRgOY8iSXk4jLsAY5P-HV049wOIBUsyQZRP3IOnTtg40lbE79F8oadbfVRmcrsje9P56XCsmk3tuy2RpGpwb12xDSB6m3rOlTefCKZthZV6bwja2eazbfZ7HURjxcpmZTWb8mqdx4PZNFq3N9GV3W5d3j3M4fRejp5H7_E8-XzbDyax4oJ6WOtABIuqcxB6BQqnqVM5UwznrIso0mdoUYAUVdZjoxXtGS0rrNcSiaplpoPo4ezb0j1cUTni117tE14WXAQlPGECwgsemapEMhZrIvOmkNp-4JCcWq4-NNw0LCzxgVus0H76_y_6AvkAHxu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3061234360</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Resnyanskii, Yu. D. ; Zelen’ko, A. A. ; Strukov, B. S. ; Stepanov, V. N. ; Khan, V. M. ; Vorob’eva, V. V. ; Tarasevich, M. A. ; Gritsun, A. S. ; Volodin, E. M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Resnyanskii, Yu. D. ; Zelen’ko, A. A. ; Strukov, B. S. ; Stepanov, V. N. ; Khan, V. M. ; Vorob’eva, V. V. ; Tarasevich, M. A. ; Gritsun, A. S. ; Volodin, E. M.</creatorcontrib><description>Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model climate bias. A degree of consistency with the control data significantly increases when comparing anomalies counted from the individual normals of each of the compared data types. In particular, the forecasts of SST anomalies for the Niño-3.4 region with a lead time up to six months appear to be quite successful.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1068-3739</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1934-8096</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3103/S1068373924030014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Moscow: Pleiades Publishing</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Atmospheric Sciences ; Climate ; Climate models ; Control data (computers) ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Lead time ; Meteorology ; Reproducibility ; Sea surface ; Sea surface temperature anomalies</subject><ispartof>Russian meteorology and hydrology, 2024-03, Vol.49 (3), p.183-194</ispartof><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2024</rights><rights>Pleiades Publishing, Ltd. 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-dc0043818906d50b3752c92d23527714f7ede006fb79e23b1a21ff7988281d8d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3103/S1068373924030014$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3103/S1068373924030014$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Resnyanskii, Yu. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelen’ko, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strukov, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanov, V. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorob’eva, V. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarasevich, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gritsun, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volodin, E. M.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model</title><title>Russian meteorology and hydrology</title><addtitle>Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol</addtitle><description>Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model climate bias. A degree of consistency with the control data significantly increases when comparing anomalies counted from the individual normals of each of the compared data types. In particular, the forecasts of SST anomalies for the Niño-3.4 region with a lead time up to six months appear to be quite successful.</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Atmospheric Sciences</subject><subject>Climate</subject><subject>Climate models</subject><subject>Control data (computers)</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Lead time</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><subject>Sea surface</subject><subject>Sea surface temperature anomalies</subject><issn>1068-3739</issn><issn>1934-8096</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UF1LwzAULaLgnP4A3wI-V2-SNk0fx9h0sDlw7rm0ye2WsbU1yYT-ezMn-CA-3cs9H5dzouiewiOnwJ9WFITkGc9ZAhyAJhfRgOY8iSXk4jLsAY5P-HV049wOIBUsyQZRP3IOnTtg40lbE79F8oadbfVRmcrsje9P56XCsmk3tuy2RpGpwb12xDSB6m3rOlTefCKZthZV6bwja2eazbfZ7HURjxcpmZTWb8mqdx4PZNFq3N9GV3W5d3j3M4fRejp5H7_E8-XzbDyax4oJ6WOtABIuqcxB6BQqnqVM5UwznrIso0mdoUYAUVdZjoxXtGS0rrNcSiaplpoPo4ezb0j1cUTni117tE14WXAQlPGECwgsemapEMhZrIvOmkNp-4JCcWq4-NNw0LCzxgVus0H76_y_6AvkAHxu</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Resnyanskii, Yu. D.</creator><creator>Zelen’ko, A. A.</creator><creator>Strukov, B. S.</creator><creator>Stepanov, V. N.</creator><creator>Khan, V. M.</creator><creator>Vorob’eva, V. V.</creator><creator>Tarasevich, M. A.</creator><creator>Gritsun, A. S.</creator><creator>Volodin, E. M.</creator><general>Pleiades Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model</title><author>Resnyanskii, Yu. D. ; Zelen’ko, A. A. ; Strukov, B. S. ; Stepanov, V. N. ; Khan, V. M. ; Vorob’eva, V. V. ; Tarasevich, M. A. ; Gritsun, A. S. ; Volodin, E. M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-dc0043818906d50b3752c92d23527714f7ede006fb79e23b1a21ff7988281d8d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Atmospheric Sciences</topic><topic>Climate</topic><topic>Climate models</topic><topic>Control data (computers)</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Lead time</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><topic>Sea surface</topic><topic>Sea surface temperature anomalies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Resnyanskii, Yu. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zelen’ko, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strukov, B. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stepanov, V. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khan, V. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vorob’eva, V. V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarasevich, M. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gritsun, A. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Volodin, E. M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Russian meteorology and hydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Resnyanskii, Yu. D.</au><au>Zelen’ko, A. A.</au><au>Strukov, B. S.</au><au>Stepanov, V. N.</au><au>Khan, V. M.</au><au>Vorob’eva, V. V.</au><au>Tarasevich, M. A.</au><au>Gritsun, A. S.</au><au>Volodin, E. M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model</atitle><jtitle>Russian meteorology and hydrology</jtitle><stitle>Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>183</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>183-194</pages><issn>1068-3739</issn><eissn>1934-8096</eissn><abstract>Skill scores of the reproducibility of oceanographic fields in applying the INM-CM5 climate model to long-term forecasting for several months are presented. It is shown that disagreements between the model forecasts and the control data in terms of their absolute values are mainly due to the model climate bias. A degree of consistency with the control data significantly increases when comparing anomalies counted from the individual normals of each of the compared data types. In particular, the forecasts of SST anomalies for the Niño-3.4 region with a lead time up to six months appear to be quite successful.</abstract><cop>Moscow</cop><pub>Pleiades Publishing</pub><doi>10.3103/S1068373924030014</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1068-3739
ispartof Russian meteorology and hydrology, 2024-03, Vol.49 (3), p.183-194
issn 1068-3739
1934-8096
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3061234360
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Anomalies
Atmospheric Sciences
Climate
Climate models
Control data (computers)
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Lead time
Meteorology
Reproducibility
Sea surface
Sea surface temperature anomalies
title Assessment of the Reproducibility of Oceanographic Fields in Retrospective Forecasts Using the INM-CM5 Earth System Model
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T07%3A56%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20the%20Reproducibility%20of%20Oceanographic%20Fields%20in%20Retrospective%20Forecasts%20Using%20the%20INM-CM5%20Earth%20System%20Model&rft.jtitle=Russian%20meteorology%20and%20hydrology&rft.au=Resnyanskii,%20Yu.%20D.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=183&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=183-194&rft.issn=1068-3739&rft.eissn=1934-8096&rft_id=info:doi/10.3103/S1068373924030014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3061234360%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3061234360&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true