Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes

Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐depe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Freshwater biology 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.635-644
Hauptverfasser: Vargas, Anderson L., Brazil, Thamires, Santangelo, Jayme M., Bozelli, Reinaldo L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 644
container_issue 5
container_start_page 635
container_title Freshwater biology
container_volume 69
creator Vargas, Anderson L.
Brazil, Thamires
Santangelo, Jayme M.
Bozelli, Reinaldo L.
description Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐dependent. This study simulated one long‐term (1 year) dry‐out episode in wet sediments originating from permanent and temporary lakes and compared hatching patterns through ex situ experiments. The abundance and species richness of hatchlings decreased in dry sediments compared to wet sediments. Hatchling composition differed between wet and dry sediments of each lake category, whereas community variability did not differ between wet and dry sediments of temporary lakes. Overall, there was no difference in the ability of rotifers and crustaceans to cope with desiccation, since all species decreased hatchling numbers after desiccation. Artemia was the only taxon that benefited from drying sediments. Long‐term desiccation may affect the contribution of resting egg banks to future active populations in the water column, even in temporary habitats which presumably select for drought‐resistant resting eggs. The ecological roles played by resting egg banks may be weakening because droughts are becoming more common worldwide, even in former permanent aquatic habitats.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/fwb.14234
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3043886105</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3043886105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-70144bd8667a6ed5ee374705b52b6dd50d0ca0cb9d5d81f97a523c765f66c8753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2ol_0hEqCkiVWECMlmM7SdvEDrYrVCYegWfkSXApK3e5w_3OuUcHgEuMJjjNtH6vJpjkBTkCI1wwmuUk58dghBBhGUUcnYKzENYIoZLyfASGpbPN9-dXNL6H2rtt08YAVSttY2BsDWxlVO3KNnCQMUE2QFfDD-eGTtpNdBZ6E-L-bpomwNq7Hg7JS1pjI5RWw2j6wXnpd7CTGxPOwUktu2Au_vYYvCzunucP2fLp_nF-s8xUTjnJOMKEVLpkjEtmNDWm4IQjWtG8YlpTpJGSSFUzTXWJ6xmXNC8UZ7RmTJWcFmNwdfAdvHvbpoxi7bbeppeiQKQoS4bRnro-UMq7ELypxeBXfQorMBL7QkUqVPwWmtjpgX1fdWb3PygWr7cHxQ89Z3nW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3043886105</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><creator>Vargas, Anderson L. ; Brazil, Thamires ; Santangelo, Jayme M. ; Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Anderson L. ; Brazil, Thamires ; Santangelo, Jayme M. ; Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creatorcontrib><description>Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐dependent. This study simulated one long‐term (1 year) dry‐out episode in wet sediments originating from permanent and temporary lakes and compared hatching patterns through ex situ experiments. The abundance and species richness of hatchlings decreased in dry sediments compared to wet sediments. Hatchling composition differed between wet and dry sediments of each lake category, whereas community variability did not differ between wet and dry sediments of temporary lakes. Overall, there was no difference in the ability of rotifers and crustaceans to cope with desiccation, since all species decreased hatchling numbers after desiccation. Artemia was the only taxon that benefited from drying sediments. Long‐term desiccation may affect the contribution of resting egg banks to future active populations in the water column, even in temporary habitats which presumably select for drought‐resistant resting eggs. The ecological roles played by resting egg banks may be weakening because droughts are becoming more common worldwide, even in former permanent aquatic habitats.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0046-5070</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2427</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/fwb.14234</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic crustaceans ; Aquatic habitats ; Artemia ; Banks (topography) ; climate change ; Crustaceans ; Desiccants ; Desiccation ; diapause ; dormancy ; Drought ; Drying ; Eggs ; Habitats ; Hatching ; hydroregime ; Lakes ; Plankton ; Resting eggs ; Sediment ; Sediments ; Shellfish ; Species richness ; Temporary ponds ; water balance ; Water circulation ; Water column ; Zooplankton</subject><ispartof>Freshwater biology, 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.635-644</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-70144bd8667a6ed5ee374705b52b6dd50d0ca0cb9d5d81f97a523c765f66c8753</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4153-6894</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Ffwb.14234$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Ffwb.14234$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Anderson L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazil, Thamires</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Jayme M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creatorcontrib><title>Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes</title><title>Freshwater biology</title><description>Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐dependent. This study simulated one long‐term (1 year) dry‐out episode in wet sediments originating from permanent and temporary lakes and compared hatching patterns through ex situ experiments. The abundance and species richness of hatchlings decreased in dry sediments compared to wet sediments. Hatchling composition differed between wet and dry sediments of each lake category, whereas community variability did not differ between wet and dry sediments of temporary lakes. Overall, there was no difference in the ability of rotifers and crustaceans to cope with desiccation, since all species decreased hatchling numbers after desiccation. Artemia was the only taxon that benefited from drying sediments. Long‐term desiccation may affect the contribution of resting egg banks to future active populations in the water column, even in temporary habitats which presumably select for drought‐resistant resting eggs. The ecological roles played by resting egg banks may be weakening because droughts are becoming more common worldwide, even in former permanent aquatic habitats.