Improvement of amorphous localization algorithm in WSN using ALO and GWO
Summary The process of node identification is referred to as localization, and it is rapidly gaining popularity in the field of WSN. Different node identification processes have different findings, benefits, challenges, costs, effectiveness, and applications. In this work, the position error of the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Concurrency and computation 2024-05, Vol.36 (11), p.n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Concurrency and computation |
container_volume | 36 |
creator | Tripathy, Pujasuman Khilar, P.M. |
description | Summary
The process of node identification is referred to as localization, and it is rapidly gaining popularity in the field of WSN. Different node identification processes have different findings, benefits, challenges, costs, effectiveness, and applications. In this work, the position error of the Amorphous algorithm is minimized by optimizing the hop size. For optimization of the hop size of the Amorphous algorithm, two different optimization algorithms, such as ALO and GWO, are considered. Proposed Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO provide higher accuracy rates of 33.89% and 4.22% than traditional Amorphous as well as ensemble approaches. Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO provide position errors 2.9161 and 2.9164 respectively, which are very similar. Therefore, to determine the suitable optimization algorithm for Amorphous, the minimum, average, and maximum execution times of Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO are considered. The approach that has less execution time is considered as most suitable for Amorphous. Amorphous‐ALO takes 67.76, 69.60 and 84.24 s for minimum, average and maximum execution whereas Amorphous‐GWO takes 65.17, 65.46 and 65.66 s for minimum, average and maximum execution respectively. As Amorphous‐GWO takes less execution time than Amorphous‐ALO; therefore, GWO is more suitable for optimization in Amorphous algorithm. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cpe.8036 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3044148299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3044148299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2546-bdc5173393d697b4a6f6a1e86ba5c7f5c5d93533b33cfd979a8f89696d5666913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10EFLwzAUB_AgCs4p-BECXrx0Jk2TNsdR5jYYTlDZMaRpsmW0TU1aZX56OyfePL13-PF_jz8AtxhNMELxg2r1JEOEnYERpiSOECPJ-d8es0twFcIeIYwRwSOwWNatdx-61k0HnYGydr7duT7AyilZ2S_ZWddAWW2dt92uhraBm5cn2AfbbOF0tYayKeF8s74GF0ZWQd_8zjF4e5y95ototZ4v8-kqUjFNWFSUiuKUEE5KxtMikcwwiXXGCklVaqiiJSeUkIIQZUqecpmZjDPOSsoY45iMwd0pd3j7vdehE3vX-2Y4KQhKEpxkMeeDuj8p5V0IXhvReltLfxAYiWNPYuhJHHsaaHSin7bSh3-dyJ9nP_4b8ZtnZg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3044148299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Improvement of amorphous localization algorithm in WSN using ALO and GWO</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Tripathy, Pujasuman ; Khilar, P.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tripathy, Pujasuman ; Khilar, P.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The process of node identification is referred to as localization, and it is rapidly gaining popularity in the field of WSN. Different node identification processes have different findings, benefits, challenges, costs, effectiveness, and applications. In this work, the position error of the Amorphous algorithm is minimized by optimizing the hop size. For optimization of the hop size of the Amorphous algorithm, two different optimization algorithms, such as ALO and GWO, are considered. Proposed Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO provide higher accuracy rates of 33.89% and 4.22% than traditional Amorphous as well as ensemble approaches. Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO provide position errors 2.9161 and 2.9164 respectively, which are very similar. Therefore, to determine the suitable optimization algorithm for Amorphous, the minimum, average, and maximum execution times of Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO are considered. The approach that has less execution time is considered as most suitable for Amorphous. Amorphous‐ALO takes 67.76, 69.60 and 84.24 s for minimum, average and maximum execution whereas Amorphous‐GWO takes 65.17, 65.46 and 65.66 s for minimum, average and maximum execution respectively. As Amorphous‐GWO takes less execution time than Amorphous‐ALO; therefore, GWO is more suitable for optimization in Amorphous algorithm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-0626</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-0634</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cpe.8036</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; ALO ; amorphous algorithm ; GWO ; Localization ; Optimization ; Position errors ; wireless sensor network</subject><ispartof>Concurrency and computation, 2024-05, Vol.36 (11), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2546-bdc5173393d697b4a6f6a1e86ba5c7f5c5d93533b33cfd979a8f89696d5666913</cites><orcidid>0009-0009-3670-5348</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcpe.8036$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcpe.8036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tripathy, Pujasuman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khilar, P.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Improvement of amorphous localization algorithm in WSN using ALO and GWO</title><title>Concurrency and computation</title><description>Summary
The process of node identification is referred to as localization, and it is rapidly gaining popularity in the field of WSN. Different node identification processes have different findings, benefits, challenges, costs, effectiveness, and applications. In this work, the position error of the Amorphous algorithm is minimized by optimizing the hop size. For optimization of the hop size of the Amorphous algorithm, two different optimization algorithms, such as ALO and GWO, are considered. Proposed Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO provide higher accuracy rates of 33.89% and 4.22% than traditional Amorphous as well as ensemble approaches. Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO provide position errors 2.9161 and 2.9164 respectively, which are very similar. Therefore, to determine the suitable optimization algorithm for Amorphous, the minimum, average, and maximum execution times of Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO are considered. The approach that has less execution time is considered as most suitable for Amorphous. Amorphous‐ALO takes 67.76, 69.60 and 84.24 s for minimum, average and maximum execution whereas Amorphous‐GWO takes 65.17, 65.46 and 65.66 s for minimum, average and maximum execution respectively. As Amorphous‐GWO takes less execution time than Amorphous‐ALO; therefore, GWO is more suitable for optimization in Amorphous algorithm.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>ALO</subject><subject>amorphous algorithm</subject><subject>GWO</subject><subject>Localization</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Position errors</subject><subject>wireless sensor network</subject><issn>1532-0626</issn><issn>1532-0634</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10EFLwzAUB_AgCs4p-BECXrx0Jk2TNsdR5jYYTlDZMaRpsmW0TU1aZX56OyfePL13-PF_jz8AtxhNMELxg2r1JEOEnYERpiSOECPJ-d8es0twFcIeIYwRwSOwWNatdx-61k0HnYGydr7duT7AyilZ2S_ZWddAWW2dt92uhraBm5cn2AfbbOF0tYayKeF8s74GF0ZWQd_8zjF4e5y95ototZ4v8-kqUjFNWFSUiuKUEE5KxtMikcwwiXXGCklVaqiiJSeUkIIQZUqecpmZjDPOSsoY45iMwd0pd3j7vdehE3vX-2Y4KQhKEpxkMeeDuj8p5V0IXhvReltLfxAYiWNPYuhJHHsaaHSin7bSh3-dyJ9nP_4b8ZtnZg</recordid><startdate>20240515</startdate><enddate>20240515</enddate><creator>Tripathy, Pujasuman</creator><creator>Khilar, P.M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3670-5348</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240515</creationdate><title>Improvement of amorphous localization algorithm in WSN using ALO and GWO</title><author>Tripathy, Pujasuman ; Khilar, P.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2546-bdc5173393d697b4a6f6a1e86ba5c7f5c5d93533b33cfd979a8f89696d5666913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>ALO</topic><topic>amorphous algorithm</topic><topic>GWO</topic><topic>Localization</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Position errors</topic><topic>wireless sensor network</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tripathy, Pujasuman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khilar, P.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Concurrency and computation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tripathy, Pujasuman</au><au>Khilar, P.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Improvement of amorphous localization algorithm in WSN using ALO and GWO</atitle><jtitle>Concurrency and computation</jtitle><date>2024-05-15</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>11</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1532-0626</issn><eissn>1532-0634</eissn><abstract>Summary
The process of node identification is referred to as localization, and it is rapidly gaining popularity in the field of WSN. Different node identification processes have different findings, benefits, challenges, costs, effectiveness, and applications. In this work, the position error of the Amorphous algorithm is minimized by optimizing the hop size. For optimization of the hop size of the Amorphous algorithm, two different optimization algorithms, such as ALO and GWO, are considered. Proposed Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO provide higher accuracy rates of 33.89% and 4.22% than traditional Amorphous as well as ensemble approaches. Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO provide position errors 2.9161 and 2.9164 respectively, which are very similar. Therefore, to determine the suitable optimization algorithm for Amorphous, the minimum, average, and maximum execution times of Amorphous‐ALO and Amorphous‐GWO are considered. The approach that has less execution time is considered as most suitable for Amorphous. Amorphous‐ALO takes 67.76, 69.60 and 84.24 s for minimum, average and maximum execution whereas Amorphous‐GWO takes 65.17, 65.46 and 65.66 s for minimum, average and maximum execution respectively. As Amorphous‐GWO takes less execution time than Amorphous‐ALO; therefore, GWO is more suitable for optimization in Amorphous algorithm.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1002/cpe.8036</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3670-5348</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1532-0626 |
ispartof | Concurrency and computation, 2024-05, Vol.36 (11), p.n/a |
issn | 1532-0626 1532-0634 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3044148299 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Algorithms ALO amorphous algorithm GWO Localization Optimization Position errors wireless sensor network |
title | Improvement of amorphous localization algorithm in WSN using ALO and GWO |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T06%3A20%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Improvement%20of%20amorphous%20localization%20algorithm%20in%20WSN%20using%20ALO%20and%20GWO&rft.jtitle=Concurrency%20and%20computation&rft.au=Tripathy,%20Pujasuman&rft.date=2024-05-15&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=11&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1532-0626&rft.eissn=1532-0634&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cpe.8036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3044148299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3044148299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |