That’s Why is Worth Continuing to Think About Our Successors – A Reply to Erler

That’s Why is Worth Continuing to Think About Our Successors – A Reply to Erler

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Philosophy & technology 2024-06, Vol.37 (2), p.56, Article 56
Hauptverfasser: Lavazza, Andrea, Vilaça, Murilo
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Commentary
Education
Philosophy
Philosophy of Technology
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 56
container_title Philosophy & technology
container_volume 37
creator Lavazza, Andrea
Vilaça, Murilo
description
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s13347-024-00747-7
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3046071985</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3046071985</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1857-2fea693fdc280a160bc5a5b274a6f805e17db3d4fe1f237c79e200aaf0d088783</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGpfwFXA9ehNMjNJl6XUHygUtOIyZDJJZ2qd1GRm0V3fwZWv1ycxdUR33s25F845Fz6ELglcEwB-EwhjKU-Apkk848ZP0IBSAkmWpuT0d2fsHI1CWEOcjOSM8gF6WlaqPew_A36pdriO4nxb4alr2rrp6maFW4eXVd284knhuhYvOo-fOq1NCM4HfNh_4Al-NNvN7uic-Y3xF-jMqk0wox8doufb2XJ6n8wXdw_TyTzRRGQ8odaofMxsqakARXIodKaygvJU5VZAZggvC1am1hBLGdd8bCiAUhZKEIILNkRXfe_Wu_fOhFauXeeb-FIySHPgZCyy6KK9S3sXgjdWbn39pvxOEpBHfrLnJyM_-c1P8hhifShEc7My_q_6n9QX-JZy-g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3046071985</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>That’s Why is Worth Continuing to Think About Our Successors – A Reply to Erler</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Lavazza, Andrea ; Vilaça, Murilo</creator><creatorcontrib>Lavazza, Andrea ; Vilaça, Murilo</creatorcontrib><identifier>ISSN: 2210-5433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2210-5441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s13347-024-00747-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Commentary ; Education ; Philosophy ; Philosophy of Technology</subject><ispartof>Philosophy &amp; technology, 2024-06, Vol.37 (2), p.56, Article 56</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1857-2fea693fdc280a160bc5a5b274a6f805e17db3d4fe1f237c79e200aaf0d088783</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2608-2609</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13347-024-00747-7$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13347-024-00747-7$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lavazza, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilaça, Murilo</creatorcontrib><title>That’s Why is Worth Continuing to Think About Our Successors – A Reply to Erler</title><title>Philosophy &amp; technology</title><addtitle>Philos. Technol</addtitle><subject>Commentary</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Philosophy</subject><subject>Philosophy of Technology</subject><issn>2210-5433</issn><issn>2210-5441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KAzEUhYMoWGpfwFXA9ehNMjNJl6XUHygUtOIyZDJJZ2qd1GRm0V3fwZWv1ycxdUR33s25F845Fz6ELglcEwB-EwhjKU-Apkk848ZP0IBSAkmWpuT0d2fsHI1CWEOcjOSM8gF6WlaqPew_A36pdriO4nxb4alr2rrp6maFW4eXVd284knhuhYvOo-fOq1NCM4HfNh_4Al-NNvN7uic-Y3xF-jMqk0wox8doufb2XJ6n8wXdw_TyTzRRGQ8odaofMxsqakARXIodKaygvJU5VZAZggvC1am1hBLGdd8bCiAUhZKEIILNkRXfe_Wu_fOhFauXeeb-FIySHPgZCyy6KK9S3sXgjdWbn39pvxOEpBHfrLnJyM_-c1P8hhifShEc7My_q_6n9QX-JZy-g</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Lavazza, Andrea</creator><creator>Vilaça, Murilo</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2608-2609</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>That’s Why is Worth Continuing to Think About Our Successors – A Reply to Erler</title><author>Lavazza, Andrea ; Vilaça, Murilo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1857-2fea693fdc280a160bc5a5b274a6f805e17db3d4fe1f237c79e200aaf0d088783</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Commentary</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Philosophy</topic><topic>Philosophy of Technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lavazza, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vilaça, Murilo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Philosophy &amp; technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lavazza, Andrea</au><au>Vilaça, Murilo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>That’s Why is Worth Continuing to Think About Our Successors – A Reply to Erler</atitle><jtitle>Philosophy &amp; technology</jtitle><stitle>Philos. Technol</stitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>56</spage><pages>56-</pages><artnum>56</artnum><issn>2210-5433</issn><eissn>2210-5441</eissn><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s13347-024-00747-7</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2608-2609</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2210-5433
ispartof Philosophy & technology, 2024-06, Vol.37 (2), p.56, Article 56
issn 2210-5433
2210-5441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3046071985
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Commentary
Education
Philosophy
Philosophy of Technology
title That’s Why is Worth Continuing to Think About Our Successors – A Reply to Erler
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A39%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=That%E2%80%99s%20Why%20is%20Worth%20Continuing%20to%20Think%20About%20Our%20Successors%20%E2%80%93%20A%20Reply%20to%20Erler&rft.jtitle=Philosophy%20&%20technology&rft.au=Lavazza,%20Andrea&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=56&rft.pages=56-&rft.artnum=56&rft.issn=2210-5433&rft.eissn=2210-5441&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s13347-024-00747-7&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3046071985%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3046071985&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true