MCDM model to rank the performance outcomes in the implementation of Industry 4.0

PurposeIndustry 4.0 has received significant attention in today's competitive business market, necessitating a restructuring of functional domains in nearly every manufacturing organization. A comprehensive strategy to improve performance in preparation for Industry 4.0 implementation necessita...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Benchmarking : an international journal 2024-05, Vol.31 (5), p.1453-1491
Hauptverfasser: Kumar, Veepan, Vrat, Prem, Shankar, Ravi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1491
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1453
container_title Benchmarking : an international journal
container_volume 31
creator Kumar, Veepan
Vrat, Prem
Shankar, Ravi
description PurposeIndustry 4.0 has received significant attention in today's competitive business market, necessitating a restructuring of functional domains in nearly every manufacturing organization. A comprehensive strategy to improve performance in preparation for Industry 4.0 implementation necessitates several steps, one of which is the establishment of performance outcomes (POs). The aim of this paper is to identify and rank the POs realized due to the adoption of Industry 4.0 enablers.Design/methodology/approachBased on an extensive literature review and inputs received from experts, a comprehensive list of enablers and the POs was prepared and finalized. This paper proposes a framework based on hybrid solution methodology, namely Neutrosophic Analytical Hierarchy Process (N-AHP) and Neutrosophic Combined Compromise Solution (N-CoCoSo), to rank the POs realized due to the adoption of Industry 4.0 enablers. The N-AHP methodology has been adopted to calculate the relative weights of the Industry 4.0 enablers. In comparison, the N-CoCoSo method has been adopted to rank the POs of Industry 4.0.FindingsThe proposed framework is applied to an Indian manufacturing organization to test the organization's practical applicability. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is also carried out to check the steadiness of the proposed framework. The findings of this study revealed that “Improved responsiveness to market conditions in today's competitive business environment” is the top-ranked PO of Industry 4.0, followed by “Enhanced competitiveness and better market share”, “Better product quality, through smart management of production process” and “Reduction in manufacturing waste and environmental sustainability” which could be realized due to adoption of its enablers.Practical implicationsThis research would aid practitioners by enhancing the practitioners' capacity to understand and prioritize the various POs resulting from implementing Industry 4.0 enablers. Embracing a clear strategic plan will further assist practitioners in improving the efficiency of Industry 4.0 implementation.Originality/valuePrevious literature has only addressed the relationship between Industry 4.0 enablers and POs in a limited way. This paper attempts to compile a comprehensive list of Industry 4.0 enablers relevant to manufacturing organizations in order to fill this knowledge and research gap.
doi_str_mv 10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0273
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_emera</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3056589000</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3056589000</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-419617c9afdbc5251b5dc798fddf61b82485df0446f4ed73e4c5c53e091875483</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw52iJs-k6tmPnCOVV1AohwdlK_RApSRxs99B_T0q5IHHakXZmV_MhdEnhmlJQs9vFMwFOCigKAoVkR2hCpVCEQ8WPR81LRoSU9BSdpbQBgJKqYoJeV_O7Fe6CdS3OAce6_8T5w-HBRR9iV_fG4bDNJnQu4ab_2TXd0LrO9bnOTehx8HjR223KcYf5NZyjE1-3yV38zil6f7h_mz-R5cvjYn6zJIZRmgmnVUmlqWpv10YUgq6FNbJS3lpf0rUquBLWA-el585K5rgRRjAHFVVScMWm6Opwd4jha-tS1puwjf34UjMQpVDVWHJ0wcFlYkgpOq-H2HR13GkKeg9Oj-A0cL0Hp_fgxsjsEBk7xrq1_yX-oGbfBFttMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3056589000</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>MCDM model to rank the performance outcomes in the implementation of Industry 4.0</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><creator>Kumar, Veepan ; Vrat, Prem ; Shankar, Ravi</creator><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Veepan ; Vrat, Prem ; Shankar, Ravi</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeIndustry 4.0 has received significant attention in today's competitive business market, necessitating a restructuring of functional domains in nearly every manufacturing organization. A comprehensive strategy to improve performance in preparation for Industry 4.0 implementation necessitates several steps, one of which is the establishment of performance outcomes (POs). The aim of this paper is to identify and rank the POs realized due to the adoption of Industry 4.0 enablers.Design/methodology/approachBased on an extensive literature review and inputs received from experts, a comprehensive list of enablers and the POs was prepared and finalized. This paper proposes a framework based on hybrid solution methodology, namely Neutrosophic Analytical Hierarchy Process (N-AHP) and Neutrosophic Combined Compromise Solution (N-CoCoSo), to rank the POs realized due to the adoption of Industry 4.0 enablers. The N-AHP methodology has been adopted to calculate the relative weights of the Industry 4.0 enablers. In comparison, the N-CoCoSo method has been adopted to rank the POs of Industry 4.0.FindingsThe proposed framework is applied to an Indian manufacturing organization to test the organization's practical applicability. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is also carried out to check the steadiness of the proposed framework. The findings of this study revealed that “Improved responsiveness to market conditions in today's competitive business environment” is the top-ranked PO of Industry 4.0, followed by “Enhanced competitiveness and better market share”, “Better product quality, through smart management of production process” and “Reduction in manufacturing waste and environmental sustainability” which could be realized due to adoption of its enablers.Practical implicationsThis research would aid practitioners by enhancing the practitioners' capacity to understand and prioritize the various POs resulting from implementing Industry 4.0 enablers. Embracing a clear strategic plan will further assist practitioners in improving the efficiency of Industry 4.0 implementation.Originality/valuePrevious literature has only addressed the relationship between Industry 4.0 enablers and POs in a limited way. This paper attempts to compile a comprehensive list of Industry 4.0 enablers relevant to manufacturing organizations in order to fill this knowledge and research gap.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1463-5771</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-4094</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0273</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Analytic hierarchy process ; Business competition ; Business metrics ; Competition ; Competitive advantage ; Digital technology ; Fuzzy sets ; Industry 4.0 ; Literature reviews ; Manufacturers ; Manufacturing ; Methodology ; Performance enhancement ; Performance evaluation ; Product life cycle ; Sensitivity analysis ; Success factors ; Technological change ; Technology adoption</subject><ispartof>Benchmarking : an international journal, 2024-05, Vol.31 (5), p.1453-1491</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-419617c9afdbc5251b5dc798fddf61b82485df0446f4ed73e4c5c53e091875483</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-419617c9afdbc5251b5dc798fddf61b82485df0446f4ed73e4c5c53e091875483</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0870-470X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0273/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21674,27901,27902,53219</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Veepan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrat, Prem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Ravi</creatorcontrib><title>MCDM model to rank the performance outcomes in the implementation of Industry 4.0</title><title>Benchmarking : an international journal</title><description>PurposeIndustry 4.0 has received significant attention in today's competitive business market, necessitating a restructuring of functional domains in nearly every manufacturing organization. A comprehensive strategy to improve performance in preparation for Industry 4.0 implementation necessitates several steps, one of which is the establishment of performance outcomes (POs). The aim of this paper is to identify and rank the POs realized due to the adoption of Industry 4.0 enablers.Design/methodology/approachBased on an extensive literature review and inputs received from experts, a comprehensive list of enablers and the POs was prepared and finalized. This paper proposes a framework based on hybrid solution methodology, namely Neutrosophic Analytical Hierarchy Process (N-AHP) and Neutrosophic Combined Compromise Solution (N-CoCoSo), to rank the POs realized due to the adoption of Industry 4.0 enablers. The N-AHP methodology has been adopted to calculate the relative weights of the Industry 4.0 enablers. In comparison, the N-CoCoSo method has been adopted to rank the POs of Industry 4.0.FindingsThe proposed framework is applied to an Indian manufacturing organization to test the organization's practical applicability. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is also carried out to check the steadiness of the proposed framework. The findings of this study revealed that “Improved responsiveness to market conditions in today's competitive business environment” is the top-ranked PO of Industry 4.0, followed by “Enhanced competitiveness and better market share”, “Better product quality, through smart management of production process” and “Reduction in manufacturing waste and environmental sustainability” which could be realized due to adoption of its enablers.Practical implicationsThis research would aid practitioners by enhancing the practitioners' capacity to understand and prioritize the various POs resulting from implementing Industry 4.0 enablers. Embracing a clear strategic plan will further assist practitioners in improving the efficiency of Industry 4.0 implementation.Originality/valuePrevious literature has only addressed the relationship between Industry 4.0 enablers and POs in a limited way. This paper attempts to compile a comprehensive list of Industry 4.0 enablers relevant to manufacturing organizations in order to fill this knowledge and research gap.</description><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Business competition</subject><subject>Business metrics</subject><subject>Competition</subject><subject>Competitive advantage</subject><subject>Digital technology</subject><subject>Fuzzy sets</subject><subject>Industry 4.0</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Performance enhancement</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Product life cycle</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Success factors</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><issn>1463-5771</issn><issn>1758-4094</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkEtPwzAQhC0EEqVw52iJs-k6tmPnCOVV1AohwdlK_RApSRxs99B_T0q5IHHakXZmV_MhdEnhmlJQs9vFMwFOCigKAoVkR2hCpVCEQ8WPR81LRoSU9BSdpbQBgJKqYoJeV_O7Fe6CdS3OAce6_8T5w-HBRR9iV_fG4bDNJnQu4ab_2TXd0LrO9bnOTehx8HjR223KcYf5NZyjE1-3yV38zil6f7h_mz-R5cvjYn6zJIZRmgmnVUmlqWpv10YUgq6FNbJS3lpf0rUquBLWA-el585K5rgRRjAHFVVScMWm6Opwd4jha-tS1puwjf34UjMQpVDVWHJ0wcFlYkgpOq-H2HR13GkKeg9Oj-A0cL0Hp_fgxsjsEBk7xrq1_yX-oGbfBFttMA</recordid><startdate>20240521</startdate><enddate>20240521</enddate><creator>Kumar, Veepan</creator><creator>Vrat, Prem</creator><creator>Shankar, Ravi</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0870-470X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240521</creationdate><title>MCDM model to rank the performance outcomes in the implementation of Industry 4.0</title><author>Kumar, Veepan ; Vrat, Prem ; Shankar, Ravi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c311t-419617c9afdbc5251b5dc798fddf61b82485df0446f4ed73e4c5c53e091875483</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Business competition</topic><topic>Business metrics</topic><topic>Competition</topic><topic>Competitive advantage</topic><topic>Digital technology</topic><topic>Fuzzy sets</topic><topic>Industry 4.0</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Performance enhancement</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Product life cycle</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Success factors</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Veepan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrat, Prem</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Ravi</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kumar, Veepan</au><au>Vrat, Prem</au><au>Shankar, Ravi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MCDM model to rank the performance outcomes in the implementation of Industry 4.0</atitle><jtitle>Benchmarking : an international journal</jtitle><date>2024-05-21</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1453</spage><epage>1491</epage><pages>1453-1491</pages><issn>1463-5771</issn><eissn>1758-4094</eissn><abstract>PurposeIndustry 4.0 has received significant attention in today's competitive business market, necessitating a restructuring of functional domains in nearly every manufacturing organization. A comprehensive strategy to improve performance in preparation for Industry 4.0 implementation necessitates several steps, one of which is the establishment of performance outcomes (POs). The aim of this paper is to identify and rank the POs realized due to the adoption of Industry 4.0 enablers.Design/methodology/approachBased on an extensive literature review and inputs received from experts, a comprehensive list of enablers and the POs was prepared and finalized. This paper proposes a framework based on hybrid solution methodology, namely Neutrosophic Analytical Hierarchy Process (N-AHP) and Neutrosophic Combined Compromise Solution (N-CoCoSo), to rank the POs realized due to the adoption of Industry 4.0 enablers. The N-AHP methodology has been adopted to calculate the relative weights of the Industry 4.0 enablers. In comparison, the N-CoCoSo method has been adopted to rank the POs of Industry 4.0.FindingsThe proposed framework is applied to an Indian manufacturing organization to test the organization's practical applicability. Additionally, sensitivity analysis is also carried out to check the steadiness of the proposed framework. The findings of this study revealed that “Improved responsiveness to market conditions in today's competitive business environment” is the top-ranked PO of Industry 4.0, followed by “Enhanced competitiveness and better market share”, “Better product quality, through smart management of production process” and “Reduction in manufacturing waste and environmental sustainability” which could be realized due to adoption of its enablers.Practical implicationsThis research would aid practitioners by enhancing the practitioners' capacity to understand and prioritize the various POs resulting from implementing Industry 4.0 enablers. Embracing a clear strategic plan will further assist practitioners in improving the efficiency of Industry 4.0 implementation.Originality/valuePrevious literature has only addressed the relationship between Industry 4.0 enablers and POs in a limited way. This paper attempts to compile a comprehensive list of Industry 4.0 enablers relevant to manufacturing organizations in order to fill this knowledge and research gap.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0273</doi><tpages>39</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0870-470X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1463-5771
ispartof Benchmarking : an international journal, 2024-05, Vol.31 (5), p.1453-1491
issn 1463-5771
1758-4094
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3056589000
source Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection
subjects Analytic hierarchy process
Business competition
Business metrics
Competition
Competitive advantage
Digital technology
Fuzzy sets
Industry 4.0
Literature reviews
Manufacturers
Manufacturing
Methodology
Performance enhancement
Performance evaluation
Product life cycle
Sensitivity analysis
Success factors
Technological change
Technology adoption
title MCDM model to rank the performance outcomes in the implementation of Industry 4.0
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A05%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_emera&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MCDM%20model%20to%20rank%20the%20performance%20outcomes%20in%20the%20implementation%20of%20Industry%204.0&rft.jtitle=Benchmarking%20:%20an%20international%20journal&rft.au=Kumar,%20Veepan&rft.date=2024-05-21&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1453&rft.epage=1491&rft.pages=1453-1491&rft.issn=1463-5771&rft.eissn=1758-4094&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/BIJ-04-2022-0273&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_emera%3E3056589000%3C/proquest_emera%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3056589000&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true