CONSIDERAȚII CRITICE CU PRIVIRE LA DECIZIA NR. 27/2021 PRONUNȚATĂ DE ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAȚIE ȘI JUSTIȚIE – COMPLETUL PENTRU SOLUȚIONAREA RECURSULUI ÎN INTERESUL LEGII, ÎN MATERIA SUSPENDĂRII PROVIZORII A EXECUTĂRII SILITE
The present study analyzes the Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No 27/2021 - the Panel for the settlement of the appeal in the interest of the law, in the matter of the provisional suspension of the enforcement. The authors offer a critical, different perspective on this, analyzin...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Dreptul (București) 2024-01 (4), p.16-30 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | rum |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 30 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 16 |
container_title | Dreptul (București) |
container_volume | |
creator | Truta, Roxana Silvia Rosu, Claudia |
description | The present study analyzes the Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No 27/2021 - the Panel for the settlement of the appeal in the interest of the law, in the matter of the provisional suspension of the enforcement. The authors offer a critical, different perspective on this, analyzing and fighting in detail the arguments offered by the supreme court which led to the admission of the appeal in the interest of the law. Moreover, the present study analyzes the consequences of the solution pronounced by the High Court of Cassation and Justice regarding the obligation of the court vested with a request for provisional suspension of the enforcement to verify its competence according to the general provisions, respectively whether the character of special emergency of the procedure is still complied with, in the end, being able to even question the usefulness of the institution. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3052809513</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3052809513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_30528095133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjj1Ow0AQhV2ARAS5w0i0BNY2FqZcrQcYtNm19idCaSKKUESIQEx6lAPQ0KBcJyl8DlouwThwAKaZmfdmPr29pJeKtByI87w4SPpNMxNcZVZw9ZJvZY2nCp1s10SgHAVSCCpC7WhEDkFLqFDRmCQYdwrZxVkmspRta6Jp1zJsV3wAm3cjdZD86QJ2gpK-YyK0nwS30QfabV9vH6DssNYYooYaTXARvNWRXWukQwkOGeKjjtRRgUxAh7yDxmuik504lCxyJB89M6rtynF6zjSise1GCXjHmPBreNIU8CjZf7h_bKb9v36YHF9hUDeD58X8ZTltXiez-XLxxNYkF0VWissizfP_Xf0AIy1rUg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3052809513</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>CONSIDERAȚII CRITICE CU PRIVIRE LA DECIZIA NR. 27/2021 PRONUNȚATĂ DE ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAȚIE ȘI JUSTIȚIE – COMPLETUL PENTRU SOLUȚIONAREA RECURSULUI ÎN INTERESUL LEGII, ÎN MATERIA SUSPENDĂRII PROVIZORII A EXECUTĂRII SILITE</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Central and Eastern European Online Library</source><creator>Truta, Roxana Silvia ; Rosu, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Truta, Roxana Silvia ; Rosu, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>The present study analyzes the Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No 27/2021 - the Panel for the settlement of the appeal in the interest of the law, in the matter of the provisional suspension of the enforcement. The authors offer a critical, different perspective on this, analyzing and fighting in detail the arguments offered by the supreme court which led to the admission of the appeal in the interest of the law. Moreover, the present study analyzes the consequences of the solution pronounced by the High Court of Cassation and Justice regarding the obligation of the court vested with a request for provisional suspension of the enforcement to verify its competence according to the general provisions, respectively whether the character of special emergency of the procedure is still complied with, in the end, being able to even question the usefulness of the institution.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1018-0435</identifier><language>rum</language><publisher>Bucharest: Union of Jurists of Romania</publisher><subject>Enforcement</subject><ispartof>Dreptul (București), 2024-01 (4), p.16-30</ispartof><rights>Copyright Union of Jurists of Romania 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Truta, Roxana Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosu, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>CONSIDERAȚII CRITICE CU PRIVIRE LA DECIZIA NR. 27/2021 PRONUNȚATĂ DE ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAȚIE ȘI JUSTIȚIE – COMPLETUL PENTRU SOLUȚIONAREA RECURSULUI ÎN INTERESUL LEGII, ÎN MATERIA SUSPENDĂRII PROVIZORII A EXECUTĂRII SILITE</title><title>Dreptul (București)</title><description>The present study analyzes the Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No 27/2021 - the Panel for the settlement of the appeal in the interest of the law, in the matter of the provisional suspension of the enforcement. The authors offer a critical, different perspective on this, analyzing and fighting in detail the arguments offered by the supreme court which led to the admission of the appeal in the interest of the law. Moreover, the present study analyzes the consequences of the solution pronounced by the High Court of Cassation and Justice regarding the obligation of the court vested with a request for provisional suspension of the enforcement to verify its competence according to the general provisions, respectively whether the character of special emergency of the procedure is still complied with, in the end, being able to even question the usefulness of the institution.</description><subject>Enforcement</subject><issn>1018-0435</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjj1Ow0AQhV2ARAS5w0i0BNY2FqZcrQcYtNm19idCaSKKUESIQEx6lAPQ0KBcJyl8DlouwThwAKaZmfdmPr29pJeKtByI87w4SPpNMxNcZVZw9ZJvZY2nCp1s10SgHAVSCCpC7WhEDkFLqFDRmCQYdwrZxVkmspRta6Jp1zJsV3wAm3cjdZD86QJ2gpK-YyK0nwS30QfabV9vH6DssNYYooYaTXARvNWRXWukQwkOGeKjjtRRgUxAh7yDxmuik504lCxyJB89M6rtynF6zjSise1GCXjHmPBreNIU8CjZf7h_bKb9v36YHF9hUDeD58X8ZTltXiez-XLxxNYkF0VWissizfP_Xf0AIy1rUg</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Truta, Roxana Silvia</creator><creator>Rosu, Claudia</creator><general>Union of Jurists of Romania</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BYOGL</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>CONSIDERAȚII CRITICE CU PRIVIRE LA DECIZIA NR. 27/2021 PRONUNȚATĂ DE ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAȚIE ȘI JUSTIȚIE – COMPLETUL PENTRU SOLUȚIONAREA RECURSULUI ÎN INTERESUL LEGII, ÎN MATERIA SUSPENDĂRII PROVIZORII A EXECUTĂRII SILITE</title><author>Truta, Roxana Silvia ; Rosu, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_30528095133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>rum</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Enforcement</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Truta, Roxana Silvia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosu, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>East Europe, Central Europe Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Dreptul (București)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Truta, Roxana Silvia</au><au>Rosu, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>CONSIDERAȚII CRITICE CU PRIVIRE LA DECIZIA NR. 27/2021 PRONUNȚATĂ DE ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAȚIE ȘI JUSTIȚIE – COMPLETUL PENTRU SOLUȚIONAREA RECURSULUI ÎN INTERESUL LEGII, ÎN MATERIA SUSPENDĂRII PROVIZORII A EXECUTĂRII SILITE</atitle><jtitle>Dreptul (București)</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issue>4</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>16-30</pages><issn>1018-0435</issn><abstract>The present study analyzes the Decision of the High Court of Cassation and Justice No 27/2021 - the Panel for the settlement of the appeal in the interest of the law, in the matter of the provisional suspension of the enforcement. The authors offer a critical, different perspective on this, analyzing and fighting in detail the arguments offered by the supreme court which led to the admission of the appeal in the interest of the law. Moreover, the present study analyzes the consequences of the solution pronounced by the High Court of Cassation and Justice regarding the obligation of the court vested with a request for provisional suspension of the enforcement to verify its competence according to the general provisions, respectively whether the character of special emergency of the procedure is still complied with, in the end, being able to even question the usefulness of the institution.</abstract><cop>Bucharest</cop><pub>Union of Jurists of Romania</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1018-0435 |
ispartof | Dreptul (București), 2024-01 (4), p.16-30 |
issn | 1018-0435 |
language | rum |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3052809513 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Central and Eastern European Online Library |
subjects | Enforcement |
title | CONSIDERAȚII CRITICE CU PRIVIRE LA DECIZIA NR. 27/2021 PRONUNȚATĂ DE ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAȚIE ȘI JUSTIȚIE – COMPLETUL PENTRU SOLUȚIONAREA RECURSULUI ÎN INTERESUL LEGII, ÎN MATERIA SUSPENDĂRII PROVIZORII A EXECUTĂRII SILITE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A06%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=CONSIDERA%C8%9AII%20CRITICE%20CU%20PRIVIRE%20LA%20DECIZIA%20NR.%2027/2021%20PRONUN%C8%9AAT%C4%82%20DE%20%C3%8ENALTA%20CURTE%20DE%20CASA%C8%9AIE%20%C8%98I%20JUSTI%C8%9AIE%20%E2%80%93%20COMPLETUL%20PENTRU%20SOLU%C8%9AIONAREA%20RECURSULUI%20%C3%8EN%20INTERESUL%20LEGII,%20%C3%8EN%20MATERIA%20SUSPEND%C4%82RII%20PROVIZORII%20A%20EXECUT%C4%82RII%20SILITE&rft.jtitle=Dreptul%20(Bucure%C8%99ti)&rft.au=Truta,%20Roxana%20Silvia&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=16-30&rft.issn=1018-0435&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E3052809513%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3052809513&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |