The effect of anticipated telework conditions and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on work-family outcomes
With the lasting impact of the shift to telework due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential that organizations understand the effects of teleworking and family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs) on important work-family outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the causal implicatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) N.J.), 2024-05, Vol.43 (19), p.17065-17078 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 17078 |
---|---|
container_issue | 19 |
container_start_page | 17065 |
container_title | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.) |
container_volume | 43 |
creator | Huynh, Tiffany McDonald, Janet L. Smith, Rachel Williamson |
description | With the lasting impact of the shift to telework due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential that organizations understand the effects of teleworking and family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs) on important work-family outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the causal implications that formal vs. informal telework arrangements and FSSBs have on anticipated work-family conflict (AWFC) and workplace telepressure. A sample of undergraduate students read two vignettes manipulating telework arrangements (formal/informal) and amount of FSSBs (high/low), then responded to outcome measures through a survey. The informal teleworking arrangement was hypothesized to result in higher AWFC and workplace telepressure than the formal teleworking arrangement. The high FSSBs condition was posited to result in lower AWFC and workplace telepressure than the low FSSBs condition. An interaction was expected in both dependent variables, such that ratings would be particularly high when teleworking was informal and FSSBs were low. In our sample, we found no main effect of formal vs. informal teleworking arrangement, partial evidence for the hypothesized main effect of FSSBs, and some evidence for the interaction between the two. Implications for managerial training and organizational teleworking policies are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12144-024-05675-5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3047000817</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3047000817</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-52266d4406ba4ece510757a05872af78540bbb531bd5de679eb665206429950c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxRdRsFb_AU8Bz9FJNh_doxS_oOClnkN2d9amtps1SSv9701dwZuHYR7Me2_gVxTXDG4ZgL6LjDMhKPA8UmlJ5UkxYVWpqNBleZo1CEVZyeC8uIhxDcC0qqpJMSxXSLDrsEnEd8T2yTVusAlbknCDXz58kMb3rUvO9zHfW9LZrdscaNwNgw_J7ZFkiWHvog-kxpXdOx8i8T05puloJ36XGr_FeFmcdXYT8ep3T4u3x4fl_JkuXp9e5vcL2nANiUrOlWqFAFVbgQ1KBlpqC3Kmue30TAqo61qWrG5li0pXWCslOSjBq0pCU06Lm7F3CP5zhzGZtd-FPr80JQgNADOms4uPrib4GAN2Zghua8PBMDBHsmYkazJZ80PWyBwqx1DM5v4dw1_1P6lvn6x9SA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3047000817</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The effect of anticipated telework conditions and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on work-family outcomes</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Huynh, Tiffany ; McDonald, Janet L. ; Smith, Rachel Williamson</creator><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Tiffany ; McDonald, Janet L. ; Smith, Rachel Williamson</creatorcontrib><description>With the lasting impact of the shift to telework due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential that organizations understand the effects of teleworking and family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs) on important work-family outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the causal implications that formal vs. informal telework arrangements and FSSBs have on anticipated work-family conflict (AWFC) and workplace telepressure. A sample of undergraduate students read two vignettes manipulating telework arrangements (formal/informal) and amount of FSSBs (high/low), then responded to outcome measures through a survey. The informal teleworking arrangement was hypothesized to result in higher AWFC and workplace telepressure than the formal teleworking arrangement. The high FSSBs condition was posited to result in lower AWFC and workplace telepressure than the low FSSBs condition. An interaction was expected in both dependent variables, such that ratings would be particularly high when teleworking was informal and FSSBs were low. In our sample, we found no main effect of formal vs. informal teleworking arrangement, partial evidence for the hypothesized main effect of FSSBs, and some evidence for the interaction between the two. Implications for managerial training and organizational teleworking policies are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1046-1310</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1936-4733</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12144-024-05675-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology ; College graduates ; COVID-19 ; Employment ; Families & family life ; Job satisfaction ; Pandemics ; Psychology ; Social Sciences ; Supervisors ; Telecommuting ; Work life balance</subject><ispartof>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2024-05, Vol.43 (19), p.17065-17078</ispartof><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2024</rights><rights>This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-52266d4406ba4ece510757a05872af78540bbb531bd5de679eb665206429950c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2139-2624</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12144-024-05675-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12144-024-05675-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,41469,42538,51300</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Rachel Williamson</creatorcontrib><title>The effect of anticipated telework conditions and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on work-family outcomes</title><title>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</title><addtitle>Curr Psychol</addtitle><description>With the lasting impact of the shift to telework due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential that organizations understand the effects of teleworking and family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs) on important work-family outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the causal implications that formal vs. informal telework arrangements and FSSBs have on anticipated work-family conflict (AWFC) and workplace telepressure. A sample of undergraduate students read two vignettes manipulating telework arrangements (formal/informal) and amount of FSSBs (high/low), then responded to outcome measures through a survey. The informal teleworking arrangement was hypothesized to result in higher AWFC and workplace telepressure than the formal teleworking arrangement. The high FSSBs condition was posited to result in lower AWFC and workplace telepressure than the low FSSBs condition. An interaction was expected in both dependent variables, such that ratings would be particularly high when teleworking was informal and FSSBs were low. In our sample, we found no main effect of formal vs. informal teleworking arrangement, partial evidence for the hypothesized main effect of FSSBs, and some evidence for the interaction between the two. Implications for managerial training and organizational teleworking policies are discussed.</description><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>College graduates</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Families & family life</subject><subject>Job satisfaction</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Telecommuting</subject><subject>Work life balance</subject><issn>1046-1310</issn><issn>1936-4733</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxRdRsFb_AU8Bz9FJNh_doxS_oOClnkN2d9amtps1SSv9701dwZuHYR7Me2_gVxTXDG4ZgL6LjDMhKPA8UmlJ5UkxYVWpqNBleZo1CEVZyeC8uIhxDcC0qqpJMSxXSLDrsEnEd8T2yTVusAlbknCDXz58kMb3rUvO9zHfW9LZrdscaNwNgw_J7ZFkiWHvog-kxpXdOx8i8T05puloJ36XGr_FeFmcdXYT8ep3T4u3x4fl_JkuXp9e5vcL2nANiUrOlWqFAFVbgQ1KBlpqC3Kmue30TAqo61qWrG5li0pXWCslOSjBq0pCU06Lm7F3CP5zhzGZtd-FPr80JQgNADOms4uPrib4GAN2Zghua8PBMDBHsmYkazJZ80PWyBwqx1DM5v4dw1_1P6lvn6x9SA</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Huynh, Tiffany</creator><creator>McDonald, Janet L.</creator><creator>Smith, Rachel Williamson</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-2624</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>The effect of anticipated telework conditions and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on work-family outcomes</title><author>Huynh, Tiffany ; McDonald, Janet L. ; Smith, Rachel Williamson</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-52266d4406ba4ece510757a05872af78540bbb531bd5de679eb665206429950c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>College graduates</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Families & family life</topic><topic>Job satisfaction</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Telecommuting</topic><topic>Work life balance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huynh, Tiffany</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McDonald, Janet L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Rachel Williamson</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huynh, Tiffany</au><au>McDonald, Janet L.</au><au>Smith, Rachel Williamson</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The effect of anticipated telework conditions and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on work-family outcomes</atitle><jtitle>Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.)</jtitle><stitle>Curr Psychol</stitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>17065</spage><epage>17078</epage><pages>17065-17078</pages><issn>1046-1310</issn><eissn>1936-4733</eissn><abstract>With the lasting impact of the shift to telework due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it is essential that organizations understand the effects of teleworking and family-supportive supervisor behaviors (FSSBs) on important work-family outcomes. The purpose of this study was to examine the causal implications that formal vs. informal telework arrangements and FSSBs have on anticipated work-family conflict (AWFC) and workplace telepressure. A sample of undergraduate students read two vignettes manipulating telework arrangements (formal/informal) and amount of FSSBs (high/low), then responded to outcome measures through a survey. The informal teleworking arrangement was hypothesized to result in higher AWFC and workplace telepressure than the formal teleworking arrangement. The high FSSBs condition was posited to result in lower AWFC and workplace telepressure than the low FSSBs condition. An interaction was expected in both dependent variables, such that ratings would be particularly high when teleworking was informal and FSSBs were low. In our sample, we found no main effect of formal vs. informal teleworking arrangement, partial evidence for the hypothesized main effect of FSSBs, and some evidence for the interaction between the two. Implications for managerial training and organizational teleworking policies are discussed.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12144-024-05675-5</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2139-2624</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1046-1310 |
ispartof | Current psychology (New Brunswick, N.J.), 2024-05, Vol.43 (19), p.17065-17078 |
issn | 1046-1310 1936-4733 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3047000817 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Behavioral Science and Psychology College graduates COVID-19 Employment Families & family life Job satisfaction Pandemics Psychology Social Sciences Supervisors Telecommuting Work life balance |
title | The effect of anticipated telework conditions and family-supportive supervisor behaviors on work-family outcomes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T10%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20effect%20of%20anticipated%20telework%20conditions%20and%20family-supportive%20supervisor%20behaviors%20on%20work-family%20outcomes&rft.jtitle=Current%20psychology%20(New%20Brunswick,%20N.J.)&rft.au=Huynh,%20Tiffany&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=17065&rft.epage=17078&rft.pages=17065-17078&rft.issn=1046-1310&rft.eissn=1936-4733&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12144-024-05675-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3047000817%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3047000817&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |