Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues

We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of operations research 2024-05, Vol.336 (3), p.1395-1417
Hauptverfasser: Bergantiños, G., Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1417
container_issue 3
container_start_page 1395
container_title Annals of operations research
container_volume 336
creator Bergantiños, G.
Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.
description We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other axioms that have been considered in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Other and combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) and the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3054648758</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3054648758</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-93bbec770e675eb9191c001df337289d98c13660c11413931d3e2adec7b6a33e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwB5gsMRvOuTiOx1JBQarEArPlOE6bqo2DnSLl3-MSJDamG-79uHsIueVwzwHkQ-SQS8UgQwYCc8HGMzLjQmZMIZbnZAaZyJlAhEtyFeMOADgvxYw8LjrfjYd2GGnb0bg1oe02dNg6GtyX644u0ib4A62CN7U1cTitY-_DEOnemU0SXJOLxuyju_mdc_Lx_PS-fGHrt9XrcrFmFgsc0iFV5ayU4AopXKW44jZdUTeIMitVrUrLsSjAcp5zVMhrdJmpk6UqDKLDObmbcvvgP1PvoHf-GLpUqRFEXuSlFGVSZZPKBh9jcI3uQ3swYdQc9ImVnljpxEr_sNJjMuFkiv3pfxf-ov9xfQOX12y-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3054648758</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Bergantiños, G. ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bergantiños, G. ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creatorcontrib><description>We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other axioms that have been considered in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Other and combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) and the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0254-5330</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9338</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Audiences ; Axioms ; Broadcasting ; Business and Management ; Combinatorics ; Operations research ; Operations Research/Decision Theory ; Original Research ; Revenue ; Revenue sharing ; Symmetry ; Teams ; Theory of Computation ; Upper bounds</subject><ispartof>Annals of operations research, 2024-05, Vol.336 (3), p.1395-1417</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-93bbec770e675eb9191c001df337289d98c13660c11413931d3e2adec7b6a33e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-93bbec770e675eb9191c001df337289d98c13660c11413931d3e2adec7b6a33e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7288-8596 ; 0000-0003-2592-5213</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bergantiños, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creatorcontrib><title>Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues</title><title>Annals of operations research</title><addtitle>Ann Oper Res</addtitle><description>We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other axioms that have been considered in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Other and combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) and the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role.</description><subject>Audiences</subject><subject>Axioms</subject><subject>Broadcasting</subject><subject>Business and Management</subject><subject>Combinatorics</subject><subject>Operations research</subject><subject>Operations Research/Decision Theory</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Revenue</subject><subject>Revenue sharing</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>Theory of Computation</subject><subject>Upper bounds</subject><issn>0254-5330</issn><issn>1572-9338</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwB5gsMRvOuTiOx1JBQarEArPlOE6bqo2DnSLl3-MSJDamG-79uHsIueVwzwHkQ-SQS8UgQwYCc8HGMzLjQmZMIZbnZAaZyJlAhEtyFeMOADgvxYw8LjrfjYd2GGnb0bg1oe02dNg6GtyX644u0ib4A62CN7U1cTitY-_DEOnemU0SXJOLxuyju_mdc_Lx_PS-fGHrt9XrcrFmFgsc0iFV5ayU4AopXKW44jZdUTeIMitVrUrLsSjAcp5zVMhrdJmpk6UqDKLDObmbcvvgP1PvoHf-GLpUqRFEXuSlFGVSZZPKBh9jcI3uQ3swYdQc9ImVnljpxEr_sNJjMuFkiv3pfxf-ov9xfQOX12y-</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Bergantiños, G.</creator><creator>Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-8596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-5213</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues</title><author>Bergantiños, G. ; Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-93bbec770e675eb9191c001df337289d98c13660c11413931d3e2adec7b6a33e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Audiences</topic><topic>Axioms</topic><topic>Broadcasting</topic><topic>Business and Management</topic><topic>Combinatorics</topic><topic>Operations research</topic><topic>Operations Research/Decision Theory</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Revenue</topic><topic>Revenue sharing</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>Theory of Computation</topic><topic>Upper bounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bergantiños, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bergantiños, G.</au><au>Moreno-Ternero, Juan D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues</atitle><jtitle>Annals of operations research</jtitle><stitle>Ann Oper Res</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>336</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1395</spage><epage>1417</epage><pages>1395-1417</pages><issn>0254-5330</issn><eissn>1572-9338</eissn><abstract>We study the problem of sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues axiomatically. Our key axiom is anonymity, the classical impartiality axiom. Other impartiality axioms already studied in broadcasting problems are equal treatment of equals, weak equal treatment of equals and symmetry. We study the relationship between all impartiality axioms. Besides we combine anonymity with other axioms that have been considered in the literature. Some combinations give rise to new characterizations of well-known rules. The family of generalized split rules is characterized with anonymity, additivity and null team. The concede-and-divide rule is characterized with anonymity, additivity and essential team. Other and combinations characterize new rules that had not been considered before. We provide three characterizations in which three axioms are the same (anonymity, additivity, and order preservation) and the fourth one is different (maximum aspirations, weak upper bound, and non-negativity). Depending on the fourth axiom we obtain three different families of rules. In all of them concede-and-divide plays a central role.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7288-8596</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-5213</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0254-5330
ispartof Annals of operations research, 2024-05, Vol.336 (3), p.1395-1417
issn 0254-5330
1572-9338
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3054648758
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Audiences
Axioms
Broadcasting
Business and Management
Combinatorics
Operations research
Operations Research/Decision Theory
Original Research
Revenue
Revenue sharing
Symmetry
Teams
Theory of Computation
Upper bounds
title Anonymity in sharing the revenues from broadcasting sports leagues
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T01%3A14%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Anonymity%20in%20sharing%20the%20revenues%20from%20broadcasting%20sports%20leagues&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20operations%20research&rft.au=Berganti%C3%B1os,%20G.&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=336&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1395&rft.epage=1417&rft.pages=1395-1417&rft.issn=0254-5330&rft.eissn=1572-9338&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10479-023-05345-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3054648758%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3054648758&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true