How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability

Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting account...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Res publica (Liverpool, England) England), 2024-06, Vol.30 (2), p.361-400
Hauptverfasser: Grant, Ruth W., Katzenstein, Suzanne, Kennedy, Christopher
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 400
container_issue 2
container_start_page 361
container_title Res publica (Liverpool, England)
container_volume 30
creator Grant, Ruth W.
Katzenstein, Suzanne
Kennedy, Christopher
description Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3048670219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3048670219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-48b57f82ada53833dec195d0b88b79490dcad0c8061d48776dd91d466e26615d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuAt6uepM1Hr2QMdcJALzbwLrRJ6jq6piatY__eaAXvvDovnOc9Bx6ErgncEgBxFwghTCZA0wRyTmVyOEETwgRNJM_pacwp40kmODtHFyHsAIBBTifobekOeOGGxuD11h7xyvYx1AEvi66z7X3cfVqPN12YxbjvmlrX_XGGi9bgfmvxq3dlY_fYVXiutRvavijrJiKX6KwqmmCvfucUbR4f1otlsnp5el7MV4mmAvokkyUTlaSFKVgq09RYTXJmoJSyFHmWg9GFAS2BE5NJIbgxeUycW8o5YSadopvxbufdx2BDr3Zu8G18qVLIJBdASR4pOlLauxC8rVTn633hj4qA-jaoRoMqGlQ_BtUhltKxFCLcvlv_d_qf1heVpHLC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048670219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability</title><source>Springer Online Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Grant, Ruth W. ; Katzenstein, Suzanne ; Kennedy, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ruth W. ; Katzenstein, Suzanne ; Kennedy, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-4765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Clergy ; Education ; Ethics ; Hypothesis testing ; Institutionalization ; Institutions ; Legal History ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Law ; Police brutality ; Political Philosophy ; Political Theory ; Sanctions ; Sex crimes ; Sexual abuse ; Theories of Law ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Res publica (Liverpool, England), 2024-06, Vol.30 (2), p.361-400</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-48b57f82ada53833dec195d0b88b79490dcad0c8061d48776dd91d466e26615d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0014-3709</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ruth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katzenstein, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability</title><title>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</title><addtitle>Res Publica</addtitle><description>Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Clergy</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Legal History</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Law</subject><subject>Police brutality</subject><subject>Political Philosophy</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual abuse</subject><subject>Theories of Law</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>1356-4765</issn><issn>1572-8692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuAt6uepM1Hr2QMdcJALzbwLrRJ6jq6piatY__eaAXvvDovnOc9Bx6ErgncEgBxFwghTCZA0wRyTmVyOEETwgRNJM_pacwp40kmODtHFyHsAIBBTifobekOeOGGxuD11h7xyvYx1AEvi66z7X3cfVqPN12YxbjvmlrX_XGGi9bgfmvxq3dlY_fYVXiutRvavijrJiKX6KwqmmCvfucUbR4f1otlsnp5el7MV4mmAvokkyUTlaSFKVgq09RYTXJmoJSyFHmWg9GFAS2BE5NJIbgxeUycW8o5YSadopvxbufdx2BDr3Zu8G18qVLIJBdASR4pOlLauxC8rVTn633hj4qA-jaoRoMqGlQ_BtUhltKxFCLcvlv_d_qf1heVpHLC</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Grant, Ruth W.</creator><creator>Katzenstein, Suzanne</creator><creator>Kennedy, Christopher</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-3709</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability</title><author>Grant, Ruth W. ; Katzenstein, Suzanne ; Kennedy, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-48b57f82ada53833dec195d0b88b79490dcad0c8061d48776dd91d466e26615d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Clergy</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Legal History</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Law</topic><topic>Police brutality</topic><topic>Political Philosophy</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual abuse</topic><topic>Theories of Law</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ruth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katzenstein, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grant, Ruth W.</au><au>Katzenstein, Suzanne</au><au>Kennedy, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability</atitle><jtitle>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</jtitle><stitle>Res Publica</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>361-400</pages><issn>1356-4765</issn><eissn>1572-8692</eissn><abstract>Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w</doi><tpages>40</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-3709</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1356-4765
ispartof Res publica (Liverpool, England), 2024-06, Vol.30 (2), p.361-400
issn 1356-4765
1572-8692
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3048670219
source Springer Online Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Accountability
Clergy
Education
Ethics
Hypothesis testing
Institutionalization
Institutions
Legal History
Philosophy
Philosophy of Law
Police brutality
Political Philosophy
Political Theory
Sanctions
Sex crimes
Sexual abuse
Theories of Law
Transparency
title How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A14%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Could%20They%20Let%20This%20Happen?%20Cover%20Ups,%20Complicity,%20and%20the%20Problem%20of%20Accountability&rft.jtitle=Res%20publica%20(Liverpool,%20England)&rft.au=Grant,%20Ruth%20W.&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=361-400&rft.issn=1356-4765&rft.eissn=1572-8692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3048670219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048670219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true