How Credible Is the 25-Year Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Warranty?—A Techno-Financial Evaluation and Implications for the Sustainable Development of the PV Industry
To support the bankability of PV projects, PV manufacturers have been offering one of the longest warranties in the world, typically in the range of 25–30 years. During the warranty period, PV manufacturers guarantee that the degradation of PV modules will not exceed 0.4–0.6% each year, or the buyer...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sustainability 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3880 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 3880 |
container_title | Sustainability |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Hsi, Pao-Hsiang Shieh, Joseph C. P |
description | To support the bankability of PV projects, PV manufacturers have been offering one of the longest warranties in the world, typically in the range of 25–30 years. During the warranty period, PV manufacturers guarantee that the degradation of PV modules will not exceed 0.4–0.6% each year, or the buyer can at any time make a claim to the manufacturer for replacement or compensation for the shortfall. Due to its popularity, the performance warranty terms have become more and more competitive each year. However, long-term PV operating data have been very limited and bankruptcy of PV manufacturers has been quite common. Without a proper methodology to assess the adequacy of PV manufacturer’s warranty fund (WF) reserve, the 25-year performance warranty can become empty promises. To ensure sustainable development of the PV industry, this study develops a probability-weighted expected value method to determine the necessary WF reserve based on benchmark field degradation data and prevailing degradation cap of 0.55% per year. The simulation result shows that, unless the manufacturer’s degradation pattern is significantly better than the benchmark degradation profile, 1.302% of the sales value is required for the WF reserve. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that provides WF reserve requirement estimation for 25-year PV performance warranty. The result will provide transparency for PV investors and motivation for PV manufacturers for continuous quality improvement as all such achievement can now be reflected in manufacturers’ annual report result. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/su16093880 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3053205052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A793571455</galeid><sourcerecordid>A793571455</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-371256737b5d0e4063ad0fccb898977fe71e9665719e3f2c3d6f2a214e7ff9523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVkc1OGzEQx1cVlYqAS5_AUi-AtNQf8To-oSjlYyUkokKpelo53jEx2rWD7U3JjYfoO_S9-iSYpFKL5-AZz2_-f8lTFB8JPmFM4s9xIBWWbDzG74pdigUpCeZ457_8Q3EQ4wPOhzEiSbVb_L70P9E0QGvnHaA6orQARHn5A1RAs4VPfuW7pKxGh7O7IzSDYHzoldOAvqsQlEvr0z_PvyboFvTC-fLcuty0qkNnK9UNKlnvkHItqvtlZ_WmjihrbIxuhpi1nXr1_gIr6PyyB5eQN5v27A7Vrs1MWO8X743qIhz8vfeKb-dnt9PL8ur6op5OrkrNqEglE4TySjAx5y2GEa6YarHRej6WYymEAUFAVhUXRAIzVLO2MlRRMgJhjOSU7RWftrrL4B8HiKl58ENw2bJhmDOaP3FDnWype9VBY53xKSido4Xeau_A2Pw-EZJlpxHneeDozUBmEjylezXE2NQ3X9-yx1tWBx9jANMsg-1VWDcEN6-Lbv4tmr0A1R6a7A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053205052</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Credible Is the 25-Year Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Warranty?—A Techno-Financial Evaluation and Implications for the Sustainable Development of the PV Industry</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hsi, Pao-Hsiang ; Shieh, Joseph C. P</creator><creatorcontrib>Hsi, Pao-Hsiang ; Shieh, Joseph C. P</creatorcontrib><description>To support the bankability of PV projects, PV manufacturers have been offering one of the longest warranties in the world, typically in the range of 25–30 years. During the warranty period, PV manufacturers guarantee that the degradation of PV modules will not exceed 0.4–0.6% each year, or the buyer can at any time make a claim to the manufacturer for replacement or compensation for the shortfall. Due to its popularity, the performance warranty terms have become more and more competitive each year. However, long-term PV operating data have been very limited and bankruptcy of PV manufacturers has been quite common. Without a proper methodology to assess the adequacy of PV manufacturer’s warranty fund (WF) reserve, the 25-year performance warranty can become empty promises. To ensure sustainable development of the PV industry, this study develops a probability-weighted expected value method to determine the necessary WF reserve based on benchmark field degradation data and prevailing degradation cap of 0.55% per year. The simulation result shows that, unless the manufacturer’s degradation pattern is significantly better than the benchmark degradation profile, 1.302% of the sales value is required for the WF reserve. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that provides WF reserve requirement estimation for 25-year PV performance warranty. The result will provide transparency for PV investors and motivation for PV manufacturers for continuous quality improvement as all such achievement can now be reflected in manufacturers’ annual report result.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2071-1050</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/su16093880</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bankruptcy ; Investors ; Manufacturers ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Solar energy industry ; Sustainable development ; Thermal cycling</subject><ispartof>Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3880</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-371256737b5d0e4063ad0fccb898977fe71e9665719e3f2c3d6f2a214e7ff9523</cites><orcidid>0009-0006-6666-1727</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hsi, Pao-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shieh, Joseph C. P</creatorcontrib><title>How Credible Is the 25-Year Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Warranty?—A Techno-Financial Evaluation and Implications for the Sustainable Development of the PV Industry</title><title>Sustainability</title><description>To support the bankability of PV projects, PV manufacturers have been offering one of the longest warranties in the world, typically in the range of 25–30 years. During the warranty period, PV manufacturers guarantee that the degradation of PV modules will not exceed 0.4–0.6% each year, or the buyer can at any time make a claim to the manufacturer for replacement or compensation for the shortfall. Due to its popularity, the performance warranty terms have become more and more competitive each year. However, long-term PV operating data have been very limited and bankruptcy of PV manufacturers has been quite common. Without a proper methodology to assess the adequacy of PV manufacturer’s warranty fund (WF) reserve, the 25-year performance warranty can become empty promises. To ensure sustainable development of the PV industry, this study develops a probability-weighted expected value method to determine the necessary WF reserve based on benchmark field degradation data and prevailing degradation cap of 0.55% per year. The simulation result shows that, unless the manufacturer’s degradation pattern is significantly better than the benchmark degradation profile, 1.302% of the sales value is required for the WF reserve. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that provides WF reserve requirement estimation for 25-year PV performance warranty. The result will provide transparency for PV investors and motivation for PV manufacturers for continuous quality improvement as all such achievement can now be reflected in manufacturers’ annual report result.</description><subject>Bankruptcy</subject><subject>Investors</subject><subject>Manufacturers</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Solar energy industry</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Thermal cycling</subject><issn>2071-1050</issn><issn>2071-1050</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNpVkc1OGzEQx1cVlYqAS5_AUi-AtNQf8To-oSjlYyUkokKpelo53jEx2rWD7U3JjYfoO_S9-iSYpFKL5-AZz2_-f8lTFB8JPmFM4s9xIBWWbDzG74pdigUpCeZ457_8Q3EQ4wPOhzEiSbVb_L70P9E0QGvnHaA6orQARHn5A1RAs4VPfuW7pKxGh7O7IzSDYHzoldOAvqsQlEvr0z_PvyboFvTC-fLcuty0qkNnK9UNKlnvkHItqvtlZ_WmjihrbIxuhpi1nXr1_gIr6PyyB5eQN5v27A7Vrs1MWO8X743qIhz8vfeKb-dnt9PL8ur6op5OrkrNqEglE4TySjAx5y2GEa6YarHRej6WYymEAUFAVhUXRAIzVLO2MlRRMgJhjOSU7RWftrrL4B8HiKl58ENw2bJhmDOaP3FDnWype9VBY53xKSido4Xeau_A2Pw-EZJlpxHneeDozUBmEjylezXE2NQ3X9-yx1tWBx9jANMsg-1VWDcEN6-Lbv4tmr0A1R6a7A</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Hsi, Pao-Hsiang</creator><creator>Shieh, Joseph C. P</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6666-1727</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>How Credible Is the 25-Year Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Warranty?—A Techno-Financial Evaluation and Implications for the Sustainable Development of the PV Industry</title><author>Hsi, Pao-Hsiang ; Shieh, Joseph C. P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c327t-371256737b5d0e4063ad0fccb898977fe71e9665719e3f2c3d6f2a214e7ff9523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bankruptcy</topic><topic>Investors</topic><topic>Manufacturers</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Solar energy industry</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Thermal cycling</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hsi, Pao-Hsiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shieh, Joseph C. P</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hsi, Pao-Hsiang</au><au>Shieh, Joseph C. P</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Credible Is the 25-Year Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Warranty?—A Techno-Financial Evaluation and Implications for the Sustainable Development of the PV Industry</atitle><jtitle>Sustainability</jtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>3880</spage><pages>3880-</pages><issn>2071-1050</issn><eissn>2071-1050</eissn><abstract>To support the bankability of PV projects, PV manufacturers have been offering one of the longest warranties in the world, typically in the range of 25–30 years. During the warranty period, PV manufacturers guarantee that the degradation of PV modules will not exceed 0.4–0.6% each year, or the buyer can at any time make a claim to the manufacturer for replacement or compensation for the shortfall. Due to its popularity, the performance warranty terms have become more and more competitive each year. However, long-term PV operating data have been very limited and bankruptcy of PV manufacturers has been quite common. Without a proper methodology to assess the adequacy of PV manufacturer’s warranty fund (WF) reserve, the 25-year performance warranty can become empty promises. To ensure sustainable development of the PV industry, this study develops a probability-weighted expected value method to determine the necessary WF reserve based on benchmark field degradation data and prevailing degradation cap of 0.55% per year. The simulation result shows that, unless the manufacturer’s degradation pattern is significantly better than the benchmark degradation profile, 1.302% of the sales value is required for the WF reserve. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that provides WF reserve requirement estimation for 25-year PV performance warranty. The result will provide transparency for PV investors and motivation for PV manufacturers for continuous quality improvement as all such achievement can now be reflected in manufacturers’ annual report result.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/su16093880</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6666-1727</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2071-1050 |
ispartof | Sustainability, 2024-05, Vol.16 (9), p.3880 |
issn | 2071-1050 2071-1050 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3053205052 |
source | MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Bankruptcy Investors Manufacturers Monte Carlo simulation Solar energy industry Sustainable development Thermal cycling |
title | How Credible Is the 25-Year Photovoltaic (PV) Performance Warranty?—A Techno-Financial Evaluation and Implications for the Sustainable Development of the PV Industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Credible%20Is%20the%2025-Year%20Photovoltaic%20(PV)%20Performance%20Warranty?%E2%80%94A%20Techno-Financial%20Evaluation%20and%20Implications%20for%20the%20Sustainable%20Development%20of%20the%20PV%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Sustainability&rft.au=Hsi,%20Pao-Hsiang&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=3880&rft.pages=3880-&rft.issn=2071-1050&rft.eissn=2071-1050&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/su16093880&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA793571455%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053205052&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A793571455&rfr_iscdi=true |