Evaluation of the Rock Mass Strength for Hard Rock Pillar Design Using Bonded Block Models

The estimation of rock mass strength is a crucial step in pillar design. While the tri-linear (or S-shaped) failure criterion has been proposed to estimate the strength of massive to moderately jointed hard rock masses at low confinement, it remains unclear whether this criterion is applicable to de...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Rock mechanics and rock engineering 2024-05, Vol.57 (5), p.3659-3680
Hauptverfasser: Hamediazad, Farzaneh, Bahrani, Navid
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3680
container_issue 5
container_start_page 3659
container_title Rock mechanics and rock engineering
container_volume 57
creator Hamediazad, Farzaneh
Bahrani, Navid
description The estimation of rock mass strength is a crucial step in pillar design. While the tri-linear (or S-shaped) failure criterion has been proposed to estimate the strength of massive to moderately jointed hard rock masses at low confinement, it remains unclear whether this criterion is applicable to designing wide pillars at great depths, where the pillar core is highly confined. This study employs a plane strain Block Bonded Model (BBM), consisting of polygonal blocks that can break at their contacts, to examine the applicability of the tri-linear strength criterion for estimating the strength of hard rock pillars with various width-to-height ratios (W/H). Furthermore, this study aims to identify a BBM with suitable constitutive laws for blocks (i.e., zones) and contacts that realistically captures the strength and failure mechanism of hard rock pillars under compressive loading conditions. The numerical simulations are based on the case of pillar failures at the Quirke Mine, ON, Canada. The simulation results have revealed that the model calibrated to the tri-linear strength envelope overestimates the strength of pillars with W / H greater than 0.5. However, the pillar model with the Cohesion-Weakening Friction-Strengthening (CWFS) behavior for blocks and Cohesion- and Friction-Weakening (CFW) behavior for contacts realistically captures the expected failure mechanism and post-peak response when calibrated to the empirical pillar strength data. The rock mass strength back-analyzed from this model was found to follow the in situ damage initiation stress level at low confinement but significantly underestimates the confined rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion. Highlights A Bonded Block Model was calibrated to the Quirke Mine rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion. The calibrated bonded block model was found to overestimate the strength of hard rock pillars with width-to-height ratios greater than 0.5. The Bonded Block Model was calibrated to the empirical pillar strength data, and then used to estimate the rock mass strength. The back-calculated rock mass strength was found to underestimate the confined rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00603-023-03718-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3051702894</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3051702894</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-b482272e8ddd1d9bd13b8a2c057c64f18de83e5e9d0e938b642c2a97db7073ec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKf_gKeA5-rLjzbp0c3phImiDsRLSJu066zNTDrB_964Ct48vPcO3x8PPgidEjgnAOIiAGTAEqBxmCAygT00IpzxhKfsZR-NQESJZoweoqMQ1gBRFHKEXmefut3qvnEddhXuVxY_uvIN3-kQ8FPvbVf3K1w5j-fam0F7aNpWe3xlQ1N3eBmarsYT1xlr8KTdhZ2xbThGB5Vugz35vWO0vJ49T-fJ4v7mdnq5SEoqoE8KLikV1EpjDDF5YQgrpKYlpKLMeEWksZLZ1OYGbM5kkXFaUp0LUwgQzJZsjM6G3o13H1sberV2W9_Fl4pBSgRQmfPoooOr9C4Ebyu18c279l-KgPphqAaGKjJUO4ZxjxEbQiGau9r6v-p_Ut_4SXNr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3051702894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Rock Mass Strength for Hard Rock Pillar Design Using Bonded Block Models</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Hamediazad, Farzaneh ; Bahrani, Navid</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamediazad, Farzaneh ; Bahrani, Navid</creatorcontrib><description>The estimation of rock mass strength is a crucial step in pillar design. While the tri-linear (or S-shaped) failure criterion has been proposed to estimate the strength of massive to moderately jointed hard rock masses at low confinement, it remains unclear whether this criterion is applicable to designing wide pillars at great depths, where the pillar core is highly confined. This study employs a plane strain Block Bonded Model (BBM), consisting of polygonal blocks that can break at their contacts, to examine the applicability of the tri-linear strength criterion for estimating the strength of hard rock pillars with various width-to-height ratios (W/H). Furthermore, this study aims to identify a BBM with suitable constitutive laws for blocks (i.e., zones) and contacts that realistically captures the strength and failure mechanism of hard rock pillars under compressive loading conditions. The numerical simulations are based on the case of pillar failures at the Quirke Mine, ON, Canada. The simulation results have revealed that the model calibrated to the tri-linear strength envelope overestimates the strength of pillars with W / H greater than 0.5. However, the pillar model with the Cohesion-Weakening Friction-Strengthening (CWFS) behavior for blocks and Cohesion- and Friction-Weakening (CFW) behavior for contacts realistically captures the expected failure mechanism and post-peak response when calibrated to the empirical pillar strength data. The rock mass strength back-analyzed from this model was found to follow the in situ damage initiation stress level at low confinement but significantly underestimates the confined rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion. Highlights A Bonded Block Model was calibrated to the Quirke Mine rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion. The calibrated bonded block model was found to overestimate the strength of hard rock pillars with width-to-height ratios greater than 0.5. The Bonded Block Model was calibrated to the empirical pillar strength data, and then used to estimate the rock mass strength. The back-calculated rock mass strength was found to underestimate the confined rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0723-2632</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1434-453X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00603-023-03718-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Vienna: Springer Vienna</publisher><subject>Bonding strength ; Calibration ; Civil Engineering ; Cohesion ; Compressive strength ; Confinement ; Crack initiation ; Criteria ; Damage ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Empirical analysis ; Estimation ; Failure ; Failure mechanisms ; Fracture mechanics ; Friction ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Height ; Mathematical models ; Original Paper ; Plane strain ; Rock ; Rock masses ; Rocks ; Strength</subject><ispartof>Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2024-05, Vol.57 (5), p.3659-3680</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Austria, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-b482272e8ddd1d9bd13b8a2c057c64f18de83e5e9d0e938b642c2a97db7073ec3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3102-6476</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00603-023-03718-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00603-023-03718-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamediazad, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahrani, Navid</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Rock Mass Strength for Hard Rock Pillar Design Using Bonded Block Models</title><title>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</title><addtitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</addtitle><description>The estimation of rock mass strength is a crucial step in pillar design. While the tri-linear (or S-shaped) failure criterion has been proposed to estimate the strength of massive to moderately jointed hard rock masses at low confinement, it remains unclear whether this criterion is applicable to designing wide pillars at great depths, where the pillar core is highly confined. This study employs a plane strain Block Bonded Model (BBM), consisting of polygonal blocks that can break at their contacts, to examine the applicability of the tri-linear strength criterion for estimating the strength of hard rock pillars with various width-to-height ratios (W/H). Furthermore, this study aims to identify a BBM with suitable constitutive laws for blocks (i.e., zones) and contacts that realistically captures the strength and failure mechanism of hard rock pillars under compressive loading conditions. The numerical simulations are based on the case of pillar failures at the Quirke Mine, ON, Canada. The simulation results have revealed that the model calibrated to the tri-linear strength envelope overestimates the strength of pillars with W / H greater than 0.5. However, the pillar model with the Cohesion-Weakening Friction-Strengthening (CWFS) behavior for blocks and Cohesion- and Friction-Weakening (CFW) behavior for contacts realistically captures the expected failure mechanism and post-peak response when calibrated to the empirical pillar strength data. The rock mass strength back-analyzed from this model was found to follow the in situ damage initiation stress level at low confinement but significantly underestimates the confined rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion. Highlights A Bonded Block Model was calibrated to the Quirke Mine rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion. The calibrated bonded block model was found to overestimate the strength of hard rock pillars with width-to-height ratios greater than 0.5. The Bonded Block Model was calibrated to the empirical pillar strength data, and then used to estimate the rock mass strength. The back-calculated rock mass strength was found to underestimate the confined rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion.</description><subject>Bonding strength</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Cohesion</subject><subject>Compressive strength</subject><subject>Confinement</subject><subject>Crack initiation</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Estimation</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Failure mechanisms</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Friction</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Height</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Plane strain</subject><subject>Rock</subject><subject>Rock masses</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Strength</subject><issn>0723-2632</issn><issn>1434-453X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9LwzAUx4MoOKf_gKeA5-rLjzbp0c3phImiDsRLSJu066zNTDrB_964Ct48vPcO3x8PPgidEjgnAOIiAGTAEqBxmCAygT00IpzxhKfsZR-NQESJZoweoqMQ1gBRFHKEXmefut3qvnEddhXuVxY_uvIN3-kQ8FPvbVf3K1w5j-fam0F7aNpWe3xlQ1N3eBmarsYT1xlr8KTdhZ2xbThGB5Vugz35vWO0vJ49T-fJ4v7mdnq5SEoqoE8KLikV1EpjDDF5YQgrpKYlpKLMeEWksZLZ1OYGbM5kkXFaUp0LUwgQzJZsjM6G3o13H1sberV2W9_Fl4pBSgRQmfPoooOr9C4Ebyu18c279l-KgPphqAaGKjJUO4ZxjxEbQiGau9r6v-p_Ut_4SXNr</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Hamediazad, Farzaneh</creator><creator>Bahrani, Navid</creator><general>Springer Vienna</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3102-6476</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Rock Mass Strength for Hard Rock Pillar Design Using Bonded Block Models</title><author>Hamediazad, Farzaneh ; Bahrani, Navid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-b482272e8ddd1d9bd13b8a2c057c64f18de83e5e9d0e938b642c2a97db7073ec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Bonding strength</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Cohesion</topic><topic>Compressive strength</topic><topic>Confinement</topic><topic>Crack initiation</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Estimation</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Failure mechanisms</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Friction</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Height</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Plane strain</topic><topic>Rock</topic><topic>Rock masses</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Strength</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamediazad, Farzaneh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bahrani, Navid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamediazad, Farzaneh</au><au>Bahrani, Navid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Rock Mass Strength for Hard Rock Pillar Design Using Bonded Block Models</atitle><jtitle>Rock mechanics and rock engineering</jtitle><stitle>Rock Mech Rock Eng</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>3659</spage><epage>3680</epage><pages>3659-3680</pages><issn>0723-2632</issn><eissn>1434-453X</eissn><abstract>The estimation of rock mass strength is a crucial step in pillar design. While the tri-linear (or S-shaped) failure criterion has been proposed to estimate the strength of massive to moderately jointed hard rock masses at low confinement, it remains unclear whether this criterion is applicable to designing wide pillars at great depths, where the pillar core is highly confined. This study employs a plane strain Block Bonded Model (BBM), consisting of polygonal blocks that can break at their contacts, to examine the applicability of the tri-linear strength criterion for estimating the strength of hard rock pillars with various width-to-height ratios (W/H). Furthermore, this study aims to identify a BBM with suitable constitutive laws for blocks (i.e., zones) and contacts that realistically captures the strength and failure mechanism of hard rock pillars under compressive loading conditions. The numerical simulations are based on the case of pillar failures at the Quirke Mine, ON, Canada. The simulation results have revealed that the model calibrated to the tri-linear strength envelope overestimates the strength of pillars with W / H greater than 0.5. However, the pillar model with the Cohesion-Weakening Friction-Strengthening (CWFS) behavior for blocks and Cohesion- and Friction-Weakening (CFW) behavior for contacts realistically captures the expected failure mechanism and post-peak response when calibrated to the empirical pillar strength data. The rock mass strength back-analyzed from this model was found to follow the in situ damage initiation stress level at low confinement but significantly underestimates the confined rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion. Highlights A Bonded Block Model was calibrated to the Quirke Mine rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion. The calibrated bonded block model was found to overestimate the strength of hard rock pillars with width-to-height ratios greater than 0.5. The Bonded Block Model was calibrated to the empirical pillar strength data, and then used to estimate the rock mass strength. The back-calculated rock mass strength was found to underestimate the confined rock mass strength estimated using the tri-linear strength criterion.</abstract><cop>Vienna</cop><pub>Springer Vienna</pub><doi>10.1007/s00603-023-03718-0</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3102-6476</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0723-2632
ispartof Rock mechanics and rock engineering, 2024-05, Vol.57 (5), p.3659-3680
issn 0723-2632
1434-453X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3051702894
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Bonding strength
Calibration
Civil Engineering
Cohesion
Compressive strength
Confinement
Crack initiation
Criteria
Damage
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Empirical analysis
Estimation
Failure
Failure mechanisms
Fracture mechanics
Friction
Geophysics/Geodesy
Height
Mathematical models
Original Paper
Plane strain
Rock
Rock masses
Rocks
Strength
title Evaluation of the Rock Mass Strength for Hard Rock Pillar Design Using Bonded Block Models
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T21%3A45%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Rock%20Mass%20Strength%20for%20Hard%20Rock%20Pillar%20Design%20Using%20Bonded%20Block%20Models&rft.jtitle=Rock%20mechanics%20and%20rock%20engineering&rft.au=Hamediazad,%20Farzaneh&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=3659&rft.epage=3680&rft.pages=3659-3680&rft.issn=0723-2632&rft.eissn=1434-453X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00603-023-03718-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3051702894%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3051702894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true