Structural Equation Modeling in Technology Adoption and Use in the Construction Industry: A Scientometric Analysis and Qualitative Review
Considering the emergence and adoption of various innovative technologies, the construction industry has undergone transformation into a more secure, highly efficient, and ecologically sustainable landscape. An increasing number of studies uses the structural equation modeling (SEM) method to explor...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3824 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3824 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Fu, Chuyou Wang, Jun Qu, Ziyi Skitmore, Martin Yi, Jiaxin Sun, Zhengjie Chen, Jianli |
description | Considering the emergence and adoption of various innovative technologies, the construction industry has undergone transformation into a more secure, highly efficient, and ecologically sustainable landscape. An increasing number of studies uses the structural equation modeling (SEM) method to explore the dynamics of technology adoption and use within the construction sector. Previous studies have mainly focused on qualitative analysis using the SEM method to analyze technology adoption and usage in the construction industry. This study, however, distinguishes itself from previous research by focusing on the SEM method itself and conducting a systematic analysis using scientometric methods. Based on a total of 140 relevant journal articles, this study adopts a scientometric analysis approach to conduct a holistic review encompassing sources, researchers, keywords, and highly cited documents. The research findings are as follows: (1) the primary focus of the current research topics is on BIM technology; (2) most studies employ cross-sectional SEM instead of longitudinal SEM; (3) there is a deficiency in the theoretical foundation for designing SEM in current research; and (4) the selection of either reflective or formative measures lacks sufficient rigor. Qualitative analysis is used to examine prevailing issues in research design and address the intricate technicalities and potential challenges inherent in the SEM method. Three research gaps and future directions are presented: diversifying regions of study and research topics, incorporating theoretical support for research design, and carefully choosing reflective or formative measures. The findings provide a comprehensive roadmap and valuable reference for future research in this field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su16093824 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3053207001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793571399</galeid><sourcerecordid>A793571399</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-c254e5dcdbe6903b8240e0fe3d44461a8a065f6340850fafcef1e36b1af423663</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkdtOGzEQhleolUCUmz6BpV61UmC8s-tke7eKKEQCIQhcrxzvOBht7OADJY_AW-MklQqeC3v8f__4MEXxncMpYgNnIXEBDU7K6qA4KmHMRxxq-PJhfVichPAEeSDyhouj4m0efVIxeTmw8-cko3GWXbueBmOXzFh2T-rRusEtN6zt3XqnS9uzh0BbOT4SmzobdlW22sz2KWeb36xlc2XIRrei6I1irZXDJpiws98mOZiYj3shdkcvhv5-K75qOQQ6-TcfFw9_zu-nl6Orm4vZtL0aKSzHcaTKuqK6V_2CRAO4yK8FAk3YV1UluJxIELUWWMGkBi21Is0JxYJLXZUoBB4XP_Z11949Jwqxe3LJ57uFDqHG_FcAPFOne2opB-qM1S56qXL0tDLKWdIm77fjBusxx6bJhp-fDJmJ9BqXMoXQzeZ3n9lfe1Z5F4In3a29WUm_6Th021Z2_1uJ7xAdkYM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053207001</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural Equation Modeling in Technology Adoption and Use in the Construction Industry: A Scientometric Analysis and Qualitative Review</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Fu, Chuyou ; Wang, Jun ; Qu, Ziyi ; Skitmore, Martin ; Yi, Jiaxin ; Sun, Zhengjie ; Chen, Jianli</creator><creatorcontrib>Fu, Chuyou ; Wang, Jun ; Qu, Ziyi ; Skitmore, Martin ; Yi, Jiaxin ; Sun, Zhengjie ; Chen, Jianli</creatorcontrib><description>Considering the emergence and adoption of various innovative technologies, the construction industry has undergone transformation into a more secure, highly efficient, and ecologically sustainable landscape. An increasing number of studies uses the structural equation modeling (SEM) method to explore the dynamics of technology adoption and use within the construction sector. Previous studies have mainly focused on qualitative analysis using the SEM method to analyze technology adoption and usage in the construction industry. This study, however, distinguishes itself from previous research by focusing on the SEM method itself and conducting a systematic analysis using scientometric methods. Based on a total of 140 relevant journal articles, this study adopts a scientometric analysis approach to conduct a holistic review encompassing sources, researchers, keywords, and highly cited documents. The research findings are as follows: (1) the primary focus of the current research topics is on BIM technology; (2) most studies employ cross-sectional SEM instead of longitudinal SEM; (3) there is a deficiency in the theoretical foundation for designing SEM in current research; and (4) the selection of either reflective or formative measures lacks sufficient rigor. Qualitative analysis is used to examine prevailing issues in research design and address the intricate technicalities and potential challenges inherent in the SEM method. Three research gaps and future directions are presented: diversifying regions of study and research topics, incorporating theoretical support for research design, and carefully choosing reflective or formative measures. The findings provide a comprehensive roadmap and valuable reference for future research in this field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16093824</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Building information modeling ; Construction industry ; Knowledge management ; Literature reviews ; Mediation ; Quantitative analysis ; Research design ; Research methodology ; Science ; Scientometrics ; Social networks ; Structural equation modeling ; Technology adoption</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3824</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-c254e5dcdbe6903b8240e0fe3d44461a8a065f6340850fafcef1e36b1af423663</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-7135-1201 ; 0000-0003-4235-2736</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fu, Chuyou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Ziyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skitmore, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhengjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jianli</creatorcontrib><title>Structural Equation Modeling in Technology Adoption and Use in the Construction Industry: A Scientometric Analysis and Qualitative Review</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>Considering the emergence and adoption of various innovative technologies, the construction industry has undergone transformation into a more secure, highly efficient, and ecologically sustainable landscape. An increasing number of studies uses the structural equation modeling (SEM) method to explore the dynamics of technology adoption and use within the construction sector. Previous studies have mainly focused on qualitative analysis using the SEM method to analyze technology adoption and usage in the construction industry. This study, however, distinguishes itself from previous research by focusing on the SEM method itself and conducting a systematic analysis using scientometric methods. Based on a total of 140 relevant journal articles, this study adopts a scientometric analysis approach to conduct a holistic review encompassing sources, researchers, keywords, and highly cited documents. The research findings are as follows: (1) the primary focus of the current research topics is on BIM technology; (2) most studies employ cross-sectional SEM instead of longitudinal SEM; (3) there is a deficiency in the theoretical foundation for designing SEM in current research; and (4) the selection of either reflective or formative measures lacks sufficient rigor. Qualitative analysis is used to examine prevailing issues in research design and address the intricate technicalities and potential challenges inherent in the SEM method. Three research gaps and future directions are presented: diversifying regions of study and research topics, incorporating theoretical support for research design, and carefully choosing reflective or formative measures. The findings provide a comprehensive roadmap and valuable reference for future research in this field.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Building information modeling</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Literature reviews</subject><subject>Mediation</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Research design</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Scientometrics</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Structural equation modeling</subject><subject>Technology adoption</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkdtOGzEQhleolUCUmz6BpV61UmC8s-tke7eKKEQCIQhcrxzvOBht7OADJY_AW-MklQqeC3v8f__4MEXxncMpYgNnIXEBDU7K6qA4KmHMRxxq-PJhfVichPAEeSDyhouj4m0efVIxeTmw8-cko3GWXbueBmOXzFh2T-rRusEtN6zt3XqnS9uzh0BbOT4SmzobdlW22sz2KWeb36xlc2XIRrei6I1irZXDJpiws98mOZiYj3shdkcvhv5-K75qOQQ6-TcfFw9_zu-nl6Orm4vZtL0aKSzHcaTKuqK6V_2CRAO4yK8FAk3YV1UluJxIELUWWMGkBi21Is0JxYJLXZUoBB4XP_Z11949Jwqxe3LJ57uFDqHG_FcAPFOne2opB-qM1S56qXL0tDLKWdIm77fjBusxx6bJhp-fDJmJ9BqXMoXQzeZ3n9lfe1Z5F4In3a29WUm_6Th021Z2_1uJ7xAdkYM</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Fu, Chuyou</creator><creator>Wang, Jun</creator><creator>Qu, Ziyi</creator><creator>Skitmore, Martin</creator><creator>Yi, Jiaxin</creator><creator>Sun, Zhengjie</creator><creator>Chen, Jianli</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>COVID</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7135-1201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-2736</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Structural Equation Modeling in Technology Adoption and Use in the Construction Industry: A Scientometric Analysis and Qualitative Review</title><author>Fu, Chuyou ; Wang, Jun ; Qu, Ziyi ; Skitmore, Martin ; Yi, Jiaxin ; Sun, Zhengjie ; Chen, Jianli</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-c254e5dcdbe6903b8240e0fe3d44461a8a065f6340850fafcef1e36b1af423663</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Building information modeling</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Literature reviews</topic><topic>Mediation</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Research design</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Scientometrics</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Structural equation modeling</topic><topic>Technology adoption</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fu, Chuyou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Ziyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skitmore, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Jiaxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Zhengjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jianli</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Coronavirus Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fu, Chuyou</au><au>Wang, Jun</au><au>Qu, Ziyi</au><au>Skitmore, Martin</au><au>Yi, Jiaxin</au><au>Sun, Zhengjie</au><au>Chen, Jianli</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural Equation Modeling in Technology Adoption and Use in the Construction Industry: A Scientometric Analysis and Qualitative Review</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3824</spage><pages>3824-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>Considering the emergence and adoption of various innovative technologies, the construction industry has undergone transformation into a more secure, highly efficient, and ecologically sustainable landscape. An increasing number of studies uses the structural equation modeling (SEM) method to explore the dynamics of technology adoption and use within the construction sector. Previous studies have mainly focused on qualitative analysis using the SEM method to analyze technology adoption and usage in the construction industry. This study, however, distinguishes itself from previous research by focusing on the SEM method itself and conducting a systematic analysis using scientometric methods. Based on a total of 140 relevant journal articles, this study adopts a scientometric analysis approach to conduct a holistic review encompassing sources, researchers, keywords, and highly cited documents. The research findings are as follows: (1) the primary focus of the current research topics is on BIM technology; (2) most studies employ cross-sectional SEM instead of longitudinal SEM; (3) there is a deficiency in the theoretical foundation for designing SEM in current research; and (4) the selection of either reflective or formative measures lacks sufficient rigor. Qualitative analysis is used to examine prevailing issues in research design and address the intricate technicalities and potential challenges inherent in the SEM method. Three research gaps and future directions are presented: diversifying regions of study and research topics, incorporating theoretical support for research design, and carefully choosing reflective or formative measures. The findings provide a comprehensive roadmap and valuable reference for future research in this field.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16093824</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7135-1201</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4235-2736</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3824 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3053207001 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Bibliometrics Building information modeling Construction industry Knowledge management Literature reviews Mediation Quantitative analysis Research design Research methodology Science Scientometrics Social networks Structural equation modeling Technology adoption |
title | Structural Equation Modeling in Technology Adoption and Use in the Construction Industry: A Scientometric Analysis and Qualitative Review |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T00%3A18%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20Equation%20Modeling%20in%20Technology%20Adoption%20and%20Use%20in%20the%20Construction%20Industry:%20A%20Scientometric%20Analysis%20and%20Qualitative%20Review&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Fu,%20Chuyou&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3824&rft.pages=3824-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16093824&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA793571399%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053207001&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A793571399&rfr_iscdi=true |