Understanding polyploid establishment: temporary persistence or stable coexistence?

Polyploidy, resulting from whole‐genome duplication (WGD), is ubiquitous in nature and reportedly associated with extreme environments and biological invasions. However, WGD usually comes with great costs, raising questions about the establishment chance of newly formed polyploids. The surprisingly...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Oikos 2024-05, Vol.2024 (5), p.n/a
Hauptverfasser: Mortier, Frederik, Bafort, Quinten, Milosavljevic, Silvija, Kauai, Felipe, Prost Boxoen, Lucas, Van de Peer, Yves, Bonte, Dries
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 5
container_start_page
container_title Oikos
container_volume 2024
creator Mortier, Frederik
Bafort, Quinten
Milosavljevic, Silvija
Kauai, Felipe
Prost Boxoen, Lucas
Van de Peer, Yves
Bonte, Dries
description Polyploidy, resulting from whole‐genome duplication (WGD), is ubiquitous in nature and reportedly associated with extreme environments and biological invasions. However, WGD usually comes with great costs, raising questions about the establishment chance of newly formed polyploids. The surprisingly high number of polyploid and mixed‐ploidy species observed in nature may be a consequence of their continuous emergence or may reflect stable polyploid persistence and even coexistence with the ancestral ploidy under certain circumstances. However, empirical studies on contemporary polyploid establishment often neglect the cost–benefit balances of polyploid characteristics, tradeoffs between phenotypic characteristics, intercytotype interactions, recurrent polyploid formation, and stochastic processes. Here, we advocate for considering population‐level success, combining the aforementioned factors that affect polyploid establishment and long‐term coexistence with their ancestors. We approach the paradox of polyploid establishment despite high costs from a modern coexistence theory perspective and give an overview of the diversity of mechanisms and their timing that may potentially enable stable rather than transient persistence.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/oik.09929
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3049205229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3049205229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-472af87ff2e07d29da05f35113d5b64b87257500f337bde063eb3c9d763faed13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGkPdtJXLMgVBWoqNQBOltJfIaUNA52Kui_x7RdueWkV4_u4yHkmsGIxRq7-nMESnF1QgYsB0hAQn5KBgACEsaVOicXIawBQEqZDsjrqjXoQ1-0pm7faeeaXde42lCMWdnU4WODbX9He9x0zhd-R7uI16HHtkLqPN1jSCuHP8f0_pKc2aIJeHXsQ7J6nL1Nn5PF8mk-fVgklRCcJankhZ1IazmCNFyZAjIrMsaEyco8LSeSZzIDsELI0iDkAktRKSNzYQs0TAzJzWFu593XNh6s127r27hSC0gVh4xzFanbA1V5F4JHqztfb-InmoH-c6ajM713Ftnxgf2uG9z9D-rl_IWJXDLxC0vxbuU</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049205229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding polyploid establishment: temporary persistence or stable coexistence?</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Mortier, Frederik ; Bafort, Quinten ; Milosavljevic, Silvija ; Kauai, Felipe ; Prost Boxoen, Lucas ; Van de Peer, Yves ; Bonte, Dries</creator><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Frederik ; Bafort, Quinten ; Milosavljevic, Silvija ; Kauai, Felipe ; Prost Boxoen, Lucas ; Van de Peer, Yves ; Bonte, Dries</creatorcontrib><description>Polyploidy, resulting from whole‐genome duplication (WGD), is ubiquitous in nature and reportedly associated with extreme environments and biological invasions. However, WGD usually comes with great costs, raising questions about the establishment chance of newly formed polyploids. The surprisingly high number of polyploid and mixed‐ploidy species observed in nature may be a consequence of their continuous emergence or may reflect stable polyploid persistence and even coexistence with the ancestral ploidy under certain circumstances. However, empirical studies on contemporary polyploid establishment often neglect the cost–benefit balances of polyploid characteristics, tradeoffs between phenotypic characteristics, intercytotype interactions, recurrent polyploid formation, and stochastic processes. Here, we advocate for considering population‐level success, combining the aforementioned factors that affect polyploid establishment and long‐term coexistence with their ancestors. We approach the paradox of polyploid establishment despite high costs from a modern coexistence theory perspective and give an overview of the diversity of mechanisms and their timing that may potentially enable stable rather than transient persistence.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0030-1299</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0706</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/oik.09929</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Biological invasions ; Coexistence ; Extreme environments ; Genomes ; niche differentiation ; phenotypic evolution ; Ploidy ; polyploid establishment ; Polyploidy ; Stochastic processes ; Stochasticity ; whole-genome duplication</subject><ispartof>Oikos, 2024-05, Vol.2024 (5), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 Nordic Society Oikos. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</rights><rights>Oikos © 2024 Nordic Society Oikos</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-472af87ff2e07d29da05f35113d5b64b87257500f337bde063eb3c9d763faed13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-472af87ff2e07d29da05f35113d5b64b87257500f337bde063eb3c9d763faed13</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3320-7505 ; 0000-0002-4991-8256 ; 0000-0003-2155-3344 ; 0000-0003-1740-6587 ; 0000-0003-2779-9097 ; 0000-0002-1480-2675 ; 0000-0003-4327-3730</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Foik.09929$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Foik.09929$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bafort, Quinten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, Silvija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauai, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prost Boxoen, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Peer, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonte, Dries</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding polyploid establishment: temporary persistence or stable coexistence?</title><title>Oikos</title><description>Polyploidy, resulting from whole‐genome duplication (WGD), is ubiquitous in nature and reportedly associated with extreme environments and biological invasions. However, WGD usually comes with great costs, raising questions about the establishment chance of newly formed polyploids. The surprisingly high number of polyploid and mixed‐ploidy species observed in nature may be a consequence of their continuous emergence or may reflect stable polyploid persistence and even coexistence with the ancestral ploidy under certain circumstances. However, empirical studies on contemporary polyploid establishment often neglect the cost–benefit balances of polyploid characteristics, tradeoffs between phenotypic characteristics, intercytotype interactions, recurrent polyploid formation, and stochastic processes. Here, we advocate for considering population‐level success, combining the aforementioned factors that affect polyploid establishment and long‐term coexistence with their ancestors. We approach the paradox of polyploid establishment despite high costs from a modern coexistence theory perspective and give an overview of the diversity of mechanisms and their timing that may potentially enable stable rather than transient persistence.</description><subject>Biological invasions</subject><subject>Coexistence</subject><subject>Extreme environments</subject><subject>Genomes</subject><subject>niche differentiation</subject><subject>phenotypic evolution</subject><subject>Ploidy</subject><subject>polyploid establishment</subject><subject>Polyploidy</subject><subject>Stochastic processes</subject><subject>Stochasticity</subject><subject>whole-genome duplication</subject><issn>0030-1299</issn><issn>1600-0706</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAQhi0EEqUw8A8sMTGkPdtJXLMgVBWoqNQBOltJfIaUNA52Kui_x7RdueWkV4_u4yHkmsGIxRq7-nMESnF1QgYsB0hAQn5KBgACEsaVOicXIawBQEqZDsjrqjXoQ1-0pm7faeeaXde42lCMWdnU4WODbX9He9x0zhd-R7uI16HHtkLqPN1jSCuHP8f0_pKc2aIJeHXsQ7J6nL1Nn5PF8mk-fVgklRCcJankhZ1IazmCNFyZAjIrMsaEyco8LSeSZzIDsELI0iDkAktRKSNzYQs0TAzJzWFu593XNh6s127r27hSC0gVh4xzFanbA1V5F4JHqztfb-InmoH-c6ajM713Ftnxgf2uG9z9D-rl_IWJXDLxC0vxbuU</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Mortier, Frederik</creator><creator>Bafort, Quinten</creator><creator>Milosavljevic, Silvija</creator><creator>Kauai, Felipe</creator><creator>Prost Boxoen, Lucas</creator><creator>Van de Peer, Yves</creator><creator>Bonte, Dries</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-7505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-8256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2155-3344</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-6587</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2779-9097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1480-2675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-3730</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Understanding polyploid establishment: temporary persistence or stable coexistence?</title><author>Mortier, Frederik ; Bafort, Quinten ; Milosavljevic, Silvija ; Kauai, Felipe ; Prost Boxoen, Lucas ; Van de Peer, Yves ; Bonte, Dries</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3321-472af87ff2e07d29da05f35113d5b64b87257500f337bde063eb3c9d763faed13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biological invasions</topic><topic>Coexistence</topic><topic>Extreme environments</topic><topic>Genomes</topic><topic>niche differentiation</topic><topic>phenotypic evolution</topic><topic>Ploidy</topic><topic>polyploid establishment</topic><topic>Polyploidy</topic><topic>Stochastic processes</topic><topic>Stochasticity</topic><topic>whole-genome duplication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mortier, Frederik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bafort, Quinten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milosavljevic, Silvija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauai, Felipe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prost Boxoen, Lucas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van de Peer, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonte, Dries</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mortier, Frederik</au><au>Bafort, Quinten</au><au>Milosavljevic, Silvija</au><au>Kauai, Felipe</au><au>Prost Boxoen, Lucas</au><au>Van de Peer, Yves</au><au>Bonte, Dries</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Understanding polyploid establishment: temporary persistence or stable coexistence?</atitle><jtitle>Oikos</jtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2024</volume><issue>5</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>0030-1299</issn><eissn>1600-0706</eissn><abstract>Polyploidy, resulting from whole‐genome duplication (WGD), is ubiquitous in nature and reportedly associated with extreme environments and biological invasions. However, WGD usually comes with great costs, raising questions about the establishment chance of newly formed polyploids. The surprisingly high number of polyploid and mixed‐ploidy species observed in nature may be a consequence of their continuous emergence or may reflect stable polyploid persistence and even coexistence with the ancestral ploidy under certain circumstances. However, empirical studies on contemporary polyploid establishment often neglect the cost–benefit balances of polyploid characteristics, tradeoffs between phenotypic characteristics, intercytotype interactions, recurrent polyploid formation, and stochastic processes. Here, we advocate for considering population‐level success, combining the aforementioned factors that affect polyploid establishment and long‐term coexistence with their ancestors. We approach the paradox of polyploid establishment despite high costs from a modern coexistence theory perspective and give an overview of the diversity of mechanisms and their timing that may potentially enable stable rather than transient persistence.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/oik.09929</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3320-7505</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4991-8256</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2155-3344</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1740-6587</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2779-9097</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1480-2675</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4327-3730</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0030-1299
ispartof Oikos, 2024-05, Vol.2024 (5), p.n/a
issn 0030-1299
1600-0706
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3049205229
source Wiley Journals
subjects Biological invasions
Coexistence
Extreme environments
Genomes
niche differentiation
phenotypic evolution
Ploidy
polyploid establishment
Polyploidy
Stochastic processes
Stochasticity
whole-genome duplication
title Understanding polyploid establishment: temporary persistence or stable coexistence?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T03%3A25%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20polyploid%20establishment:%20temporary%20persistence%20or%20stable%20coexistence?&rft.jtitle=Oikos&rft.au=Mortier,%20Frederik&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=2024&rft.issue=5&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=0030-1299&rft.eissn=1600-0706&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/oik.09929&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3049205229%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049205229&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true