The sedimentology of gravel beds in groundwater‐dominated chalk streams: Implications for sediment modelling and management
Elevated fine sediment accumulation in a river system's gravel bed is known to cause detrimental ecological impacts. Current sediment targets and approaches to mitigation have failed due to the oversimplification of geomorphological processes controlling fine sediment accumulation and the lack...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | River research and applications 2024-05, Vol.40 (4), p.508-528 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 528 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 508 |
container_title | River research and applications |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Mondon, Beth Sear, David A. Collins, Adrian L. Shaw, Peter J. Sykes, Tim |
description | Elevated fine sediment accumulation in a river system's gravel bed is known to cause detrimental ecological impacts. Current sediment targets and approaches to mitigation have failed due to the oversimplification of geomorphological processes controlling fine sediment accumulation and the lack of relevant scientific knowledge underpinning them. This is particularly apparent in chalk streams (groundwater‐dominated systems) which regularly exhibit high rates of sediment accumulation despite low suspended sediment yields. A necessary first step is to better characterise their sedimentology; thus, the novelty of this study was to determine the sedimentological characteristics of chalk stream gravel beds, specifically the quantity and distribution of fine sediment with depth. We collated published and unpublished freeze‐core data, encompassing 90 sites across 11 UK chalk streams. Results showed average quantities of fine sediment (75% of beds exceeding thresholds for ecological degradation. Quantities of fine sediment increased with increasing depth into the bed, with an average increase between surface and subsurface layers of 54%, and 89% of the gravel bed over‐saturated with fine sediment. Regional differences were attributed to differences in stream power and local sediment sources, including surficial geology and catchment land use. Additionally, a major contrast was identified between experimental conditions in flume studies used to establish models describing interactions/mechanisms of fine sediment infiltration into immobile gravel beds and the natural conditions observed in chalk streams. As such, the use of such models as a basis to explore sediment management scenarios is unlikely to predict the outcome of such management techniques correctly in a real‐world situation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rra.4250 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3051317789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3051317789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-e22b727549e957038cf60ff1aa4a4fac974216b4daf69c5d6a89f5b6fd5f46ed3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFbBR1jw4iV1N9ndJN6kWC0UvNRzmGRn09Rkt-6mSg-Cj-Az-iSmVHqaf5iff_g_Qq45m3DG4jvvYSJiyU7IiMtERlyo9PSoZX5OLkJYM8bTLM9G5Gu5QhpQNx3a3rWu3lFnaO3hA1taog60scPqtlZ_Qo_-9_tHu66xg9a0WkH7RkPvEbpwT-fdpm0q6BtnAzXOH3Np5zS2bWNrClbTDizUuD9ckjMDbcCr_zkmr7PH5fQ5Wrw8zacPi6gamvQRxnGZxqkUOeYyZUlWGcWM4QAChIEqT0XMVSk0GJVXUivIciNLZbQ0QqFOxuTmkLvx7n2LoS_Wbuvt8LJImOQJTwcag-v24Kq8C8GjKTa-6cDvCs6KPdxigFvs4SZ_zQBwtg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3051317789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The sedimentology of gravel beds in groundwater‐dominated chalk streams: Implications for sediment modelling and management</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Mondon, Beth ; Sear, David A. ; Collins, Adrian L. ; Shaw, Peter J. ; Sykes, Tim</creator><creatorcontrib>Mondon, Beth ; Sear, David A. ; Collins, Adrian L. ; Shaw, Peter J. ; Sykes, Tim</creatorcontrib><description>Elevated fine sediment accumulation in a river system's gravel bed is known to cause detrimental ecological impacts. Current sediment targets and approaches to mitigation have failed due to the oversimplification of geomorphological processes controlling fine sediment accumulation and the lack of relevant scientific knowledge underpinning them. This is particularly apparent in chalk streams (groundwater‐dominated systems) which regularly exhibit high rates of sediment accumulation despite low suspended sediment yields. A necessary first step is to better characterise their sedimentology; thus, the novelty of this study was to determine the sedimentological characteristics of chalk stream gravel beds, specifically the quantity and distribution of fine sediment with depth. We collated published and unpublished freeze‐core data, encompassing 90 sites across 11 UK chalk streams. Results showed average quantities of fine sediment (<2 mm) in chalk stream gravel beds were 25% by weight, with >75% of beds exceeding thresholds for ecological degradation. Quantities of fine sediment increased with increasing depth into the bed, with an average increase between surface and subsurface layers of 54%, and 89% of the gravel bed over‐saturated with fine sediment. Regional differences were attributed to differences in stream power and local sediment sources, including surficial geology and catchment land use. Additionally, a major contrast was identified between experimental conditions in flume studies used to establish models describing interactions/mechanisms of fine sediment infiltration into immobile gravel beds and the natural conditions observed in chalk streams. As such, the use of such models as a basis to explore sediment management scenarios is unlikely to predict the outcome of such management techniques correctly in a real‐world situation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1535-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1535-1467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rra.4250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accumulation ; Catchment area ; Chalk ; Environmental degradation ; Flumes ; Geology ; Geomorphology ; Gravel ; Gravel beds ; Groundwater ; Land use ; Mitigation ; Rivers ; Sediment ; Sediment sources ; Sediment yield ; Sedimentology ; Sediments ; Streams ; Suspended sediments</subject><ispartof>River research and applications, 2024-05, Vol.40 (4), p.508-528</ispartof><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-e22b727549e957038cf60ff1aa4a4fac974216b4daf69c5d6a89f5b6fd5f46ed3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0925-5010 ; 0000-0003-0191-6179 ; 0000-0003-4788-6016 ; 0000-0002-0665-0368 ; 0000-0001-8790-8473</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mondon, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sear, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Adrian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Tim</creatorcontrib><title>The sedimentology of gravel beds in groundwater‐dominated chalk streams: Implications for sediment modelling and management</title><title>River research and applications</title><description>Elevated fine sediment accumulation in a river system's gravel bed is known to cause detrimental ecological impacts. Current sediment targets and approaches to mitigation have failed due to the oversimplification of geomorphological processes controlling fine sediment accumulation and the lack of relevant scientific knowledge underpinning them. This is particularly apparent in chalk streams (groundwater‐dominated systems) which regularly exhibit high rates of sediment accumulation despite low suspended sediment yields. A necessary first step is to better characterise their sedimentology; thus, the novelty of this study was to determine the sedimentological characteristics of chalk stream gravel beds, specifically the quantity and distribution of fine sediment with depth. We collated published and unpublished freeze‐core data, encompassing 90 sites across 11 UK chalk streams. Results showed average quantities of fine sediment (<2 mm) in chalk stream gravel beds were 25% by weight, with >75% of beds exceeding thresholds for ecological degradation. Quantities of fine sediment increased with increasing depth into the bed, with an average increase between surface and subsurface layers of 54%, and 89% of the gravel bed over‐saturated with fine sediment. Regional differences were attributed to differences in stream power and local sediment sources, including surficial geology and catchment land use. Additionally, a major contrast was identified between experimental conditions in flume studies used to establish models describing interactions/mechanisms of fine sediment infiltration into immobile gravel beds and the natural conditions observed in chalk streams. As such, the use of such models as a basis to explore sediment management scenarios is unlikely to predict the outcome of such management techniques correctly in a real‐world situation.</description><subject>Accumulation</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Chalk</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Flumes</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Geomorphology</subject><subject>Gravel</subject><subject>Gravel beds</subject><subject>Groundwater</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediment sources</subject><subject>Sediment yield</subject><subject>Sedimentology</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Suspended sediments</subject><issn>1535-1459</issn><issn>1535-1467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kMFKw0AQhhdRsFbBR1jw4iV1N9ndJN6kWC0UvNRzmGRn09Rkt-6mSg-Cj-Az-iSmVHqaf5iff_g_Qq45m3DG4jvvYSJiyU7IiMtERlyo9PSoZX5OLkJYM8bTLM9G5Gu5QhpQNx3a3rWu3lFnaO3hA1taog60scPqtlZ_Qo_-9_tHu66xg9a0WkH7RkPvEbpwT-fdpm0q6BtnAzXOH3Np5zS2bWNrClbTDizUuD9ckjMDbcCr_zkmr7PH5fQ5Wrw8zacPi6gamvQRxnGZxqkUOeYyZUlWGcWM4QAChIEqT0XMVSk0GJVXUivIciNLZbQ0QqFOxuTmkLvx7n2LoS_Wbuvt8LJImOQJTwcag-v24Kq8C8GjKTa-6cDvCs6KPdxigFvs4SZ_zQBwtg</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Mondon, Beth</creator><creator>Sear, David A.</creator><creator>Collins, Adrian L.</creator><creator>Shaw, Peter J.</creator><creator>Sykes, Tim</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-5010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-6179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4788-6016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-0368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8790-8473</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>The sedimentology of gravel beds in groundwater‐dominated chalk streams: Implications for sediment modelling and management</title><author>Mondon, Beth ; Sear, David A. ; Collins, Adrian L. ; Shaw, Peter J. ; Sykes, Tim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c250t-e22b727549e957038cf60ff1aa4a4fac974216b4daf69c5d6a89f5b6fd5f46ed3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accumulation</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Chalk</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Flumes</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Geomorphology</topic><topic>Gravel</topic><topic>Gravel beds</topic><topic>Groundwater</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediment sources</topic><topic>Sediment yield</topic><topic>Sedimentology</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Suspended sediments</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mondon, Beth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sear, David A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, Adrian L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shaw, Peter J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sykes, Tim</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mondon, Beth</au><au>Sear, David A.</au><au>Collins, Adrian L.</au><au>Shaw, Peter J.</au><au>Sykes, Tim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The sedimentology of gravel beds in groundwater‐dominated chalk streams: Implications for sediment modelling and management</atitle><jtitle>River research and applications</jtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>508</spage><epage>528</epage><pages>508-528</pages><issn>1535-1459</issn><eissn>1535-1467</eissn><abstract>Elevated fine sediment accumulation in a river system's gravel bed is known to cause detrimental ecological impacts. Current sediment targets and approaches to mitigation have failed due to the oversimplification of geomorphological processes controlling fine sediment accumulation and the lack of relevant scientific knowledge underpinning them. This is particularly apparent in chalk streams (groundwater‐dominated systems) which regularly exhibit high rates of sediment accumulation despite low suspended sediment yields. A necessary first step is to better characterise their sedimentology; thus, the novelty of this study was to determine the sedimentological characteristics of chalk stream gravel beds, specifically the quantity and distribution of fine sediment with depth. We collated published and unpublished freeze‐core data, encompassing 90 sites across 11 UK chalk streams. Results showed average quantities of fine sediment (<2 mm) in chalk stream gravel beds were 25% by weight, with >75% of beds exceeding thresholds for ecological degradation. Quantities of fine sediment increased with increasing depth into the bed, with an average increase between surface and subsurface layers of 54%, and 89% of the gravel bed over‐saturated with fine sediment. Regional differences were attributed to differences in stream power and local sediment sources, including surficial geology and catchment land use. Additionally, a major contrast was identified between experimental conditions in flume studies used to establish models describing interactions/mechanisms of fine sediment infiltration into immobile gravel beds and the natural conditions observed in chalk streams. As such, the use of such models as a basis to explore sediment management scenarios is unlikely to predict the outcome of such management techniques correctly in a real‐world situation.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/rra.4250</doi><tpages>21</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0925-5010</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0191-6179</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4788-6016</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0665-0368</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8790-8473</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1535-1459 |
ispartof | River research and applications, 2024-05, Vol.40 (4), p.508-528 |
issn | 1535-1459 1535-1467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3051317789 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Accumulation Catchment area Chalk Environmental degradation Flumes Geology Geomorphology Gravel Gravel beds Groundwater Land use Mitigation Rivers Sediment Sediment sources Sediment yield Sedimentology Sediments Streams Suspended sediments |
title | The sedimentology of gravel beds in groundwater‐dominated chalk streams: Implications for sediment modelling and management |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T13%3A56%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20sedimentology%20of%20gravel%20beds%20in%20groundwater%E2%80%90dominated%20chalk%20streams:%20Implications%20for%20sediment%20modelling%20and%20management&rft.jtitle=River%20research%20and%20applications&rft.au=Mondon,%20Beth&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=508&rft.epage=528&rft.pages=508-528&rft.issn=1535-1459&rft.eissn=1535-1467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rra.4250&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3051317789%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3051317789&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |