If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism

For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes al...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Synthese (Dordrecht) 2024-05, Vol.203 (5), p.168, Article 168
1. Verfasser: Guillon, Jean-Baptiste
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 168
container_title Synthese (Dordrecht)
container_volume 203
creator Guillon, Jean-Baptiste
description For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes also conceded by eternalists). As has been shown in other domains of philosophy (e.g. free will), we should be careful when attributing some supposed intuitions to common sense, and Torrengo (Phenomenology and Mind 12: 50–55, 2017) and Le Bihan (Igitur-Arguments Philos 9(1):1–23, 2018) have legitimately raised doubts about the assumption that common sense is presentist. In this paper, I take up this challenge and try to show that our common-sense intuitions do imply presentism. More precisely, the intuitions that I take to imply presentism are fundamental intuitions about our selves as conscious beings. The upshot is that presentism is so much embedded within our conception of our selves that if presentism is false, then I don’t exist!
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3053859066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3053859066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab01928a4bccf15c1ff0ff07ec5b7c7eb1958d4b1b40987477e4d09ef096f98b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4Cng1dTJbrJJjlK0LRR60XPYpIlucbM12YLefA1fzycxdgV7EgZmDv83M3wIXVKYUABxkygtCkWgYAQYZ5zIIzSiXJQEVMWOD-ZTdJbSBoDSisEIzRceb6NLLvRNanGTsK9fkrvG_bMLeIHXXfj6-Oyxe2tSP8GrgG3Xtl0gmUjuAD1HJ3vy4reP0eP93cN0Tpar2WJ6uyS2pKwntQGqClkzY62n3FLvIZdwlhthhTNUcblmhhoGSgomhGNrUM7n372Sphyjq2HvNnavO5d6vel2MeSTugReSq6gqnKqGFI2dilF5_U2Nm0d3zUF_WNMD8Z0Nqb3xrTMUDlAKYfDk4t_q_-hvgFx-G61</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053859066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creator><creatorcontrib>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><description>For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes also conceded by eternalists). As has been shown in other domains of philosophy (e.g. free will), we should be careful when attributing some supposed intuitions to common sense, and Torrengo (Phenomenology and Mind 12: 50–55, 2017) and Le Bihan (Igitur-Arguments Philos 9(1):1–23, 2018) have legitimately raised doubts about the assumption that common sense is presentist. In this paper, I take up this challenge and try to show that our common-sense intuitions do imply presentism. More precisely, the intuitions that I take to imply presentism are fundamental intuitions about our selves as conscious beings. The upshot is that presentism is so much embedded within our conception of our selves that if presentism is false, then I don’t exist!</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Debates ; Education ; Epistemology ; Free will ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Original Research ; Phenomenology ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2024-05, Vol.203 (5), p.168, Article 168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab01928a4bccf15c1ff0ff07ec5b7c7eb1958d4b1b40987477e4d09ef096f98b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3868-4351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><title>If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes also conceded by eternalists). As has been shown in other domains of philosophy (e.g. free will), we should be careful when attributing some supposed intuitions to common sense, and Torrengo (Phenomenology and Mind 12: 50–55, 2017) and Le Bihan (Igitur-Arguments Philos 9(1):1–23, 2018) have legitimately raised doubts about the assumption that common sense is presentist. In this paper, I take up this challenge and try to show that our common-sense intuitions do imply presentism. More precisely, the intuitions that I take to imply presentism are fundamental intuitions about our selves as conscious beings. The upshot is that presentism is so much embedded within our conception of our selves that if presentism is false, then I don’t exist!</description><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Free will</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><issn>1573-0964</issn><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4Cng1dTJbrJJjlK0LRR60XPYpIlucbM12YLefA1fzycxdgV7EgZmDv83M3wIXVKYUABxkygtCkWgYAQYZ5zIIzSiXJQEVMWOD-ZTdJbSBoDSisEIzRceb6NLLvRNanGTsK9fkrvG_bMLeIHXXfj6-Oyxe2tSP8GrgG3Xtl0gmUjuAD1HJ3vy4reP0eP93cN0Tpar2WJ6uyS2pKwntQGqClkzY62n3FLvIZdwlhthhTNUcblmhhoGSgomhGNrUM7n372Sphyjq2HvNnavO5d6vel2MeSTugReSq6gqnKqGFI2dilF5_U2Nm0d3zUF_WNMD8Z0Nqb3xrTMUDlAKYfDk4t_q_-hvgFx-G61</recordid><startdate>20240512</startdate><enddate>20240512</enddate><creator>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3868-4351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240512</creationdate><title>If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism</title><author>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab01928a4bccf15c1ff0ff07ec5b7c7eb1958d4b1b40987477e4d09ef096f98b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Free will</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2024-05-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>203</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>168</spage><pages>168-</pages><artnum>168</artnum><issn>1573-0964</issn><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes also conceded by eternalists). As has been shown in other domains of philosophy (e.g. free will), we should be careful when attributing some supposed intuitions to common sense, and Torrengo (Phenomenology and Mind 12: 50–55, 2017) and Le Bihan (Igitur-Arguments Philos 9(1):1–23, 2018) have legitimately raised doubts about the assumption that common sense is presentist. In this paper, I take up this challenge and try to show that our common-sense intuitions do imply presentism. More precisely, the intuitions that I take to imply presentism are fundamental intuitions about our selves as conscious beings. The upshot is that presentism is so much embedded within our conception of our selves that if presentism is false, then I don’t exist!</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3868-4351</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1573-0964
ispartof Synthese (Dordrecht), 2024-05, Vol.203 (5), p.168, Article 168
issn 1573-0964
0039-7857
1573-0964
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3053859066
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Debates
Education
Epistemology
Free will
Logic
Metaphysics
Original Research
Phenomenology
Philosophy
Philosophy of Language
Philosophy of Science
title If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A57%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=If%20presentism%20is%20false,%20then%20I%20don%E2%80%99t%20exist.%20On%20common-sense%20presentism&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Guillon,%20Jean-Baptiste&rft.date=2024-05-12&rft.volume=203&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=168&rft.pages=168-&rft.artnum=168&rft.issn=1573-0964&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3053859066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053859066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true