Assessing Multilateral Development Bank ESG Safeguard Integration with International Sustainability Ratings
In an era where sustainability is paramount, this study critically assesses how multilateral development banks (MDBs) integrate internationally recognized sustainability indicators into their ESG safeguard policies. MDBs have historically incorporated policies to manage environmental and social risk...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3789 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3789 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Rodríguez Estévez, Damián Arce Ruíz, Rosa María |
description | In an era where sustainability is paramount, this study critically assesses how multilateral development banks (MDBs) integrate internationally recognized sustainability indicators into their ESG safeguard policies. MDBs have historically incorporated policies to manage environmental and social risks in project financing; yet, protections against negative impacts in developing countries often remain insufficient. On the other hand, several infrastructure sustainability rating systems have been established around the world in recent decades due to economic growth and the importance of controlling environmental impacts associated with the construction sector. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether and how the indicators that these internationally recognized systems use to rate whether a project is sustainable are integrated into these safeguards by using several methodologies, including an analysis of existing documentation, a high-level matrix, and qualitative methods based on co-occurrences using specialized “atlas ti” software. The results show that MDBs’ coverage of financial, governance, and country risks lacks the sustainability focus found in these rating systems. Therefore, this study that concludes MDB safeguards must evolve, balancing comprehensive sustainability parameters and detailed management guidelines and addressing impacts beyond statutory frameworks to encourage stakeholder engagement for more sustainable infrastructure projects. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su16093789 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3053209711</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793570925</galeid><sourcerecordid>A793570925</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-bf64a9a73338fd7ec0e2e0598ecc85f5e72b5130a2fc4a9332ee4ea96322bbb93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkU9LAzEQxRdRUGovfoIFTwrVJOM2zbHWqgVF6Op5md1O1thttiZZ_3x7oxW0M4cZHr83DLwkOeLsDECxc9_xIVMgR2onORBM8gFnGdv9t-8nfe9fWCwArvjwIFmOvSfvja3T-64JpsFADpv0it6oadcrsiG9RLtMp_lNmqOmukO3SGc2UO0wmNam7yY8_wjO_gjRnXc-oLFYmsaEz3QedVv7w2RPY-Op_zt7ydP19HFyO7h7uJlNxneDCoQMg1IPL1ChBICRXkiqGAlimRpRVY0ynZEUZcaBodBVBAEE0QWhGoIQZVkq6CXHm7tr17525EPx0nbxucYXwDIQTEnOI3W2oWpsqDBWt8FhFXtBK1O1lrSJ-lgqyCRTIouGky1DZAJ9hBo774tZPt9mTzds5VrvHeli7cwK3WfBWfEdVvEXFnwBEXmHVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053209711</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Multilateral Development Bank ESG Safeguard Integration with International Sustainability Ratings</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Rodríguez Estévez, Damián ; Arce Ruíz, Rosa María</creator><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Estévez, Damián ; Arce Ruíz, Rosa María</creatorcontrib><description>In an era where sustainability is paramount, this study critically assesses how multilateral development banks (MDBs) integrate internationally recognized sustainability indicators into their ESG safeguard policies. MDBs have historically incorporated policies to manage environmental and social risks in project financing; yet, protections against negative impacts in developing countries often remain insufficient. On the other hand, several infrastructure sustainability rating systems have been established around the world in recent decades due to economic growth and the importance of controlling environmental impacts associated with the construction sector. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether and how the indicators that these internationally recognized systems use to rate whether a project is sustainable are integrated into these safeguards by using several methodologies, including an analysis of existing documentation, a high-level matrix, and qualitative methods based on co-occurrences using specialized “atlas ti” software. The results show that MDBs’ coverage of financial, governance, and country risks lacks the sustainability focus found in these rating systems. Therefore, this study that concludes MDB safeguards must evolve, balancing comprehensive sustainability parameters and detailed management guidelines and addressing impacts beyond statutory frameworks to encourage stakeholder engagement for more sustainable infrastructure projects.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16093789</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Certification ; Construction industry ; Developing countries ; Development banks ; Economic growth ; Environmental sustainability ; Infrastructure ; Sustainability ; Taxonomy ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3789</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-bf64a9a73338fd7ec0e2e0598ecc85f5e72b5130a2fc4a9332ee4ea96322bbb93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9897-509X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Estévez, Damián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arce Ruíz, Rosa María</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Multilateral Development Bank ESG Safeguard Integration with International Sustainability Ratings</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>In an era where sustainability is paramount, this study critically assesses how multilateral development banks (MDBs) integrate internationally recognized sustainability indicators into their ESG safeguard policies. MDBs have historically incorporated policies to manage environmental and social risks in project financing; yet, protections against negative impacts in developing countries often remain insufficient. On the other hand, several infrastructure sustainability rating systems have been established around the world in recent decades due to economic growth and the importance of controlling environmental impacts associated with the construction sector. