Final report of APMP.AUV.V-S2: supplementary comparison on calibration of laser tachometers using mechanical generators or optical simulators

This is the final report for APMP supplementary comparison APMP.AUV.V-S2 in the area of 'vibration' (quantity of rotational speed). The aim of this comparison was to compare primary measurements of rotational speed in the range from 30 r/min to 99 996 r/min. Six Metrology Institutes from t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Metrologia 2024-01, Vol.61 (1A), p.9002
Hauptverfasser: Qiao, Sun, Lei, Du, Yulin, Chen, Shan, Cui, Jianqiang, Mou, Ruiz, Manuel M, Digay, Sarah Jane T, Rattanangkul, Pairoj, Bore, Calvin, Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim, Hawary, Mohamed El
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1A
container_start_page 9002
container_title Metrologia
container_volume 61
creator Qiao, Sun
Lei, Du
Yulin, Chen
Shan, Cui
Jianqiang, Mou
Ruiz, Manuel M
Digay, Sarah Jane T
Rattanangkul, Pairoj
Bore, Calvin
Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim
Hawary, Mohamed El
description This is the final report for APMP supplementary comparison APMP.AUV.V-S2 in the area of 'vibration' (quantity of rotational speed). The aim of this comparison was to compare primary measurements of rotational speed in the range from 30 r/min to 99 996 r/min. Six Metrology Institutes from two RMOs, APMP and AFRIMETS, have participated in the comparison with the National Institute of Metrology, P.R. China as the pilot lab. NIM, NMC and NIS used a mechanical generator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-3 to 10-5. NML, NIMT and KEBS used an optical simulator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-4 to 10-5. All the participating laboratories provided their calibration results, which were all consistent within their declared expanded uncertainties for the measurement results. Each participant contributed to the SCRVs calculated for five rotational speed comparison values of two laser tachometers, NLYZ-02 and 03, except that NIS's measurement results of NLYZ-03 are invalid. Smaller measurement uncertainties than the order of 10-5 for the calibration of laser tachometers are difficult to achieve for either mechanical generators or optical simulators with the current technology of rotational speed standard devices and laser tachometers. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCAUV, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1A/09002
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3043896095</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3043896095</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1165-7eb6e98247603847c4483d640b00d7d6195ba90552fc374a56ed6b5aa177395d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQQj43DVp86f1rQynwsSBbq8hTdMto21q0j74IfzOZpvom3Dhcs895zz8ALjFaIZRlsUIJSzCaU5ihmNcxCgPyhmYYJbhiFNOz8Hk13MJrrzfI4R5QvkEfC1MJxvodG_dAG0Ni9XLalasN7NN9JbcQz_2faNb3Q3SfUJl2146420HwyjZmNLJwRzOGjbSawcHqXa21YN2Ho7edFvYarWTnQluuNWdDgEbftZB2w9H1Zt2bI7qNbioZeP1zc-egvXi4X3-FC1fH5_nxTJSGDMacV0ynWcJ4QylGeGKkCytGEElQhWvGM5pKXNEaVKrlBNJma5YSaXEnKc5rdIpuDv19s5-jNoPYm9HF0B4kSKSZjlDOQ0uenIpZ713uha9M23gIDASB_LiQFUcqAqGBS7EkXzI4VPO2P6v-P_MN7c5heI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3043896095</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Final report of APMP.AUV.V-S2: supplementary comparison on calibration of laser tachometers using mechanical generators or optical simulators</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Qiao, Sun ; Lei, Du ; Yulin, Chen ; Shan, Cui ; Jianqiang, Mou ; Ruiz, Manuel M ; Digay, Sarah Jane T ; Rattanangkul, Pairoj ; Bore, Calvin ; Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim ; Hawary, Mohamed El</creator><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Sun ; Lei, Du ; Yulin, Chen ; Shan, Cui ; Jianqiang, Mou ; Ruiz, Manuel M ; Digay, Sarah Jane T ; Rattanangkul, Pairoj ; Bore, Calvin ; Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim ; Hawary, Mohamed El</creatorcontrib><description>This is the final report for APMP supplementary comparison APMP.AUV.V-S2 in the area of 'vibration' (quantity of rotational speed). The aim of this comparison was to compare primary measurements of rotational speed in the range from 30 r/min to 99 996 r/min. Six Metrology Institutes from two RMOs, APMP and AFRIMETS, have participated in the comparison with the National Institute of Metrology, P.R. China as the pilot lab. NIM, NMC and NIS used a mechanical generator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-3 to 10-5. NML, NIMT and KEBS used an optical simulator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-4 to 10-5. All the participating laboratories provided their calibration results, which were all consistent within their declared expanded uncertainties for the measurement results. Each participant contributed to the SCRVs calculated for five rotational speed comparison values of two laser tachometers, NLYZ-02 and 03, except that NIS's measurement results of NLYZ-03 are invalid. Smaller measurement uncertainties than the order of 10-5 for the calibration of laser tachometers are difficult to achieve for either mechanical generators or optical simulators with the current technology of rotational speed standard devices and laser tachometers. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCAUV, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1394</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1681-7575</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0026-1394/61/1A/09002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MTRGAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Calibration ; Lasers ; Metrology ; Simulation ; Simulators ; Tachometers ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Metrologia, 2024-01, Vol.61 (1A), p.9002</ispartof><rights>2024 BIPM &amp; IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-2592-021X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1A/09002/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,53824,53871</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Du</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yulin, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Cui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jianqiang, Mou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Manuel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Digay, Sarah Jane T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rattanangkul, Pairoj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bore, Calvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawary, Mohamed El</creatorcontrib><title>Final report of APMP.AUV.V-S2: supplementary comparison on calibration of laser tachometers using mechanical generators or optical simulators</title><title>Metrologia</title><addtitle>MET</addtitle><addtitle>Metrologia</addtitle><description>This is the final report for APMP supplementary comparison APMP.AUV.V-S2 in the area of 'vibration' (quantity of rotational speed). The aim of this comparison was to compare primary measurements of rotational speed in the range from 30 r/min to 99 996 r/min. Six Metrology Institutes from two RMOs, APMP and AFRIMETS, have participated in the comparison with the National Institute of Metrology, P.R. China as the pilot lab. NIM, NMC and NIS used a mechanical generator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-3 to 10-5. NML, NIMT and KEBS used an optical simulator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-4 to 10-5. All the participating laboratories provided their calibration results, which were all consistent within their declared expanded uncertainties for the measurement results. Each participant contributed to the SCRVs calculated for five rotational speed comparison values of two laser tachometers, NLYZ-02 and 03, except that NIS's measurement results of NLYZ-03 are invalid. Smaller measurement uncertainties than the order of 10-5 for the calibration of laser tachometers are difficult to achieve for either mechanical generators or optical simulators with the current technology of rotational speed standard devices and laser tachometers. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCAUV, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).</description><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Lasers</subject><subject>Metrology</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulators</subject><subject>Tachometers</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0026-1394</issn><issn>1681-7575</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQQj43DVp86f1rQynwsSBbq8hTdMto21q0j74IfzOZpvom3Dhcs895zz8ALjFaIZRlsUIJSzCaU5ihmNcxCgPyhmYYJbhiFNOz8Hk13MJrrzfI4R5QvkEfC1MJxvodG_dAG0Ni9XLalasN7NN9JbcQz_2faNb3Q3SfUJl2146420HwyjZmNLJwRzOGjbSawcHqXa21YN2Ho7edFvYarWTnQluuNWdDgEbftZB2w9H1Zt2bI7qNbioZeP1zc-egvXi4X3-FC1fH5_nxTJSGDMacV0ynWcJ4QylGeGKkCytGEElQhWvGM5pKXNEaVKrlBNJma5YSaXEnKc5rdIpuDv19s5-jNoPYm9HF0B4kSKSZjlDOQ0uenIpZ713uha9M23gIDASB_LiQFUcqAqGBS7EkXzI4VPO2P6v-P_MN7c5heI</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Qiao, Sun</creator><creator>Lei, Du</creator><creator>Yulin, Chen</creator><creator>Shan, Cui</creator><creator>Jianqiang, Mou</creator><creator>Ruiz, Manuel M</creator><creator>Digay, Sarah Jane T</creator><creator>Rattanangkul, Pairoj</creator><creator>Bore, Calvin</creator><creator>Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim</creator><creator>Hawary, Mohamed El</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-021X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Final report of APMP.AUV.V-S2: supplementary comparison on calibration of laser tachometers using mechanical generators or optical simulators</title><author>Qiao, Sun ; Lei, Du ; Yulin, Chen ; Shan, Cui ; Jianqiang, Mou ; Ruiz, Manuel M ; Digay, Sarah Jane T ; Rattanangkul, Pairoj ; Bore, Calvin ; Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim ; Hawary, Mohamed El</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1165-7eb6e98247603847c4483d640b00d7d6195ba90552fc374a56ed6b5aa177395d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Lasers</topic><topic>Metrology</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulators</topic><topic>Tachometers</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Du</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yulin, Chen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shan, Cui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jianqiang, Mou</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz, Manuel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Digay, Sarah Jane T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rattanangkul, Pairoj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bore, Calvin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hawary, Mohamed El</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Metrologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qiao, Sun</au><au>Lei, Du</au><au>Yulin, Chen</au><au>Shan, Cui</au><au>Jianqiang, Mou</au><au>Ruiz, Manuel M</au><au>Digay, Sarah Jane T</au><au>Rattanangkul, Pairoj</au><au>Bore, Calvin</au><au>Mostafa, Aly Ibrahim</au><au>Hawary, Mohamed El</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Final report of APMP.AUV.V-S2: supplementary comparison on calibration of laser tachometers using mechanical generators or optical simulators</atitle><jtitle>Metrologia</jtitle><stitle>MET</stitle><addtitle>Metrologia</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>61</volume><issue>1A</issue><spage>9002</spage><pages>9002-</pages><issn>0026-1394</issn><eissn>1681-7575</eissn><coden>MTRGAU</coden><abstract>This is the final report for APMP supplementary comparison APMP.AUV.V-S2 in the area of 'vibration' (quantity of rotational speed). The aim of this comparison was to compare primary measurements of rotational speed in the range from 30 r/min to 99 996 r/min. Six Metrology Institutes from two RMOs, APMP and AFRIMETS, have participated in the comparison with the National Institute of Metrology, P.R. China as the pilot lab. NIM, NMC and NIS used a mechanical generator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-3 to 10-5. NML, NIMT and KEBS used an optical simulator for calibration, with expanded uncertainties in the order from 10-4 to 10-5. All the participating laboratories provided their calibration results, which were all consistent within their declared expanded uncertainties for the measurement results. Each participant contributed to the SCRVs calculated for five rotational speed comparison values of two laser tachometers, NLYZ-02 and 03, except that NIS's measurement results of NLYZ-03 are invalid. Smaller measurement uncertainties than the order of 10-5 for the calibration of laser tachometers are difficult to achieve for either mechanical generators or optical simulators with the current technology of rotational speed standard devices and laser tachometers. To reach the main text of this paper, click on Final Report . Note that this text is that which appears in Appendix B of the BIPM key comparison database https://www.bipm.org/kcdb/ . The final report has been peer-reviewed and approved for publication by the CCAUV, according to the provisions of the CIPM Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM MRA).</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/0026-1394/61/1A/09002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2592-021X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0026-1394
ispartof Metrologia, 2024-01, Vol.61 (1A), p.9002
issn 0026-1394
1681-7575
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3043896095
source IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Calibration
Lasers
Metrology
Simulation
Simulators
Tachometers
Uncertainty
title Final report of APMP.AUV.V-S2: supplementary comparison on calibration of laser tachometers using mechanical generators or optical simulators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T13%3A48%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Final%20report%20of%20APMP.AUV.V-S2:%20supplementary%20comparison%20on%20calibration%20of%20laser%20tachometers%20using%20mechanical%20generators%20or%20optical%20simulators&rft.jtitle=Metrologia&rft.au=Qiao,%20Sun&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=61&rft.issue=1A&rft.spage=9002&rft.pages=9002-&rft.issn=0026-1394&rft.eissn=1681-7575&rft.coden=MTRGAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0026-1394/61/1A/09002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E3043896095%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3043896095&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true