Nudge to insure: Can informational nudges change enrollment decisions in pasture, rangeland, and forage rainfall index insurance?

Through a framed field experiment with livestock farmers in the Northeast and Southeast United States, this research explores whether an informational nudge changes producers' selection of two‐month intervals and/or increases the likelihood of enrollment in pasture, rangeland, and forage (PRF)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Applied economic perspectives and policy 2023-03, Vol.45 (1), p.534-554
Hauptverfasser: Davidson, Kelly A., Goodrich, Brittney K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 554
container_issue 1
container_start_page 534
container_title Applied economic perspectives and policy
container_volume 45
creator Davidson, Kelly A.
Goodrich, Brittney K.
description Through a framed field experiment with livestock farmers in the Northeast and Southeast United States, this research explores whether an informational nudge changes producers' selection of two‐month intervals and/or increases the likelihood of enrollment in pasture, rangeland, and forage (PRF) insurance. We find no evidence that a nudge influences interval choices; however, producers are more likely to enroll when PRF is framed as a risk management decision regarding forage loss. Risk aversion, familiarity with other United States Department of Agriculture livestock programs, and higher risk exposure increase the likelihood of enrollment. Past PRF and crop insurance participation decrease the amount insured during growing‐season months.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/aepp.13215
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3057724691</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3057724691</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3915-2015d5784e06a128c624d686d356ba82d6678e49a0292bef74fa145a890543233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M9LwzAUB_AiCo65i39BwJts8-VnUy8iY_6AoTvouby1qXZ0aU1adEf_c1OreDOH5BE-7xvyouiUwpwCsAs0TTOnnFF5EI0YCJhJDeLwt44TOI4m3m8hLE6FAD2KPh-6_MWQtial9Z0zl2SBNtRF7XbYlrXFitieeJK9og3UWFdX1c7YluQmK30wPjSQBn0bAqbE9axCm09J2EhIwtDmMIRiVQWam4_hNbSZuTqJjsK9N5Ofcxw93yyfFnez1ePt_eJ6Nct4QuWMAZW5jLUwoJAynSkmcqVVzqXaoGa5UrE2IkFgCduYIhYFUiFRJyAFZ5yPo7Mht3H1W2d8m27rzoX_-ZSDjGMmVEKDOh9U5mrvnSnSxpU7dPuUQtpPOe2nnH5POWAyYJPVtvR_VAvgLNEQB0IH8l5WZv9PWHq9XK-H2C_zpolw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3057724691</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nudge to insure: Can informational nudges change enrollment decisions in pasture, rangeland, and forage rainfall index insurance?</title><source>Business Source Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Davidson, Kelly A. ; Goodrich, Brittney K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Kelly A. ; Goodrich, Brittney K.</creatorcontrib><description>Through a framed field experiment with livestock farmers in the Northeast and Southeast United States, this research explores whether an informational nudge changes producers' selection of two‐month intervals and/or increases the likelihood of enrollment in pasture, rangeland, and forage (PRF) insurance. We find no evidence that a nudge influences interval choices; however, producers are more likely to enroll when PRF is framed as a risk management decision regarding forage loss. Risk aversion, familiarity with other United States Department of Agriculture livestock programs, and higher risk exposure increase the likelihood of enrollment. Past PRF and crop insurance participation decrease the amount insured during growing‐season months.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2040-5790</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2040-5804</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/aepp.13215</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Boston, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Aversion ; Crop insurance ; experimental economics ; Familiarity ; Forage ; Insurance ; Livestock ; Livestock farming ; nudge ; Pasture ; pasture, rangeland, and forage insurance ; Rainfall ; Rainfall index ; Rangelands ; Risk aversion ; Risk management</subject><ispartof>Applied economic perspectives and policy, 2023-03, Vol.45 (1), p.534-554</ispartof><rights>2021 Agricultural &amp; Applied Economics Association.</rights><rights>2023 Agricultural and Applied Economics Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3915-2015d5784e06a128c624d686d356ba82d6678e49a0292bef74fa145a890543233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3915-2015d5784e06a128c624d686d356ba82d6678e49a0292bef74fa145a890543233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Faepp.13215$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Faepp.13215$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27922,27923,45572,45573</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Kelly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich, Brittney K.</creatorcontrib><title>Nudge to insure: Can informational nudges change enrollment decisions in pasture, rangeland, and forage rainfall index insurance?</title><title>Applied economic perspectives and policy</title><description>Through a framed field experiment with livestock farmers in the Northeast and Southeast United States, this research explores whether an informational nudge changes producers' selection of two‐month intervals and/or increases the likelihood of enrollment in pasture, rangeland, and forage (PRF) insurance. We find no evidence that a nudge influences interval choices; however, producers are more likely to enroll when PRF is framed as a risk management decision regarding forage loss. Risk aversion, familiarity with other United States Department of Agriculture livestock programs, and higher risk exposure increase the likelihood of enrollment. Past PRF and crop insurance participation decrease the amount insured during growing‐season months.</description><subject>Aversion</subject><subject>Crop insurance</subject><subject>experimental economics</subject><subject>Familiarity</subject><subject>Forage</subject><subject>Insurance</subject><subject>Livestock</subject><subject>Livestock farming</subject><subject>nudge</subject><subject>Pasture</subject><subject>pasture, rangeland, and forage insurance</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Rainfall index</subject><subject>Rangelands</subject><subject>Risk aversion</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><issn>2040-5790</issn><issn>2040-5804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M9LwzAUB_AiCo65i39BwJts8-VnUy8iY_6AoTvouby1qXZ0aU1adEf_c1OreDOH5BE-7xvyouiUwpwCsAs0TTOnnFF5EI0YCJhJDeLwt44TOI4m3m8hLE6FAD2KPh-6_MWQtial9Z0zl2SBNtRF7XbYlrXFitieeJK9og3UWFdX1c7YluQmK30wPjSQBn0bAqbE9axCm09J2EhIwtDmMIRiVQWam4_hNbSZuTqJjsK9N5Ofcxw93yyfFnez1ePt_eJ6Nct4QuWMAZW5jLUwoJAynSkmcqVVzqXaoGa5UrE2IkFgCduYIhYFUiFRJyAFZ5yPo7Mht3H1W2d8m27rzoX_-ZSDjGMmVEKDOh9U5mrvnSnSxpU7dPuUQtpPOe2nnH5POWAyYJPVtvR_VAvgLNEQB0IH8l5WZv9PWHq9XK-H2C_zpolw</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>Davidson, Kelly A.</creator><creator>Goodrich, Brittney K.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><scope>OQ6</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>Nudge to insure: Can informational nudges change enrollment decisions in pasture, rangeland, and forage rainfall index insurance?</title><author>Davidson, Kelly A. ; Goodrich, Brittney K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3915-2015d5784e06a128c624d686d356ba82d6678e49a0292bef74fa145a890543233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Aversion</topic><topic>Crop insurance</topic><topic>experimental economics</topic><topic>Familiarity</topic><topic>Forage</topic><topic>Insurance</topic><topic>Livestock</topic><topic>Livestock farming</topic><topic>nudge</topic><topic>Pasture</topic><topic>pasture, rangeland, and forage insurance</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Rainfall index</topic><topic>Rangelands</topic><topic>Risk aversion</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Davidson, Kelly A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Goodrich, Brittney K.</creatorcontrib><collection>ECONIS</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Applied economic perspectives and policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Davidson, Kelly A.</au><au>Goodrich, Brittney K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nudge to insure: Can informational nudges change enrollment decisions in pasture, rangeland, and forage rainfall index insurance?</atitle><jtitle>Applied economic perspectives and policy</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>554</epage><pages>534-554</pages><issn>2040-5790</issn><eissn>2040-5804</eissn><abstract>Through a framed field experiment with livestock farmers in the Northeast and Southeast United States, this research explores whether an informational nudge changes producers' selection of two‐month intervals and/or increases the likelihood of enrollment in pasture, rangeland, and forage (PRF) insurance. We find no evidence that a nudge influences interval choices; however, producers are more likely to enroll when PRF is framed as a risk management decision regarding forage loss. Risk aversion, familiarity with other United States Department of Agriculture livestock programs, and higher risk exposure increase the likelihood of enrollment. Past PRF and crop insurance participation decrease the amount insured during growing‐season months.</abstract><cop>Boston, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/aepp.13215</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2040-5790
ispartof Applied economic perspectives and policy, 2023-03, Vol.45 (1), p.534-554
issn 2040-5790
2040-5804
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3057724691
source Business Source Complete; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Aversion
Crop insurance
experimental economics
Familiarity
Forage
Insurance
Livestock
Livestock farming
nudge
Pasture
pasture, rangeland, and forage insurance
Rainfall
Rainfall index
Rangelands
Risk aversion
Risk management
title Nudge to insure: Can informational nudges change enrollment decisions in pasture, rangeland, and forage rainfall index insurance?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T15%3A39%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nudge%20to%20insure:%20Can%20informational%20nudges%20change%20enrollment%20decisions%20in%20pasture,%20rangeland,%20and%20forage%20rainfall%20index%20insurance?&rft.jtitle=Applied%20economic%20perspectives%20and%20policy&rft.au=Davidson,%20Kelly%20A.&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=554&rft.pages=534-554&rft.issn=2040-5790&rft.eissn=2040-5804&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/aepp.13215&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3057724691%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3057724691&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true