D.2 Cost-effectiveness analysis of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for treatment of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis in Canada
Background: Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment recently approved by Health Canada for patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). We assessed cost-effectiveness of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for adult patients with AChR-Ab+...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of neurological sciences 2024-06, Vol.51 (s1), p.S9-S9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | S9 |
---|---|
container_issue | s1 |
container_start_page | S9 |
container_title | Canadian journal of neurological sciences |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Siddiqi, Z Genge, A Qi, C Zhou, A Kaprielian, R Locklin, J Garcia, D |
description | Background: Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment recently approved by Health Canada for patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). We assessed cost-effectiveness of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for adult patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Methods: A Markov model estimated costs (treatment and administration, disease monitoring, complications from chronic corticosteroid use, exacerbation and crisis management, adverse events, end-of-life care) and benefits (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). The analysis was conducted from the Canadian healthcare system perspective. Health state transition probabilities were estimated using data from ADAPT, ADAPT+, and a network meta-analysis comparing efgartigimod with chronic IVIg. Utility values were obtained from MyRealWorld MG. Patients with MG-ADL ≥5 who did not die/discontinue were assumed to receive treatment every 4 weeks or every 3 weeks over the lifetime horizon. Results: Over the lifetime horizon, efgartigimod and chronic IVIg were predicted to have total discounted QALYs of 16.80 and 13.35, and total discounted costs of $1,913,294 and $2,170,315, respectively. Efgartigimod dominated chronic IVIg with incremental QALYs of 3.45 and cost savings of $257,020 over the lifetime horizon. Conclusions: Efgartigimod may provide greater benefit at lower costs than chronic IVIg for Canadian patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG, with substantial healthcare system savings over the lifetime horizon. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/cjn.2024.93 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3059005057</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_cjn_2024_93</cupid><sourcerecordid>3059005057</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1393-8882482588b5aa67a160b072d740cadf91a848da8872bad1e389fc81635577673</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkMtOwzAQAC0EEqVw4gcscUQJfsSxc0ThVakSF-AabRI7ddUkxXaLygfw3bhqJS6cdg-jWe0gdE1JSgmVd81ySBlhWVrwEzRhRMiEUCFO0YRwKhOaS3qOLrxfEsJykWcT9POQMlyOPiTaGN0Eu9WD9h7DAKudtx6PBmvTgQu2s_3Y4q3HzcKNg23w7GPWYTM6HJyG0Osh7Ok1BBtXj79sWOAu6hys7Lducb8DHxZ6sIA7B9sotwMu46UWLtGZgZXXV8c5Re9Pj2_lSzJ_fZ6V9_OkobzgiVKKZYoJpWoBkEugOamJZK3MSAOtKSioTLWglGQ1tFRzVZhG0ZwLIWUu-RTdHLxrN35utA_Vcty4-KuvOBEFISI2i9TtgWrc6L3Tplo724PbVZRU-9BVDF3tQ1cFj3RypKGvnW07_Sf9j_8FS3GAcA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3059005057</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>D.2 Cost-effectiveness analysis of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for treatment of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis in Canada</title><source>Cambridge University Press Journals Complete</source><creator>Siddiqi, Z ; Genge, A ; Qi, C ; Zhou, A ; Kaprielian, R ; Locklin, J ; Garcia, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Siddiqi, Z ; Genge, A ; Qi, C ; Zhou, A ; Kaprielian, R ; Locklin, J ; Garcia, D</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment recently approved by Health Canada for patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). We assessed cost-effectiveness of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for adult patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Methods: A Markov model estimated costs (treatment and administration, disease monitoring, complications from chronic corticosteroid use, exacerbation and crisis management, adverse events, end-of-life care) and benefits (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). The analysis was conducted from the Canadian healthcare system perspective. Health state transition probabilities were estimated using data from ADAPT, ADAPT+, and a network meta-analysis comparing efgartigimod with chronic IVIg. Utility values were obtained from MyRealWorld MG. Patients with MG-ADL ≥5 who did not die/discontinue were assumed to receive treatment every 4 weeks or every 3 weeks over the lifetime horizon. Results: Over the lifetime horizon, efgartigimod and chronic IVIg were predicted to have total discounted QALYs of 16.80 and 13.35, and total discounted costs of $1,913,294 and $2,170,315, respectively. Efgartigimod dominated chronic IVIg with incremental QALYs of 3.45 and cost savings of $257,020 over the lifetime horizon. Conclusions: Efgartigimod may provide greater benefit at lower costs than chronic IVIg for Canadian patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG, with substantial healthcare system savings over the lifetime horizon.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0317-1671</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2057-0155</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2024.93</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Abstracts ; Clinical Neurophysiology (CSCN) ; Cost analysis ; Cost control ; Myasthenia gravis ; Platform Presentations</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of neurological sciences, 2024-06, Vol.51 (s1), p.S9-S9</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Neurological Sciences Federation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0317167124000933/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>164,314,776,780,27901,27902,55603</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siddiqi, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genge, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaprielian, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locklin, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, D</creatorcontrib><title>D.2 Cost-effectiveness analysis of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for treatment of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis in Canada</title><title>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</title><addtitle>Can. J. Neurol. Sci</addtitle><description>Background: Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment recently approved by Health Canada for patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). We assessed cost-effectiveness of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for adult patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Methods: A Markov model estimated costs (treatment and administration, disease monitoring, complications from chronic corticosteroid use, exacerbation and crisis management, adverse events, end-of-life care) and benefits (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). The analysis was conducted from the Canadian healthcare system perspective. Health state transition probabilities were estimated using data from ADAPT, ADAPT+, and a network meta-analysis comparing efgartigimod with chronic IVIg. Utility values were obtained from MyRealWorld MG. Patients with MG-ADL ≥5 who did not die/discontinue were assumed to receive treatment every 4 weeks or every 3 weeks over the lifetime horizon. Results: Over the lifetime horizon, efgartigimod and chronic IVIg were predicted to have total discounted QALYs of 16.80 and 13.35, and total discounted costs of $1,913,294 and $2,170,315, respectively. Efgartigimod dominated chronic IVIg with incremental QALYs of 3.45 and cost savings of $257,020 over the lifetime horizon. Conclusions: Efgartigimod may provide greater benefit at lower costs than chronic IVIg for Canadian patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG, with substantial healthcare system savings over the lifetime horizon.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><subject>Clinical Neurophysiology (CSCN)</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>Cost control</subject><subject>Myasthenia gravis</subject><subject>Platform Presentations</subject><issn>0317-1671</issn><issn>2057-0155</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkMtOwzAQAC0EEqVw4gcscUQJfsSxc0ThVakSF-AabRI7ddUkxXaLygfw3bhqJS6cdg-jWe0gdE1JSgmVd81ySBlhWVrwEzRhRMiEUCFO0YRwKhOaS3qOLrxfEsJykWcT9POQMlyOPiTaGN0Eu9WD9h7DAKudtx6PBmvTgQu2s_3Y4q3HzcKNg23w7GPWYTM6HJyG0Osh7Ok1BBtXj79sWOAu6hys7Lducb8DHxZ6sIA7B9sotwMu46UWLtGZgZXXV8c5Re9Pj2_lSzJ_fZ6V9_OkobzgiVKKZYoJpWoBkEugOamJZK3MSAOtKSioTLWglGQ1tFRzVZhG0ZwLIWUu-RTdHLxrN35utA_Vcty4-KuvOBEFISI2i9TtgWrc6L3Tplo724PbVZRU-9BVDF3tQ1cFj3RypKGvnW07_Sf9j_8FS3GAcA</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Siddiqi, Z</creator><creator>Genge, A</creator><creator>Qi, C</creator><creator>Zhou, A</creator><creator>Kaprielian, R</creator><creator>Locklin, J</creator><creator>Garcia, D</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>D.2 Cost-effectiveness analysis of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for treatment of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis in Canada</title><author>Siddiqi, Z ; Genge, A ; Qi, C ; Zhou, A ; Kaprielian, R ; Locklin, J ; Garcia, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1393-8882482588b5aa67a160b072d740cadf91a848da8872bad1e389fc81635577673</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><topic>Clinical Neurophysiology (CSCN)</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>Cost control</topic><topic>Myasthenia gravis</topic><topic>Platform Presentations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siddiqi, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Genge, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qi, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaprielian, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Locklin, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Garcia, D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siddiqi, Z</au><au>Genge, A</au><au>Qi, C</au><au>Zhou, A</au><au>Kaprielian, R</au><au>Locklin, J</au><au>Garcia, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>D.2 Cost-effectiveness analysis of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for treatment of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis in Canada</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of neurological sciences</jtitle><addtitle>Can. J. Neurol. Sci</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>S9</spage><epage>S9</epage><pages>S9-S9</pages><issn>0317-1671</issn><eissn>2057-0155</eissn><abstract>Background: Efgartigimod is a human IgG1 antibody Fc fragment recently approved by Health Canada for patients with acetylcholine receptor antibody positive (AChR-Ab+) generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG). We assessed cost-effectiveness of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for adult patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG. Methods: A Markov model estimated costs (treatment and administration, disease monitoring, complications from chronic corticosteroid use, exacerbation and crisis management, adverse events, end-of-life care) and benefits (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]). The analysis was conducted from the Canadian healthcare system perspective. Health state transition probabilities were estimated using data from ADAPT, ADAPT+, and a network meta-analysis comparing efgartigimod with chronic IVIg. Utility values were obtained from MyRealWorld MG. Patients with MG-ADL ≥5 who did not die/discontinue were assumed to receive treatment every 4 weeks or every 3 weeks over the lifetime horizon. Results: Over the lifetime horizon, efgartigimod and chronic IVIg were predicted to have total discounted QALYs of 16.80 and 13.35, and total discounted costs of $1,913,294 and $2,170,315, respectively. Efgartigimod dominated chronic IVIg with incremental QALYs of 3.45 and cost savings of $257,020 over the lifetime horizon. Conclusions: Efgartigimod may provide greater benefit at lower costs than chronic IVIg for Canadian patients with AChR-Ab+ gMG, with substantial healthcare system savings over the lifetime horizon.</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/cjn.2024.93</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0317-1671 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of neurological sciences, 2024-06, Vol.51 (s1), p.S9-S9 |
issn | 0317-1671 2057-0155 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3059005057 |
source | Cambridge University Press Journals Complete |
subjects | Abstracts Clinical Neurophysiology (CSCN) Cost analysis Cost control Myasthenia gravis Platform Presentations |
title | D.2 Cost-effectiveness analysis of efgartigimod vs chronic IVIg for treatment of patients with generalized myasthenia gravis in Canada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T17%3A39%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=D.2%20Cost-effectiveness%20analysis%20of%20efgartigimod%20vs%20chronic%20IVIg%20for%20treatment%20of%20patients%20with%20generalized%20myasthenia%20gravis%20in%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20neurological%20sciences&rft.au=Siddiqi,%20Z&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=S9&rft.epage=S9&rft.pages=S9-S9&rft.issn=0317-1671&rft.eissn=2057-0155&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/cjn.2024.93&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3059005057%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3059005057&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_cjn_2024_93&rfr_iscdi=true |