Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues
We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of operations research 2024-05, Vol.336 (3), p.1395-1417 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1417 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1395 |
container_title | Annals of operations research |
container_volume | 336 |
creator | Bergantiños, G. Moreno-Ternero, Juan D. |
description | We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other axioms that have been considered in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Other and combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) and the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3054648758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3054648758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-93bbec770e675eb9191c001df337289d98c13660c11413931d3e2adec7b6a33e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwB5gsMRvOuTiOx1JBQarEArPlOE6bqo2DnSLl3-MSJDamG-79uHsIueVwzwHkQ-SQS8UgQwYCc8HGMzLjQmZMIZbnZAaZyJlAhEtyFeMOADgvxYw8LjrfjYd2GGnb0bg1oe02dNg6GtyX644u0ib4A62CN7U1cTitY-_DEOnemU0SXJOLxuyju_mdc_Lx_PS-fGHrt9XrcrFmFgsc0iFV5ayU4AopXKW44jZdUTeIMitVrUrLsSjAcp5zVMhrdJmpk6UqDKLDObmbcvvgP1PvoHf-GLpUqRFEXuSlFGVSZZPKBh9jcI3uQ3swYdQc9ImVnljpxEr_sNJjMuFkiv3pfxf-ov9xfQOX12y-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3054648758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bergantiños, G. ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bergantiños, G. ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creatorcontrib><description>We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other axioms that have been considered in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Other and combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) and the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Axioms ; Broadcasting ; Business and Management ; Combinatorics ; Operations research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Original Research ; Revenue ; Revenue sharing ; Symmetry ; Teams ; Theory of Computation ; Upper bounds</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2024-05, Vol.336 (3), p.1395-1417</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-93bbec770e675eb9191c001df337289d98c13660c11413931d3e2adec7b6a33e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-93bbec770e675eb9191c001df337289d98c13660c11413931d3e2adec7b6a33e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7288-8596 ; 0000-0003-2592-5213</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bergantiños, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><addtitle>Ann Oper Res</addtitle><description>We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other axioms that have been considered in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Other and combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) and the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Axioms</subject><subject>Broadcasting</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwB5gsMRvOuTiOx1JBQarEArPlOE6bqo2DnSLl3-MSJDamG-79uHsIueVwzwHkQ-SQS8UgQwYCc8HGMzLjQmZMIZbnZAaZyJlAhEtyFeMOADgvxYw8LjrfjYd2GGnb0bg1oe02dNg6GtyX644u0ib4A62CN7U1cTitY-_DEOnemU0SXJOLxuyju_mdc_Lx_PS-fGHrt9XrcrFmFgsc0iFV5ayU4AopXKW44jZdUTeIMitVrUrLsSjAcp5zVMhrdJmpk6UqDKLDObmbcvvgP1PvoHf-GLpUqRFEXuSlFGVSZZPKBh9jcI3uQ3swYdQc9ImVnljpxEr_sNJjMuFkiv3pfxf-ov9xfQOX12y-</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Bergantiños, G.</creator><creator>Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-8596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-5213</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues</title><author>Bergantiños, G. ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-93bbec770e675eb9191c001df337289d98c13660c11413931d3e2adec7b6a33e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Axioms</topic><topic>Broadcasting</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bergantiños, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bergantiños, G.</au><au>Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><stitle>Ann Oper Res</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>336</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1395</spage><epage>1417</epage><pages>1395-1417</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other axioms that have been considered in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Other and combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) and the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-8596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-5213</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0254-5330 |
ispartof | Annals of operations research, 2024-05, Vol.336 (3), p.1395-1417 |
issn | 0254-5330 1572-9338 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3054648758 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Audiences Axioms Broadcasting Business and Management Combinatorics Operations research Operations Research/Decision Theory Original Research Revenue Revenue sharing Symmetry Teams Theory of Computation Upper bounds |
title | Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T01%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anonymity%20in%20sharing%20the%20revenues%20from%20broadcasting%20sports%20leagues&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Berganti%C3%B1os,%20G.&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=336&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1395&rft.epage=1417&rft.pages=1395-1417&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3054648758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3054648758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |