Opting out or left out? The gendered determinants of marriage in South Korea

Objective: This study examines the determinants of marriage decline in South Korea, a representative case of the demographic crisis sweeping East Asia. Background: The major theories accounting for marriage and family trends are for the most part based on Western cases. A complementing focus on non-...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of marriage and family 2024-01, Vol.86 (1), p.132-153
Hauptverfasser: Chang, Paul Y, Oh, Jihye, Kim, Young-Mi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 1
container_start_page 132
container_title Journal of marriage and family
container_volume 86
creator Chang, Paul Y
Oh, Jihye
Kim, Young-Mi
description Objective: This study examines the determinants of marriage decline in South Korea, a representative case of the demographic crisis sweeping East Asia. Background: The major theories accounting for marriage and family trends are for the most part based on Western cases. A complementing focus on non-Western societies is likely to identify a more diverse range of processes governing marriage patterns in advanced capitalist societies. Method: The study draws on the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study (KLIPS) to analyze a sample of 4201 unmarried individuals whose longitudinal data were organized into 55,989 person-year records. Discrete-time hazard models incorporating 23 waves of KLIPS data (1998-2020) identify the gendered determinants of marriage. Results: Socioeconomic resources continue to positively impact mens marriage chances although income, relative to employment status and educational attainment, has become paramount for members of the younger 1980s cohort. Parental wealth, an important precondition for home purchases, also positively impacts the likelihood of marriage for men. Income and parental wealth have become important for women as well but unlike the documented educational crossover that has occurred elsewhere, high educational attainment remains negatively associated with marriage probability for Korean women. Conclusion: This study clarifies the scope conditions for arguments about the shifting economic foundations of marriage, while foregrounding the enduring legacy of extended-family resources in strong familism societies. The results also lend empirical leverage to past studies highlighting the clear disincentives for marriage among highly educated women and provide a more comprehensive picture of why underprivileged men are being left out of Korea's marriage market.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/jomf.l2935
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3056236570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3056236570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30562365703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNissKwjAUBYMoWB8bv-CC62qa9EFXLkQRFFzYfQn0tk1pk5qk_28EP8DZnAMzhOwieog8x04P9aFnOU9mJIiyOAp5xrM5CShlLGRxnCzJytqOelhOA_J4jk6qBvTkQBvosXbff4KiRWhQVWiwggodmkEqoZwFXcMgjJGiQZAKXj5v4a4Nig1Z1KK3uP3tmuyvl-J8C0ej3xNaV3Z6MsqrktMkZTxNMsr_qz7zH0LJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3056236570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opting out or left out? The gendered determinants of marriage in South Korea</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Chang, Paul Y ; Oh, Jihye ; Kim, Young-Mi</creator><creatorcontrib>Chang, Paul Y ; Oh, Jihye ; Kim, Young-Mi</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study examines the determinants of marriage decline in South Korea, a representative case of the demographic crisis sweeping East Asia. Background: The major theories accounting for marriage and family trends are for the most part based on Western cases. A complementing focus on non-Western societies is likely to identify a more diverse range of processes governing marriage patterns in advanced capitalist societies. Method: The study draws on the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study (KLIPS) to analyze a sample of 4201 unmarried individuals whose longitudinal data were organized into 55,989 person-year records. Discrete-time hazard models incorporating 23 waves of KLIPS data (1998-2020) identify the gendered determinants of marriage. Results: Socioeconomic resources continue to positively impact mens marriage chances although income, relative to employment status and educational attainment, has become paramount for members of the younger 1980s cohort. Parental wealth, an important precondition for home purchases, also positively impacts the likelihood of marriage for men. Income and parental wealth have become important for women as well but unlike the documented educational crossover that has occurred elsewhere, high educational attainment remains negatively associated with marriage probability for Korean women. Conclusion: This study clarifies the scope conditions for arguments about the shifting economic foundations of marriage, while foregrounding the enduring legacy of extended-family resources in strong familism societies. The results also lend empirical leverage to past studies highlighting the clear disincentives for marriage among highly educated women and provide a more comprehensive picture of why underprivileged men are being left out of Korea's marriage market.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2445</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3737</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jomf.l2935</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Minneapolis: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Accounting ; Birth Rate ; Capitalist societies ; Cohabitation ; Demographic transition theory ; Disincentives ; Economic conditions ; Educational attainment ; Employed Women ; Employment ; Employment Level ; Employment status ; Families &amp; family life ; Familism ; Family (Sociological Unit) ; Family resources ; Females ; Fertility ; Gender ; Human Capital ; Income ; Interpersonal Relationship ; Labor force ; Labor Force Nonparticipants ; Labor market ; Males ; Marriage ; Marriage patterns ; Mate selection ; Non-Western societies ; Opting out ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Society ; Socioeconomic factors ; Trends ; Wealth ; Women</subject><ispartof>Journal of marriage and family, 2024-01, Vol.86 (1), p.132-153</ispartof><rights>Copyright Blackwell Publishing Ltd. Feb 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chang, Paul Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Mi</creatorcontrib><title>Opting out or left out? The gendered determinants of marriage in South Korea</title><title>Journal of marriage and family</title><description>Objective: This study examines the determinants of marriage decline in South Korea, a representative case of the demographic crisis sweeping East Asia. Background: The major theories accounting for marriage and family trends are for the most part based on Western cases. A complementing focus on non-Western societies is likely to identify a more diverse range of processes governing marriage patterns in advanced capitalist societies. Method: The study draws on the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study (KLIPS) to analyze a sample of 4201 unmarried individuals whose longitudinal data were organized into 55,989 person-year records. Discrete-time hazard models incorporating 23 waves of KLIPS data (1998-2020) identify the gendered determinants of marriage. Results: Socioeconomic resources continue to positively impact mens marriage chances although income, relative to employment status and educational attainment, has become paramount for members of the younger 1980s cohort. Parental wealth, an important precondition for home purchases, also positively impacts the likelihood of marriage for men. Income and parental wealth have become important for women as well but unlike the documented educational crossover that has occurred elsewhere, high educational attainment remains negatively associated with marriage probability for Korean women. Conclusion: This study clarifies the scope conditions for arguments about the shifting economic foundations of marriage, while foregrounding the enduring legacy of extended-family resources in strong familism societies. The results also lend empirical leverage to past studies highlighting the clear disincentives for marriage among highly educated women and provide a more comprehensive picture of why underprivileged men are being left out of Korea's marriage market.</description><subject>Accounting</subject><subject>Birth Rate</subject><subject>Capitalist societies</subject><subject>Cohabitation</subject><subject>Demographic transition theory</subject><subject>Disincentives</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Educational attainment</subject><subject>Employed Women</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Employment Level</subject><subject>Employment status</subject><subject>Families &amp; family life</subject><subject>Familism</subject><subject>Family (Sociological Unit)</subject><subject>Family resources</subject><subject>Females</subject><subject>Fertility</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Human Capital</subject><subject>Income</subject><subject>Interpersonal Relationship</subject><subject>Labor force</subject><subject>Labor Force Nonparticipants</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Males</subject><subject>Marriage</subject><subject>Marriage patterns</subject><subject>Mate selection</subject><subject>Non-Western societies</subject><subject>Opting out</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Socioeconomic factors</subject><subject>Trends</subject><subject>Wealth</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0022-2445</issn><issn>1741-3737</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>88H</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2N</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNissKwjAUBYMoWB8bv-CC62qa9EFXLkQRFFzYfQn0tk1pk5qk_28EP8DZnAMzhOwieog8x04P9aFnOU9mJIiyOAp5xrM5CShlLGRxnCzJytqOelhOA_J4jk6qBvTkQBvosXbff4KiRWhQVWiwggodmkEqoZwFXcMgjJGiQZAKXj5v4a4Nig1Z1KK3uP3tmuyvl-J8C0ej3xNaV3Z6MsqrktMkZTxNMsr_qz7zH0LJ</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Chang, Paul Y</creator><creator>Oh, Jihye</creator><creator>Kim, Young-Mi</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88H</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Opting out or left out? The gendered determinants of marriage in South Korea</title><author>Chang, Paul Y ; Oh, Jihye ; Kim, Young-Mi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30562365703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accounting</topic><topic>Birth Rate</topic><topic>Capitalist societies</topic><topic>Cohabitation</topic><topic>Demographic transition theory</topic><topic>Disincentives</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Educational attainment</topic><topic>Employed Women</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Employment Level</topic><topic>Employment status</topic><topic>Families &amp; family life</topic><topic>Familism</topic><topic>Family (Sociological Unit)</topic><topic>Family resources</topic><topic>Females</topic><topic>Fertility</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Human Capital</topic><topic>Income</topic><topic>Interpersonal Relationship</topic><topic>Labor force</topic><topic>Labor Force Nonparticipants</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Males</topic><topic>Marriage</topic><topic>Marriage patterns</topic><topic>Mate selection</topic><topic>Non-Western societies</topic><topic>Opting out</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Socioeconomic factors</topic><topic>Trends</topic><topic>Wealth</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chang, Paul Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, Jihye</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Young-Mi</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Religion Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Religion Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chang, Paul Y</au><au>Oh, Jihye</au><au>Kim, Young-Mi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opting out or left out? The gendered determinants of marriage in South Korea</atitle><jtitle>Journal of marriage and family</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>132</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>132-153</pages><issn>0022-2445</issn><eissn>1741-3737</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study examines the determinants of marriage decline in South Korea, a representative case of the demographic crisis sweeping East Asia. Background: The major theories accounting for marriage and family trends are for the most part based on Western cases. A complementing focus on non-Western societies is likely to identify a more diverse range of processes governing marriage patterns in advanced capitalist societies. Method: The study draws on the Korean Labor and Income Panel Study (KLIPS) to analyze a sample of 4201 unmarried individuals whose longitudinal data were organized into 55,989 person-year records. Discrete-time hazard models incorporating 23 waves of KLIPS data (1998-2020) identify the gendered determinants of marriage. Results: Socioeconomic resources continue to positively impact mens marriage chances although income, relative to employment status and educational attainment, has become paramount for members of the younger 1980s cohort. Parental wealth, an important precondition for home purchases, also positively impacts the likelihood of marriage for men. Income and parental wealth have become important for women as well but unlike the documented educational crossover that has occurred elsewhere, high educational attainment remains negatively associated with marriage probability for Korean women. Conclusion: This study clarifies the scope conditions for arguments about the shifting economic foundations of marriage, while foregrounding the enduring legacy of extended-family resources in strong familism societies. The results also lend empirical leverage to past studies highlighting the clear disincentives for marriage among highly educated women and provide a more comprehensive picture of why underprivileged men are being left out of Korea's marriage market.</abstract><cop>Minneapolis</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/jomf.l2935</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2445
ispartof Journal of marriage and family, 2024-01, Vol.86 (1), p.132-153
issn 0022-2445
1741-3737
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3056236570
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Accounting
Birth Rate
Capitalist societies
Cohabitation
Demographic transition theory
Disincentives
Economic conditions
Educational attainment
Employed Women
Employment
Employment Level
Employment status
Families & family life
Familism
Family (Sociological Unit)
Family resources
Females
Fertility
Gender
Human Capital
Income
Interpersonal Relationship
Labor force
Labor Force Nonparticipants
Labor market
Males
Marriage
Marriage patterns
Mate selection
Non-Western societies
Opting out
Parents & parenting
Society
Socioeconomic factors
Trends
Wealth
Women
title Opting out or left out? The gendered determinants of marriage in South Korea
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T22%3A56%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opting%20out%20or%20left%20out?%20The%20gendered%20determinants%20of%20marriage%20in%20South%20Korea&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20marriage%20and%20family&rft.au=Chang,%20Paul%20Y&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=132&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=132-153&rft.issn=0022-2445&rft.eissn=1741-3737&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jomf.l2935&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3056236570%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3056236570&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true