Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections

A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertain...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2024-04, Vol.23 (2), p.403-425
Hauptverfasser: Wu, Chenhao, Tang, Yuchuan, Cao, Xuyang, Wu, Gang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 425
container_issue 2
container_start_page 403
container_title Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration
container_volume 23
creator Wu, Chenhao
Tang, Yuchuan
Cao, Xuyang
Wu, Gang
description A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertainties in the seismic hazard, fragility, capacity, demand, loss functions, and post-earthquake recovery. In this study, the PCF structures are distinguished from ordinary reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structures by characterizing multiple limit states for the PCF based on its unique damage mechanisms. Accordingly, probabilistic story-wise pushover analyses are performed to yield story-wise capacities for the predefined limit states. In the seismic resilience analysis, a step-wise recovery model is proposed to idealize the functionality recovery process, with separate considerations of the repair and non-repair events. The recovery model leverages the economic loss and downtime to delineate the stochastic post-earthquake recovery curves for the resilience loss estimation. As such, contingencies in the probabilistic post-earthquake repairs are incorporated and the empirical judgments on the recovery parameters are largely circumvented. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a comparative study between two “dry” connected PCFs and one RCF designed as alternative structural systems for a prototype building. The results from the risk quantification indicate that the PCFs show reduced loss hazards and lower expected losses relative to the RCF. Particularly, the PCF equipped with energy dissipation devices at the “dry” connections largely reduces the expected economic loss, downtime, and resilience loss by 29%, 56%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the RCF.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3041898172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3041898172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-d739ec9aa89f2cb5701a09c294150252f746923b738e558b39c41891039aead3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhoMoWKsP4G7A9ejccpmlFG9QEKQLd8N0cqJTm0mck2Ld9UH05fokJkRw5eocON__H_iS5JyzS85YfoWcF0xSJhQVQim6PUgmXGtJUyafD_s9yzmVWaaOkxPEFWOZEjKbJPAE6NceggPqg2ti20TbQUkQPNbekejxjVhEQKwhdKSpSBvBWeyIa4KL0AGpoq0ByYfvXsl-91XGz_3uezgHcJ1vAp4mR5VdI5z9zmmyuL1ZzO7p_PHuYXY9p05kRUfLXGpw2tpCV8It05xxy7QTWvGUiVRUucq0kMtcFpCmxVJqp3ihOZPagi3lNLkYa9vYvG8AO7NqNjH0H41kA1nwXPQUHykXG8QIlWmjr238NJyZQaYZZZpephlkmm2fEWMGeza8QPxr_j_0AxoteuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041898172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wu, Chenhao ; Tang, Yuchuan ; Cao, Xuyang ; Wu, Gang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenhao ; Tang, Yuchuan ; Cao, Xuyang ; Wu, Gang</creatorcontrib><description>A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertainties in the seismic hazard, fragility, capacity, demand, loss functions, and post-earthquake recovery. In this study, the PCF structures are distinguished from ordinary reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structures by characterizing multiple limit states for the PCF based on its unique damage mechanisms. Accordingly, probabilistic story-wise pushover analyses are performed to yield story-wise capacities for the predefined limit states. In the seismic resilience analysis, a step-wise recovery model is proposed to idealize the functionality recovery process, with separate considerations of the repair and non-repair events. The recovery model leverages the economic loss and downtime to delineate the stochastic post-earthquake recovery curves for the resilience loss estimation. As such, contingencies in the probabilistic post-earthquake repairs are incorporated and the empirical judgments on the recovery parameters are largely circumvented. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a comparative study between two “dry” connected PCFs and one RCF designed as alternative structural systems for a prototype building. The results from the risk quantification indicate that the PCFs show reduced loss hazards and lower expected losses relative to the RCF. Particularly, the PCF equipped with energy dissipation devices at the “dry” connections largely reduces the expected economic loss, downtime, and resilience loss by 29%, 56%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the RCF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1671-3664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-503X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Concrete ; Control ; Downtime ; Dynamical Systems ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake construction ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake resistance ; Earthquakes ; Economic impact ; Economic models ; Economics ; Empirical analysis ; Energy dissipation ; Energy exchange ; Fragility ; Geological hazards ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Limit states ; Precast concrete ; Probability theory ; Recovery ; Reinforced concrete ; Repair ; Resilience ; Risk assessment ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Structures ; Technical Papers ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2024-04, Vol.23 (2), p.403-425</ispartof><rights>Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration 2024</rights><rights>Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-d739ec9aa89f2cb5701a09c294150252f746923b738e558b39c41891039aead3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xuyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Gang</creatorcontrib><title>Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections</title><title>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</title><addtitle>Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib</addtitle><description>A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertainties in the seismic hazard, fragility, capacity, demand, loss functions, and post-earthquake recovery. In this study, the PCF structures are distinguished from ordinary reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structures by characterizing multiple limit states for the PCF based on its unique damage mechanisms. Accordingly, probabilistic story-wise pushover analyses are performed to yield story-wise capacities for the predefined limit states. In the seismic resilience analysis, a step-wise recovery model is proposed to idealize the functionality recovery process, with separate considerations of the repair and non-repair events. The recovery model leverages the economic loss and downtime to delineate the stochastic post-earthquake recovery curves for the resilience loss estimation. As such, contingencies in the probabilistic post-earthquake repairs are incorporated and the empirical judgments on the recovery parameters are largely circumvented. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a comparative study between two “dry” connected PCFs and one RCF designed as alternative structural systems for a prototype building. The results from the risk quantification indicate that the PCFs show reduced loss hazards and lower expected losses relative to the RCF. Particularly, the PCF equipped with energy dissipation devices at the “dry” connections largely reduces the expected economic loss, downtime, and resilience loss by 29%, 56%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the RCF.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Downtime</subject><subject>Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake construction</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake resistance</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Energy exchange</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Limit states</subject><subject>Precast concrete</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Repair</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1671-3664</issn><issn>1993-503X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhoMoWKsP4G7A9ejccpmlFG9QEKQLd8N0cqJTm0mck2Ld9UH05fokJkRw5eocON__H_iS5JyzS85YfoWcF0xSJhQVQim6PUgmXGtJUyafD_s9yzmVWaaOkxPEFWOZEjKbJPAE6NceggPqg2ti20TbQUkQPNbekejxjVhEQKwhdKSpSBvBWeyIa4KL0AGpoq0ByYfvXsl-91XGz_3uezgHcJ1vAp4mR5VdI5z9zmmyuL1ZzO7p_PHuYXY9p05kRUfLXGpw2tpCV8It05xxy7QTWvGUiVRUucq0kMtcFpCmxVJqp3ihOZPagi3lNLkYa9vYvG8AO7NqNjH0H41kA1nwXPQUHykXG8QIlWmjr238NJyZQaYZZZpephlkmm2fEWMGeza8QPxr_j_0AxoteuA</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Wu, Chenhao</creator><creator>Tang, Yuchuan</creator><creator>Cao, Xuyang</creator><creator>Wu, Gang</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections</title><author>Wu, Chenhao ; Tang, Yuchuan ; Cao, Xuyang ; Wu, Gang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-d739ec9aa89f2cb5701a09c294150252f746923b738e558b39c41891039aead3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Downtime</topic><topic>Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake construction</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake resistance</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Energy exchange</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Limit states</topic><topic>Precast concrete</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Repair</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xuyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Gang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Chenhao</au><au>Tang, Yuchuan</au><au>Cao, Xuyang</au><au>Wu, Gang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</jtitle><stitle>Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib</stitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>403-425</pages><issn>1671-3664</issn><eissn>1993-503X</eissn><abstract>A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertainties in the seismic hazard, fragility, capacity, demand, loss functions, and post-earthquake recovery. In this study, the PCF structures are distinguished from ordinary reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structures by characterizing multiple limit states for the PCF based on its unique damage mechanisms. Accordingly, probabilistic story-wise pushover analyses are performed to yield story-wise capacities for the predefined limit states. In the seismic resilience analysis, a step-wise recovery model is proposed to idealize the functionality recovery process, with separate considerations of the repair and non-repair events. The recovery model leverages the economic loss and downtime to delineate the stochastic post-earthquake recovery curves for the resilience loss estimation. As such, contingencies in the probabilistic post-earthquake repairs are incorporated and the empirical judgments on the recovery parameters are largely circumvented. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a comparative study between two “dry” connected PCFs and one RCF designed as alternative structural systems for a prototype building. The results from the risk quantification indicate that the PCFs show reduced loss hazards and lower expected losses relative to the RCF. Particularly, the PCF equipped with energy dissipation devices at the “dry” connections largely reduces the expected economic loss, downtime, and resilience loss by 29%, 56%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the RCF.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1671-3664
ispartof Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2024-04, Vol.23 (2), p.403-425
issn 1671-3664
1993-503X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3041898172
source Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Civil Engineering
Comparative analysis
Comparative studies
Concrete
Control
Downtime
Dynamical Systems
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquake construction
Earthquake damage
Earthquake resistance
Earthquakes
Economic impact
Economic models
Economics
Empirical analysis
Energy dissipation
Energy exchange
Fragility
Geological hazards
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Limit states
Precast concrete
Probability theory
Recovery
Reinforced concrete
Repair
Resilience
Risk assessment
Seismic activity
Seismic hazard
Structures
Technical Papers
Vibration
title Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A57%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resilience-incorporated%20seismic%20risk%20assessment%20of%20precast%20concrete%20frames%20with%20%E2%80%9Cdry%E2%80%9D%20connections&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20Engineering%20and%20Engineering%20Vibration&rft.au=Wu,%20Chenhao&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=403-425&rft.issn=1671-3664&rft.eissn=1993-503X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3041898172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041898172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true