Navigating the metric maze: a taxonomy of evaluation metrics for anomaly detection in time series
The field of time series anomaly detection is constantly advancing, with several methods available, making it a challenge to determine the most appropriate method for a specific domain. The evaluation of these methods is facilitated by the use of metrics, which vary widely in their properties. Despi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Data mining and knowledge discovery 2024-05, Vol.38 (3), p.1027-1068 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1068 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1027 |
container_title | Data mining and knowledge discovery |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Sørbø, Sondre Ruocco, Massimiliano |
description | The field of time series anomaly detection is constantly advancing, with several methods available, making it a challenge to determine the most appropriate method for a specific domain. The evaluation of these methods is facilitated by the use of metrics, which vary widely in their properties. Despite the existence of new evaluation metrics, there is limited agreement on which metrics are best suited for specific scenarios and domains, and the most commonly used metrics have faced criticism in the literature. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the metrics used for the evaluation of time series anomaly detection methods, and also defines a taxonomy of these based on how they are calculated. By defining a set of properties for evaluation metrics and a set of specific case studies and experiments, twenty metrics are analyzed and discussed in detail, highlighting the unique suitability of each for specific tasks. Through extensive experimentation and analysis, this paper argues that the choice of evaluation metric must be made with care, taking into account the specific requirements of the task at hand. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10618-023-00988-8 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3050579131</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3050579131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-15d0bc3e41867088eaffa99272ca3e7e17aac1075fca9c199e17f92c67dc826e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA8-pk02yy3qT4D4peFLyFMZ3ULd1NTbbF-umNbcGbpxnm_d4beIydC7gUAPoqCaiEKaCUBUBtTGEO2EAoLQutqrfDvEszKpQRcMxOUpoDgColDBg-4bqZYd90M95_EG-pj43jLX7TNUfe41foQrvhwXNa42KVydDtqcR9iByzjosNn1JPbqs2He-blnii2FA6ZUceF4nO9nPIXu9uX8YPxeT5_nF8MymcrGRfCDWFdydpJEylwRhC77GuS106lKRJaEQnQCvvsHairvPF16Wr9NSZsiI5ZBe73GUMnytKvZ2HVezySytBgdK1kCJT5Y5yMaQUydtlbFqMGyvA_lZpd1XaXKXdVmlNNsmdKWW4m1H8i_7H9QPj1ngD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050579131</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Navigating the metric maze: a taxonomy of evaluation metrics for anomaly detection in time series</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Sørbø, Sondre ; Ruocco, Massimiliano</creator><creatorcontrib>Sørbø, Sondre ; Ruocco, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><description>The field of time series anomaly detection is constantly advancing, with several methods available, making it a challenge to determine the most appropriate method for a specific domain. The evaluation of these methods is facilitated by the use of metrics, which vary widely in their properties. Despite the existence of new evaluation metrics, there is limited agreement on which metrics are best suited for specific scenarios and domains, and the most commonly used metrics have faced criticism in the literature. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the metrics used for the evaluation of time series anomaly detection methods, and also defines a taxonomy of these based on how they are calculated. By defining a set of properties for evaluation metrics and a set of specific case studies and experiments, twenty metrics are analyzed and discussed in detail, highlighting the unique suitability of each for specific tasks. Through extensive experimentation and analysis, this paper argues that the choice of evaluation metric must be made with care, taking into account the specific requirements of the task at hand.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1384-5810</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-756X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10618-023-00988-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Anomalies ; Artificial Intelligence ; Chemistry and Earth Sciences ; Computer Science ; Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Physics ; Statistics for Engineering ; Taxonomy ; Time series</subject><ispartof>Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2024-05, Vol.38 (3), p.1027-1068</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-15d0bc3e41867088eaffa99272ca3e7e17aac1075fca9c199e17f92c67dc826e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-15d0bc3e41867088eaffa99272ca3e7e17aac1075fca9c199e17f92c67dc826e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0673-5107</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10618-023-00988-8$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10618-023-00988-8$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,27907,27908,41471,42540,51302</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sørbø, Sondre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruocco, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><title>Navigating the metric maze: a taxonomy of evaluation metrics for anomaly detection in time series</title><title>Data mining and knowledge discovery</title><addtitle>Data Min Knowl Disc</addtitle><description>The field of time series anomaly detection is constantly advancing, with several methods available, making it a challenge to determine the most appropriate method for a specific domain. The evaluation of these methods is facilitated by the use of metrics, which vary widely in their properties. Despite the existence of new evaluation metrics, there is limited agreement on which metrics are best suited for specific scenarios and domains, and the most commonly used metrics have faced criticism in the literature. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the metrics used for the evaluation of time series anomaly detection methods, and also defines a taxonomy of these based on how they are calculated. By defining a set of properties for evaluation metrics and a set of specific case studies and experiments, twenty metrics are analyzed and discussed in detail, highlighting the unique suitability of each for specific tasks. Through extensive experimentation and analysis, this paper argues that the choice of evaluation metric must be made with care, taking into account the specific requirements of the task at hand.</description><subject>Anomalies</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Statistics for Engineering</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Time series</subject><issn>1384-5810</issn><issn>1573-756X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LAzEQxYMoWKtfwFPA8-pk02yy3qT4D4peFLyFMZ3ULd1NTbbF-umNbcGbpxnm_d4beIydC7gUAPoqCaiEKaCUBUBtTGEO2EAoLQutqrfDvEszKpQRcMxOUpoDgColDBg-4bqZYd90M95_EG-pj43jLX7TNUfe41foQrvhwXNa42KVydDtqcR9iByzjosNn1JPbqs2He-blnii2FA6ZUceF4nO9nPIXu9uX8YPxeT5_nF8MymcrGRfCDWFdydpJEylwRhC77GuS106lKRJaEQnQCvvsHairvPF16Wr9NSZsiI5ZBe73GUMnytKvZ2HVezySytBgdK1kCJT5Y5yMaQUydtlbFqMGyvA_lZpd1XaXKXdVmlNNsmdKWW4m1H8i_7H9QPj1ngD</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Sørbø, Sondre</creator><creator>Ruocco, Massimiliano</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0673-5107</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Navigating the metric maze: a taxonomy of evaluation metrics for anomaly detection in time series</title><author>Sørbø, Sondre ; Ruocco, Massimiliano</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-15d0bc3e41867088eaffa99272ca3e7e17aac1075fca9c199e17f92c67dc826e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Anomalies</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Chemistry and Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Statistics for Engineering</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Time series</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sørbø, Sondre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruocco, Massimiliano</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Data mining and knowledge discovery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sørbø, Sondre</au><au>Ruocco, Massimiliano</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Navigating the metric maze: a taxonomy of evaluation metrics for anomaly detection in time series</atitle><jtitle>Data mining and knowledge discovery</jtitle><stitle>Data Min Knowl Disc</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1027</spage><epage>1068</epage><pages>1027-1068</pages><issn>1384-5810</issn><eissn>1573-756X</eissn><abstract>The field of time series anomaly detection is constantly advancing, with several methods available, making it a challenge to determine the most appropriate method for a specific domain. The evaluation of these methods is facilitated by the use of metrics, which vary widely in their properties. Despite the existence of new evaluation metrics, there is limited agreement on which metrics are best suited for specific scenarios and domains, and the most commonly used metrics have faced criticism in the literature. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of the metrics used for the evaluation of time series anomaly detection methods, and also defines a taxonomy of these based on how they are calculated. By defining a set of properties for evaluation metrics and a set of specific case studies and experiments, twenty metrics are analyzed and discussed in detail, highlighting the unique suitability of each for specific tasks. Through extensive experimentation and analysis, this paper argues that the choice of evaluation metric must be made with care, taking into account the specific requirements of the task at hand.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s10618-023-00988-8</doi><tpages>42</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0673-5107</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1384-5810 |
ispartof | Data mining and knowledge discovery, 2024-05, Vol.38 (3), p.1027-1068 |
issn | 1384-5810 1573-756X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3050579131 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Anomalies Artificial Intelligence Chemistry and Earth Sciences Computer Science Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Information Storage and Retrieval Physics Statistics for Engineering Taxonomy Time series |
title | Navigating the metric maze: a taxonomy of evaluation metrics for anomaly detection in time series |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T09%3A14%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Navigating%20the%20metric%20maze:%20a%20taxonomy%20of%20evaluation%20metrics%20for%20anomaly%20detection%20in%20time%20series&rft.jtitle=Data%20mining%20and%20knowledge%20discovery&rft.au=S%C3%B8rb%C3%B8,%20Sondre&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1027&rft.epage=1068&rft.pages=1027-1068&rft.issn=1384-5810&rft.eissn=1573-756X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10618-023-00988-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3050579131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050579131&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |