Analysis of the self-efficacy level of students at SMAN 1 Singosari

Students in this Industry 4.0 era need to be prepared with high competitiveness, namely great enthusiasm and optimism, developing their potential and abilities, especially self-efficacy and good cognitive abilities. Self-efficacy is essential in the education sector as it can affect the cognitive pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Azzahra, Widyarti, Mahanal, Susriyati, Zubaidah, Siti
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Students in this Industry 4.0 era need to be prepared with high competitiveness, namely great enthusiasm and optimism, developing their potential and abilities, especially self-efficacy and good cognitive abilities. Self-efficacy is essential in the education sector as it can affect the cognitive processes, motivation, action, and achievement of students. Students with high self-efficacy are more diligent and do not give up easily when faced with failure and difficulties. This study is survey research that aims to determine the level of self-efficacy of students at SMAN 1 Singosari, Malang district. The population in this study were students of 11th class SMAN 1 Singosari, which consisted of 7 classes with a sample of 32 students. The sampling technique used is simple random sampling. The data collection technique used a self-efficacy questionnaire from Gafoor & Asraf and interviews. The data were analysed by quantitative description, namely calculating the scores obtained from the results of the questionnaire. The results showed that students’ self-efficacy was in a low category with an average of 48.00, which means that students’ self-efficacy at SMAN 1 Singosari needs to be trained. 71.87% of students are in the low category, 28.12% are in the medium category, and 0% are in the high category. Students’ self-efficacy is low because the learning process has not been empowered, and the learning model used by the teacher has not been able to train students’ self-efficacy.
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0214924