1588 INTRODUCING ‘THE CARE TOOL’: A SIMPLE TOOL TO IMPROVE GENERAL SURGERY DOCUMENTATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF KEY ASPECTS OF FRAILTY
Abstract Introduction Increased frailty is associated with increased post-operative morbidity and mortality in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. NELA recommend documentation of frailty in surgical patients over 652. Using QI methodology, we introduced a ‘CARE tool’ for surgical doctors...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Age and ageing 2023-07, Vol.52 (Supplement_2) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | Supplement_2 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Age and ageing |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Tilley, B Macstay, D Valetopoulou, A Gathercole, G MacDonald, L Wright, H Sengupta, I Bertfield, D |
description | Abstract
Introduction
Increased frailty is associated with increased post-operative morbidity and mortality in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. NELA recommend documentation of frailty in surgical patients over 652. Using QI methodology, we introduced a ‘CARE tool’ for surgical doctors aiming to improve their documentation of an older person’s medical history (including CFS and delirium).
Method
A collaborative team representing geriatric medicine, anaesthetics and surgery devised the acronym CARE (Cognition, Assistance at home, Record the CFS, Exercise tolerance). The tool was tested using QI methodology over 2 PDSA cycles. Cycle one introduced the tool into electronic patient records (EPR) and presented it at the surgical faculty meeting. Cycle two introduced the tool specifically to surgical FY1 doctors during induction. The EPR surgical clerkings of patients over 65 years old admitted to general surgery were sampled weekly over seven weeks to assess CARE tool completion. Post-intervention, we surveyed the surgical doctors assessing their understanding of frailty and perceived value of the CARE tool.
Results
At baseline: 12% of confusion, 92% dementia status, 0% CFS, 30% assistance at home, 8% exercise tolerance were documented. Following PDSA cycle one, use of the CARE tool was 40%. There was an increase in the documentation of confusion (40%) and CFS (40%). Dementia status and assistance at home were documented in similar frequency pre- and post-cycle. During cycle two, CFS documentation increased to 55% but identification of confusion dropped to 25%. The survey demonstrated that frailty, CFS scoring and delirium screening were better understood by junior doctors than Consultants and registrars.
Conclusions
Our project showed mixed success in improving documentation using the CARE tool. The survey demonstrated a good understanding and knowledge of frailty in surgical FY1s. Ongoing frailty teaching is planned for the surgical department. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/ageing/afad104.002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3049091446</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ageing/afad104.002</oup_id><sourcerecordid>3049091446</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1096-1dd31b25c0a5421691ecfc8b711e7c0febf23c9784ef0b9fe8ac84f5683dfc823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcLLEOa3tOKnDLUrcNiJNqsRB6inKw65aQVMSeuDWI58Av9cvwVX6AVx2d0azs9oB4BGjEUaOOS7WcrNbjwtV1BjREULkCgwwtZlBmEmvwQBpykAT4tyCu67baogtTAbgG1uMwSASSexnXhDN4On4I-Ycem7CoYjj8HT8fYYuTIPFMuwZXaBGSfzK4YxHPHFDmGbJjCcr6MdetuCRcEUQR9CNfJhFPk9SocezezyFL3wF3XTJPZGe4TRxg1Cs7sGNKt46-XDpQ5BNufDmRhjPAs8NjUo_ahu4rk1cEqtChUUJth0sK1WxcoKxnFRIyVIRs3ImjEqFSkdJVlSMKstmZq11xByCp9533zYfB9l95tvm0O70ydxE1EEOptTWKtKrqrbpulaqfN9u3ov2K8coPyee94nnl8RzHa9eMvql5rD_j_4PQfR8uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3049091446</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>1588 INTRODUCING ‘THE CARE TOOL’: A SIMPLE TOOL TO IMPROVE GENERAL SURGERY DOCUMENTATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF KEY ASPECTS OF FRAILTY</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tilley, B ; Macstay, D ; Valetopoulou, A ; Gathercole, G ; MacDonald, L ; Wright, H ; Sengupta, I ; Bertfield, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Tilley, B ; Macstay, D ; Valetopoulou, A ; Gathercole, G ; MacDonald, L ; Wright, H ; Sengupta, I ; Bertfield, D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Introduction
Increased frailty is associated with increased post-operative morbidity and mortality in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. NELA recommend documentation of frailty in surgical patients over 652. Using QI methodology, we introduced a ‘CARE tool’ for surgical doctors aiming to improve their documentation of an older person’s medical history (including CFS and delirium).
Method
A collaborative team representing geriatric medicine, anaesthetics and surgery devised the acronym CARE (Cognition, Assistance at home, Record the CFS, Exercise tolerance). The tool was tested using QI methodology over 2 PDSA cycles. Cycle one introduced the tool into electronic patient records (EPR) and presented it at the surgical faculty meeting. Cycle two introduced the tool specifically to surgical FY1 doctors during induction. The EPR surgical clerkings of patients over 65 years old admitted to general surgery were sampled weekly over seven weeks to assess CARE tool completion. Post-intervention, we surveyed the surgical doctors assessing their understanding of frailty and perceived value of the CARE tool.
Results
At baseline: 12% of confusion, 92% dementia status, 0% CFS, 30% assistance at home, 8% exercise tolerance were documented. Following PDSA cycle one, use of the CARE tool was 40%. There was an increase in the documentation of confusion (40%) and CFS (40%). Dementia status and assistance at home were documented in similar frequency pre- and post-cycle. During cycle two, CFS documentation increased to 55% but identification of confusion dropped to 25%. The survey demonstrated that frailty, CFS scoring and delirium screening were better understood by junior doctors than Consultants and registrars.
Conclusions
Our project showed mixed success in improving documentation using the CARE tool. The survey demonstrated a good understanding and knowledge of frailty in surgical FY1s. Ongoing frailty teaching is planned for the surgical department.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-0729</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad104.002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Anesthesia ; Anesthetics ; Cognition ; Computerized medical records ; Confusion ; Consultants ; Delirium ; Dementia ; Dementia disorders ; Documentation ; Frailty ; Geriatrics ; Induction ; Medical history ; Medical screening ; Morbidity ; Older people ; Patient admissions ; Patients ; Physicians ; Polls & surveys ; Registrars ; Resident physicians ; Surgery ; Surveys ; Teaching ; Tolerance ; Understanding</subject><ispartof>Age and ageing, 2023-07, Vol.52 (Supplement_2)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1578,27903,27904,30978</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tilley, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macstay, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valetopoulou, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathercole, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sengupta, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertfield, D</creatorcontrib><title>1588 INTRODUCING ‘THE CARE TOOL’: A SIMPLE TOOL TO IMPROVE GENERAL SURGERY DOCUMENTATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF KEY ASPECTS OF FRAILTY</title><title>Age and ageing</title><description>Abstract
Introduction
Increased frailty is associated with increased post-operative morbidity and mortality in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. NELA recommend documentation of frailty in surgical patients over 652. Using QI methodology, we introduced a ‘CARE tool’ for surgical doctors aiming to improve their documentation of an older person’s medical history (including CFS and delirium).
Method
A collaborative team representing geriatric medicine, anaesthetics and surgery devised the acronym CARE (Cognition, Assistance at home, Record the CFS, Exercise tolerance). The tool was tested using QI methodology over 2 PDSA cycles. Cycle one introduced the tool into electronic patient records (EPR) and presented it at the surgical faculty meeting. Cycle two introduced the tool specifically to surgical FY1 doctors during induction. The EPR surgical clerkings of patients over 65 years old admitted to general surgery were sampled weekly over seven weeks to assess CARE tool completion. Post-intervention, we surveyed the surgical doctors assessing their understanding of frailty and perceived value of the CARE tool.
Results
At baseline: 12% of confusion, 92% dementia status, 0% CFS, 30% assistance at home, 8% exercise tolerance were documented. Following PDSA cycle one, use of the CARE tool was 40%. There was an increase in the documentation of confusion (40%) and CFS (40%). Dementia status and assistance at home were documented in similar frequency pre- and post-cycle. During cycle two, CFS documentation increased to 55% but identification of confusion dropped to 25%. The survey demonstrated that frailty, CFS scoring and delirium screening were better understood by junior doctors than Consultants and registrars.
Conclusions
Our project showed mixed success in improving documentation using the CARE tool. The survey demonstrated a good understanding and knowledge of frailty in surgical FY1s. Ongoing frailty teaching is planned for the surgical department.</description><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>Computerized medical records</subject><subject>Confusion</subject><subject>Consultants</subject><subject>Delirium</subject><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Dementia disorders</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Frailty</subject><subject>Geriatrics</subject><subject>Induction</subject><subject>Medical history</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient admissions</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Polls & surveys</subject><subject>Registrars</subject><subject>Resident physicians</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Tolerance</subject><subject>Understanding</subject><issn>0002-0729</issn><issn>1468-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUMtOwzAQtBBIlMIPcLLEOa3tOKnDLUrcNiJNqsRB6inKw65aQVMSeuDWI58Av9cvwVX6AVx2d0azs9oB4BGjEUaOOS7WcrNbjwtV1BjREULkCgwwtZlBmEmvwQBpykAT4tyCu67baogtTAbgG1uMwSASSexnXhDN4On4I-Ycem7CoYjj8HT8fYYuTIPFMuwZXaBGSfzK4YxHPHFDmGbJjCcr6MdetuCRcEUQR9CNfJhFPk9SocezezyFL3wF3XTJPZGe4TRxg1Cs7sGNKt46-XDpQ5BNufDmRhjPAs8NjUo_ahu4rk1cEqtChUUJth0sK1WxcoKxnFRIyVIRs3ImjEqFSkdJVlSMKstmZq11xByCp9533zYfB9l95tvm0O70ydxE1EEOptTWKtKrqrbpulaqfN9u3ov2K8coPyee94nnl8RzHa9eMvql5rD_j_4PQfR8uw</recordid><startdate>20230721</startdate><enddate>20230721</enddate><creator>Tilley, B</creator><creator>Macstay, D</creator><creator>Valetopoulou, A</creator><creator>Gathercole, G</creator><creator>MacDonald, L</creator><creator>Wright, H</creator><creator>Sengupta, I</creator><creator>Bertfield, D</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230721</creationdate><title>1588 INTRODUCING ‘THE CARE TOOL’: A SIMPLE TOOL TO IMPROVE GENERAL SURGERY DOCUMENTATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF KEY ASPECTS OF FRAILTY</title><author>Tilley, B ; Macstay, D ; Valetopoulou, A ; Gathercole, G ; MacDonald, L ; Wright, H ; Sengupta, I ; Bertfield, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1096-1dd31b25c0a5421691ecfc8b711e7c0febf23c9784ef0b9fe8ac84f5683dfc823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>Computerized medical records</topic><topic>Confusion</topic><topic>Consultants</topic><topic>Delirium</topic><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Dementia disorders</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Frailty</topic><topic>Geriatrics</topic><topic>Induction</topic><topic>Medical history</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient admissions</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Polls & surveys</topic><topic>Registrars</topic><topic>Resident physicians</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Tolerance</topic><topic>Understanding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tilley, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Macstay, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valetopoulou, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gathercole, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacDonald, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wright, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sengupta, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bertfield, D</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tilley, B</au><au>Macstay, D</au><au>Valetopoulou, A</au><au>Gathercole, G</au><au>MacDonald, L</au><au>Wright, H</au><au>Sengupta, I</au><au>Bertfield, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>1588 INTRODUCING ‘THE CARE TOOL’: A SIMPLE TOOL TO IMPROVE GENERAL SURGERY DOCUMENTATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF KEY ASPECTS OF FRAILTY</atitle><jtitle>Age and ageing</jtitle><date>2023-07-21</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>Supplement_2</issue><issn>0002-0729</issn><eissn>1468-2834</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Introduction
Increased frailty is associated with increased post-operative morbidity and mortality in older patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. NELA recommend documentation of frailty in surgical patients over 652. Using QI methodology, we introduced a ‘CARE tool’ for surgical doctors aiming to improve their documentation of an older person’s medical history (including CFS and delirium).
Method
A collaborative team representing geriatric medicine, anaesthetics and surgery devised the acronym CARE (Cognition, Assistance at home, Record the CFS, Exercise tolerance). The tool was tested using QI methodology over 2 PDSA cycles. Cycle one introduced the tool into electronic patient records (EPR) and presented it at the surgical faculty meeting. Cycle two introduced the tool specifically to surgical FY1 doctors during induction. The EPR surgical clerkings of patients over 65 years old admitted to general surgery were sampled weekly over seven weeks to assess CARE tool completion. Post-intervention, we surveyed the surgical doctors assessing their understanding of frailty and perceived value of the CARE tool.
Results
At baseline: 12% of confusion, 92% dementia status, 0% CFS, 30% assistance at home, 8% exercise tolerance were documented. Following PDSA cycle one, use of the CARE tool was 40%. There was an increase in the documentation of confusion (40%) and CFS (40%). Dementia status and assistance at home were documented in similar frequency pre- and post-cycle. During cycle two, CFS documentation increased to 55% but identification of confusion dropped to 25%. The survey demonstrated that frailty, CFS scoring and delirium screening were better understood by junior doctors than Consultants and registrars.
Conclusions
Our project showed mixed success in improving documentation using the CARE tool. The survey demonstrated a good understanding and knowledge of frailty in surgical FY1s. Ongoing frailty teaching is planned for the surgical department.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ageing/afad104.002</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-0729 |
ispartof | Age and ageing, 2023-07, Vol.52 (Supplement_2) |
issn | 0002-0729 1468-2834 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3049091446 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Anesthesia Anesthetics Cognition Computerized medical records Confusion Consultants Delirium Dementia Dementia disorders Documentation Frailty Geriatrics Induction Medical history Medical screening Morbidity Older people Patient admissions Patients Physicians Polls & surveys Registrars Resident physicians Surgery Surveys Teaching Tolerance Understanding |
title | 1588 INTRODUCING ‘THE CARE TOOL’: A SIMPLE TOOL TO IMPROVE GENERAL SURGERY DOCUMENTATION AND UNDERSTANDING OF KEY ASPECTS OF FRAILTY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T20%3A34%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=1588%20INTRODUCING%20%E2%80%98THE%20CARE%20TOOL%E2%80%99:%20A%20SIMPLE%20TOOL%20TO%20IMPROVE%20GENERAL%20SURGERY%20DOCUMENTATION%20AND%20UNDERSTANDING%20OF%20KEY%20ASPECTS%20OF%20FRAILTY&rft.jtitle=Age%20and%20ageing&rft.au=Tilley,%20B&rft.date=2023-07-21&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=Supplement_2&rft.issn=0002-0729&rft.eissn=1468-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ageing/afad104.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3049091446%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3049091446&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ageing/afad104.002&rfr_iscdi=true |