Bernard Williams and Alasdair MacIntyre on Authenticity
The formation of the moral point of view in Bernard Williams’ work might be understood as taking place between two central concepts: the individual and the community. It is through the tension between these two poles that some form of knowledge is acquired. In Williams’ work, the individual virtue t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Topoi 2024-05, Vol.43 (2), p.387-402 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 402 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 387 |
container_title | Topoi |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Franco, Pedro António Monteiro |
description | The formation of the moral point of view in Bernard Williams’ work might be understood as taking place between two central concepts: the individual and the community. It is through the tension between these two poles that some form of knowledge is acquired. In Williams’ work, the individual virtue takes the name of authenticity, and the communitarian knowledge is, importantly, ethical confidence. A philosophical peer of Williams, Alasdair MacIntyre, has dealt with the same question, although in very different ways. They are usually taken to be philosophical rivals in many respects, especially regarding their political views, their views on religion and their thoughts on Aristotle. But if we look deeper into their claims, we should discover that not only do they have similar ethical concerns, as their responses to those concerns are not, in essence, as different as they seem. My purpose with this paper, however, is not to deny the important differences between the two philosophers, but rather to make conspicuous Williams’ demanding ideas on the formation of the moral point of view by (1) connecting significant portions of his work and (2) contrasting his ideas with that of a philosophical “rival,” namely by interpreting MacIntyre’s own declarations on Williams’ work. It will stand out that both philosophers’ motivation to do ethics is to grant an equilibrium between the individual conscience and the moral knowledge that is acquired within a community. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11245-024-10049-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3054672639</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3054672639</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-74450366ad7b027d689c0a915fad2d43f6cfdbd4658fbf84e125657d1d3c10f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhF4mzY9TM5lopHpSIulThabmxDqjQpdnLov8cQJG6cViPNzI4-Qq4RbhFA3yVEJiQFJmjWoqLihMxQakZLLapTMgNUmmqBeE4uUtoBgFQSZ0Tf-9jZ6Iq3pm0bu0-F7VyxaG1ytonFi61X3XCMvui7YjEOH74bmroZjpfkLNg2-avfOyebx4fN8pmuX59Wy8Wa1kzDkD8KCVwp6_QWmHaqrGqwFcpgHXOCB1UHt3VCyTJsQyk8srxLO3S8Rgh8Tm6m2kPsP0efBrPrxzy4TYaDFEozxavsYpOrjn1K0QdziM3exqNBMN98zMTHZD7mh48ROcSnUMrm7t3Hv-p_Ul-IK2cJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3054672639</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bernard Williams and Alasdair MacIntyre on Authenticity</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Franco, Pedro António Monteiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Franco, Pedro António Monteiro</creatorcontrib><description>The formation of the moral point of view in Bernard Williams’ work might be understood as taking place between two central concepts: the individual and the community. It is through the tension between these two poles that some form of knowledge is acquired. In Williams’ work, the individual virtue takes the name of authenticity, and the communitarian knowledge is, importantly, ethical confidence. A philosophical peer of Williams, Alasdair MacIntyre, has dealt with the same question, although in very different ways. They are usually taken to be philosophical rivals in many respects, especially regarding their political views, their views on religion and their thoughts on Aristotle. But if we look deeper into their claims, we should discover that not only do they have similar ethical concerns, as their responses to those concerns are not, in essence, as different as they seem. My purpose with this paper, however, is not to deny the important differences between the two philosophers, but rather to make conspicuous Williams’ demanding ideas on the formation of the moral point of view by (1) connecting significant portions of his work and (2) contrasting his ideas with that of a philosophical “rival,” namely by interpreting MacIntyre’s own declarations on Williams’ work. It will stand out that both philosophers’ motivation to do ethics is to grant an equilibrium between the individual conscience and the moral knowledge that is acquired within a community.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-7411</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8749</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11245-024-10049-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Education ; Philosophers ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Science ; Philosophy of Technology ; Williams, Bernard</subject><ispartof>Topoi, 2024-05, Vol.43 (2), p.387-402</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-74450366ad7b027d689c0a915fad2d43f6cfdbd4658fbf84e125657d1d3c10f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6702-5961</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11245-024-10049-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11245-024-10049-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Franco, Pedro António Monteiro</creatorcontrib><title>Bernard Williams and Alasdair MacIntyre on Authenticity</title><title>Topoi</title><addtitle>Topoi</addtitle><description>The formation of the moral point of view in Bernard Williams’ work might be understood as taking place between two central concepts: the individual and the community. It is through the tension between these two poles that some form of knowledge is acquired. In Williams’ work, the individual virtue takes the name of authenticity, and the communitarian knowledge is, importantly, ethical confidence. A philosophical peer of Williams, Alasdair MacIntyre, has dealt with the same question, although in very different ways. They are usually taken to be philosophical rivals in many respects, especially regarding their political views, their views on religion and their thoughts on Aristotle. But if we look deeper into their claims, we should discover that not only do they have similar ethical concerns, as their responses to those concerns are not, in essence, as different as they seem. My purpose with this paper, however, is not to deny the important differences between the two philosophers, but rather to make conspicuous Williams’ demanding ideas on the formation of the moral point of view by (1) connecting significant portions of his work and (2) contrasting his ideas with that of a philosophical “rival,” namely by interpreting MacIntyre’s own declarations on Williams’ work. It will stand out that both philosophers’ motivation to do ethics is to grant an equilibrium between the individual conscience and the moral knowledge that is acquired within a community.</description><subject>Education</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><subject>Philosophy of Technology</subject><subject>Williams, Bernard</subject><issn>0167-7411</issn><issn>1572-8749</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhF4mzY9TM5lopHpSIulThabmxDqjQpdnLov8cQJG6cViPNzI4-Qq4RbhFA3yVEJiQFJmjWoqLihMxQakZLLapTMgNUmmqBeE4uUtoBgFQSZ0Tf-9jZ6Iq3pm0bu0-F7VyxaG1ytonFi61X3XCMvui7YjEOH74bmroZjpfkLNg2-avfOyebx4fN8pmuX59Wy8Wa1kzDkD8KCVwp6_QWmHaqrGqwFcpgHXOCB1UHt3VCyTJsQyk8srxLO3S8Rgh8Tm6m2kPsP0efBrPrxzy4TYaDFEozxavsYpOrjn1K0QdziM3exqNBMN98zMTHZD7mh48ROcSnUMrm7t3Hv-p_Ul-IK2cJ</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Franco, Pedro António Monteiro</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-5961</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Bernard Williams and Alasdair MacIntyre on Authenticity</title><author>Franco, Pedro António Monteiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-74450366ad7b027d689c0a915fad2d43f6cfdbd4658fbf84e125657d1d3c10f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Education</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><topic>Philosophy of Technology</topic><topic>Williams, Bernard</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Franco, Pedro António Monteiro</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Topoi</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Franco, Pedro António Monteiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bernard Williams and Alasdair MacIntyre on Authenticity</atitle><jtitle>Topoi</jtitle><stitle>Topoi</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>387</spage><epage>402</epage><pages>387-402</pages><issn>0167-7411</issn><eissn>1572-8749</eissn><abstract>The formation of the moral point of view in Bernard Williams’ work might be understood as taking place between two central concepts: the individual and the community. It is through the tension between these two poles that some form of knowledge is acquired. In Williams’ work, the individual virtue takes the name of authenticity, and the communitarian knowledge is, importantly, ethical confidence. A philosophical peer of Williams, Alasdair MacIntyre, has dealt with the same question, although in very different ways. They are usually taken to be philosophical rivals in many respects, especially regarding their political views, their views on religion and their thoughts on Aristotle. But if we look deeper into their claims, we should discover that not only do they have similar ethical concerns, as their responses to those concerns are not, in essence, as different as they seem. My purpose with this paper, however, is not to deny the important differences between the two philosophers, but rather to make conspicuous Williams’ demanding ideas on the formation of the moral point of view by (1) connecting significant portions of his work and (2) contrasting his ideas with that of a philosophical “rival,” namely by interpreting MacIntyre’s own declarations on Williams’ work. It will stand out that both philosophers’ motivation to do ethics is to grant an equilibrium between the individual conscience and the moral knowledge that is acquired within a community.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11245-024-10049-4</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-5961</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-7411 |
ispartof | Topoi, 2024-05, Vol.43 (2), p.387-402 |
issn | 0167-7411 1572-8749 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3054672639 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Education Philosophers Philosophy Philosophy of Science Philosophy of Technology Williams, Bernard |
title | Bernard Williams and Alasdair MacIntyre on Authenticity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T06%3A51%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bernard%20Williams%20and%20Alasdair%20MacIntyre%20on%20Authenticity&rft.jtitle=Topoi&rft.au=Franco,%20Pedro%20Ant%C3%B3nio%20Monteiro&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=387&rft.epage=402&rft.pages=387-402&rft.issn=0167-7411&rft.eissn=1572-8749&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11245-024-10049-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3054672639%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3054672639&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |