178 Academic Quadrathlon as an In-Service Training Tool
Abstract The Animal Science Extension team at the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture provides a yearly joint in-service training for county agents. In previous years, in-service trainings were held on a regional basis, with one one-day training in each region of the state for a total o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of animal science 2023-05, Vol.101 (Supplement_1), p.9-9 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 9 |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_1 |
container_start_page | 9 |
container_title | Journal of animal science |
container_volume | 101 |
creator | Mason, Katie Fancher, Malerie Ivey, Jennie L Strickland, Lew G Rowan, Troy N Eckelkamp, Elizabeth Rhinehart, Justin D Shanks, Jessica Fisher, Aaron Tabler, Tom Zoca, Saulo Main, Sawyer |
description | Abstract
The Animal Science Extension team at the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture provides a yearly joint in-service training for county agents. In previous years, in-service trainings were held on a regional basis, with one one-day training in each region of the state for a total of 3 trainings. In 2021, the Animal Science team took a difference approach by offering a centrally located, conference style in-service training that lasted for 3 days. There were separate tracks for 4-H and Agriculture and Natural Resources (ANR) with concurrent sessions, and a few combined sessions with general program updates. A range of topics were covered in species-specific sessions, covering beef, dairy, small ruminant, equine, and poultry. On day 3, to increase agent interaction during the in-service training, the Animal Science Extension team created a mini-academic quadrathlon (AQ) to test the agents in a friendly competition. The AQ had species-specific hands-on lab sections and a quiz bowl competition. Teams were created by Specialists to ensure that each team comprised agents with varying levels of knowledge and experience. In December 2021, fifty-two agents participated in the training. An evaluation was administered at the end of the training to gauge effectiveness of each session. Of the 28 respondents, 15 were ANR agents, 7 were 4-H agents, 5 were ANR/4-H agents, and 1 was an area specialist. When asked to give an overall rating for the quiz bowl session of AQ on scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent, 71% of respondent responded “5: excellent.” When asked the same for hands-on lab portions of AQ, 95% of agents responded “5: excellent.” Selected comments regarding the AQ during in-service training included: “Day 3 by far was the most fun I have had at an in-service. I loved it.” and “I thought the stations and quiz bowl was a great way to tie in everything that was covered in the first two days. Fun and educational!” Specialists concluded that the AQ was a highly effective way to deliver in-service training to agents in an exciting way. Due to the success of the program, the 2022 in-service training taking place in December, will follow the same format. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jas/skad068.011 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3051757806</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jas/skad068.011</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3051757806</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1441-9f2c88e1a4b3512d3dde5d7be609a007ed32cced6e6883fd67c634fd1d0987863</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKtrtwF3wnTuTSaPWZbio1AQsa5DmmR0ajupSUfw3zul3bs6m--cAx8htwgThJqXa5vL_GU9SD0BxDMyQsFEwVHyczICYFhojeySXOW8BkAmajEiCpWmU2d92LaOvvbWJ7v_3MSO2kxtR-dd8RbST-sCXSbbdm33QZcxbq7JRWM3OdycckzeHx-Ws-di8fI0n00XhcOqwqJumNM6oK1WXCDz3PsgvFoFCbUFUMFz5lzwMkiteeOlcpJXjUcPtVZa8jG5O-7uUvzuQ96bdexTN1waDgKVUBoOVHmkXIo5p9CYXWq3Nv0aBHOwYwY75mTHDHaGxv2xEfvdv_AfBz5lQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3051757806</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>178 Academic Quadrathlon as an In-Service Training Tool</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Mason, Katie ; Fancher, Malerie ; Ivey, Jennie L ; Strickland, Lew G ; Rowan, Troy N ; Eckelkamp, Elizabeth ; Rhinehart, Justin D ; Shanks, Jessica ; Fisher, Aaron ; Tabler, Tom ; Zoca, Saulo ; Main, Sawyer</creator><creatorcontrib>Mason, Katie ; Fancher, Malerie ; Ivey, Jennie L ; Strickland, Lew G ; Rowan, Troy N ; Eckelkamp, Elizabeth ; Rhinehart, Justin D ; Shanks, Jessica ; Fisher, Aaron ; Tabler, Tom ; Zoca, Saulo ; Main, Sawyer</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
The Animal Science Extension team at the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture provides a yearly joint in-service training for county agents. In previous years, in-service trainings were held on a regional basis, with one one-day training in each region of the state for a total of 3 trainings. In 2021, the Animal Science team took a difference approach by offering a centrally located, conference style in-service training that lasted for 3 days. There were separate tracks for 4-H and Agriculture and Natural Resources (ANR) with concurrent sessions, and a few combined sessions with general program updates. A range of topics were covered in species-specific sessions, covering beef, dairy, small ruminant, equine, and poultry. On day 3, to increase agent interaction during the in-service training, the Animal Science Extension team created a mini-academic quadrathlon (AQ) to test the agents in a friendly competition. The AQ had species-specific hands-on lab sections and a quiz bowl competition. Teams were created by Specialists to ensure that each team comprised agents with varying levels of knowledge and experience. In December 2021, fifty-two agents participated in the training. An evaluation was administered at the end of the training to gauge effectiveness of each session. Of the 28 respondents, 15 were ANR agents, 7 were 4-H agents, 5 were ANR/4-H agents, and 1 was an area specialist. When asked to give an overall rating for the quiz bowl session of AQ on scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent, 71% of respondent responded “5: excellent.” When asked the same for hands-on lab portions of AQ, 95% of agents responded “5: excellent.” Selected comments regarding the AQ during in-service training included: “Day 3 by far was the most fun I have had at an in-service. I loved it.” and “I thought the stations and quiz bowl was a great way to tie in everything that was covered in the first two days. Fun and educational!” Specialists concluded that the AQ was a highly effective way to deliver in-service training to agents in an exciting way. Due to the success of the program, the 2022 in-service training taking place in December, will follow the same format.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-3163</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jas/skad068.011</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Agriculture ; Animal sciences ; Colleges & universities ; Natural resources ; Training ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Journal of animal science, 2023-05, Vol.101 (Supplement_1), p.9-9</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mason, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fancher, Malerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivey, Jennie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Lew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowan, Troy N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckelkamp, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhinehart, Justin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabler, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoca, Saulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Main, Sawyer</creatorcontrib><title>178 Academic Quadrathlon as an In-Service Training Tool</title><title>Journal of animal science</title><description>Abstract
The Animal Science Extension team at the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture provides a yearly joint in-service training for county agents. In previous years, in-service trainings were held on a regional basis, with one one-day training in each region of the state for a total of 3 trainings. In 2021, the Animal Science team took a difference approach by offering a centrally located, conference style in-service training that lasted for 3 days. There were separate tracks for 4-H and Agriculture and Natural Resources (ANR) with concurrent sessions, and a few combined sessions with general program updates. A range of topics were covered in species-specific sessions, covering beef, dairy, small ruminant, equine, and poultry. On day 3, to increase agent interaction during the in-service training, the Animal Science Extension team created a mini-academic quadrathlon (AQ) to test the agents in a friendly competition. The AQ had species-specific hands-on lab sections and a quiz bowl competition. Teams were created by Specialists to ensure that each team comprised agents with varying levels of knowledge and experience. In December 2021, fifty-two agents participated in the training. An evaluation was administered at the end of the training to gauge effectiveness of each session. Of the 28 respondents, 15 were ANR agents, 7 were 4-H agents, 5 were ANR/4-H agents, and 1 was an area specialist. When asked to give an overall rating for the quiz bowl session of AQ on scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent, 71% of respondent responded “5: excellent.” When asked the same for hands-on lab portions of AQ, 95% of agents responded “5: excellent.” Selected comments regarding the AQ during in-service training included: “Day 3 by far was the most fun I have had at an in-service. I loved it.” and “I thought the stations and quiz bowl was a great way to tie in everything that was covered in the first two days. Fun and educational!” Specialists concluded that the AQ was a highly effective way to deliver in-service training to agents in an exciting way. Due to the success of the program, the 2022 in-service training taking place in December, will follow the same format.</description><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal sciences</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Natural resources</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0021-8812</issn><issn>1525-3163</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKtrtwF3wnTuTSaPWZbio1AQsa5DmmR0ajupSUfw3zul3bs6m--cAx8htwgThJqXa5vL_GU9SD0BxDMyQsFEwVHyczICYFhojeySXOW8BkAmajEiCpWmU2d92LaOvvbWJ7v_3MSO2kxtR-dd8RbST-sCXSbbdm33QZcxbq7JRWM3OdycckzeHx-Ws-di8fI0n00XhcOqwqJumNM6oK1WXCDz3PsgvFoFCbUFUMFz5lzwMkiteeOlcpJXjUcPtVZa8jG5O-7uUvzuQ96bdexTN1waDgKVUBoOVHmkXIo5p9CYXWq3Nv0aBHOwYwY75mTHDHaGxv2xEfvdv_AfBz5lQA</recordid><startdate>20230504</startdate><enddate>20230504</enddate><creator>Mason, Katie</creator><creator>Fancher, Malerie</creator><creator>Ivey, Jennie L</creator><creator>Strickland, Lew G</creator><creator>Rowan, Troy N</creator><creator>Eckelkamp, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Rhinehart, Justin D</creator><creator>Shanks, Jessica</creator><creator>Fisher, Aaron</creator><creator>Tabler, Tom</creator><creator>Zoca, Saulo</creator><creator>Main, Sawyer</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230504</creationdate><title>178 Academic Quadrathlon as an In-Service Training Tool</title><author>Mason, Katie ; Fancher, Malerie ; Ivey, Jennie L ; Strickland, Lew G ; Rowan, Troy N ; Eckelkamp, Elizabeth ; Rhinehart, Justin D ; Shanks, Jessica ; Fisher, Aaron ; Tabler, Tom ; Zoca, Saulo ; Main, Sawyer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1441-9f2c88e1a4b3512d3dde5d7be609a007ed32cced6e6883fd67c634fd1d0987863</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal sciences</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Natural resources</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mason, Katie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fancher, Malerie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ivey, Jennie L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland, Lew G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rowan, Troy N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eckelkamp, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rhinehart, Justin D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shanks, Jessica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, Aaron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tabler, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zoca, Saulo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Main, Sawyer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mason, Katie</au><au>Fancher, Malerie</au><au>Ivey, Jennie L</au><au>Strickland, Lew G</au><au>Rowan, Troy N</au><au>Eckelkamp, Elizabeth</au><au>Rhinehart, Justin D</au><au>Shanks, Jessica</au><au>Fisher, Aaron</au><au>Tabler, Tom</au><au>Zoca, Saulo</au><au>Main, Sawyer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>178 Academic Quadrathlon as an In-Service Training Tool</atitle><jtitle>Journal of animal science</jtitle><date>2023-05-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>101</volume><issue>Supplement_1</issue><spage>9</spage><epage>9</epage><pages>9-9</pages><issn>0021-8812</issn><eissn>1525-3163</eissn><abstract>Abstract
The Animal Science Extension team at the University of Tennessee Institute of Agriculture provides a yearly joint in-service training for county agents. In previous years, in-service trainings were held on a regional basis, with one one-day training in each region of the state for a total of 3 trainings. In 2021, the Animal Science team took a difference approach by offering a centrally located, conference style in-service training that lasted for 3 days. There were separate tracks for 4-H and Agriculture and Natural Resources (ANR) with concurrent sessions, and a few combined sessions with general program updates. A range of topics were covered in species-specific sessions, covering beef, dairy, small ruminant, equine, and poultry. On day 3, to increase agent interaction during the in-service training, the Animal Science Extension team created a mini-academic quadrathlon (AQ) to test the agents in a friendly competition. The AQ had species-specific hands-on lab sections and a quiz bowl competition. Teams were created by Specialists to ensure that each team comprised agents with varying levels of knowledge and experience. In December 2021, fifty-two agents participated in the training. An evaluation was administered at the end of the training to gauge effectiveness of each session. Of the 28 respondents, 15 were ANR agents, 7 were 4-H agents, 5 were ANR/4-H agents, and 1 was an area specialist. When asked to give an overall rating for the quiz bowl session of AQ on scale of 1 to 5, with 1 being poor and 5 being excellent, 71% of respondent responded “5: excellent.” When asked the same for hands-on lab portions of AQ, 95% of agents responded “5: excellent.” Selected comments regarding the AQ during in-service training included: “Day 3 by far was the most fun I have had at an in-service. I loved it.” and “I thought the stations and quiz bowl was a great way to tie in everything that was covered in the first two days. Fun and educational!” Specialists concluded that the AQ was a highly effective way to deliver in-service training to agents in an exciting way. Due to the success of the program, the 2022 in-service training taking place in December, will follow the same format.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jas/skad068.011</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8812 |
ispartof | Journal of animal science, 2023-05, Vol.101 (Supplement_1), p.9-9 |
issn | 0021-8812 1525-3163 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3051757806 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central |
subjects | Agriculture Animal sciences Colleges & universities Natural resources Training Zoology |
title | 178 Academic Quadrathlon as an In-Service Training Tool |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A22%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=178%20Academic%20Quadrathlon%20as%20an%20In-Service%20Training%20Tool&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20animal%20science&rft.au=Mason,%20Katie&rft.date=2023-05-04&rft.volume=101&rft.issue=Supplement_1&rft.spage=9&rft.epage=9&rft.pages=9-9&rft.issn=0021-8812&rft.eissn=1525-3163&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jas/skad068.011&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3051757806%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3051757806&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jas/skad068.011&rfr_iscdi=true |