An Assessment of Accessibility from a Socially Sustainable Urban Mobility Approach in Mass Transit Projects: Contributions from the Northern Central American Triangle
This article aims to address the lack of research on the social dimension of sustainability, also known as social sustainability, in urban mobility projects, primarily in cities of the Global South. It proposes a strategy to partially assess social sustainability, focusing on accessibility, which is...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3766 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3766 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Grande-Ayala, Carlos Ernesto |
description | This article aims to address the lack of research on the social dimension of sustainability, also known as social sustainability, in urban mobility projects, primarily in cities of the Global South. It proposes a strategy to partially assess social sustainability, focusing on accessibility, which is one of the key dimensions for conducting such an evaluation. To this end, a comparative analysis of three study cases is conducted in the capital cities of the Northern Central American Triangle (NCAT) before and after the construction of bus rapid transit (BRT) projects between 2000 and 2020. Accessibility is evaluated through equity and spatial efficiency indicators obtained through geographical information system (GIS) modeling, including layers representing transportation networks, populated areas, and locations of basic urban facilities. The result is an unprecedented assessment of accessibility in the NCAT capitals, which shows how the Guatemala City BRT project has improved the city’s social sustainability by reducing access times to basic urban facilities, mainly public health clinics and educational facilities, and narrowing the inequality gap as compared to projects in San Salvador and Tegucigalpa, the other capital cities in the NCAT. Additionally, it is emphasized that this methodology can be replicated in the Global South while considering the scarcity of information and the use of open-source software in the process. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su16093766 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3053206217</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793570902</galeid><sourcerecordid>A793570902</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-2f9a3ab3274bce92bd95adf43217116785cbe550670c140a01a6d87c3e2926fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptks1qGzEQx5fSQEOaS59A0FMLTvRhSdneFtO0gbQJsXMWs7LkyOxKrkYL9Qv1OavgQGqo5jAf_OY_I5im-cDohRAtvcSJKdoKrdSb5pRTzWaMSvr2n_hdc464pfUJwVqmTps_XSQdokMcXSwkedJZW7PQhyGUPfE5jQTIMtkAw7AnywkLhAj94Mhj7iGSH-kF7Xa7nMA-kVCLgEhWGSKGQu5z2jpb8AtZpFhy6KcSUsSDdnly5GfK1eVIFnWHDAPpRpeDreKrHCBuBve-OfEwoDt_8WfN4_XX1eL77Pbu282iu51ZIWWZcd-CgF5wPe-ta3m_biWs_VxwphlT-kra3klJlaaWzSlQBmp9pa1wvOXKW3HWfDzo1q_8mhwWs01TjnWkEVQKTlVVeqU2MDgTok91azsGtKbTrZCatpRX6uI_VLW1G4NN0flQ60cNn44aKlPc77KBCdHcLB-O2c8H1uaEmJ03uxxGyHvDqHm-BvN6DeIvf7Cm_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053206217</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Assessment of Accessibility from a Socially Sustainable Urban Mobility Approach in Mass Transit Projects: Contributions from the Northern Central American Triangle</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><creator>Grande-Ayala, Carlos Ernesto</creator><creatorcontrib>Grande-Ayala, Carlos Ernesto</creatorcontrib><description>This article aims to address the lack of research on the social dimension of sustainability, also known as social sustainability, in urban mobility projects, primarily in cities of the Global South. It proposes a strategy to partially assess social sustainability, focusing on accessibility, which is one of the key dimensions for conducting such an evaluation. To this end, a comparative analysis of three study cases is conducted in the capital cities of the Northern Central American Triangle (NCAT) before and after the construction of bus rapid transit (BRT) projects between 2000 and 2020. Accessibility is evaluated through equity and spatial efficiency indicators obtained through geographical information system (GIS) modeling, including layers representing transportation networks, populated areas, and locations of basic urban facilities. The result is an unprecedented assessment of accessibility in the NCAT capitals, which shows how the Guatemala City BRT project has improved the city’s social sustainability by reducing access times to basic urban facilities, mainly public health clinics and educational facilities, and narrowing the inequality gap as compared to projects in San Salvador and Tegucigalpa, the other capital cities in the NCAT. Additionally, it is emphasized that this methodology can be replicated in the Global South while considering the scarcity of information and the use of open-source software in the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16093766</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Cities ; Clinics ; Comparative analysis ; Developing countries ; Education parks ; Geographic information systems ; LDCs ; Local transit ; Mass transit ; Public software ; Public transportation ; Quality of life ; Research methodology ; School facilities ; Social sustainability ; Sustainable development ; Sustainable urban development ; Urban planning</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3766</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-2f9a3ab3274bce92bd95adf43217116785cbe550670c140a01a6d87c3e2926fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0406-3538</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grande-Ayala, Carlos Ernesto</creatorcontrib><title>An Assessment of Accessibility from a Socially Sustainable Urban Mobility Approach in Mass Transit Projects: Contributions from the Northern Central American Triangle</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>This article aims to address the lack of research on the social dimension of sustainability, also known as social sustainability, in urban mobility projects, primarily in cities of the Global South. It proposes a strategy to partially assess social sustainability, focusing on accessibility, which is one of the key dimensions for conducting such an evaluation. To this end, a comparative analysis of three study cases is conducted in the capital cities of the Northern Central American Triangle (NCAT) before and after the construction of bus rapid transit (BRT) projects between 2000 and 2020. Accessibility is evaluated through equity and spatial efficiency indicators obtained through geographical information system (GIS) modeling, including layers representing transportation networks, populated areas, and locations of basic urban facilities. The result is an unprecedented assessment of accessibility in the NCAT capitals, which shows how the Guatemala City BRT project has improved the city’s social sustainability by reducing access times to basic urban facilities, mainly public health clinics and educational facilities, and narrowing the inequality gap as compared to projects in San Salvador and Tegucigalpa, the other capital cities in the NCAT. Additionally, it is emphasized that this methodology can be replicated in the Global South while considering the scarcity of information and the use of open-source software in the process.</description><subject>Cities</subject><subject>Clinics</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Education parks</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Local transit</subject><subject>Mass transit</subject><subject>Public software</subject><subject>Public transportation</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>School facilities</subject><subject>Social sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Sustainable urban development</subject><subject>Urban planning</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNptks1qGzEQx5fSQEOaS59A0FMLTvRhSdneFtO0gbQJsXMWs7LkyOxKrkYL9Qv1OavgQGqo5jAf_OY_I5im-cDohRAtvcSJKdoKrdSb5pRTzWaMSvr2n_hdc464pfUJwVqmTps_XSQdokMcXSwkedJZW7PQhyGUPfE5jQTIMtkAw7AnywkLhAj94Mhj7iGSH-kF7Xa7nMA-kVCLgEhWGSKGQu5z2jpb8AtZpFhy6KcSUsSDdnly5GfK1eVIFnWHDAPpRpeDreKrHCBuBve-OfEwoDt_8WfN4_XX1eL77Pbu282iu51ZIWWZcd-CgF5wPe-ta3m_biWs_VxwphlT-kra3klJlaaWzSlQBmp9pa1wvOXKW3HWfDzo1q_8mhwWs01TjnWkEVQKTlVVeqU2MDgTok91azsGtKbTrZCatpRX6uI_VLW1G4NN0flQ60cNn44aKlPc77KBCdHcLB-O2c8H1uaEmJ03uxxGyHvDqHm-BvN6DeIvf7Cm_A</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Grande-Ayala, Carlos Ernesto</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0406-3538</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>An Assessment of Accessibility from a Socially Sustainable Urban Mobility Approach in Mass Transit Projects: Contributions from the Northern Central American Triangle</title><author>Grande-Ayala, Carlos Ernesto</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c355t-2f9a3ab3274bce92bd95adf43217116785cbe550670c140a01a6d87c3e2926fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cities</topic><topic>Clinics</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Education parks</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Local transit</topic><topic>Mass transit</topic><topic>Public software</topic><topic>Public transportation</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>School facilities</topic><topic>Social sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Sustainable urban development</topic><topic>Urban planning</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grande-Ayala, Carlos Ernesto</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grande-Ayala, Carlos Ernesto</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Assessment of Accessibility from a Socially Sustainable Urban Mobility Approach in Mass Transit Projects: Contributions from the Northern Central American Triangle</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3766</spage><pages>3766-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>This article aims to address the lack of research on the social dimension of sustainability, also known as social sustainability, in urban mobility projects, primarily in cities of the Global South. It proposes a strategy to partially assess social sustainability, focusing on accessibility, which is one of the key dimensions for conducting such an evaluation. To this end, a comparative analysis of three study cases is conducted in the capital cities of the Northern Central American Triangle (NCAT) before and after the construction of bus rapid transit (BRT) projects between 2000 and 2020. Accessibility is evaluated through equity and spatial efficiency indicators obtained through geographical information system (GIS) modeling, including layers representing transportation networks, populated areas, and locations of basic urban facilities. The result is an unprecedented assessment of accessibility in the NCAT capitals, which shows how the Guatemala City BRT project has improved the city’s social sustainability by reducing access times to basic urban facilities, mainly public health clinics and educational facilities, and narrowing the inequality gap as compared to projects in San Salvador and Tegucigalpa, the other capital cities in the NCAT. Additionally, it is emphasized that this methodology can be replicated in the Global South while considering the scarcity of information and the use of open-source software in the process.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16093766</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0406-3538</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3766 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3053206217 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute |
subjects | Cities Clinics Comparative analysis Developing countries Education parks Geographic information systems LDCs Local transit Mass transit Public software Public transportation Quality of life Research methodology School facilities Social sustainability Sustainable development Sustainable urban development Urban planning |
title | An Assessment of Accessibility from a Socially Sustainable Urban Mobility Approach in Mass Transit Projects: Contributions from the Northern Central American Triangle |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A08%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Assessment%20of%20Accessibility%20from%20a%20Socially%20Sustainable%20Urban%20Mobility%20Approach%20in%20Mass%20Transit%20Projects:%20Contributions%20from%20the%20Northern%20Central%20American%20Triangle&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Grande-Ayala,%20Carlos%20Ernesto&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3766&rft.pages=3766-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16093766&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA793570902%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053206217&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A793570902&rfr_iscdi=true |