Corruption between public and private moralities: The Albanian case in a comparative perspective

This essay draws on comparative ethnographic material from Albania and Italy. It addresses different forms of corruption, arguing that in order to understand the way in which phenomena such as corruption occur and are experienced in any given society, we should contextualize them in the historical a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Human affairs (Bratislava, Slovakia) Slovakia), 2013-04, Vol.23 (2), p.196-211
1. Verfasser: Prato, Giuliana B.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 211
container_issue 2
container_start_page 196
container_title Human affairs (Bratislava, Slovakia)
container_volume 23
creator Prato, Giuliana B.
description This essay draws on comparative ethnographic material from Albania and Italy. It addresses different forms of corruption, arguing that in order to understand the way in which phenomena such as corruption occur and are experienced in any given society, we should contextualize them in the historical and cultural traditions of that specific society. In doing so, however, we should be alert in avoiding falling into the trap of either moral relativism or cultural determinism. The essay suggests that an anthropological analysis of corruption should distinguish between legal rules and social norms. In particular, the empirical study of such norms helps to understand the meanings—both individual and inter-subjective—that actors give to the social and political situation in which they operate.
doi_str_mv 10.2478/s13374-013-0119-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3047328033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3047328033</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-93c13bfae4ee84ceb2d4a60f415926d0f883890133f8d1ce9f30248d0e16bbfa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUM9LwzAULqLgnP4B3gKeq0lemrVeZAx_wcDLBG8xTV9nRtfWpN3Yf29KPXhRPDzeR_h-vHxRdMnoNRez9MYzgJmIKYMwLIvhKJoMT7Gg7O04YM5oDDRJTqMz7zeUCiqFmETvi8a5vu1sU5Mcuz1iTdo-r6whui5I6-xOd0i2jdOV7Sz6W7L6QDKvcl1bXROjPRJbE01Ms221053dIWnR-RbNgM-jk1JXHi--9zR6fbhfLZ7i5cvj82K-jA1kSRdnYBjkpUaBmAqDOS-ElrQULMm4LGiZppBm4XtQpgUzmJVAuUgLikzmQQfT6Gr0bV3z2aPv1KbpXR0iFVAxA55SgL9YTCZJIpmQs8BiI8u4xnuHpQo9bLU7KEbVULca61bhHjXUrQbnu1Gz11WHrsC16w8B_Aj4TcuBs0wGBz46-JBWr_8lhS9qk5aZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1655561467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Corruption between public and private moralities: The Albanian case in a comparative perspective</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>De Gruyter journals</source><creator>Prato, Giuliana B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Prato, Giuliana B.</creatorcontrib><description>This essay draws on comparative ethnographic material from Albania and Italy. It addresses different forms of corruption, arguing that in order to understand the way in which phenomena such as corruption occur and are experienced in any given society, we should contextualize them in the historical and cultural traditions of that specific society. In doing so, however, we should be alert in avoiding falling into the trap of either moral relativism or cultural determinism. The essay suggests that an anthropological analysis of corruption should distinguish between legal rules and social norms. In particular, the empirical study of such norms helps to understand the meanings—both individual and inter-subjective—that actors give to the social and political situation in which they operate.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1210-3055</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1337-401X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2478/s13374-013-0119-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: SP Versita</publisher><subject>Albania ; Comparative studies ; Corruption ; Corruption in government ; Cultural tradition ; Determinism ; Ethnography ; informal networks ; Italy ; Middle Eastern Culture ; Norms ; party rule ; Political parties ; Quality of Life Research ; regime change ; Relativism ; Research Article ; Social conditions &amp; trends ; Social norms ; Social Sciences ; Society ; Sociology</subject><ispartof>Human affairs (Bratislava, Slovakia), 2013-04, Vol.23 (2), p.196-211</ispartof><rights>Versita Warsaw and Springer-Verlag Wien 2013</rights><rights>2013. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-93c13bfae4ee84ceb2d4a60f415926d0f883890133f8d1ce9f30248d0e16bbfa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s13374-013-0119-3/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.2478/s13374-013-0119-3/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwalterdegruyter$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27321,27901,27902,33751,66497,68281</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prato, Giuliana B.</creatorcontrib><title>Corruption between public and private moralities: The Albanian case in a comparative perspective</title><title>Human affairs (Bratislava, Slovakia)</title><addtitle>Humaff</addtitle><description>This essay draws on comparative ethnographic material from Albania and Italy. It addresses different forms of corruption, arguing that in order to understand the way in which phenomena such as corruption occur and are experienced in any given society, we should contextualize them in the historical and cultural traditions of that specific society. In doing so, however, we should be alert in avoiding falling into the trap of either moral relativism or cultural determinism. The essay suggests that an anthropological analysis of corruption should distinguish between legal rules and social norms. In particular, the empirical study of such norms helps to understand the meanings—both individual and inter-subjective—that actors give to the social and political situation in which they operate.</description><subject>Albania</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Corruption</subject><subject>Corruption in government</subject><subject>Cultural tradition</subject><subject>Determinism</subject><subject>Ethnography</subject><subject>informal networks</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Middle Eastern Culture</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>party rule</subject><subject>Political parties</subject><subject>Quality of Life Research</subject><subject>regime change</subject><subject>Relativism</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Social conditions &amp; trends</subject><subject>Social norms</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Society</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><issn>1210-3055</issn><issn>1337-401X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUM9LwzAULqLgnP4B3gKeq0lemrVeZAx_wcDLBG8xTV9nRtfWpN3Yf29KPXhRPDzeR_h-vHxRdMnoNRez9MYzgJmIKYMwLIvhKJoMT7Gg7O04YM5oDDRJTqMz7zeUCiqFmETvi8a5vu1sU5Mcuz1iTdo-r6whui5I6-xOd0i2jdOV7Sz6W7L6QDKvcl1bXROjPRJbE01Ms221053dIWnR-RbNgM-jk1JXHi--9zR6fbhfLZ7i5cvj82K-jA1kSRdnYBjkpUaBmAqDOS-ElrQULMm4LGiZppBm4XtQpgUzmJVAuUgLikzmQQfT6Gr0bV3z2aPv1KbpXR0iFVAxA55SgL9YTCZJIpmQs8BiI8u4xnuHpQo9bLU7KEbVULca61bhHjXUrQbnu1Gz11WHrsC16w8B_Aj4TcuBs0wGBz46-JBWr_8lhS9qk5aZ</recordid><startdate>20130401</startdate><enddate>20130401</enddate><creator>Prato, Giuliana B.</creator><general>SP Versita</general><general>Versita</general><general>Walter de Gruyter GmbH</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130401</creationdate><title>Corruption between public and private moralities: The Albanian case in a comparative perspective</title><author>Prato, Giuliana B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c395t-93c13bfae4ee84ceb2d4a60f415926d0f883890133f8d1ce9f30248d0e16bbfa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Albania</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Corruption</topic><topic>Corruption in government</topic><topic>Cultural tradition</topic><topic>Determinism</topic><topic>Ethnography</topic><topic>informal networks</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Middle Eastern Culture</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>party rule</topic><topic>Political parties</topic><topic>Quality of Life Research</topic><topic>regime change</topic><topic>Relativism</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Social conditions &amp; trends</topic><topic>Social norms</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Society</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prato, Giuliana B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Human affairs (Bratislava, Slovakia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prato, Giuliana B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Corruption between public and private moralities: The Albanian case in a comparative perspective</atitle><jtitle>Human affairs (Bratislava, Slovakia)</jtitle><stitle>Humaff</stitle><date>2013-04-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>196</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>196-211</pages><issn>1210-3055</issn><eissn>1337-401X</eissn><abstract>This essay draws on comparative ethnographic material from Albania and Italy. It addresses different forms of corruption, arguing that in order to understand the way in which phenomena such as corruption occur and are experienced in any given society, we should contextualize them in the historical and cultural traditions of that specific society. In doing so, however, we should be alert in avoiding falling into the trap of either moral relativism or cultural determinism. The essay suggests that an anthropological analysis of corruption should distinguish between legal rules and social norms. In particular, the empirical study of such norms helps to understand the meanings—both individual and inter-subjective—that actors give to the social and political situation in which they operate.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>SP Versita</pub><doi>10.2478/s13374-013-0119-3</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1210-3055
ispartof Human affairs (Bratislava, Slovakia), 2013-04, Vol.23 (2), p.196-211
issn 1210-3055
1337-401X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3047328033
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Sociological Abstracts; De Gruyter journals
subjects Albania
Comparative studies
Corruption
Corruption in government
Cultural tradition
Determinism
Ethnography
informal networks
Italy
Middle Eastern Culture
Norms
party rule
Political parties
Quality of Life Research
regime change
Relativism
Research Article
Social conditions & trends
Social norms
Social Sciences
Society
Sociology
title Corruption between public and private moralities: The Albanian case in a comparative perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T19%3A22%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Corruption%20between%20public%20and%20private%20moralities:%20The%20Albanian%20case%20in%20a%20comparative%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Human%20affairs%20(Bratislava,%20Slovakia)&rft.au=Prato,%20Giuliana%20B.&rft.date=2013-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=196&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=196-211&rft.issn=1210-3055&rft.eissn=1337-401X&rft_id=info:doi/10.2478/s13374-013-0119-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3047328033%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1655561467&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true