The geometry of global protected lands
Expanding protected areas (PAs) is a worldwide endeavour aimed at addressing the biodiversity crisis and harnessing the benefits that natural ecosystems provide to humanity. However, conservation agendas often overlook the spatial geometry of PAs—shape and size—and its implications for critical issu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature sustainability 2024-01, Vol.7 (1), p.82-89 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 89 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 82 |
container_title | Nature sustainability |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Schauman, Santiago A. Peñuelas, Josep Jobbágy, Esteban G. Baldi, Germán |
description | Expanding protected areas (PAs) is a worldwide endeavour aimed at addressing the biodiversity crisis and harnessing the benefits that natural ecosystems provide to humanity. However, conservation agendas often overlook the spatial geometry of PAs—shape and size—and its implications for critical issues such as agricultural encroachment, poaching, biological invasion or the contact between wildlife, domestic animals and humans. Here we show how the global PA expansion has added predominantly small and complex-shaped PAs. Consequently, one-third of protected lands are located within 2 km of unprotected areas, while only 0.6% extend beyond 100 km. Developed countries tend to have smaller, dispersed, perforated and fragmented PAs, while less-affluent nations host larger, more-compact units. Relatively smaller and less-compact PAs were also found within the world’s most critically endangered biomes. The results highlight overlooked threats for the long-term conservation of nature and global environmental sustainability. As countries continue to expand their PA networks, the consideration of the spatial geometry of protected lands becomes urgent.
While most conservation efforts rightfully focus on the percentage of protected land, this paper analyses how the size and complexity of protected area boundaries affects the remoteness of internal areas and the contiguity of protected natural ecosystems |
doi_str_mv | 10.1038/s41893-023-01243-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3049265087</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3049265087</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f8a7894ca5bca75ff756e4fbaba44a044f9f07eb6c639ef4b83d09539a8cde003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gKsBwd3ozWNmkqUUtULBTV2HJHMzWqaTmkwX_femjqArF_exOOc7cAi5pnBHgcv7JKhUvASWhzKR9xmZMa5kqWqmzv_8l2SR0hYAGAiphJiR2807Fh2GHY7xWARfdH2wpi_2MYzoRmyL3gxtuiIX3vQJFz93Tt6eHjfLVbl-fX5ZPqxLx6kaSy9Nk7nOVNaZpvK-qWoU3hprhDAghFceGrS1q7lCL6zkLaiKKyNdiwB8Tm4mbs7_PGAa9TYc4pAjNQehWF2BbLKKTSoXQ0oRvd7Hj52JR01BnyrRUyU6V6K_K9EnNJ9MKYuHDuMv-h_XF7ZhYtU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049265087</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The geometry of global protected lands</title><source>Nature</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Schauman, Santiago A. ; Peñuelas, Josep ; Jobbágy, Esteban G. ; Baldi, Germán</creator><creatorcontrib>Schauman, Santiago A. ; Peñuelas, Josep ; Jobbágy, Esteban G. ; Baldi, Germán</creatorcontrib><description>Expanding protected areas (PAs) is a worldwide endeavour aimed at addressing the biodiversity crisis and harnessing the benefits that natural ecosystems provide to humanity. However, conservation agendas often overlook the spatial geometry of PAs—shape and size—and its implications for critical issues such as agricultural encroachment, poaching, biological invasion or the contact between wildlife, domestic animals and humans. Here we show how the global PA expansion has added predominantly small and complex-shaped PAs. Consequently, one-third of protected lands are located within 2 km of unprotected areas, while only 0.6% extend beyond 100 km. Developed countries tend to have smaller, dispersed, perforated and fragmented PAs, while less-affluent nations host larger, more-compact units. Relatively smaller and less-compact PAs were also found within the world’s most critically endangered biomes. The results highlight overlooked threats for the long-term conservation of nature and global environmental sustainability. As countries continue to expand their PA networks, the consideration of the spatial geometry of protected lands becomes urgent.
While most conservation efforts rightfully focus on the percentage of protected land, this paper analyses how the size and complexity of protected area boundaries affects the remoteness of internal areas and the contiguity of protected natural ecosystems</description><identifier>ISSN: 2398-9629</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2398-9629</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1038/s41893-023-01243-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Nature Publishing Group UK</publisher><subject>704/844/685 ; 706/2808 ; Analysis ; Developed countries ; Domestic animals ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Encroachment ; Environment ; Geometry ; Nature conservation ; Poaching ; Protected areas ; Sustainable Development ; Wildlife</subject><ispartof>Nature sustainability, 2024-01, Vol.7 (1), p.82-89</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f8a7894ca5bca75ff756e4fbaba44a044f9f07eb6c639ef4b83d09539a8cde003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f8a7894ca5bca75ff756e4fbaba44a044f9f07eb6c639ef4b83d09539a8cde003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7215-0150 ; 0000-0003-4679-9340 ; 0000-0002-4214-6011 ; 0009-0002-0996-5098</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1038/s41893-023-01243-0$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1038/s41893-023-01243-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schauman, Santiago A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peñuelas, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jobbágy, Esteban G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldi, Germán</creatorcontrib><title>The geometry of global protected lands</title><title>Nature sustainability</title><addtitle>Nat Sustain</addtitle><description>Expanding protected areas (PAs) is a worldwide endeavour aimed at addressing the biodiversity crisis and harnessing the benefits that natural ecosystems provide to humanity. However, conservation agendas often overlook the spatial geometry of PAs—shape and size—and its implications for critical issues such as agricultural encroachment, poaching, biological invasion or the contact between wildlife, domestic animals and humans. Here we show how the global PA expansion has added predominantly small and complex-shaped PAs. Consequently, one-third of protected lands are located within 2 km of unprotected areas, while only 0.6% extend beyond 100 km. Developed countries tend to have smaller, dispersed, perforated and fragmented PAs, while less-affluent nations host larger, more-compact units. Relatively smaller and less-compact PAs were also found within the world’s most critically endangered biomes. The results highlight overlooked threats for the long-term conservation of nature and global environmental sustainability. As countries continue to expand their PA networks, the consideration of the spatial geometry of protected lands becomes urgent.
While most conservation efforts rightfully focus on the percentage of protected land, this paper analyses how the size and complexity of protected area boundaries affects the remoteness of internal areas and the contiguity of protected natural ecosystems</description><subject>704/844/685</subject><subject>706/2808</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Developed countries</subject><subject>Domestic animals</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Encroachment</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Nature conservation</subject><subject>Poaching</subject><subject>Protected areas</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><issn>2398-9629</issn><issn>2398-9629</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtLAzEUhYMoWGr_gKsBwd3ozWNmkqUUtULBTV2HJHMzWqaTmkwX_femjqArF_exOOc7cAi5pnBHgcv7JKhUvASWhzKR9xmZMa5kqWqmzv_8l2SR0hYAGAiphJiR2807Fh2GHY7xWARfdH2wpi_2MYzoRmyL3gxtuiIX3vQJFz93Tt6eHjfLVbl-fX5ZPqxLx6kaSy9Nk7nOVNaZpvK-qWoU3hprhDAghFceGrS1q7lCL6zkLaiKKyNdiwB8Tm4mbs7_PGAa9TYc4pAjNQehWF2BbLKKTSoXQ0oRvd7Hj52JR01BnyrRUyU6V6K_K9EnNJ9MKYuHDuMv-h_XF7ZhYtU</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Schauman, Santiago A.</creator><creator>Peñuelas, Josep</creator><creator>Jobbágy, Esteban G.</creator><creator>Baldi, Germán</creator><general>Nature Publishing Group UK</general><general>Nature Publishing Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-0150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-9340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4214-6011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0996-5098</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>The geometry of global protected lands</title><author>Schauman, Santiago A. ; Peñuelas, Josep ; Jobbágy, Esteban G. ; Baldi, Germán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-f8a7894ca5bca75ff756e4fbaba44a044f9f07eb6c639ef4b83d09539a8cde003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>704/844/685</topic><topic>706/2808</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Developed countries</topic><topic>Domestic animals</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Encroachment</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Nature conservation</topic><topic>Poaching</topic><topic>Protected areas</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schauman, Santiago A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peñuelas, Josep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jobbágy, Esteban G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Baldi, Germán</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Nature sustainability</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schauman, Santiago A.</au><au>Peñuelas, Josep</au><au>Jobbágy, Esteban G.</au><au>Baldi, Germán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The geometry of global protected lands</atitle><jtitle>Nature sustainability</jtitle><stitle>Nat Sustain</stitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>82</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>82-89</pages><issn>2398-9629</issn><eissn>2398-9629</eissn><abstract>Expanding protected areas (PAs) is a worldwide endeavour aimed at addressing the biodiversity crisis and harnessing the benefits that natural ecosystems provide to humanity. However, conservation agendas often overlook the spatial geometry of PAs—shape and size—and its implications for critical issues such as agricultural encroachment, poaching, biological invasion or the contact between wildlife, domestic animals and humans. Here we show how the global PA expansion has added predominantly small and complex-shaped PAs. Consequently, one-third of protected lands are located within 2 km of unprotected areas, while only 0.6% extend beyond 100 km. Developed countries tend to have smaller, dispersed, perforated and fragmented PAs, while less-affluent nations host larger, more-compact units. Relatively smaller and less-compact PAs were also found within the world’s most critically endangered biomes. The results highlight overlooked threats for the long-term conservation of nature and global environmental sustainability. As countries continue to expand their PA networks, the consideration of the spatial geometry of protected lands becomes urgent.
While most conservation efforts rightfully focus on the percentage of protected land, this paper analyses how the size and complexity of protected area boundaries affects the remoteness of internal areas and the contiguity of protected natural ecosystems</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Nature Publishing Group UK</pub><doi>10.1038/s41893-023-01243-0</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7215-0150</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4679-9340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4214-6011</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0996-5098</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2398-9629 |
ispartof | Nature sustainability, 2024-01, Vol.7 (1), p.82-89 |
issn | 2398-9629 2398-9629 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3049265087 |
source | Nature; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | 704/844/685 706/2808 Analysis Developed countries Domestic animals Earth and Environmental Science Encroachment Environment Geometry Nature conservation Poaching Protected areas Sustainable Development Wildlife |
title | The geometry of global protected lands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A52%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20geometry%20of%20global%20protected%20lands&rft.jtitle=Nature%20sustainability&rft.au=Schauman,%20Santiago%20A.&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=82&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=82-89&rft.issn=2398-9629&rft.eissn=2398-9629&rft_id=info:doi/10.1038/s41893-023-01243-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3049265087%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049265087&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |