Anthropogenic Geosite Concept within Geological Heritage and Turkey’s Anthropogenic Geosites
The focus of this article is on the 10th grade of the geosite classification by ProGEO-98. Group (J) is the proposed “ Historic, for development of geological sciences ” group. Since this group, which we propose to define as the “ Anthropogenic Geosite Group ”, contains a very wide content, we focus...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoheritage 2024-06, Vol.16 (2), Article 61 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Geoheritage |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Çiftçi, Yahya Güngör, Yıldırım |
description | The focus of this article is on the 10th grade of the geosite classification by ProGEO-98. Group (J) is the proposed “
Historic, for development of geological sciences
” group. Since this group, which we propose to define as the “
Anthropogenic Geosite Group
”, contains a very wide content, we focused on the subgroups of this group and tried to give examples from Turkey for each subgroup. The main subject of this article is the civilization traces left by human beings, starting from their shelters in the hunter-gatherer period, before moving to settled life, to the periods when they created advanced architectural works such as the Zeus Altar in Pergamum, Hierapolis, the Ancient city of Ephesus, underground cities/castles of Cappadoccia and the Alexander Sarcophagus, and their geological counterparts. This geosite class has been defined in detail for the first time in this article by dividing it into subclasses, and all cultural geology remains within this 10th Group are collectively called “Anthropogenic Geosite”. These locations, which are concrete evidence and “legacies” of human/nature interaction, are of great importance in terms of geological culture/cultural geology as well as the archaeological and anthropological values they carry. Anthropogenic Geosites prove that “Cultural Heritage” sites can also be “Geological Heritage” sites and serve “Cultural Geology”. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12371-024-00968-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3059398029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3059398029</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-836c8e11a5d3e674d2c6bba9ba241994f11b48074378355b42631e0c4d16c33f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGpfwFXAdTS3yWVZirZCwU3dGjKZzHRqnYzJFOnO1_D1fJJOHdGNeDbncPgv8AFwSfA1wVjeJEKZJAhTjjDWQiF-AkZECYkoV9npzy3lOZiktMH9MJIppkfgadp06xjaUPmmdnDuQ6o7D2ehcb7t4Fvdrevm-N6GqnZ2Cxc-1p2tPLRNAVe7-Oz3n-8fCf6Zky7AWWm3yU--9xg83t2uZgu0fJjfz6ZL5KjEHVJMOOUJsVnBvJC8oE7kudW5pZxozUtCcq6w5EwqlmU5p4IRjx0viHCMlWwMrobcNobXnU-d2YRdbPpKw3CmmVaY6l5FB5WLIaXoS9PG-sXGvSHYHFGaAaXpUZovlIb3JjaYUi9uKh9_o_9xHQCiandk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3059398029</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anthropogenic Geosite Concept within Geological Heritage and Turkey’s Anthropogenic Geosites</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Çiftçi, Yahya ; Güngör, Yıldırım</creator><creatorcontrib>Çiftçi, Yahya ; Güngör, Yıldırım</creatorcontrib><description>The focus of this article is on the 10th grade of the geosite classification by ProGEO-98. Group (J) is the proposed “
Historic, for development of geological sciences
” group. Since this group, which we propose to define as the “
Anthropogenic Geosite Group
”, contains a very wide content, we focused on the subgroups of this group and tried to give examples from Turkey for each subgroup. The main subject of this article is the civilization traces left by human beings, starting from their shelters in the hunter-gatherer period, before moving to settled life, to the periods when they created advanced architectural works such as the Zeus Altar in Pergamum, Hierapolis, the Ancient city of Ephesus, underground cities/castles of Cappadoccia and the Alexander Sarcophagus, and their geological counterparts. This geosite class has been defined in detail for the first time in this article by dividing it into subclasses, and all cultural geology remains within this 10th Group are collectively called “Anthropogenic Geosite”. These locations, which are concrete evidence and “legacies” of human/nature interaction, are of great importance in terms of geological culture/cultural geology as well as the archaeological and anthropological values they carry. Anthropogenic Geosites prove that “Cultural Heritage” sites can also be “Geological Heritage” sites and serve “Cultural Geology”.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1867-2477</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1867-2485</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12371-024-00968-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Anthropogenic factors ; Biogeosciences ; Cultural heritage ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Geology ; Historical Geology ; Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning ; Mineralogy ; Original Article ; Paleontology ; Physical Geography</subject><ispartof>Geoheritage, 2024-06, Vol.16 (2), Article 61</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Association for the Conservation of Geological Heritage 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-836c8e11a5d3e674d2c6bba9ba241994f11b48074378355b42631e0c4d16c33f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-5026-3808</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12371-024-00968-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12371-024-00968-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Çiftçi, Yahya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güngör, Yıldırım</creatorcontrib><title>Anthropogenic Geosite Concept within Geological Heritage and Turkey’s Anthropogenic Geosites</title><title>Geoheritage</title><addtitle>Geoheritage</addtitle><description>The focus of this article is on the 10th grade of the geosite classification by ProGEO-98. Group (J) is the proposed “
Historic, for development of geological sciences
” group. Since this group, which we propose to define as the “
Anthropogenic Geosite Group
”, contains a very wide content, we focused on the subgroups of this group and tried to give examples from Turkey for each subgroup. The main subject of this article is the civilization traces left by human beings, starting from their shelters in the hunter-gatherer period, before moving to settled life, to the periods when they created advanced architectural works such as the Zeus Altar in Pergamum, Hierapolis, the Ancient city of Ephesus, underground cities/castles of Cappadoccia and the Alexander Sarcophagus, and their geological counterparts. This geosite class has been defined in detail for the first time in this article by dividing it into subclasses, and all cultural geology remains within this 10th Group are collectively called “Anthropogenic Geosite”. These locations, which are concrete evidence and “legacies” of human/nature interaction, are of great importance in terms of geological culture/cultural geology as well as the archaeological and anthropological values they carry. Anthropogenic Geosites prove that “Cultural Heritage” sites can also be “Geological Heritage” sites and serve “Cultural Geology”.</description><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Biogeosciences</subject><subject>Cultural heritage</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Historical Geology</subject><subject>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</subject><subject>Mineralogy</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Paleontology</subject><subject>Physical Geography</subject><issn>1867-2477</issn><issn>1867-2485</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMoWGpfwFXAdTS3yWVZirZCwU3dGjKZzHRqnYzJFOnO1_D1fJJOHdGNeDbncPgv8AFwSfA1wVjeJEKZJAhTjjDWQiF-AkZECYkoV9npzy3lOZiktMH9MJIppkfgadp06xjaUPmmdnDuQ6o7D2ehcb7t4Fvdrevm-N6GqnZ2Cxc-1p2tPLRNAVe7-Oz3n-8fCf6Zky7AWWm3yU--9xg83t2uZgu0fJjfz6ZL5KjEHVJMOOUJsVnBvJC8oE7kudW5pZxozUtCcq6w5EwqlmU5p4IRjx0viHCMlWwMrobcNobXnU-d2YRdbPpKw3CmmVaY6l5FB5WLIaXoS9PG-sXGvSHYHFGaAaXpUZovlIb3JjaYUi9uKh9_o_9xHQCiandk</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Çiftçi, Yahya</creator><creator>Güngör, Yıldırım</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-3808</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Anthropogenic Geosite Concept within Geological Heritage and Turkey’s Anthropogenic Geosites</title><author>Çiftçi, Yahya ; Güngör, Yıldırım</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-836c8e11a5d3e674d2c6bba9ba241994f11b48074378355b42631e0c4d16c33f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Biogeosciences</topic><topic>Cultural heritage</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Historical Geology</topic><topic>Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning</topic><topic>Mineralogy</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Paleontology</topic><topic>Physical Geography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Çiftçi, Yahya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Güngör, Yıldırım</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Geoheritage</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Çiftçi, Yahya</au><au>Güngör, Yıldırım</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anthropogenic Geosite Concept within Geological Heritage and Turkey’s Anthropogenic Geosites</atitle><jtitle>Geoheritage</jtitle><stitle>Geoheritage</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><artnum>61</artnum><issn>1867-2477</issn><eissn>1867-2485</eissn><abstract>The focus of this article is on the 10th grade of the geosite classification by ProGEO-98. Group (J) is the proposed “
Historic, for development of geological sciences
” group. Since this group, which we propose to define as the “
Anthropogenic Geosite Group
”, contains a very wide content, we focused on the subgroups of this group and tried to give examples from Turkey for each subgroup. The main subject of this article is the civilization traces left by human beings, starting from their shelters in the hunter-gatherer period, before moving to settled life, to the periods when they created advanced architectural works such as the Zeus Altar in Pergamum, Hierapolis, the Ancient city of Ephesus, underground cities/castles of Cappadoccia and the Alexander Sarcophagus, and their geological counterparts. This geosite class has been defined in detail for the first time in this article by dividing it into subclasses, and all cultural geology remains within this 10th Group are collectively called “Anthropogenic Geosite”. These locations, which are concrete evidence and “legacies” of human/nature interaction, are of great importance in terms of geological culture/cultural geology as well as the archaeological and anthropological values they carry. Anthropogenic Geosites prove that “Cultural Heritage” sites can also be “Geological Heritage” sites and serve “Cultural Geology”.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s12371-024-00968-4</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5026-3808</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1867-2477 |
ispartof | Geoheritage, 2024-06, Vol.16 (2), Article 61 |
issn | 1867-2477 1867-2485 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3059398029 |
source | SpringerNature Journals |
subjects | Anthropogenic factors Biogeosciences Cultural heritage Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Geology Historical Geology Landscape/Regional and Urban Planning Mineralogy Original Article Paleontology Physical Geography |
title | Anthropogenic Geosite Concept within Geological Heritage and Turkey’s Anthropogenic Geosites |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T17%3A02%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anthropogenic%20Geosite%20Concept%20within%20Geological%20Heritage%20and%20Turkey%E2%80%99s%20Anthropogenic%20Geosites&rft.jtitle=Geoheritage&rft.au=%C3%87ift%C3%A7i,%20Yahya&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.artnum=61&rft.issn=1867-2477&rft.eissn=1867-2485&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12371-024-00968-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3059398029%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3059398029&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |