How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability
Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting account...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Res publica (Liverpool, England) England), 2024-06, Vol.30 (2), p.361-400 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 400 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 361 |
container_title | Res publica (Liverpool, England) |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Grant, Ruth W. Katzenstein, Suzanne Kennedy, Christopher |
description | Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3048670219</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3048670219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-48b57f82ada53833dec195d0b88b79490dcad0c8061d48776dd91d466e26615d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuAt6uepM1Hr2QMdcJALzbwLrRJ6jq6piatY__eaAXvvDovnOc9Bx6ErgncEgBxFwghTCZA0wRyTmVyOEETwgRNJM_pacwp40kmODtHFyHsAIBBTifobekOeOGGxuD11h7xyvYx1AEvi66z7X3cfVqPN12YxbjvmlrX_XGGi9bgfmvxq3dlY_fYVXiutRvavijrJiKX6KwqmmCvfucUbR4f1otlsnp5el7MV4mmAvokkyUTlaSFKVgq09RYTXJmoJSyFHmWg9GFAS2BE5NJIbgxeUycW8o5YSadopvxbufdx2BDr3Zu8G18qVLIJBdASR4pOlLauxC8rVTn633hj4qA-jaoRoMqGlQ_BtUhltKxFCLcvlv_d_qf1heVpHLC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3048670219</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability</title><source>Springer Online Journals</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Grant, Ruth W. ; Katzenstein, Suzanne ; Kennedy, Christopher</creator><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ruth W. ; Katzenstein, Suzanne ; Kennedy, Christopher</creatorcontrib><description>Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1356-4765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-8692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Clergy ; Education ; Ethics ; Hypothesis testing ; Institutionalization ; Institutions ; Legal History ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Law ; Police brutality ; Political Philosophy ; Political Theory ; Sanctions ; Sex crimes ; Sexual abuse ; Theories of Law ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Res publica (Liverpool, England), 2024-06, Vol.30 (2), p.361-400</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-48b57f82ada53833dec195d0b88b79490dcad0c8061d48776dd91d466e26615d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0014-3709</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33751,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ruth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katzenstein, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Christopher</creatorcontrib><title>How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability</title><title>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</title><addtitle>Res Publica</addtitle><description>Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Clergy</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Hypothesis testing</subject><subject>Institutionalization</subject><subject>Institutions</subject><subject>Legal History</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Law</subject><subject>Police brutality</subject><subject>Political Philosophy</subject><subject>Political Theory</subject><subject>Sanctions</subject><subject>Sex crimes</subject><subject>Sexual abuse</subject><subject>Theories of Law</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>1356-4765</issn><issn>1572-8692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_wKuAt6uepM1Hr2QMdcJALzbwLrRJ6jq6piatY__eaAXvvDovnOc9Bx6ErgncEgBxFwghTCZA0wRyTmVyOEETwgRNJM_pacwp40kmODtHFyHsAIBBTifobekOeOGGxuD11h7xyvYx1AEvi66z7X3cfVqPN12YxbjvmlrX_XGGi9bgfmvxq3dlY_fYVXiutRvavijrJiKX6KwqmmCvfucUbR4f1otlsnp5el7MV4mmAvokkyUTlaSFKVgq09RYTXJmoJSyFHmWg9GFAS2BE5NJIbgxeUycW8o5YSadopvxbufdx2BDr3Zu8G18qVLIJBdASR4pOlLauxC8rVTn633hj4qA-jaoRoMqGlQ_BtUhltKxFCLcvlv_d_qf1heVpHLC</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Grant, Ruth W.</creator><creator>Katzenstein, Suzanne</creator><creator>Kennedy, Christopher</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U3</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-3709</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability</title><author>Grant, Ruth W. ; Katzenstein, Suzanne ; Kennedy, Christopher</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-48b57f82ada53833dec195d0b88b79490dcad0c8061d48776dd91d466e26615d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Clergy</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Hypothesis testing</topic><topic>Institutionalization</topic><topic>Institutions</topic><topic>Legal History</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Law</topic><topic>Police brutality</topic><topic>Political Philosophy</topic><topic>Political Theory</topic><topic>Sanctions</topic><topic>Sex crimes</topic><topic>Sexual abuse</topic><topic>Theories of Law</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Grant, Ruth W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katzenstein, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, Christopher</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Social Services Abstracts</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Grant, Ruth W.</au><au>Katzenstein, Suzanne</au><au>Kennedy, Christopher</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability</atitle><jtitle>Res publica (Liverpool, England)</jtitle><stitle>Res Publica</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>361</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>361-400</pages><issn>1356-4765</issn><eissn>1572-8692</eissn><abstract>Sexual abuse by clergymen, poisoned water, police brutality—these cases each involve two wrongs: the abuse itself and the attempt to avoid responsibility for it. Our focus is this second wrong—the cover up. Cover ups are accountability failures, and they share common strategies for thwarting accountability whatever the abuse and whatever the institution. We find that cover ups often succeed even when accountability mechanisms are in place. Hence, improved institutions will not be sufficient to prevent accountability failures. Accountability mechanisms are tools that people must be willing to use in good faith. They fail when people are complicit. What explains complicity? We identify certain human proclivities and features of modern organizations that lead people to become complicit in the wrongdoing of others. If we focus exclusively on the design of institutions, we will fail to constrain the perpetrators of wrongdoing. Understanding complicity is key to understanding accountability failures.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w</doi><tpages>40</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0014-3709</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1356-4765 |
ispartof | Res publica (Liverpool, England), 2024-06, Vol.30 (2), p.361-400 |
issn | 1356-4765 1572-8692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3048670219 |
source | Springer Online Journals; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Sociological Abstracts |
subjects | Accountability Clergy Education Ethics Hypothesis testing Institutionalization Institutions Legal History Philosophy Philosophy of Law Police brutality Political Philosophy Political Theory Sanctions Sex crimes Sexual abuse Theories of Law Transparency |
title | How Could They Let This Happen? Cover Ups, Complicity, and the Problem of Accountability |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-14T15%3A14%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Could%20They%20Let%20This%20Happen?%20Cover%20Ups,%20Complicity,%20and%20the%20Problem%20of%20Accountability&rft.jtitle=Res%20publica%20(Liverpool,%20England)&rft.au=Grant,%20Ruth%20W.&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=361&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=361-400&rft.issn=1356-4765&rft.eissn=1572-8692&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11158-023-09628-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3048670219%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3048670219&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |