Projecting the current and potential future distribution of New Zealand’s invasive sturnids

Invasive species threaten native ecosystems, the economy and human health. Improved understanding of an invasive species’ ecological niche, and whether it has differentiated in the invasive compared to the native range, will enable better prediction of areas at risk of future invasions. Here, we cha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Biological invasions 2024-05, Vol.26 (5), p.1345-1366
Hauptverfasser: Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat, Whibley, Annabel, Cain, Kristal E., Major, Richard E., Santure, Anna W.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1366
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1345
container_title Biological invasions
container_volume 26
creator Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat
Whibley, Annabel
Cain, Kristal E.
Major, Richard E.
Santure, Anna W.
description Invasive species threaten native ecosystems, the economy and human health. Improved understanding of an invasive species’ ecological niche, and whether it has differentiated in the invasive compared to the native range, will enable better prediction of areas at risk of future invasions. Here, we characterise the ecological niche of the common myna ( Acridotheres tristis ) and common starling ( Sturnus vulgaris ), in their native range and in Aotearoa New Zealand, where they were introduced over 140 years ago. Common myna and common starling are two of the most invasive bird species in the world and are agricultural pests, competitors to native fauna and may act as disease vectors. Using biologically justified environmental variables and occurrence data, we construct ecological niche models (ENMs) using five algorithms. Based on the ENM algorithm with highest transferability, we identify key environmental variables to compare the niches of the two species in New Zealand and the native range, and between the two species in New Zealand. For both species, we find no evidence of niche divergence between New Zealand and their native range despite their long invasion history. However, we do find evidence for niche differences between the two species in New Zealand. Our future suitable habitat predictions suggest little range expansion of the already-widespread starlings in New Zealand, but large areas at risk of future myna invasion in New Zealand’s South Island. Our results support ongoing management of myna populations, especially in the South Island where the Cook strait may already provide some barrier to dispersal.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10530-024-03246-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3050350156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3050350156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9c3b722e1f25edece60ded2082dc13e21e00516324733c4b55b3db55034d7c033</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWAfGnjhul6jiT6qABWyQUJTYk-KqJMV2ithxDa7HSTAEiR2bN2_xzd9j7FDAsQDQJ0GAQshA5hmgzIsMtthIKI2ZyIt8O3mc6AxVrnfZXghLAJhqUCP2eOu7JZno2gWPT8RN7z21kVet5esuJuuqFW_62Hvi1oXoXd1H17W8a_g1vfIHqlYJ_nz_CNy1myq4DfGQ8NbZsM92mmoV6OC3jtn9-dnd7DKb31xczU7nmcECYzY1WGspSTRSkSVDBViyEibSGoEkBQEoUaTHNKLJa6VqtEkBc6sNII7Z0TB37buXnkIsl126IK0sERKmQKgiUXKgjO9C8NSUa--eK_9WCii_YyyHGMsUY_kTY9Ixw6EpJLhdkP8b_U_XF7KzdvU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3050350156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Projecting the current and potential future distribution of New Zealand’s invasive sturnids</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat ; Whibley, Annabel ; Cain, Kristal E. ; Major, Richard E. ; Santure, Anna W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat ; Whibley, Annabel ; Cain, Kristal E. ; Major, Richard E. ; Santure, Anna W.</creatorcontrib><description>Invasive species threaten native ecosystems, the economy and human health. Improved understanding of an invasive species’ ecological niche, and whether it has differentiated in the invasive compared to the native range, will enable better prediction of areas at risk of future invasions. Here, we characterise the ecological niche of the common myna ( Acridotheres tristis ) and common starling ( Sturnus vulgaris ), in their native range and in Aotearoa New Zealand, where they were introduced over 140 years ago. Common myna and common starling are two of the most invasive bird species in the world and are agricultural pests, competitors to native fauna and may act as disease vectors. Using biologically justified environmental variables and occurrence data, we construct ecological niche models (ENMs) using five algorithms. Based on the ENM algorithm with highest transferability, we identify key environmental variables to compare the niches of the two species in New Zealand and the native range, and between the two species in New Zealand. For both species, we find no evidence of niche divergence between New Zealand and their native range despite their long invasion history. However, we do find evidence for niche differences between the two species in New Zealand. Our future suitable habitat predictions suggest little range expansion of the already-widespread starlings in New Zealand, but