The role of knowledge boundary resources for platform ecosystems – insights and design implications from SAP's Business Technology Platform

Platform ecosystems shift the locus of innovation from internal departments to third‐party developers, leading to knowledge boundaries between the platform owner and these external developers. Whereas traditional knowledge management approaches focus on intra‐organizational knowledge sharing, platfo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:R & D management 2024-06, Vol.54 (3), p.470-495
Hauptverfasser: Kauschinger, Martin, Schreieck, Maximilian, Krcmar, Helmut
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 495
container_issue 3
container_start_page 470
container_title R & D management
container_volume 54
creator Kauschinger, Martin
Schreieck, Maximilian
Krcmar, Helmut
description Platform ecosystems shift the locus of innovation from internal departments to third‐party developers, leading to knowledge boundaries between the platform owner and these external developers. Whereas traditional knowledge management approaches focus on intra‐organizational knowledge sharing, platform owners have to adopt an inter‐organizational approach to integrate knowledge across firm boundaries. Platform owners thus rely on knowledge boundary resources such as technical documentation, information portals, training materials, sample code, blogs, and online communities to overcome knowledge boundaries in their ecosystems. Existing research has identified different types of knowledge boundaries and knowledge boundary resources, but further research is needed to clarify how they influence third‐party application development. Against this background, we study how third‐party developers integrate knowledge boundary resources into their development practices. To derive an in‐depth understanding of the phenomenon, we used cognitive fit theory and conducted a single case study of SAP's Business Technology Platform. Based on 23 interviews, we developed a process model and distilled two primary purposes why third‐party developers use knowledge boundary resources: learning and problem‐solving. Based on these purposes, we explain the emergence of a knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit that shapes the selection, evaluation, and usage of knowledge boundary resources. We then draw upon various knowledge boundary resource characteristics to condense four cases with a particularly favorable knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit. Based on our results, we derive five propositions to help platform owners design effective knowledge boundary resources.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/radm.12644
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_econi</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3044870825</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3044870825</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e3184-b0d7a472486a26c13849432de0b27022aef3af69ba6658fa95d38bf28ed20d8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkc9O20AQxldVKzVNufQJRuqBk2H_xV4fQ6AtEogI0rO19o6TpfZu2LWFcuMFOPUNeRIWEom5zIz0mxl98xHyg9ETluI0aNOfMJ5L-YlMmMyLrBSMfiYTSoXIckWLr-RbjPc0xawsJuR5tUEIvkPwLfxz_rFDs0ao_eiMDjsIGP0YGozQ-gDbTg8p94CNj7s4YB_h5ek_WBftejNE0M6AwdQ4sP22s40erHdpOPge7ubL4whnY7QOY4QVNhvnO7_ewfKw9zv50uou4tEhT8nfXxerxZ_s6ub35WJ-laFgSmY1NYWWBZcq1zxvmFCylIIbpDUvKOcaW6HbvKx1ns9Uq8uZEapuuULDqVGtmJKf-73b4B9GjEN1n1S6dLISVEpVUMVniYI9ldQ6G6ttsH36ScWUKgvFFRcJYXvk0Xa4-yBo9WZH9WZH9W5HdTs_v36vxCszkYIa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3044870825</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The role of knowledge boundary resources for platform ecosystems – insights and design implications from SAP's Business Technology Platform</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><creator>Kauschinger, Martin ; Schreieck, Maximilian ; Krcmar, Helmut</creator><creatorcontrib>Kauschinger, Martin ; Schreieck, Maximilian ; Krcmar, Helmut</creatorcontrib><description>Platform ecosystems shift the locus of innovation from internal departments to third‐party developers, leading to knowledge boundaries between the platform owner and these external developers. Whereas traditional knowledge management approaches focus on intra‐organizational knowledge sharing, platform owners have to adopt an inter‐organizational approach to integrate knowledge across firm boundaries. Platform owners thus rely on knowledge boundary resources such as technical documentation, information portals, training materials, sample code, blogs, and online communities to overcome knowledge boundaries in their ecosystems. Existing research has identified different types of knowledge boundaries and knowledge boundary resources, but further research is needed to clarify how they influence third‐party application development. Against this background, we study how third‐party developers integrate knowledge boundary resources into their development practices. To derive an in‐depth understanding of the phenomenon, we used cognitive fit theory and conducted a single case study of SAP's Business Technology Platform. Based on 23 interviews, we developed a process model and distilled two primary purposes why third‐party developers use knowledge boundary resources: learning and problem‐solving. Based on these purposes, we explain the emergence of a knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit that shapes the selection, evaluation, and usage of knowledge boundary resources. We then draw upon various knowledge boundary resource characteristics to condense four cases with a particularly favorable knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit. Based on our results, we derive five propositions to help platform owners design effective knowledge boundary resources.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0033-6807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-9310</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/radm.12644</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Ecosystems ; Knowledge management ; Web portals</subject><ispartof>R &amp; D management, 2024-06, Vol.54 (3), p.470-495</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by RADMA and John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-1937-8869 ; 0000-0002-2754-8493 ; 0000-0003-2723-3245</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fradm.12644$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fradm.12644$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kauschinger, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreieck, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krcmar, Helmut</creatorcontrib><title>The role of knowledge boundary resources for platform ecosystems – insights and design implications from SAP's Business Technology Platform</title><title>R &amp; D management</title><description>Platform ecosystems shift the locus of innovation from internal departments to third‐party developers, leading to knowledge boundaries between the platform owner and these external developers. Whereas traditional knowledge management approaches focus on intra‐organizational knowledge sharing, platform owners have to adopt an inter‐organizational approach to integrate knowledge across firm boundaries. Platform owners thus rely on knowledge boundary resources such as technical documentation, information portals, training materials, sample code, blogs, and online communities to overcome knowledge boundaries in their ecosystems. Existing research has identified different types of knowledge boundaries and knowledge boundary resources, but further research is needed to clarify how they influence third‐party application development. Against this background, we study how third‐party developers integrate knowledge boundary resources into their development practices. To derive an in‐depth understanding of the phenomenon, we used cognitive fit theory and conducted a single case study of SAP's Business Technology Platform. Based on 23 interviews, we developed a process model and distilled two primary purposes why third‐party developers use knowledge boundary resources: learning and problem‐solving. Based on these purposes, we explain the emergence of a knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit that shapes the selection, evaluation, and usage of knowledge boundary resources. We then draw upon various knowledge boundary resource characteristics to condense four cases with a particularly favorable knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit. Based on our results, we derive five propositions to help platform owners design effective knowledge boundary resources.</description><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Knowledge management</subject><subject>Web portals</subject><issn>0033-6807</issn><issn>1467-9310</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNpFkc9O20AQxldVKzVNufQJRuqBk2H_xV4fQ6AtEogI0rO19o6TpfZu2LWFcuMFOPUNeRIWEom5zIz0mxl98xHyg9ETluI0aNOfMJ5L-YlMmMyLrBSMfiYTSoXIckWLr-RbjPc0xawsJuR5tUEIvkPwLfxz_rFDs0ao_eiMDjsIGP0YGozQ-gDbTg8p94CNj7s4YB_h5ek_WBftejNE0M6AwdQ4sP22s40erHdpOPge7ubL4whnY7QOY4QVNhvnO7_ewfKw9zv50uou4tEhT8nfXxerxZ_s6ub35WJ-laFgSmY1NYWWBZcq1zxvmFCylIIbpDUvKOcaW6HbvKx1ns9Uq8uZEapuuULDqVGtmJKf-73b4B9GjEN1n1S6dLISVEpVUMVniYI9ldQ6G6ttsH36ScWUKgvFFRcJYXvk0Xa4-yBo9WZH9WZH9W5HdTs_v36vxCszkYIa</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Kauschinger, Martin</creator><creator>Schreieck, Maximilian</creator><creator>Krcmar, Helmut</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>OQ6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1937-8869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2754-8493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-3245</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>The role of knowledge boundary resources for platform ecosystems – insights and design implications from SAP's Business Technology Platform</title><author>Kauschinger, Martin ; Schreieck, Maximilian ; Krcmar, Helmut</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e3184-b0d7a472486a26c13849432de0b27022aef3af69ba6658fa95d38bf28ed20d8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Knowledge management</topic><topic>Web portals</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kauschinger, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schreieck, Maximilian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krcmar, Helmut</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>ECONIS</collection><jtitle>R &amp; D management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kauschinger, Martin</au><au>Schreieck, Maximilian</au><au>Krcmar, Helmut</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The role of knowledge boundary resources for platform ecosystems – insights and design implications from SAP's Business Technology Platform</atitle><jtitle>R &amp; D management</jtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>54</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>470</spage><epage>495</epage><pages>470-495</pages><issn>0033-6807</issn><eissn>1467-9310</eissn><abstract>Platform ecosystems shift the locus of innovation from internal departments to third‐party developers, leading to knowledge boundaries between the platform owner and these external developers. Whereas traditional knowledge management approaches focus on intra‐organizational knowledge sharing, platform owners have to adopt an inter‐organizational approach to integrate knowledge across firm boundaries. Platform owners thus rely on knowledge boundary resources such as technical documentation, information portals, training materials, sample code, blogs, and online communities to overcome knowledge boundaries in their ecosystems. Existing research has identified different types of knowledge boundaries and knowledge boundary resources, but further research is needed to clarify how they influence third‐party application development. Against this background, we study how third‐party developers integrate knowledge boundary resources into their development practices. To derive an in‐depth understanding of the phenomenon, we used cognitive fit theory and conducted a single case study of SAP's Business Technology Platform. Based on 23 interviews, we developed a process model and distilled two primary purposes why third‐party developers use knowledge boundary resources: learning and problem‐solving. Based on these purposes, we explain the emergence of a knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit that shapes the selection, evaluation, and usage of knowledge boundary resources. We then draw upon various knowledge boundary resource characteristics to condense four cases with a particularly favorable knowledge boundary resource‐purpose fit. Based on our results, we derive five propositions to help platform owners design effective knowledge boundary resources.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/radm.12644</doi><tpages>26</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1937-8869</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2754-8493</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-3245</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0033-6807
ispartof R & D management, 2024-06, Vol.54 (3), p.470-495
issn 0033-6807
1467-9310
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3044870825
source Wiley Journals
subjects Ecosystems
Knowledge management
Web portals
title The role of knowledge boundary resources for platform ecosystems – insights and design implications from SAP's Business Technology Platform
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A43%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_econi&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20role%20of%20knowledge%20boundary%20resources%20for%20platform%20ecosystems%20%E2%80%93%20insights%20and%20design%20implications%20from%20SAP's%20Business%20Technology%20Platform&rft.jtitle=R%20&%20D%20management&rft.au=Kauschinger,%20Martin&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=54&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=470&rft.epage=495&rft.pages=470-495&rft.issn=0033-6807&rft.eissn=1467-9310&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/radm.12644&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_econi%3E3044870825%3C/proquest_econi%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3044870825&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true