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether and how the indicators that these internationally recognized systems use to rate whether a project is sustainable are integrated into these safeguards by using several methodologies, including an analysis of existing documentation, a high-level matrix, and qualitative methods based on co-occurrences using specialized “atlas ti” software. The results show that MDBs’ coverage of financial, governance, and country risks lacks the sustainability focus found in these rating systems. Therefore, this study that concludes MDB safeguards must evolve, balancing comprehensive sustainability parameters and detailed management guidelines and addressing impacts beyond statutory frameworks to encourage stakeholder engagement for more sustainable infrastructure projects.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Development banks</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Environmental sustainability</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkU9LAzEQxRdRUGovfoIFTwrVJOM2zbHWqgVF6Op5md1O1thttiZZ_3x7oxW0M4cZHr83DLwkOeLsDECxc9_xIVMgR2onORBM8gFnGdv9t-8nfe9fWCwArvjwIFmOvSfvja3T-64JpsFADpv0it6oadcrsiG9RLtMp_lNmqOmukO3SGc2UO0wmNam7yY8_wjO_gjRnXc-oLFYmsaEz3QedVv7w2RPY-Op_zt7ydP19HFyO7h7uJlNxneDCoQMg1IPL1ChBICRXkiqGAlimRpRVY0ynZEUZcaBodBVBAEE0QWhGoIQZVkq6CXHm7tr17525EPx0nbxucYXwDIQTEnOI3W2oWpsqDBWt8FhFXtBK1O1lrSJ-lgqyCRTIouGky1DZAJ9hBo774tZPt9mTzds5VrvHeli7cwK3WfBWfEdVvEXFnwBEXmHVQ</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Rodríguez Estévez, Damián</creator><creator>Arce Ruíz, Rosa María</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9897-509X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Assessing Multilateral Development Bank ESG Safeguard Integration with International Sustainability Ratings</title><author>Rodríguez Estévez, Damián ; Arce Ruíz, Rosa María</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-bf64a9a73338fd7ec0e2e0598ecc85f5e72b5130a2fc4a9332ee4ea96322bbb93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Development banks</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Environmental sustainability</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez Estévez, Damián</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arce Ruíz, Rosa María</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rodríguez Estévez, Damián</au><au>Arce Ruíz, Rosa María</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Multilateral Development Bank ESG Safeguard Integration with International Sustainability Ratings</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3789</spage><pages>3789-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>In an era where sustainability is paramount, this study critically assesses how multilateral development banks (MDBs) integrate internationally recognized sustainability indicators into their ESG safeguard policies. MDBs have historically incorporated policies to manage environmental and social risks in project financing; yet, protections against negative impacts in developing countries often remain insufficient. On the other hand, several infrastructure sustainability rating systems have been established around the world in recent decades due to economic growth and the importance of controlling environmental impacts associated with the construction sector. The purpose of this study was to analyze whether and how the indicators that these internationally recognized systems use to rate whether a project is sustainable are integrated into these safeguards by using several methodologies, including an analysis of existing documentation, a high-level matrix, and qualitative methods based on co-occurrences using specialized “atlas ti” software. The results show that MDBs’ coverage of financial, governance, and country risks lacks the sustainability focus found in these rating systems. Therefore, this study that concludes MDB safeguards must evolve, balancing comprehensive sustainability parameters and detailed management guidelines and addressing impacts beyond statutory frameworks to encourage stakeholder engagement for more sustainable infrastructure projects.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16093789</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9897-509X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3789 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3053209711 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Accountability Certification Construction industry Developing countries Development banks Economic growth Environmental sustainability Infrastructure Sustainability Taxonomy Transparency |
title | Assessing Multilateral Development Bank ESG Safeguard Integration with International Sustainability Ratings |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T00%3A40%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Multilateral%20Development%20Bank%20ESG%20Safeguard%20Integration%20with%20International%20Sustainability%20Ratings&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Rodr%C3%ADguez%20Est%C3%A9vez,%20Dami%C3%A1n&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3789&rft.pages=3789-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16093789&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA793570925%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053209711&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A793570925&rfr_iscdi=true |