large areas at risk of future myna invasion in New Zealand’s South Island. Our results support ongoing management of myna populations, especially in the South Island where the Cook strait may already provide some barrier to dispersal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-3547</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1464</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10530-024-03246-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Acridotheres tristis ; Algorithms ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Developmental Biology ; Ecological niches ; Ecology ; Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology ; Indigenous species ; Introduced species ; Invasive species ; Life Sciences ; Niches ; Nonnative species ; Original Paper ; Pests ; Plant Sciences ; Range extension ; Sturnus vulgaris ; Vectors</subject><ispartof>Biological invasions, 2024-05, Vol.26 (5), p.1345-1366</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9c3b722e1f25edece60ded2082dc13e21e00516324733c4b55b3db55034d7c033</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9c3b722e1f25edece60ded2082dc13e21e00516324733c4b55b3db55034d7c033</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1878-7705 ; 0000-0001-8965-1042 ; 0000-0003-3995-5448 ; 0000-0002-6908-7015 ; 0000-0002-1334-9864</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10530-024-03246-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10530-024-03246-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,41493,42562,51324</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whibley, Annabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, Kristal E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Major, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santure, Anna W.</creatorcontrib><title>Projecting the current and potential future distribution of New Zealand’s invasive sturnids</title><title>Biological invasions</title><addtitle>Biol Invasions</addtitle><description>Invasive species threaten native ecosystems, the economy and human health. Improved understanding of an invasive species’ ecological niche, and whether it has differentiated in the invasive compared to the native range, will enable better prediction of areas at risk of future invasions. Here, we characterise the ecological niche of the common myna ( Acridotheres tristis ) and common starling ( Sturnus vulgaris ), in their native range and in Aotearoa New Zealand, where they were introduced over 140 years ago. Common myna and common starling are two of the most invasive bird species in the world and are agricultural pests, competitors to native fauna and may act as disease vectors. Using biologically justified environmental variables and occurrence data, we construct ecological niche models (ENMs) using five algorithms. Based on the ENM algorithm with highest transferability, we identify key environmental variables to compare the niches of the two species in New Zealand and the native range, and between the two species in New Zealand. For both species, we find no evidence of niche divergence between New Zealand and their native range despite their long invasion history. However, we do find evidence for niche differences between the two species in New Zealand. Our future suitable habitat predictions suggest little range expansion of the already-widespread starlings in New Zealand, but large areas at risk of future myna invasion in New Zealand’s South Island. Our results support ongoing management of myna populations, especially in the South Island where the Cook strait may already provide some barrier to dispersal.</description><subject>Acridotheres tristis</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Developmental Biology</subject><subject>Ecological niches</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</subject><subject>Indigenous species</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Invasive species</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Niches</subject><subject>Nonnative species</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Range extension</subject><subject>Sturnus vulgaris</subject><subject>Vectors</subject><issn>1387-3547</issn><issn>1573-1464</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqVwAVaWWAfGnjhul6jiT6qABWyQUJTYk-KqJMV2ithxDa7HSTAEiR2bN2_xzd9j7FDAsQDQJ0GAQshA5hmgzIsMtthIKI2ZyIt8O3mc6AxVrnfZXghLAJhqUCP2eOu7JZno2gWPT8RN7z21kVet5esuJuuqFW_62Hvi1oXoXd1H17W8a_g1vfIHqlYJ_nz_CNy1myq4DfGQ8NbZsM92mmoV6OC3jtn9-dnd7DKb31xczU7nmcECYzY1WGspSTRSkSVDBViyEibSGoEkBQEoUaTHNKLJa6VqtEkBc6sNII7Z0TB37buXnkIsl126IK0sERKmQKgiUXKgjO9C8NSUa--eK_9WCii_YyyHGMsUY_kTY9Ixw6EpJLhdkP8b_U_XF7KzdvU</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat</creator><creator>Whibley, Annabel</creator><creator>Cain, Kristal E.</creator><creator>Major, Richard E.</creator><creator>Santure, Anna W.</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>C1K</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-7705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-1042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-5448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6908-7015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1334-9864</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Projecting the current and potential future distribution of New Zealand’s invasive sturnids</title><author>Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat ; Whibley, Annabel ; Cain, Kristal E. ; Major, Richard E. ; Santure, Anna W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-9c3b722e1f25edece60ded2082dc13e21e00516324733c4b55b3db55034d7c033</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acridotheres tristis</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Developmental Biology</topic><topic>Ecological niches</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Freshwater &amp; Marine Ecology</topic><topic>Indigenous species</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Invasive species</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Niches</topic><topic>Nonnative species</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Range extension</topic><topic>Sturnus vulgaris</topic><topic>Vectors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whibley, Annabel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cain, Kristal E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Major, Richard E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santure, Anna W.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Atsawawaranunt, Kamolphat</au><au>Whibley, Annabel</au><au>Cain, Kristal E.</au><au>Major, Richard E.</au><au>Santure, Anna W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Projecting the current and potential future distribution of New Zealand’s invasive sturnids</atitle><jtitle>Biological invasions</jtitle><stitle>Biol Invasions</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1345</spage><epage>1366</epage><pages>1345-1366</pages><issn>1387-3547</issn><eissn>1573-1464</eissn><abstract>Invasive species threaten native ecosystems, the economy and human health. Improved understanding of an invasive species’ ecological niche, and whether it has differentiated in the invasive compared to the native range, will enable better prediction of areas at risk of future invasions. Here, we characterise the ecological niche of the common myna ( Acridotheres tristis ) and common starling ( Sturnus vulgaris ), in their native range and in Aotearoa New Zealand, where they were introduced over 140 years ago. Common myna and common starling are two of the most invasive bird species in the world and are agricultural pests, competitors to native fauna and may act as disease vectors. Using biologically justified environmental variables and occurrence data, we construct ecological niche models (ENMs) using five algorithms. Based on the ENM algorithm with highest transferability, we identify key environmental variables to compare the niches of the two species in New Zealand and the native range, and between the two species in New Zealand. For both species, we find no evidence of niche divergence between New Zealand and their native range despite their long invasion history. However, we do find evidence for niche differences between the two species in New Zealand. Our future suitable habitat predictions suggest little range expansion of the already-widespread starlings in New Zealand, but large areas at risk of future myna invasion in New Zealand’s South Island. Our results support ongoing management of myna populations, especially in the South Island where the Cook strait may already provide some barrier to dispersal.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s10530-024-03246-0</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1878-7705</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8965-1042</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3995-5448</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6908-7015</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1334-9864</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-3547
ispartof Biological invasions, 2024-05, Vol.26 (5), p.1345-1366
issn 1387-3547
1573-1464
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3050350156
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acridotheres tristis
Algorithms
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Developmental Biology
Ecological niches
Ecology
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Indigenous species
Introduced species
Invasive species
Life Sciences
Niches
Nonnative species
Original Paper
Pests
Plant Sciences
Range extension
Sturnus vulgaris
Vectors
title Projecting the current and potential future distribution of New Zealand’s invasive sturnids
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-14T02%3A12%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Projecting%20the%20current%20and%20potential%20future%20distribution%20of%20New%20Zealand%E2%80%99s%20invasive%20sturnids&rft.jtitle=Biological%20invasions&rft.au=Atsawawaranunt,%20Kamolphat&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1345&rft.epage=1366&rft.pages=1345-1366&rft.issn=1387-3547&rft.eissn=1573-1464&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10530-024-03246-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3050350156%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3050350156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true