Image quality and patient satisfaction in cone-beam and multidetector computed tomography of the wrist: a randomized trial
Background Musculoskeletal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technique for wrist assessment. In this study, we compared image quality and patient satisfaction between CBCT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in traumatic wrist patients in a dose-matched setting. Methods We...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2024-12, Vol.55 (1), p.104-9, Article 104 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 9 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 104 |
| container_title | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine |
| container_volume | 55 |
| creator | Reidelbach, Carolin S. Neubauer, Claudia Geissler, Ann-Kristin H. Lampert, Florian Zajonc, Horst Simunovic, Filip Bamberg, Fabian Kotter, Elmar Goerke, Sebastian M. Neubauer, Jakob |
| description | Background
Musculoskeletal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technique for wrist assessment. In this study, we compared image quality and patient satisfaction between CBCT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in traumatic wrist patients in a dose-matched setting.
Methods
We prospectively enrolled traumatic patients who were scheduled for CT of the wrist. Patients were randomly assigned to CBCT or MDCT. Radiation dose was kept identical between both modalities. Subsequently, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the examination. Measurements of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were performed. Three blinded readers independently rated image quality on Likert scales.
Results
A total of 125 patients (mean age 35 years [standard deviation 16]; 91 men) were included. A total of 108 patients returned the questionnaire. With equivalent dose, CNRs were higher in CBCT compared to MDCT (
p
|
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s43055-024-01277-0 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3058383943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A794948418</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8899e69c26fa41c6a4cce80c17362c41</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A794948418</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-61221253a91bafe4e8a5f37fefd6b209ebaa9b0d362d18d92f997dd136eb9ca23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9Ustq3DAUNaWFhiQ_0JWga6d6jW11F0IfA4Fs2rW4lq4cDbblSDJl8vXVjEvTQqm0uOLqnMN9nKp6x-gNY13zIUlBd7uacllTxtu2pq-qC04VrWXb8Nd_vN9W1ykdaDmSUtbIi-p5P8GA5GmF0ecjgdmSBbLHOZNUYnJgsg8z8TMxYca6R5jOqGkds7eY0eQQy9-0rBktyWEKQ4Tl8UiCI_kRyY_oU_5IgMRCC5N_PqGih_GqeuNgTHj9K15W3z9_-nb3tb5_-LK_u72vjZRtrhvGOeM7AYr14FBiBzsnWofONn3pDHsA1VMrGm5ZZxV3SrXWMtFgrwxwcVntN10b4KCX6CeIRx3A63MixEFDzN6MqLtOKWyU4Y0DyUwD0hjsqGFtUTeSFa33m9YSw9OKKetDWONcytdlB53ohJLiBTVAEfWzCzmCmXwy-rZVUslOsq6gbv6BKtfi5E_Ddr7k_yLwjWBiSCmi-90Mo_rkBL05QRcn6LMTNC0ksZFSAc8DxpeK_8P6CWFWtlQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3058383943</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Image quality and patient satisfaction in cone-beam and multidetector computed tomography of the wrist: a randomized trial</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Reidelbach, Carolin S. ; Neubauer, Claudia ; Geissler, Ann-Kristin H. ; Lampert, Florian ; Zajonc, Horst ; Simunovic, Filip ; Bamberg, Fabian ; Kotter, Elmar ; Goerke, Sebastian M. ; Neubauer, Jakob</creator><creatorcontrib>Reidelbach, Carolin S. ; Neubauer, Claudia ; Geissler, Ann-Kristin H. ; Lampert, Florian ; Zajonc, Horst ; Simunovic, Filip ; Bamberg, Fabian ; Kotter, Elmar ; Goerke, Sebastian M. ; Neubauer, Jakob</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Musculoskeletal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technique for wrist assessment. In this study, we compared image quality and patient satisfaction between CBCT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in traumatic wrist patients in a dose-matched setting.
Methods
We prospectively enrolled traumatic patients who were scheduled for CT of the wrist. Patients were randomly assigned to CBCT or MDCT. Radiation dose was kept identical between both modalities. Subsequently, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the examination. Measurements of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were performed. Three blinded readers independently rated image quality on Likert scales.
Results
A total of 125 patients (mean age 35 years [standard deviation 16]; 91 men) were included. A total of 108 patients returned the questionnaire. With equivalent dose, CNRs were higher in CBCT compared to MDCT (
p
< 0.001) and the median ratings of image quality were better for CBCT compared to MDCT (
p
≤ 0.04). Patients only rated positioning in CBCT as more comfortable than in MDCT (
p
< 0.001), while there were no further differences regarding satisfaction with both modalities.
Conclusions
At equivalent dose settings to MDCT, CBCT showed a high image quality for the depiction of bony structures, soft tissue and artifacts in wrist examinations of trauma patients. Overall, patients were equally satisfied with both methods. Altogether, CBCT might be a promising alternative for wrist imaging. However, further studies with more different devices are needed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-4762</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0378-603X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-4762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s43055-024-01277-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Cone-beam computed tomography ; Contrast-to-noise ratio ; CT imaging ; Equivalent dose ; Hypotheses ; Image quality ; Imaging ; Interventional Radiology ; Likert scale ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Multidetector computed tomography ; Nuclear Medicine ; Patient satisfaction ; Questionnaires ; Radiation ; Radiology ; Scanners ; Sensors ; Tomography ; Wrist imaging</subject><ispartof>Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 2024-12, Vol.55 (1), p.104-9, Article 104</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-61221253a91bafe4e8a5f37fefd6b209ebaa9b0d362d18d92f997dd136eb9ca23</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9022-6000 ; 0000-0003-1755-5734 ; 0000-0003-4066-2773 ; 0000-0002-5744-7183 ; 0000-0001-9388-0219 ; 0000-0003-4052-0601</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reidelbach, Carolin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geissler, Ann-Kristin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampert, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zajonc, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simunovic, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamberg, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotter, Elmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goerke, Sebastian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Jakob</creatorcontrib><title>Image quality and patient satisfaction in cone-beam and multidetector computed tomography of the wrist: a randomized trial</title><title>Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Background
Musculoskeletal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technique for wrist assessment. In this study, we compared image quality and patient satisfaction between CBCT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in traumatic wrist patients in a dose-matched setting.
Methods
We prospectively enrolled traumatic patients who were scheduled for CT of the wrist. Patients were randomly assigned to CBCT or MDCT. Radiation dose was kept identical between both modalities. Subsequently, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the examination. Measurements of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were performed. Three blinded readers independently rated image quality on Likert scales.
Results
A total of 125 patients (mean age 35 years [standard deviation 16]; 91 men) were included. A total of 108 patients returned the questionnaire. With equivalent dose, CNRs were higher in CBCT compared to MDCT (
p
< 0.001) and the median ratings of image quality were better for CBCT compared to MDCT (
p
≤ 0.04). Patients only rated positioning in CBCT as more comfortable than in MDCT (
p
< 0.001), while there were no further differences regarding satisfaction with both modalities.
Conclusions
At equivalent dose settings to MDCT, CBCT showed a high image quality for the depiction of bony structures, soft tissue and artifacts in wrist examinations of trauma patients. Overall, patients were equally satisfied with both methods. Altogether, CBCT might be a promising alternative for wrist imaging. However, further studies with more different devices are needed.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Cone-beam computed tomography</subject><subject>Contrast-to-noise ratio</subject><subject>CT imaging</subject><subject>Equivalent dose</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Image quality</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Multidetector computed tomography</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Scanners</subject><subject>Sensors</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><subject>Wrist imaging</subject><issn>2090-4762</issn><issn>0378-603X</issn><issn>2090-4762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9Ustq3DAUNaWFhiQ_0JWga6d6jW11F0IfA4Fs2rW4lq4cDbblSDJl8vXVjEvTQqm0uOLqnMN9nKp6x-gNY13zIUlBd7uacllTxtu2pq-qC04VrWXb8Nd_vN9W1ykdaDmSUtbIi-p5P8GA5GmF0ecjgdmSBbLHOZNUYnJgsg8z8TMxYca6R5jOqGkds7eY0eQQy9-0rBktyWEKQ4Tl8UiCI_kRyY_oU_5IgMRCC5N_PqGih_GqeuNgTHj9K15W3z9_-nb3tb5_-LK_u72vjZRtrhvGOeM7AYr14FBiBzsnWofONn3pDHsA1VMrGm5ZZxV3SrXWMtFgrwxwcVntN10b4KCX6CeIRx3A63MixEFDzN6MqLtOKWyU4Y0DyUwD0hjsqGFtUTeSFa33m9YSw9OKKetDWONcytdlB53ohJLiBTVAEfWzCzmCmXwy-rZVUslOsq6gbv6BKtfi5E_Ddr7k_yLwjWBiSCmi-90Mo_rkBL05QRcn6LMTNC0ksZFSAc8DxpeK_8P6CWFWtlQ</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Reidelbach, Carolin S.</creator><creator>Neubauer, Claudia</creator><creator>Geissler, Ann-Kristin H.</creator><creator>Lampert, Florian</creator><creator>Zajonc, Horst</creator><creator>Simunovic, Filip</creator><creator>Bamberg, Fabian</creator><creator>Kotter, Elmar</creator><creator>Goerke, Sebastian M.</creator><creator>Neubauer, Jakob</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-6000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1755-5734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-2773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-7183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-0219</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-0601</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Image quality and patient satisfaction in cone-beam and multidetector computed tomography of the wrist: a randomized trial</title><author>Reidelbach, Carolin S. ; Neubauer, Claudia ; Geissler, Ann-Kristin H. ; Lampert, Florian ; Zajonc, Horst ; Simunovic, Filip ; Bamberg, Fabian ; Kotter, Elmar ; Goerke, Sebastian M. ; Neubauer, Jakob</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c447t-61221253a91bafe4e8a5f37fefd6b209ebaa9b0d362d18d92f997dd136eb9ca23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Cone-beam computed tomography</topic><topic>Contrast-to-noise ratio</topic><topic>CT imaging</topic><topic>Equivalent dose</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Image quality</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Multidetector computed tomography</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Scanners</topic><topic>Sensors</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><topic>Wrist imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reidelbach, Carolin S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Claudia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geissler, Ann-Kristin H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lampert, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zajonc, Horst</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simunovic, Filip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bamberg, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotter, Elmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goerke, Sebastian M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neubauer, Jakob</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reidelbach, Carolin S.</au><au>Neubauer, Claudia</au><au>Geissler, Ann-Kristin H.</au><au>Lampert, Florian</au><au>Zajonc, Horst</au><au>Simunovic, Filip</au><au>Bamberg, Fabian</au><au>Kotter, Elmar</au><au>Goerke, Sebastian M.</au><au>Neubauer, Jakob</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Image quality and patient satisfaction in cone-beam and multidetector computed tomography of the wrist: a randomized trial</atitle><jtitle>Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><stitle>Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med</stitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>104</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>104-9</pages><artnum>104</artnum><issn>2090-4762</issn><issn>0378-603X</issn><eissn>2090-4762</eissn><abstract>Background
Musculoskeletal cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is an imaging technique for wrist assessment. In this study, we compared image quality and patient satisfaction between CBCT and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in traumatic wrist patients in a dose-matched setting.
Methods
We prospectively enrolled traumatic patients who were scheduled for CT of the wrist. Patients were randomly assigned to CBCT or MDCT. Radiation dose was kept identical between both modalities. Subsequently, patients were asked to complete a questionnaire regarding the examination. Measurements of contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were performed. Three blinded readers independently rated image quality on Likert scales.
Results
A total of 125 patients (mean age 35 years [standard deviation 16]; 91 men) were included. A total of 108 patients returned the questionnaire. With equivalent dose, CNRs were higher in CBCT compared to MDCT (
p
< 0.001) and the median ratings of image quality were better for CBCT compared to MDCT (
p
≤ 0.04). Patients only rated positioning in CBCT as more comfortable than in MDCT (
p
< 0.001), while there were no further differences regarding satisfaction with both modalities.
Conclusions
At equivalent dose settings to MDCT, CBCT showed a high image quality for the depiction of bony structures, soft tissue and artifacts in wrist examinations of trauma patients. Overall, patients were equally satisfied with both methods. Altogether, CBCT might be a promising alternative for wrist imaging. However, further studies with more different devices are needed.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1186/s43055-024-01277-0</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9022-6000</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1755-5734</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4066-2773</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5744-7183</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9388-0219</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-0601</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2090-4762 |
| ispartof | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 2024-12, Vol.55 (1), p.104-9, Article 104 |
| issn | 2090-4762 0378-603X 2090-4762 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3058383943 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Comparative analysis Cone-beam computed tomography Contrast-to-noise ratio CT imaging Equivalent dose Hypotheses Image quality Imaging Interventional Radiology Likert scale Medicine Medicine & Public Health Multidetector computed tomography Nuclear Medicine Patient satisfaction Questionnaires Radiation Radiology Scanners Sensors Tomography Wrist imaging |
| title | Image quality and patient satisfaction in cone-beam and multidetector computed tomography of the wrist: a randomized trial |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T08%3A19%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Image%20quality%20and%20patient%20satisfaction%20in%20cone-beam%20and%20multidetector%20computed%20tomography%20of%20the%20wrist:%20a%20randomized%20trial&rft.jtitle=Egyptian%20Journal%20of%20Radiology%20and%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Reidelbach,%20Carolin%20S.&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=104&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=104-9&rft.artnum=104&rft.issn=2090-4762&rft.eissn=2090-4762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s43055-024-01277-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA794948418%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3058383943&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A794948418&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_8899e69c26fa41c6a4cce80c17362c41&rfr_iscdi=true |