If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism
For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes al...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Synthese (Dordrecht) 2024-05, Vol.203 (5), p.168, Article 168 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 168 |
container_title | Synthese (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 203 |
creator | Guillon, Jean-Baptiste |
description | For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes also conceded by eternalists). As has been shown in other domains of philosophy (e.g. free will), we should be careful when attributing some supposed intuitions to common sense, and Torrengo (Phenomenology and Mind 12: 50–55, 2017) and Le Bihan (Igitur-Arguments Philos 9(1):1–23, 2018) have legitimately raised doubts about the assumption that common sense is presentist. In this paper, I take up this challenge and try to show that our common-sense intuitions do imply presentism. More precisely, the intuitions that I take to imply presentism are fundamental intuitions about our selves as conscious beings. The upshot is that presentism is so much embedded within our conception of our selves that if presentism is false, then I don’t exist! |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3053859066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3053859066</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab01928a4bccf15c1ff0ff07ec5b7c7eb1958d4b1b40987477e4d09ef096f98b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4Cng1dTJbrJJjlK0LRR60XPYpIlucbM12YLefA1fzycxdgV7EgZmDv83M3wIXVKYUABxkygtCkWgYAQYZ5zIIzSiXJQEVMWOD-ZTdJbSBoDSisEIzRceb6NLLvRNanGTsK9fkrvG_bMLeIHXXfj6-Oyxe2tSP8GrgG3Xtl0gmUjuAD1HJ3vy4reP0eP93cN0Tpar2WJ6uyS2pKwntQGqClkzY62n3FLvIZdwlhthhTNUcblmhhoGSgomhGNrUM7n372Sphyjq2HvNnavO5d6vel2MeSTugReSq6gqnKqGFI2dilF5_U2Nm0d3zUF_WNMD8Z0Nqb3xrTMUDlAKYfDk4t_q_-hvgFx-G61</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053859066</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creator><creatorcontrib>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><description>For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes also conceded by eternalists). As has been shown in other domains of philosophy (e.g. free will), we should be careful when attributing some supposed intuitions to common sense, and Torrengo (Phenomenology and Mind 12: 50–55, 2017) and Le Bihan (Igitur-Arguments Philos 9(1):1–23, 2018) have legitimately raised doubts about the assumption that common sense is presentist. In this paper, I take up this challenge and try to show that our common-sense intuitions do imply presentism. More precisely, the intuitions that I take to imply presentism are fundamental intuitions about our selves as conscious beings. The upshot is that presentism is so much embedded within our conception of our selves that if presentism is false, then I don’t exist!</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0039-7857</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0964</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Debates ; Education ; Epistemology ; Free will ; Logic ; Metaphysics ; Original Research ; Phenomenology ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Language ; Philosophy of Science</subject><ispartof>Synthese (Dordrecht), 2024-05, Vol.203 (5), p.168, Article 168</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab01928a4bccf15c1ff0ff07ec5b7c7eb1958d4b1b40987477e4d09ef096f98b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3868-4351</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><title>If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism</title><title>Synthese (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Synthese</addtitle><description>For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes also conceded by eternalists). As has been shown in other domains of philosophy (e.g. free will), we should be careful when attributing some supposed intuitions to common sense, and Torrengo (Phenomenology and Mind 12: 50–55, 2017) and Le Bihan (Igitur-Arguments Philos 9(1):1–23, 2018) have legitimately raised doubts about the assumption that common sense is presentist. In this paper, I take up this challenge and try to show that our common-sense intuitions do imply presentism. More precisely, the intuitions that I take to imply presentism are fundamental intuitions about our selves as conscious beings. The upshot is that presentism is so much embedded within our conception of our selves that if presentism is false, then I don’t exist!</description><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Epistemology</subject><subject>Free will</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Metaphysics</subject><subject>Original Research</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Language</subject><subject>Philosophy of Science</subject><issn>1573-0964</issn><issn>0039-7857</issn><issn>1573-0964</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKsv4Cng1dTJbrJJjlK0LRR60XPYpIlucbM12YLefA1fzycxdgV7EgZmDv83M3wIXVKYUABxkygtCkWgYAQYZ5zIIzSiXJQEVMWOD-ZTdJbSBoDSisEIzRceb6NLLvRNanGTsK9fkrvG_bMLeIHXXfj6-Oyxe2tSP8GrgG3Xtl0gmUjuAD1HJ3vy4reP0eP93cN0Tpar2WJ6uyS2pKwntQGqClkzY62n3FLvIZdwlhthhTNUcblmhhoGSgomhGNrUM7n372Sphyjq2HvNnavO5d6vel2MeSTugReSq6gqnKqGFI2dilF5_U2Nm0d3zUF_WNMD8Z0Nqb3xrTMUDlAKYfDk4t_q_-hvgFx-G61</recordid><startdate>20240512</startdate><enddate>20240512</enddate><creator>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3868-4351</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240512</creationdate><title>If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism</title><author>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-ab01928a4bccf15c1ff0ff07ec5b7c7eb1958d4b1b40987477e4d09ef096f98b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Epistemology</topic><topic>Free will</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Metaphysics</topic><topic>Original Research</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Language</topic><topic>Philosophy of Science</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guillon, Jean-Baptiste</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism</atitle><jtitle>Synthese (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Synthese</stitle><date>2024-05-12</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>203</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>168</spage><pages>168-</pages><artnum>168</artnum><issn>1573-0964</issn><issn>0039-7857</issn><eissn>1573-0964</eissn><abstract>For many presentist philosophers, e.g. Zimmerman (Contemp Debates Metaphys 10:211–225, 2008), a central motivation in favour of presentism is that it is supposed to be part of common sense. But the fact that common-sense intuitions are indeed presentist is usually taken for granted (and sometimes also conceded by eternalists). As has been shown in other domains of philosophy (e.g. free will), we should be careful when attributing some supposed intuitions to common sense, and Torrengo (Phenomenology and Mind 12: 50–55, 2017) and Le Bihan (Igitur-Arguments Philos 9(1):1–23, 2018) have legitimately raised doubts about the assumption that common sense is presentist. In this paper, I take up this challenge and try to show that our common-sense intuitions do imply presentism. More precisely, the intuitions that I take to imply presentism are fundamental intuitions about our selves as conscious beings. The upshot is that presentism is so much embedded within our conception of our selves that if presentism is false, then I don’t exist!</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3868-4351</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1573-0964 |
ispartof | Synthese (Dordrecht), 2024-05, Vol.203 (5), p.168, Article 168 |
issn | 1573-0964 0039-7857 1573-0964 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3053859066 |
source | SpringerLink Journals |
subjects | Debates Education Epistemology Free will Logic Metaphysics Original Research Phenomenology Philosophy Philosophy of Language Philosophy of Science |
title | If presentism is false, then I don’t exist. On common-sense presentism |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A57%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=If%20presentism%20is%20false,%20then%20I%20don%E2%80%99t%20exist.%20On%20common-sense%20presentism&rft.jtitle=Synthese%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Guillon,%20Jean-Baptiste&rft.date=2024-05-12&rft.volume=203&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=168&rft.pages=168-&rft.artnum=168&rft.issn=1573-0964&rft.eissn=1573-0964&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11229-024-04545-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3053859066%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053859066&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |