Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?

Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?

This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we diffe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sophia 2024-03, Vol.63 (1), p.85-97
1. Verfasser: Effingham, Nikk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Defense
Education
Evidentiality
God
Hell
Murders & murder attempts
Non-Western Philosophy
Philosophy
Philosophy of Religion
Religious Studies
Theology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 97
container_issue 1
container_start_page 85
container_title Sophia
container_volume 63
creator Effingham, Nikk
description This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we differentiate two different problems of Hell—the logical problem and the evidential problem—we see that, in light of this objection, the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response only solves the logical problem of Hell.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3046718701</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3046718701</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f8cad728f49f0ab5edc0058fb69302c72ef59bbf66fbc22bb6741e4568c9defc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFPAc3Qmm91kvYgWbYWKYJV6C9lsUlrW3ZpsD_33Rlfw5mlg5r03Mx8h5wiXCCCvIqISyIALBqnBmTggI1QyY2UG74dkBJAphjmXx-Qkxg0AlljgiFwvu11T02lX0xdnmmZPF66t6ZOjfUdnrmmo7wJd9Gm2blfU0OU6bg29M-HmlBx500R39lvH5O3h_nUyY_Pn6ePkds5shqJnXllTS668KD2YKne1BciVr4p0GreSO5-XVeWLwleW86oqpEAn8kLZsnbeZmNyMeRuQ_e5c7HXm24X2rRSZyAKmd4ETCo-qGzoYgzO621Yf5iw1wj6m5EeGOnESP8w0iKZssEUk7hdufAX_Y_rC2kGZ7g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3046718701</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Effingham, Nikk</creator><creatorcontrib>Effingham, Nikk</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we differentiate two different problems of Hell—the logical problem and the evidential problem—we see that, in light of this objection, the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response only solves the logical problem of Hell.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-1527</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-930X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Defense ; Education ; Evidentiality ; God ; Hell ; Murders &amp; murder attempts ; Non-Western Philosophy ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Religion ; Religious Studies ; Theology</subject><ispartof>Sophia, 2024-03, Vol.63 (1), p.85-97</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f8cad728f49f0ab5edc0058fb69302c72ef59bbf66fbc22bb6741e4568c9defc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1839-7347</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,41486,42555,51317</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Effingham, Nikk</creatorcontrib><title>Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?</title><title>Sophia</title><addtitle>SOPHIA</addtitle><description>This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we differentiate two different problems of Hell—the logical problem and the evidential problem—we see that, in light of this objection, the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response only solves the logical problem of Hell.</description><subject>Defense</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evidentiality</subject><subject>God</subject><subject>Hell</subject><subject>Murders &amp; murder attempts</subject><subject>Non-Western Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Religion</subject><subject>Religious Studies</subject><subject>Theology</subject><issn>0038-1527</issn><issn>1873-930X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKt_wFPAc3Qmm91kvYgWbYWKYJV6C9lsUlrW3ZpsD_33Rlfw5mlg5r03Mx8h5wiXCCCvIqISyIALBqnBmTggI1QyY2UG74dkBJAphjmXx-Qkxg0AlljgiFwvu11T02lX0xdnmmZPF66t6ZOjfUdnrmmo7wJd9Gm2blfU0OU6bg29M-HmlBx500R39lvH5O3h_nUyY_Pn6ePkds5shqJnXllTS668KD2YKne1BciVr4p0GreSO5-XVeWLwleW86oqpEAn8kLZsnbeZmNyMeRuQ_e5c7HXm24X2rRSZyAKmd4ETCo-qGzoYgzO621Yf5iw1wj6m5EeGOnESP8w0iKZssEUk7hdufAX_Y_rC2kGZ7g</recordid><startdate>20240301</startdate><enddate>20240301</enddate><creator>Effingham, Nikk</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-7347</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240301</creationdate><title>Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?</title><author>Effingham, Nikk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c314t-f8cad728f49f0ab5edc0058fb69302c72ef59bbf66fbc22bb6741e4568c9defc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Defense</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evidentiality</topic><topic>God</topic><topic>Hell</topic><topic>Murders &amp; murder attempts</topic><topic>Non-Western Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Religion</topic><topic>Religious Studies</topic><topic>Theology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Effingham, Nikk</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Sophia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Effingham, Nikk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?</atitle><jtitle>Sophia</jtitle><stitle>SOPHIA</stitle><date>2024-03-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>85</spage><epage>97</epage><pages>85-97</pages><issn>0038-1527</issn><eissn>1873-930X</eissn><abstract>This paper discusses the problem of Hell, defending the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response that any immoral act deserves eternal punishment because it offends against God. I argue that the response is more defensible than one might at first think, but nevertheless faces a serious objection. If we differentiate two different problems of Hell—the logical problem and the evidential problem—we see that, in light of this objection, the Aquinas-Anselm-Edwards response only solves the logical problem of Hell.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1839-7347</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-1527
ispartof Sophia, 2024-03, Vol.63 (1), p.85-97
issn 0038-1527
1873-930X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3046718701
source SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Defense
Education
Evidentiality
God
Hell
Murders & murder attempts
Non-Western Philosophy
Philosophy
Philosophy of Religion
Religious Studies
Theology
title Would God Really Send Me to Hell for Stealing a Wispa Bar?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T06%3A08%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Would%20God%20Really%20Send%20Me%20to%20Hell%20for%20Stealing%20a%20Wispa%20Bar?&rft.jtitle=Sophia&rft.au=Effingham,%20Nikk&rft.date=2024-03-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=85&rft.epage=97&rft.pages=85-97&rft.issn=0038-1527&rft.eissn=1873-930X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11841-024-01002-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3046718701%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3046718701&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true