Hetero tempo rality and Posthumanism in Alternative Futurisms

The two most common critiques levelled against Anthropocene discourse are, first, that it projects a "one world" ideology that universalizes problematic notions of humanity and, second, that it reproduces a linear understanding of temporality by presenting the current moment as a cardinal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies 2024-03, Vol.50 (1), p.69-87
1. Verfasser: Boyden, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 87
container_issue 1
container_start_page 69
container_title Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies
container_volume 50
creator Boyden, Michael
description The two most common critiques levelled against Anthropocene discourse are, first, that it projects a "one world" ideology that universalizes problematic notions of humanity and, second, that it reproduces a linear understanding of temporality by presenting the current moment as a cardinal point in our relation to the future.1 Since the Anthropocene is of course first and foremost a narrative of our place in time and in the world, it is unsurprising that the doublé critique leveled against this new scientific concept has been extended to climate fiction, a strand of contemporary literature that engages more or less directly with climate change. By dramatizing climatic change as a universal catastrophe happening in the (not so) distant future, and by often casting straight white men in the role of climate saviors, such narratives appear to suffer from similar flaws-pretense of homogeneous humanity, assumption of linear time-that have been associated with the Anthropocene concept as such. Stephanie LeMenager's discussion of the "woman problem" in climate fiction, or Matthew Schneider-Mayerson's argument that a lot of recent American climate fiction novels reproduce white Western privilege, to name just two examples, should be understood in light of these broader concerns about the futures emplotted by the Anthropocene concept (LeMenager; Schneider-Mayerson). While a number of scholars and intellectuals have argued that narrative art, and specifically realist fiction, is fundamentally unsuited to capture the long time scales of the Anthropocene (e.g., Ghosh; Clark), others have argued that the representational resources of genre fiction might be mobilized to reach a deeper understanding of our role as geomorphic agents in this new epoch. [...]responding to Amitav Ghosh's provocative statement that the traditional epic is better attuned to the Anthropocene than the modern novel with its human-scaled, character-driven plot lines, Ursula Heise has argued that science fiction displays a "modern epic impulse" that allows it to render the expanded temporal horizon of the Anthropocene in ways not possible in conventional realist fiction (Heise 300). While not all Afrofuturist fiction engages directly with global warming-Butler's Parable of the Sower (1993), which has been hailed as an example of pro to-climate fiction (Trexler), is a notable exception-the genre contributes to the broadening of future imaginaries in the Anthropocene by challenging the racist biases em
doi_str_mv 10.6240/concentric.lit.202403_50(1).0004
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3054798134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3054798134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30547981343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjLsKwjAYhYMoWLTvEHCpQ-vf9JrBQUTp6OBeYo0YaZOai-Dbm6EP4HQOH985CEUpJCXJYdcp2XFpteiSXtiEgIdZW0CUbhMAyGcoSCtC47qiZD71sqbVEoXGiBsAIQUFWgZo33DLtcKWD6PCmvm7L2byji_K2KcbmBRmwELiQ-89yaz4cHx21mnPzRotHqw3PJxyhTbn0_XYxKNWb8eNbV_K-VVv2gyKvKJ1muXZf9YPlMxFkw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3054798134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hetero tempo rality and Posthumanism in Alternative Futurisms</title><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><creator>Boyden, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Boyden, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>The two most common critiques levelled against Anthropocene discourse are, first, that it projects a "one world" ideology that universalizes problematic notions of humanity and, second, that it reproduces a linear understanding of temporality by presenting the current moment as a cardinal point in our relation to the future.1 Since the Anthropocene is of course first and foremost a narrative of our place in time and in the world, it is unsurprising that the doublé critique leveled against this new scientific concept has been extended to climate fiction, a strand of contemporary literature that engages more or less directly with climate change. By dramatizing climatic change as a universal catastrophe happening in the (not so) distant future, and by often casting straight white men in the role of climate saviors, such narratives appear to suffer from similar flaws-pretense of homogeneous humanity, assumption of linear time-that have been associated with the Anthropocene concept as such. Stephanie LeMenager's discussion of the "woman problem" in climate fiction, or Matthew Schneider-Mayerson's argument that a lot of recent American climate fiction novels reproduce white Western privilege, to name just two examples, should be understood in light of these broader concerns about the futures emplotted by the Anthropocene concept (LeMenager; Schneider-Mayerson). While a number of scholars and intellectuals have argued that narrative art, and specifically realist fiction, is fundamentally unsuited to capture the long time scales of the Anthropocene (e.g., Ghosh; Clark), others have argued that the representational resources of genre fiction might be mobilized to reach a deeper understanding of our role as geomorphic agents in this new epoch. [...]responding to Amitav Ghosh's provocative statement that the traditional epic is better attuned to the Anthropocene than the modern novel with its human-scaled, character-driven plot lines, Ursula Heise has argued that science fiction displays a "modern epic impulse" that allows it to render the expanded temporal horizon of the Anthropocene in ways not possible in conventional realist fiction (Heise 300). While not all Afrofuturist fiction engages directly with global warming-Butler's Parable of the Sower (1993), which has been hailed as an example of pro to-climate fiction (Trexler), is a notable exception-the genre contributes to the broadening of future imaginaries in the Anthropocene by challenging the racist biases embedded in mainstream SF and fantasy Meanwhile, various other futurist movements have sprang up in the slipstream of Afrofuturism, including Latinx- or Chicanxfuturism, as well as Asian, Indigenous, and queer futurisms and various cross-overs between these groupings such as Indigiqueer fiction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1729-6897</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1729-8792</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.6240/concentric.lit.202403_50(1).0004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taichung: National Taiwan Normal University, Department of English</publisher><subject>20th century ; Afrofuturism ; Archives &amp; records ; Climate change ; Contemporary literature ; Epic literature ; Genre ; Humanities ; Literary characters ; Modernity ; Narratives ; Novels ; Politics ; Postcolonialism ; Posthumanism ; Racism ; Science fiction &amp; fantasy ; Time</subject><ispartof>Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 2024-03, Vol.50 (1), p.69-87</ispartof><rights>Copyright National Taiwan Normal University, Department of English Mar 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3054798134/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/3054798134?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27911,27912,62646,62647,62662,73951</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boyden, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Hetero tempo rality and Posthumanism in Alternative Futurisms</title><title>Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies</title><description>The two most common critiques levelled against Anthropocene discourse are, first, that it projects a "one world" ideology that universalizes problematic notions of humanity and, second, that it reproduces a linear understanding of temporality by presenting the current moment as a cardinal point in our relation to the future.1 Since the Anthropocene is of course first and foremost a narrative of our place in time and in the world, it is unsurprising that the doublé critique leveled against this new scientific concept has been extended to climate fiction, a strand of contemporary literature that engages more or less directly with climate change. By dramatizing climatic change as a universal catastrophe happening in the (not so) distant future, and by often casting straight white men in the role of climate saviors, such narratives appear to suffer from similar flaws-pretense of homogeneous humanity, assumption of linear time-that have been associated with the Anthropocene concept as such. Stephanie LeMenager's discussion of the "woman problem" in climate fiction, or Matthew Schneider-Mayerson's argument that a lot of recent American climate fiction novels reproduce white Western privilege, to name just two examples, should be understood in light of these broader concerns about the futures emplotted by the Anthropocene concept (LeMenager; Schneider-Mayerson). While a number of scholars and intellectuals have argued that narrative art, and specifically realist fiction, is fundamentally unsuited to capture the long time scales of the Anthropocene (e.g., Ghosh; Clark), others have argued that the representational resources of genre fiction might be mobilized to reach a deeper understanding of our role as geomorphic agents in this new epoch. [...]responding to Amitav Ghosh's provocative statement that the traditional epic is better attuned to the Anthropocene than the modern novel with its human-scaled, character-driven plot lines, Ursula Heise has argued that science fiction displays a "modern epic impulse" that allows it to render the expanded temporal horizon of the Anthropocene in ways not possible in conventional realist fiction (Heise 300). While not all Afrofuturist fiction engages directly with global warming-Butler's Parable of the Sower (1993), which has been hailed as an example of pro to-climate fiction (Trexler), is a notable exception-the genre contributes to the broadening of future imaginaries in the Anthropocene by challenging the racist biases embedded in mainstream SF and fantasy Meanwhile, various other futurist movements have sprang up in the slipstream of Afrofuturism, including Latinx- or Chicanxfuturism, as well as Asian, Indigenous, and queer futurisms and various cross-overs between these groupings such as Indigiqueer fiction.</description><subject>20th century</subject><subject>Afrofuturism</subject><subject>Archives &amp; records</subject><subject>Climate change</subject><subject>Contemporary literature</subject><subject>Epic literature</subject><subject>Genre</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Literary characters</subject><subject>Modernity</subject><subject>Narratives</subject><subject>Novels</subject><subject>Politics</subject><subject>Postcolonialism</subject><subject>Posthumanism</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Science fiction &amp; fantasy</subject><subject>Time</subject><issn>1729-6897</issn><issn>1729-8792</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjLsKwjAYhYMoWLTvEHCpQ-vf9JrBQUTp6OBeYo0YaZOai-Dbm6EP4HQOH985CEUpJCXJYdcp2XFpteiSXtiEgIdZW0CUbhMAyGcoSCtC47qiZD71sqbVEoXGiBsAIQUFWgZo33DLtcKWD6PCmvm7L2byji_K2KcbmBRmwELiQ-89yaz4cHx21mnPzRotHqw3PJxyhTbn0_XYxKNWb8eNbV_K-VVv2gyKvKJ1muXZf9YPlMxFkw</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Boyden, Michael</creator><general>National Taiwan Normal University, Department of English</general><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Hetero tempo rality and Posthumanism in Alternative Futurisms</title><author>Boyden, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30547981343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>20th century</topic><topic>Afrofuturism</topic><topic>Archives &amp; records</topic><topic>Climate change</topic><topic>Contemporary literature</topic><topic>Epic literature</topic><topic>Genre</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Literary characters</topic><topic>Modernity</topic><topic>Narratives</topic><topic>Novels</topic><topic>Politics</topic><topic>Postcolonialism</topic><topic>Posthumanism</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Science fiction &amp; fantasy</topic><topic>Time</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boyden, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><jtitle>Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boyden, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hetero tempo rality and Posthumanism in Alternative Futurisms</atitle><jtitle>Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>69</spage><epage>87</epage><pages>69-87</pages><issn>1729-6897</issn><eissn>1729-8792</eissn><abstract>The two most common critiques levelled against Anthropocene discourse are, first, that it projects a "one world" ideology that universalizes problematic notions of humanity and, second, that it reproduces a linear understanding of temporality by presenting the current moment as a cardinal point in our relation to the future.1 Since the Anthropocene is of course first and foremost a narrative of our place in time and in the world, it is unsurprising that the doublé critique leveled against this new scientific concept has been extended to climate fiction, a strand of contemporary literature that engages more or less directly with climate change. By dramatizing climatic change as a universal catastrophe happening in the (not so) distant future, and by often casting straight white men in the role of climate saviors, such narratives appear to suffer from similar flaws-pretense of homogeneous humanity, assumption of linear time-that have been associated with the Anthropocene concept as such. Stephanie LeMenager's discussion of the "woman problem" in climate fiction, or Matthew Schneider-Mayerson's argument that a lot of recent American climate fiction novels reproduce white Western privilege, to name just two examples, should be understood in light of these broader concerns about the futures emplotted by the Anthropocene concept (LeMenager; Schneider-Mayerson). While a number of scholars and intellectuals have argued that narrative art, and specifically realist fiction, is fundamentally unsuited to capture the long time scales of the Anthropocene (e.g., Ghosh; Clark), others have argued that the representational resources of genre fiction might be mobilized to reach a deeper understanding of our role as geomorphic agents in this new epoch. [...]responding to Amitav Ghosh's provocative statement that the traditional epic is better attuned to the Anthropocene than the modern novel with its human-scaled, character-driven plot lines, Ursula Heise has argued that science fiction displays a "modern epic impulse" that allows it to render the expanded temporal horizon of the Anthropocene in ways not possible in conventional realist fiction (Heise 300). While not all Afrofuturist fiction engages directly with global warming-Butler's Parable of the Sower (1993), which has been hailed as an example of pro to-climate fiction (Trexler), is a notable exception-the genre contributes to the broadening of future imaginaries in the Anthropocene by challenging the racist biases embedded in mainstream SF and fantasy Meanwhile, various other futurist movements have sprang up in the slipstream of Afrofuturism, including Latinx- or Chicanxfuturism, as well as Asian, Indigenous, and queer futurisms and various cross-overs between these groupings such as Indigiqueer fiction.</abstract><cop>Taichung</cop><pub>National Taiwan Normal University, Department of English</pub><doi>10.6240/concentric.lit.202403_50(1).0004</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1729-6897
ispartof Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies, 2024-03, Vol.50 (1), p.69-87
issn 1729-6897
1729-8792
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3054798134
source ProQuest One Literature
subjects 20th century
Afrofuturism
Archives & records
Climate change
Contemporary literature
Epic literature
Genre
Humanities
Literary characters
Modernity
Narratives
Novels
Politics
Postcolonialism
Posthumanism
Racism
Science fiction & fantasy
Time
title Hetero tempo rality and Posthumanism in Alternative Futurisms
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T19%3A36%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hetero%20tempo%20rality%20and%20Posthumanism%20in%20Alternative%20Futurisms&rft.jtitle=Concentric:%20Literary%20and%20Cultural%20Studies&rft.au=Boyden,%20Michael&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=69&rft.epage=87&rft.pages=69-87&rft.issn=1729-6897&rft.eissn=1729-8792&rft_id=info:doi/10.6240/concentric.lit.202403_50(1).0004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3054798134%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3054798134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true