Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes
Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐depe...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Freshwater biology 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.635-644 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 644 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 635 |
container_title | Freshwater biology |
container_volume | 69 |
creator | Vargas, Anderson L. Brazil, Thamires Santangelo, Jayme M. Bozelli, Reinaldo L. |
description | Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐dependent.
This study simulated one long‐term (1 year) dry‐out episode in wet sediments originating from permanent and temporary lakes and compared hatching patterns through ex situ experiments.
The abundance and species richness of hatchlings decreased in dry sediments compared to wet sediments. Hatchling composition differed between wet and dry sediments of each lake category, whereas community variability did not differ between wet and dry sediments of temporary lakes.
Overall, there was no difference in the ability of rotifers and crustaceans to cope with desiccation, since all species decreased hatchling numbers after desiccation. Artemia was the only taxon that benefited from drying sediments.
Long‐term desiccation may affect the contribution of resting egg banks to future active populations in the water column, even in temporary habitats which presumably select for drought‐resistant resting eggs. The ecological roles played by resting egg banks may be weakening because droughts are becoming more common worldwide, even in former permanent aquatic habitats. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/fwb.14234 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3043886105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3043886105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-70144bd8667a6ed5ee374705b52b6dd50d0ca0cb9d5d81f97a523c765f66c8753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2ol_0hEqCkiVWECMlmM7SdvEDrYrVCYegWfkSXApK3e5w_3OuUcHgEuMJjjNtH6vJpjkBTkCI1wwmuUk58dghBBhGUUcnYKzENYIoZLyfASGpbPN9-dXNL6H2rtt08YAVSttY2BsDWxlVO3KNnCQMUE2QFfDD-eGTtpNdBZ6E-L-bpomwNq7Hg7JS1pjI5RWw2j6wXnpd7CTGxPOwUktu2Au_vYYvCzunucP2fLp_nF-s8xUTjnJOMKEVLpkjEtmNDWm4IQjWtG8YlpTpJGSSFUzTXWJ6xmXNC8UZ7RmTJWcFmNwdfAdvHvbpoxi7bbeppeiQKQoS4bRnro-UMq7ELypxeBXfQorMBL7QkUqVPwWmtjpgX1fdWb3PygWr7cHxQ89Z3nW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3043886105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Vargas, Anderson L. ; Brazil, Thamires ; Santangelo, Jayme M. ; Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Anderson L. ; Brazil, Thamires ; Santangelo, Jayme M. ; Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creatorcontrib><description>Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐dependent.
This study simulated one long‐term (1 year) dry‐out episode in wet sediments originating from permanent and temporary lakes and compared hatching patterns through ex situ experiments.
The abundance and species richness of hatchlings decreased in dry sediments compared to wet sediments. Hatchling composition differed between wet and dry sediments of each lake category, whereas community variability did not differ between wet and dry sediments of temporary lakes.
Overall, there was no difference in the ability of rotifers and crustaceans to cope with desiccation, since all species decreased hatchling numbers after desiccation. Artemia was the only taxon that benefited from drying sediments.
Long‐term desiccation may affect the contribution of resting egg banks to future active populations in the water column, even in temporary habitats which presumably select for drought‐resistant resting eggs. The ecological roles played by resting egg banks may be weakening because droughts are becoming more common worldwide, even in former permanent aquatic habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fwb.14234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic crustaceans ; Aquatic habitats ; Artemia ; Banks (topography) ; climate change ; Crustaceans ; Desiccants ; Desiccation ; diapause ; dormancy ; Drought ; Drying ; Eggs ; Habitats ; Hatching ; hydroregime ; Lakes ; Plankton ; Resting eggs ; Sediment ; Sediments ; Shellfish ; Species richness ; Temporary ponds ; water balance ; Water circulation ; Water column ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.635-644</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-70144bd8667a6ed5ee374705b52b6dd50d0ca0cb9d5d81f97a523c765f66c8753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4153-6894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffwb.14234$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffwb.14234$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Anderson L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazil, Thamires</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Jayme M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creatorcontrib><title>Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐dependent.
This study simulated one long‐term (1 year) dry‐out episode in wet sediments originating from permanent and temporary lakes and compared hatching patterns through ex situ experiments.
The abundance and species richness of hatchlings decreased in dry sediments compared to wet sediments. Hatchling composition differed between wet and dry sediments of each lake category, whereas community variability did not differ between wet and dry sediments of temporary lakes.
Overall, there was no difference in the ability of rotifers and crustaceans to cope with desiccation, since all species decreased hatchling numbers after desiccation. Artemia was the only taxon that benefited from drying sediments.
Long‐term desiccation may affect the contribution of resting egg banks to future active populations in the water column, even in temporary habitats which presumably select for drought‐resistant resting eggs. The ecological roles played by resting egg banks may be weakening because droughts are becoming more common worldwide, even in former permanent aquatic habitats.</description><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Artemia</subject><subject>Banks (topography)</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Desiccants</subject><subject>Desiccation</subject><subject>diapause</subject><subject>dormancy</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>hydroregime</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Resting eggs</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Temporary ponds</subject><subject>water balance</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2ol_0hEqCkiVWECMlmM7SdvEDrYrVCYegWfkSXApK3e5w_3OuUcHgEuMJjjNtH6vJpjkBTkCI1wwmuUk58dghBBhGUUcnYKzENYIoZLyfASGpbPN9-dXNL6H2rtt08YAVSttY2BsDWxlVO3KNnCQMUE2QFfDD-eGTtpNdBZ6E-L-bpomwNq7Hg7JS1pjI5RWw2j6wXnpd7CTGxPOwUktu2Au_vYYvCzunucP2fLp_nF-s8xUTjnJOMKEVLpkjEtmNDWm4IQjWtG8YlpTpJGSSFUzTXWJ6xmXNC8UZ7RmTJWcFmNwdfAdvHvbpoxi7bbeppeiQKQoS4bRnro-UMq7ELypxeBXfQorMBL7QkUqVPwWmtjpgX1fdWb3PygWr7cHxQ89Z3nW</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Vargas, Anderson L.</creator><creator>Brazil, Thamires</creator><creator>Santangelo, Jayme M.</creator><creator>Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4153-6894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes</title><author>Vargas, Anderson L. ; Brazil, Thamires ; Santangelo, Jayme M. ; Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-70144bd8667a6ed5ee374705b52b6dd50d0ca0cb9d5d81f97a523c765f66c8753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Artemia</topic><topic>Banks (topography)</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Desiccants</topic><topic>Desiccation</topic><topic>diapause</topic><topic>dormancy</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>hydroregime</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Resting eggs</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Temporary ponds</topic><topic>water balance</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Anderson L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazil, Thamires</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Jayme M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas, Anderson L.</au><au>Brazil, Thamires</au><au>Santangelo, Jayme M.</au><au>Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>635-644</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐dependent.
This study simulated one long‐term (1 year) dry‐out episode in wet sediments originating from permanent and temporary lakes and compared hatching patterns through ex situ experiments.
The abundance and species richness of hatchlings decreased in dry sediments compared to wet sediments. Hatchling composition differed between wet and dry sediments of each lake category, whereas community variability did not differ between wet and dry sediments of temporary lakes.
Overall, there was no difference in the ability of rotifers and crustaceans to cope with desiccation, since all species decreased hatchling numbers after desiccation. Artemia was the only taxon that benefited from drying sediments.
Long‐term desiccation may affect the contribution of resting egg banks to future active populations in the water column, even in temporary habitats which presumably select for drought‐resistant resting eggs. The ecological roles played by resting egg banks may be weakening because droughts are becoming more common worldwide, even in former permanent aquatic habitats.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fwb.14234</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4153-6894</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0046-5070 |
ispartof | Freshwater biology, 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.635-644 |
issn | 0046-5070 1365-2427 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3043886105 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals |
subjects | Aquatic crustaceans Aquatic habitats Artemia Banks (topography) climate change Crustaceans Desiccants Desiccation diapause dormancy Drought Drying Eggs Habitats Hatching hydroregime Lakes Plankton Resting eggs Sediment Sediments Shellfish Species richness Temporary ponds water balance Water circulation Water column Zooplankton |
title | Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A34%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long%E2%80%90term%20droughts%20change%20the%20hatching%20patterns%20of%20zooplankton%20resting%20eggs%20from%20permanent%20and%20temporary%20lakes&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Vargas,%20Anderson%20L.&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=635-644&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fwb.14234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3043886105%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3043886105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |