A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for River Streamflow Time-Series Forecasting
This study examines the contribution of rainfall data (RF) in improving the streamflow-forecasting accuracy of advanced machine learning (ML) models in the Syr Darya River Basin. Different sets of scenarios included rainfall data from different weather stations located in various geographical locati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2024-05, Vol.16 (10), p.4005 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 4005 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Abdoulhalik, Antoifi Ahmed, Ashraf A |
description | This study examines the contribution of rainfall data (RF) in improving the streamflow-forecasting accuracy of advanced machine learning (ML) models in the Syr Darya River Basin. Different sets of scenarios included rainfall data from different weather stations located in various geographical locations with respect to the flow monitoring station. Long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models were used to examine the contribution of rainfall data on streamflow-forecasting performance by investigating five scenarios whereby RF data from different weather stations were incorporated depending on their geographical positions. Specifically, the All-RF scenario included all rainfall data collected at 11 stations; Upstream-RF (Up-RF) and Downstream-RF (Down-RF) included only the rainfall data measured upstream and downstream of the streamflow-measuring station; Pearson-RF (P-RF) only included the rainfall data exhibiting the highest level of correlation with the streamflow data, and the Flow-only (FO) scenario included streamflow data. The evaluation metrics used to quantitively assess the performance of the models included the RMSE, MAE, and the coefficient of determination, R2. Both ML models performed best in the FO scenario, which shows that the diversity of input features (hydrological and meteorological data) did not improve the predictive accuracy regardless of the positions of the weather stations. The results show that the P-RF scenarios yielded better prediction accuracy compared to all the other scenarios including rainfall data, which suggests that only rainfall data upstream of the flow monitoring station tend to make a positive contribution to the model’s forecasting performance. The findings evidence the suitability of simple monolayer LSTM-based networks with only streamflow data as input features for high-performance and budget-wise river flow forecast applications while minimizing data processing time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su16104005 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3059693066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A795445469</galeid><sourcerecordid>A795445469</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-c33a2047e7eb73a0f32193ed47257685d88e5fe5d574f4544273eaedbee7d3753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkVFLwzAQgIMoOOZe_AUBnxQ6k6Zp1scynA4mwjafS5Zetsy2mUk73b83Y4Iu95Bw-b7chUPolpIhYxl59B1NKUkI4ReoFxNBI0o4ufx3vkYD77ckLMZoRtMe-sjx2NY76WRr9oDzRlYHbzy2GuflXjYKSvwq1cY0gGcgXWOaNV6C2jTmswOPtXV4HkyHF60DWevKfuGlqSFagDMBmFgHSvo2eDfoSsvKw-B376P3ydNy_BLN3p6n43wWqZiLNlKMyZgkAgSsBJNEs5hmDMpEhOt0xMvRCLgGXnKR6IQnSSwYSChXAKJkgrM-uju9u3P22GRbbG3nws98wQjP0oyRNA3U8EStZQWFabRtnVQhSqiNsg1oE_K5yEIFngSpj-7PhMC08N2uZed9MV3Mz9mHE6uc9d6BLnbO1NIdCkqK47CKv2GxH9o9hXc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3059693066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for River Streamflow Time-Series Forecasting</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Abdoulhalik, Antoifi ; Ahmed, Ashraf A</creator><creatorcontrib>Abdoulhalik, Antoifi ; Ahmed, Ashraf A</creatorcontrib><description>This study examines the contribution of rainfall data (RF) in improving the streamflow-forecasting accuracy of advanced machine learning (ML) models in the Syr Darya River Basin. Different sets of scenarios included rainfall data from different weather stations located in various geographical locations with respect to the flow monitoring station. Long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models were used to examine the contribution of rainfall data on streamflow-forecasting performance by investigating five scenarios whereby RF data from different weather stations were incorporated depending on their geographical positions. Specifically, the All-RF scenario included all rainfall data collected at 11 stations; Upstream-RF (Up-RF) and Downstream-RF (Down-RF) included only the rainfall data measured upstream and downstream of the streamflow-measuring station; Pearson-RF (P-RF) only included the rainfall data exhibiting the highest level of correlation with the streamflow data, and the Flow-only (FO) scenario included streamflow data. The evaluation metrics used to quantitively assess the performance of the models included the RMSE, MAE, and the coefficient of determination, R2. Both ML models performed best in the FO scenario, which shows that the diversity of input features (hydrological and meteorological data) did not improve the predictive accuracy regardless of the positions of the weather stations. The results show that the P-RF scenarios yielded better prediction accuracy compared to all the other scenarios including rainfall data, which suggests that only rainfall data upstream of the flow monitoring station tend to make a positive contribution to the model’s forecasting performance. The findings evidence the suitability of simple monolayer LSTM-based networks with only streamflow data as input features for high-performance and budget-wise river flow forecast applications while minimizing data processing time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16104005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Basins ; Climate change ; Comparative analysis ; Dams ; Forecasting ; Hydroelectric power ; Hydrology ; Machine learning ; Methods ; Neural networks ; Precipitation ; Rain ; Rain and rainfall ; Rivers ; Stream flow ; Streamflow ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (10), p.4005</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-c33a2047e7eb73a0f32193ed47257685d88e5fe5d574f4544273eaedbee7d3753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Abdoulhalik, Antoifi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Ashraf A</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for River Streamflow Time-Series Forecasting</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>This study examines the contribution of rainfall data (RF) in improving the streamflow-forecasting accuracy of advanced machine learning (ML) models in the Syr Darya River Basin. Different sets of scenarios included rainfall data from different weather stations located in various geographical locations with respect to the flow monitoring station. Long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models were used to examine the contribution of rainfall data on streamflow-forecasting performance by investigating five scenarios whereby RF data from different weather stations were incorporated depending on their geographical positions. Specifically, the All-RF scenario included all rainfall data collected at 11 stations; Upstream-RF (Up-RF) and Downstream-RF (Down-RF) included only the rainfall data measured upstream and downstream of the streamflow-measuring station; Pearson-RF (P-RF) only included the rainfall data exhibiting the highest level of correlation with the streamflow data, and the Flow-only (FO) scenario included streamflow data. The evaluation metrics used to quantitively assess the performance of the models included the RMSE, MAE, and the coefficient of determination, R2. Both ML models performed best in the FO scenario, which shows that the diversity of input features (hydrological and meteorological data) did not improve the predictive accuracy regardless of the positions of the weather stations. The results show that the P-RF scenarios yielded better prediction accuracy compared to all the other scenarios including rainfall data, which suggests that only rainfall data upstream of the flow monitoring station tend to make a positive contribution to the model’s forecasting performance. The findings evidence the suitability of simple monolayer LSTM-based networks with only streamflow data as input features for high-performance and budget-wise river flow forecast applications while minimizing data processing time.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Basins</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Dams</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Hydroelectric power</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Precipitation</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rain and rainfall</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Stream flow</subject><subject>Streamflow</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkVFLwzAQgIMoOOZe_AUBnxQ6k6Zp1scynA4mwjafS5Zetsy2mUk73b83Y4Iu95Bw-b7chUPolpIhYxl59B1NKUkI4ReoFxNBI0o4ufx3vkYD77ckLMZoRtMe-sjx2NY76WRr9oDzRlYHbzy2GuflXjYKSvwq1cY0gGcgXWOaNV6C2jTmswOPtXV4HkyHF60DWevKfuGlqSFagDMBmFgHSvo2eDfoSsvKw-B376P3ydNy_BLN3p6n43wWqZiLNlKMyZgkAgSsBJNEs5hmDMpEhOt0xMvRCLgGXnKR6IQnSSwYSChXAKJkgrM-uju9u3P22GRbbG3nws98wQjP0oyRNA3U8EStZQWFabRtnVQhSqiNsg1oE_K5yEIFngSpj-7PhMC08N2uZed9MV3Mz9mHE6uc9d6BLnbO1NIdCkqK47CKv2GxH9o9hXc</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Abdoulhalik, Antoifi</creator><creator>Ahmed, Ashraf A</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for River Streamflow Time-Series Forecasting</title><author>Abdoulhalik, Antoifi ; Ahmed, Ashraf A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c257t-c33a2047e7eb73a0f32193ed47257685d88e5fe5d574f4544273eaedbee7d3753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Basins</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Dams</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Hydroelectric power</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Precipitation</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rain and rainfall</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Stream flow</topic><topic>Streamflow</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Abdoulhalik, Antoifi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Ashraf A</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Abdoulhalik, Antoifi</au><au>Ahmed, Ashraf A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for River Streamflow Time-Series Forecasting</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>4005</spage><pages>4005-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>This study examines the contribution of rainfall data (RF) in improving the streamflow-forecasting accuracy of advanced machine learning (ML) models in the Syr Darya River Basin. Different sets of scenarios included rainfall data from different weather stations located in various geographical locations with respect to the flow monitoring station. Long short-term memory (LSTM)-based models were used to examine the contribution of rainfall data on streamflow-forecasting performance by investigating five scenarios whereby RF data from different weather stations were incorporated depending on their geographical positions. Specifically, the All-RF scenario included all rainfall data collected at 11 stations; Upstream-RF (Up-RF) and Downstream-RF (Down-RF) included only the rainfall data measured upstream and downstream of the streamflow-measuring station; Pearson-RF (P-RF) only included the rainfall data exhibiting the highest level of correlation with the streamflow data, and the Flow-only (FO) scenario included streamflow data. The evaluation metrics used to quantitively assess the performance of the models included the RMSE, MAE, and the coefficient of determination, R2. Both ML models performed best in the FO scenario, which shows that the diversity of input features (hydrological and meteorological data) did not improve the predictive accuracy regardless of the positions of the weather stations. The results show that the P-RF scenarios yielded better prediction accuracy compared to all the other scenarios including rainfall data, which suggests that only rainfall data upstream of the flow monitoring station tend to make a positive contribution to the model’s forecasting performance. The findings evidence the suitability of simple monolayer LSTM-based networks with only streamflow data as input features for high-performance and budget-wise river flow forecast applications while minimizing data processing time.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16104005</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (10), p.4005 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3059693066 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Accuracy Algorithms Basins Climate change Comparative analysis Dams Forecasting Hydroelectric power Hydrology Machine learning Methods Neural networks Precipitation Rain Rain and rainfall Rivers Stream flow Streamflow Water supply |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Machine Learning Techniques for River Streamflow Time-Series Forecasting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A12%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Advanced%20Machine%20Learning%20Techniques%20for%20River%20Streamflow%20Time-Series%20Forecasting&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Abdoulhalik,%20Antoifi&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=4005&rft.pages=4005-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16104005&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA795445469%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3059693066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A795445469&rfr_iscdi=true |