Exploring the Intersection of Social Class and Technological Change: A Study of South African Perceptions of Industry 4.0

The relationship or nexus between technological change and inequality in Africa is complex and multifaceted, with both challenges and opportunities, and should therefore, be approached from a multi-faceted standpoint and conceptual grid. Popular discourse on the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) fo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:African Journal of Development Studies 2024-03, Vol.14 (1), p.435-459
Hauptverfasser: Mthombeni, Zama M., Mtapuri, Oliver
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 459
container_issue 1
container_start_page 435
container_title African Journal of Development Studies
container_volume 14
creator Mthombeni, Zama M.
Mtapuri, Oliver
description The relationship or nexus between technological change and inequality in Africa is complex and multifaceted, with both challenges and opportunities, and should therefore, be approached from a multi-faceted standpoint and conceptual grid. Popular discourse on the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) focuses on its antecedents and potential benefits whilst being cognisant of its harm. This article extends the debate by arguing that inequalities in power and influence can shape the priorities and outcomes of this technological development, leading to the emergence of technologies that serve the interests of dominant groups at the expense of marginalized ones. The study on which it is based critically examined advocacy for social impact as a crucial component of the sociological study of innovation. Using the South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) that has a sample size of N=2736 respondents, the article investigates 4IR technologies, their potential impact on the job market, and attitudes towards their implementation. The modelling approach was based on a binary logistic regression model and bivariate testing of the associations between the variables. The results indicated that overall, South Africans hold a mix of positive and negative attitudes towards 4IR technologies, with a majority believing that they will have some positive, but mainly negative impacts on society, the economy, and the quality of life. However, significant differences in attitudes were found based on social class. These findings suggest that while 4IR technologies may hold promise for economic growth and innovation, attention should be paid to addressing the potential negative consequences, particularly among the marginalized in the lower social classes.
doi_str_mv 10.31920/2634-3649/2024/v14n1a21
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3050443778</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A797765835</galeid><sabinet_id>https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-aa_affrika1_v14_n1_a21</sabinet_id><sourcerecordid>A797765835</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1841-b83eaef5fa6da2a856c5e27a6aeeddde9470dff74939092353cc7f8294bf993c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9UV1v0zAUjRBITN3-gyWe29qxE8e8VdWAiklD2ni2bu3rJiWzg-0g-u9xKEx-uNY9H1c6p6oIoxvOVE23dcvFmrdCbWtai-0vJjyDmr2pbl6Rt69_Tt9XdymdKaV110gm5U11uf89jSEO_kRyj-TgM8aEJg_Bk-DIUzADjGQ_QkoEvCXPaHofxnAazLLvwZ_wI9mRpzzby1Ux557sXCwET75hNDgtbmkBD97OKccLERt6W71zMCa8-zdX1fdP98_7L-uHx8-H_e5hbVgn2PrYcQR0jYPWQg1d05oGawktIFprUQlJrXNSKK6oqnnDjZGuq5U4OqW44avqw9V3iuHnjCnrc5ijLyc1pw0VgkvZFdbmyjrBiHrwLuQIpjyLL4MJHt1Q9juppGybrlxZVd1VYGJIKaLTUxxeIF40o_pvOXqJXS8V6KUc_b-cIv16lSY4Dh6zToDTfNR9zlPSvR11idWWcwvGaFOs8Gw0gAZXcv0BbPHSnunF7Q_da56Z</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050443778</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the Intersection of Social Class and Technological Change: A Study of South African Perceptions of Industry 4.0</title><source>Political Science Complete</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Mthombeni, Zama M. ; Mtapuri, Oliver</creator><creatorcontrib>Mthombeni, Zama M. ; Mtapuri, Oliver</creatorcontrib><description>The relationship or nexus between technological change and inequality in Africa is complex and multifaceted, with both challenges and opportunities, and should therefore, be approached from a multi-faceted standpoint and conceptual grid. Popular discourse on the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) focuses on its antecedents and potential benefits whilst being cognisant of its harm. This article extends the debate by arguing that inequalities in power and influence can shape the priorities and outcomes of this technological development, leading to the emergence of technologies that serve the interests of dominant groups at the expense of marginalized ones. The study on which it is based critically examined advocacy for social impact as a crucial component of the sociological study of innovation. Using the South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) that has a sample size of N=2736 respondents, the article investigates 4IR technologies, their potential impact on the job market, and attitudes towards their implementation. The modelling approach was based on a binary logistic regression model and bivariate testing of the associations between the variables. The results indicated that overall, South Africans hold a mix of positive and negative attitudes towards 4IR technologies, with a majority believing that they will have some positive, but mainly negative impacts on society, the economy, and the quality of life. However, significant differences in attitudes were found based on social class. These findings suggest that while 4IR technologies may hold promise for economic growth and innovation, attention should be paid to addressing the potential negative consequences, particularly among the marginalized in the lower social classes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2634-3630</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2634-3649</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.31920/2634-3649/2024/v14n1a21</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Adonis &amp; Abbey Publishers</publisher><subject>Advocacy ; Attitudes ; Black people ; Economic growth ; Education ; Forecasts and trends ; Fourth industrial revolution ; Industry 4.0 ; Inequality ; Innovations ; Labor market ; Marginality ; Medium term notes ; Methods ; Public opinion ; Quality of life ; Social aspects ; Social attitudes ; Social class ; Social classes ; Social impact ; Technological change</subject><ispartof>African Journal of Development Studies, 2024-03, Vol.14 (1), p.435-459</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Sabinet Online</rights><rights>Copyright Adonis &amp; Abbey Publishers Ltd 2024</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-7940-7094 ; 0000-0001-7698-9482</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mthombeni, Zama M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mtapuri, Oliver</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the Intersection of Social Class and Technological Change: A Study of South African Perceptions of Industry 4.0</title><title>African Journal of Development Studies</title><description>The relationship or nexus between technological change and inequality in Africa is complex and multifaceted, with both challenges and opportunities, and should therefore, be approached from a multi-faceted standpoint and conceptual grid. Popular discourse on the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) focuses on its antecedents and potential benefits whilst being cognisant of its harm. This article extends the debate by arguing that inequalities in power and influence can shape the priorities and outcomes of this technological development, leading to the emergence of technologies that serve the interests of dominant groups at the expense of marginalized ones. The study on which it is based critically examined advocacy for social impact as a crucial component of the sociological study of innovation. Using the South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) that has a sample size of N=2736 respondents, the article investigates 4IR technologies, their potential impact on the job market, and attitudes towards their implementation. The modelling approach was based on a binary logistic regression model and bivariate testing of the associations between the variables. The results indicated that overall, South Africans hold a mix of positive and negative attitudes towards 4IR technologies, with a majority believing that they will have some positive, but mainly negative impacts on society, the economy, and the quality of life. However, significant differences in attitudes were found based on social class. These findings suggest that while 4IR technologies may hold promise for economic growth and innovation, attention should be paid to addressing the potential negative consequences, particularly among the marginalized in the lower social classes.</description><subject>Advocacy</subject><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Black people</subject><subject>Economic growth</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Forecasts and trends</subject><subject>Fourth industrial revolution</subject><subject>Industry 4.0</subject><subject>Inequality</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Marginality</subject><subject>Medium term notes</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Public opinion</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social attitudes</subject><subject>Social class</subject><subject>Social classes</subject><subject>Social impact</subject><subject>Technological change</subject><issn>2634-3630</issn><issn>2634-3649</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNo9UV1v0zAUjRBITN3-gyWe29qxE8e8VdWAiklD2ni2bu3rJiWzg-0g-u9xKEx-uNY9H1c6p6oIoxvOVE23dcvFmrdCbWtai-0vJjyDmr2pbl6Rt69_Tt9XdymdKaV110gm5U11uf89jSEO_kRyj-TgM8aEJg_Bk-DIUzADjGQ_QkoEvCXPaHofxnAazLLvwZ_wI9mRpzzby1Ux557sXCwET75hNDgtbmkBD97OKccLERt6W71zMCa8-zdX1fdP98_7L-uHx8-H_e5hbVgn2PrYcQR0jYPWQg1d05oGawktIFprUQlJrXNSKK6oqnnDjZGuq5U4OqW44avqw9V3iuHnjCnrc5ijLyc1pw0VgkvZFdbmyjrBiHrwLuQIpjyLL4MJHt1Q9juppGybrlxZVd1VYGJIKaLTUxxeIF40o_pvOXqJXS8V6KUc_b-cIv16lSY4Dh6zToDTfNR9zlPSvR11idWWcwvGaFOs8Gw0gAZXcv0BbPHSnunF7Q_da56Z</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Mthombeni, Zama M.</creator><creator>Mtapuri, Oliver</creator><general>Adonis &amp; Abbey Publishers</general><general>Sabinet Online</general><general>Adonis &amp; Abbey Publishers Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7940-7094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-9482</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Exploring the Intersection of Social Class and Technological Change: A Study of South African Perceptions of Industry 4.0</title><author>Mthombeni, Zama M. ; Mtapuri, Oliver</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1841-b83eaef5fa6da2a856c5e27a6aeeddde9470dff74939092353cc7f8294bf993c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Advocacy</topic><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Black people</topic><topic>Economic growth</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Forecasts and trends</topic><topic>Fourth industrial revolution</topic><topic>Industry 4.0</topic><topic>Inequality</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Marginality</topic><topic>Medium term notes</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Public opinion</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social attitudes</topic><topic>Social class</topic><topic>Social classes</topic><topic>Social impact</topic><topic>Technological change</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mthombeni, Zama M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mtapuri, Oliver</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>African Journal of Development Studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mthombeni, Zama M.</au><au>Mtapuri, Oliver</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the Intersection of Social Class and Technological Change: A Study of South African Perceptions of Industry 4.0</atitle><jtitle>African Journal of Development Studies</jtitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>435</spage><epage>459</epage><pages>435-459</pages><issn>2634-3630</issn><eissn>2634-3649</eissn><abstract>The relationship or nexus between technological change and inequality in Africa is complex and multifaceted, with both challenges and opportunities, and should therefore, be approached from a multi-faceted standpoint and conceptual grid. Popular discourse on the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) focuses on its antecedents and potential benefits whilst being cognisant of its harm. This article extends the debate by arguing that inequalities in power and influence can shape the priorities and outcomes of this technological development, leading to the emergence of technologies that serve the interests of dominant groups at the expense of marginalized ones. The study on which it is based critically examined advocacy for social impact as a crucial component of the sociological study of innovation. Using the South African Social Attitudes Survey (SASAS) that has a sample size of N=2736 respondents, the article investigates 4IR technologies, their potential impact on the job market, and attitudes towards their implementation. The modelling approach was based on a binary logistic regression model and bivariate testing of the associations between the variables. The results indicated that overall, South Africans hold a mix of positive and negative attitudes towards 4IR technologies, with a majority believing that they will have some positive, but mainly negative impacts on society, the economy, and the quality of life. However, significant differences in attitudes were found based on social class. These findings suggest that while 4IR technologies may hold promise for economic growth and innovation, attention should be paid to addressing the potential negative consequences, particularly among the marginalized in the lower social classes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Adonis &amp; Abbey Publishers</pub><doi>10.31920/2634-3649/2024/v14n1a21</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7940-7094</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7698-9482</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2634-3630
ispartof African Journal of Development Studies, 2024-03, Vol.14 (1), p.435-459
issn 2634-3630
2634-3649
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3050443778
source Political Science Complete; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Advocacy
Attitudes
Black people
Economic growth
Education
Forecasts and trends
Fourth industrial revolution
Industry 4.0
Inequality
Innovations
Labor market
Marginality
Medium term notes
Methods
Public opinion
Quality of life
Social aspects
Social attitudes
Social class
Social classes
Social impact
Technological change
title Exploring the Intersection of Social Class and Technological Change: A Study of South African Perceptions of Industry 4.0
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T10%3A23%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20Intersection%20of%20Social%20Class%20and%20Technological%20Change:%20A%20Study%20of%20South%20African%20Perceptions%20of%20Industry%204.0&rft.jtitle=African%20Journal%20of%20Development%20Studies&rft.au=Mthombeni,%20Zama%20M.&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=435&rft.epage=459&rft.pages=435-459&rft.issn=2634-3630&rft.eissn=2634-3649&rft_id=info:doi/10.31920/2634-3649/2024/v14n1a21&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA797765835%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050443778&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A797765835&rft_sabinet_id=https://hdl.handle.net/10520/ejc-aa_affrika1_v14_n1_a21&rfr_iscdi=true