Comparative analysis of SVM and k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm in fingerprint detection

An evaluation of SVM and a novel K-Nearest Neighbor classifier for fingerprint verification improvements. Methods and Materials In this article, we compare and contrast the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method with a Support Vector Machine. The recommended procedure is applied to a total of 15 samples, 1...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Sravanthi, R., Soundari, A. Gnana
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2853
creator Sravanthi, R.
Soundari, A. Gnana
description An evaluation of SVM and a novel K-Nearest Neighbor classifier for fingerprint verification improvements. Methods and Materials In this article, we compare and contrast the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method with a Support Vector Machine. The recommended procedure is applied to a total of 15 samples, 15 from each of the two groups, and the G power is set to 80%. Results: The innovative K-Nearest Neighbor Method method predicts biometrics with an accuracy of 87 percent, which is much higher than the 82 percent accuracy of Support Vector [1]. Here, we calculated a pretest power of 85%, with a sample size of 15 in one group and 30 in total. The mean accuracy for Novel K-Nearest Neighbor (87.12%) and the SVM method (81.85%) are quite similar, however the standard deviation for Novel K-Nearest Neighbor (1.29517) is lower (2.45449) While the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method and SVM algorithms achieve similar mean accuracy (87.12 and 81.85 percent, respectively), the standard deviation for the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method is somewhat less (1.29517 vs. 2.45449), which is statistically significant at the 0.001 level (p 0.05). The Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method Algorithm is discovered to be much superior than the SVM algorithm in this research for predicting biometric recognition.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0197527
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3051672454</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3051672454</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1687-e6f1c54ccc2338ea821ac67e6bb7ee1102b4f2d54507551b35a72f8309f913f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgTpiae2aWUryB4sIL7kImk7Sp02RMpkLf3tR2dTjwncP__QBcYjTDSNAbPkO4kZzIIzDBnONKCiyOwQShhlWE0a9TcJbzCiHSSFlPQDeP60EnPfpfC3XQ_Tb7DKODb58vZe_gdxWsTjaPMFi_WLYxQdPrnL3zplzFAHW_iMmPyzX0ATofFjYNyYcRdna0ZoecgxOn-2wvDnMKPu7v3ueP1fPrw9P89rkasKhlZYXDhjNjDKG0tromWBshrWhbaS3GiLTMkY4zjmRRaynXkriaosY1mDpKp-Bq_3dI8WdTMqtV3KQilRVFHAtJGGeFut5T2fjxX0GVvGudtgojtWtRcXVokf4BmbNk0A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>3051672454</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparative analysis of SVM and k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm in fingerprint detection</title><source>AIP Journals Complete</source><creator>Sravanthi, R. ; Soundari, A. Gnana</creator><contributor>Ramesh, B. ; Sathish, T. ; Saravanan, R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sravanthi, R. ; Soundari, A. Gnana ; Ramesh, B. ; Sathish, T. ; Saravanan, R.</creatorcontrib><description>An evaluation of SVM and a novel K-Nearest Neighbor classifier for fingerprint verification improvements. Methods and Materials In this article, we compare and contrast the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method with a Support Vector Machine. The recommended procedure is applied to a total of 15 samples, 15 from each of the two groups, and the G power is set to 80%. Results: The innovative K-Nearest Neighbor Method method predicts biometrics with an accuracy of 87 percent, which is much higher than the 82 percent accuracy of Support Vector [1]. Here, we calculated a pretest power of 85%, with a sample size of 15 in one group and 30 in total. The mean accuracy for Novel K-Nearest Neighbor (87.12%) and the SVM method (81.85%) are quite similar, however the standard deviation for Novel K-Nearest Neighbor (1.29517) is lower (2.45449) While the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method and SVM algorithms achieve similar mean accuracy (87.12 and 81.85 percent, respectively), the standard deviation for the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method is somewhat less (1.29517 vs. 2.45449), which is statistically significant at the 0.001 level (p 0.05). The Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method Algorithm is discovered to be much superior than the SVM algorithm in this research for predicting biometric recognition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0197527</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Algorithms ; Biometrics ; Fingerprint verification ; K-nearest neighbors algorithm ; Standard deviation ; Support vector machines</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2853 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2024 Author(s). Published under an exclusive license by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.aip.org/acp/article-lookup/doi/10.1063/5.0197527$$EHTML$$P50$$Gscitation$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,777,781,786,787,791,4498,23911,23912,25121,27905,27906,76133</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Ramesh, B.</contributor><contributor>Sathish, T.</contributor><contributor>Saravanan, R.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Sravanthi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soundari, A. Gnana</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative analysis of SVM and k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm in fingerprint detection</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>An evaluation of SVM and a novel K-Nearest Neighbor classifier for fingerprint verification improvements. Methods and Materials In this article, we compare and contrast the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method with a Support Vector Machine. The recommended procedure is applied to a total of 15 samples, 15 from each of the two groups, and the G power is set to 80%. Results: The innovative K-Nearest Neighbor Method method predicts biometrics with an accuracy of 87 percent, which is much higher than the 82 percent accuracy of Support Vector [1]. Here, we calculated a pretest power of 85%, with a sample size of 15 in one group and 30 in total. The mean accuracy for Novel K-Nearest Neighbor (87.12%) and the SVM method (81.85%) are quite similar, however the standard deviation for Novel K-Nearest Neighbor (1.29517) is lower (2.45449) While the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method and SVM algorithms achieve similar mean accuracy (87.12 and 81.85 percent, respectively), the standard deviation for the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method is somewhat less (1.29517 vs. 2.45449), which is statistically significant at the 0.001 level (p 0.05). The Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method Algorithm is discovered to be much superior than the SVM algorithm in this research for predicting biometric recognition.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biometrics</subject><subject>Fingerprint verification</subject><subject>K-nearest neighbors algorithm</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Support vector machines</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtKAzEUhoMoWKsL3yDgTpiae2aWUryB4sIL7kImk7Sp02RMpkLf3tR2dTjwncP__QBcYjTDSNAbPkO4kZzIIzDBnONKCiyOwQShhlWE0a9TcJbzCiHSSFlPQDeP60EnPfpfC3XQ_Tb7DKODb58vZe_gdxWsTjaPMFi_WLYxQdPrnL3zplzFAHW_iMmPyzX0ATofFjYNyYcRdna0ZoecgxOn-2wvDnMKPu7v3ueP1fPrw9P89rkasKhlZYXDhjNjDKG0tromWBshrWhbaS3GiLTMkY4zjmRRaynXkriaosY1mDpKp-Bq_3dI8WdTMqtV3KQilRVFHAtJGGeFut5T2fjxX0GVvGudtgojtWtRcXVokf4BmbNk0A</recordid><startdate>20240507</startdate><enddate>20240507</enddate><creator>Sravanthi, R.</creator><creator>Soundari, A. Gnana</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240507</creationdate><title>Comparative analysis of SVM and k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm in fingerprint detection</title><author>Sravanthi, R. ; Soundari, A. Gnana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1687-e6f1c54ccc2338ea821ac67e6bb7ee1102b4f2d54507551b35a72f8309f913f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biometrics</topic><topic>Fingerprint verification</topic><topic>K-nearest neighbors algorithm</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Support vector machines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sravanthi, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soundari, A. Gnana</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sravanthi, R.</au><au>Soundari, A. Gnana</au><au>Ramesh, B.</au><au>Sathish, T.</au><au>Saravanan, R.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparative analysis of SVM and k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm in fingerprint detection</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2024-05-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2853</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>An evaluation of SVM and a novel K-Nearest Neighbor classifier for fingerprint verification improvements. Methods and Materials In this article, we compare and contrast the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method with a Support Vector Machine. The recommended procedure is applied to a total of 15 samples, 15 from each of the two groups, and the G power is set to 80%. Results: The innovative K-Nearest Neighbor Method method predicts biometrics with an accuracy of 87 percent, which is much higher than the 82 percent accuracy of Support Vector [1]. Here, we calculated a pretest power of 85%, with a sample size of 15 in one group and 30 in total. The mean accuracy for Novel K-Nearest Neighbor (87.12%) and the SVM method (81.85%) are quite similar, however the standard deviation for Novel K-Nearest Neighbor (1.29517) is lower (2.45449) While the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method and SVM algorithms achieve similar mean accuracy (87.12 and 81.85 percent, respectively), the standard deviation for the Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method is somewhat less (1.29517 vs. 2.45449), which is statistically significant at the 0.001 level (p 0.05). The Novel K-Nearest Neighbor Method Algorithm is discovered to be much superior than the SVM algorithm in this research for predicting biometric recognition.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0197527</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2024, Vol.2853 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3051672454
source AIP Journals Complete
subjects Accuracy
Algorithms
Biometrics
Fingerprint verification
K-nearest neighbors algorithm
Standard deviation
Support vector machines
title Comparative analysis of SVM and k-nearest neighbor classification algorithm in fingerprint detection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T06%3A15%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparative%20analysis%20of%20SVM%20and%20k-nearest%20neighbor%20classification%20algorithm%20in%20fingerprint%20detection&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Sravanthi,%20R.&rft.date=2024-05-07&rft.volume=2853&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0197527&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E3051672454%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3051672454&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true