</description><subject>Aquatic crustaceans</subject><subject>Aquatic habitats</subject><subject>Artemia</subject><subject>Banks (topography)</subject><subject>climate change</subject><subject>Crustaceans</subject><subject>Desiccants</subject><subject>Desiccation</subject><subject>diapause</subject><subject>dormancy</subject><subject>Drought</subject><subject>Drying</subject><subject>Eggs</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hatching</subject><subject>hydroregime</subject><subject>Lakes</subject><subject>Plankton</subject><subject>Resting eggs</subject><subject>Sediment</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Shellfish</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Temporary ponds</subject><subject>water balance</subject><subject>Water circulation</subject><subject>Water column</subject><subject>Zooplankton</subject><issn>0046-5070</issn><issn>1365-2427</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqUw8AaWmBjS2ol_0hEqCkiVWECMlmM7SdvEDrYrVCYegWfkSXApK3e5w_3OuUcHgEuMJjjNtH6vJpjkBTkCI1wwmuUk58dghBBhGUUcnYKzENYIoZLyfASGpbPN9-dXNL6H2rtt08YAVSttY2BsDWxlVO3KNnCQMUE2QFfDD-eGTtpNdBZ6E-L-bpomwNq7Hg7JS1pjI5RWw2j6wXnpd7CTGxPOwUktu2Au_vYYvCzunucP2fLp_nF-s8xUTjnJOMKEVLpkjEtmNDWm4IQjWtG8YlpTpJGSSFUzTXWJ6xmXNC8UZ7RmTJWcFmNwdfAdvHvbpoxi7bbeppeiQKQoS4bRnro-UMq7ELypxeBXfQorMBL7QkUqVPwWmtjpgX1fdWb3PygWr7cHxQ89Z3nW</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Vargas, Anderson L.</creator><creator>Brazil, Thamires</creator><creator>Santangelo, Jayme M.</creator><creator>Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M7N</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4153-6894</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes</title><author>Vargas, Anderson L. ; Brazil, Thamires ; Santangelo, Jayme M. ; Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2574-70144bd8667a6ed5ee374705b52b6dd50d0ca0cb9d5d81f97a523c765f66c8753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aquatic crustaceans</topic><topic>Aquatic habitats</topic><topic>Artemia</topic><topic>Banks (topography)</topic><topic>climate change</topic><topic>Crustaceans</topic><topic>Desiccants</topic><topic>Desiccation</topic><topic>diapause</topic><topic>dormancy</topic><topic>Drought</topic><topic>Drying</topic><topic>Eggs</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hatching</topic><topic>hydroregime</topic><topic>Lakes</topic><topic>Plankton</topic><topic>Resting eggs</topic><topic>Sediment</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Shellfish</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Temporary ponds</topic><topic>water balance</topic><topic>Water circulation</topic><topic>Water column</topic><topic>Zooplankton</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vargas, Anderson L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brazil, Thamires</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Santangelo, Jayme M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vargas, Anderson L.</au><au>Brazil, Thamires</au><au>Santangelo, Jayme M.</au><au>Bozelli, Reinaldo L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes</atitle><jtitle>Freshwater biology</jtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>69</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>635</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>635-644</pages><issn>0046-5070</issn><eissn>1365-2427</eissn><abstract>Resting eggs are commonly produced by zooplankton inhabiting permanent and temporary lakes. Although resting eggs are acknowledged to survive varying harsh conditions, the effects of desiccation on the viability and hatching patterns of resting eggs are not fully understood and might be context‐dependent. This study simulated one long‐term (1 year) dry‐out episode in wet sediments originating from permanent and temporary lakes and compared hatching patterns through ex situ experiments. The abundance and species richness of hatchlings decreased in dry sediments compared to wet sediments. Hatchling composition differed between wet and dry sediments of each lake category, whereas community variability did not differ between wet and dry sediments of temporary lakes. Overall, there was no difference in the ability of rotifers and crustaceans to cope with desiccation, since all species decreased hatchling numbers after desiccation. Artemia was the only taxon that benefited from drying sediments. Long‐term desiccation may affect the contribution of resting egg banks to future active populations in the water column, even in temporary habitats which presumably select for drought‐resistant resting eggs. The ecological roles played by resting egg banks may be weakening because droughts are becoming more common worldwide, even in former permanent aquatic habitats.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/fwb.14234</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4153-6894</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0046-5070
ispartof Freshwater biology, 2024-05, Vol.69 (5), p.635-644
issn 0046-5070
1365-2427
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3043886105
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals
subjects Aquatic crustaceans
Aquatic habitats
Artemia
Banks (topography)
climate change
Crustaceans
Desiccants
Desiccation
diapause
dormancy
Drought
Drying
Eggs
Habitats
Hatching
hydroregime
Lakes
Plankton
Resting eggs
Sediment
Sediments
Shellfish
Species richness
Temporary ponds
water balance
Water circulation
Water column
Zooplankton
title Long‐term droughts change the hatching patterns of zooplankton resting eggs from permanent and temporary lakes
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T02%3A34%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Long%E2%80%90term%20droughts%20change%20the%20hatching%20patterns%20of%20zooplankton%20resting%20eggs%20from%20permanent%20and%20temporary%20lakes&rft.jtitle=Freshwater%20biology&rft.au=Vargas,%20Anderson%20L.&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=69&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=635&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=635-644&rft.issn=0046-5070&rft.eissn=1365-2427&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/fwb.14234&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3043886105%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3043886105&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true