Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections
A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertain...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2024-04, Vol.23 (2), p.403-425 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 425 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 403 |
container_title | Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration |
container_volume | 23 |
creator | Wu, Chenhao Tang, Yuchuan Cao, Xuyang Wu, Gang |
description | A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertainties in the seismic hazard, fragility, capacity, demand, loss functions, and post-earthquake recovery. In this study, the PCF structures are distinguished from ordinary reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structures by characterizing multiple limit states for the PCF based on its unique damage mechanisms. Accordingly, probabilistic story-wise pushover analyses are performed to yield story-wise capacities for the predefined limit states. In the seismic resilience analysis, a step-wise recovery model is proposed to idealize the functionality recovery process, with separate considerations of the repair and non-repair events. The recovery model leverages the economic loss and downtime to delineate the stochastic post-earthquake recovery curves for the resilience loss estimation. As such, contingencies in the probabilistic post-earthquake repairs are incorporated and the empirical judgments on the recovery parameters are largely circumvented. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a comparative study between two “dry” connected PCFs and one RCF designed as alternative structural systems for a prototype building. The results from the risk quantification indicate that the PCFs show reduced loss hazards and lower expected losses relative to the RCF. Particularly, the PCF equipped with energy dissipation devices at the “dry” connections largely reduces the expected economic loss, downtime, and resilience loss by 29%, 56%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the RCF. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3041898172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3041898172</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-d739ec9aa89f2cb5701a09c294150252f746923b738e558b39c41891039aead3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhoMoWKsP4G7A9ejccpmlFG9QEKQLd8N0cqJTm0mck2Ld9UH05fokJkRw5eocON__H_iS5JyzS85YfoWcF0xSJhQVQim6PUgmXGtJUyafD_s9yzmVWaaOkxPEFWOZEjKbJPAE6NceggPqg2ti20TbQUkQPNbekejxjVhEQKwhdKSpSBvBWeyIa4KL0AGpoq0ByYfvXsl-91XGz_3uezgHcJ1vAp4mR5VdI5z9zmmyuL1ZzO7p_PHuYXY9p05kRUfLXGpw2tpCV8It05xxy7QTWvGUiVRUucq0kMtcFpCmxVJqp3ihOZPagi3lNLkYa9vYvG8AO7NqNjH0H41kA1nwXPQUHykXG8QIlWmjr238NJyZQaYZZZpephlkmm2fEWMGeza8QPxr_j_0AxoteuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041898172</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Wu, Chenhao ; Tang, Yuchuan ; Cao, Xuyang ; Wu, Gang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenhao ; Tang, Yuchuan ; Cao, Xuyang ; Wu, Gang</creatorcontrib><description>A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertainties in the seismic hazard, fragility, capacity, demand, loss functions, and post-earthquake recovery. In this study, the PCF structures are distinguished from ordinary reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structures by characterizing multiple limit states for the PCF based on its unique damage mechanisms. Accordingly, probabilistic story-wise pushover analyses are performed to yield story-wise capacities for the predefined limit states. In the seismic resilience analysis, a step-wise recovery model is proposed to idealize the functionality recovery process, with separate considerations of the repair and non-repair events. The recovery model leverages the economic loss and downtime to delineate the stochastic post-earthquake recovery curves for the resilience loss estimation. As such, contingencies in the probabilistic post-earthquake repairs are incorporated and the empirical judgments on the recovery parameters are largely circumvented. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a comparative study between two “dry” connected PCFs and one RCF designed as alternative structural systems for a prototype building. The results from the risk quantification indicate that the PCFs show reduced loss hazards and lower expected losses relative to the RCF. Particularly, the PCF equipped with energy dissipation devices at the “dry” connections largely reduces the expected economic loss, downtime, and resilience loss by 29%, 56%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the RCF.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1671-3664</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1993-503X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Civil Engineering ; Comparative analysis ; Comparative studies ; Concrete ; Control ; Downtime ; Dynamical Systems ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake construction ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquake resistance ; Earthquakes ; Economic impact ; Economic models ; Economics ; Empirical analysis ; Energy dissipation ; Energy exchange ; Fragility ; Geological hazards ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Limit states ; Precast concrete ; Probability theory ; Recovery ; Reinforced concrete ; Repair ; Resilience ; Risk assessment ; Seismic activity ; Seismic hazard ; Structures ; Technical Papers ; Vibration</subject><ispartof>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2024-04, Vol.23 (2), p.403-425</ispartof><rights>Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration 2024</rights><rights>Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration 2024.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-d739ec9aa89f2cb5701a09c294150252f746923b738e558b39c41891039aead3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xuyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Gang</creatorcontrib><title>Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections</title><title>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</title><addtitle>Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib</addtitle><description>A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertainties in the seismic hazard, fragility, capacity, demand, loss functions, and post-earthquake recovery. In this study, the PCF structures are distinguished from ordinary reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structures by characterizing multiple limit states for the PCF based on its unique damage mechanisms. Accordingly, probabilistic story-wise pushover analyses are performed to yield story-wise capacities for the predefined limit states. In the seismic resilience analysis, a step-wise recovery model is proposed to idealize the functionality recovery process, with separate considerations of the repair and non-repair events. The recovery model leverages the economic loss and downtime to delineate the stochastic post-earthquake recovery curves for the resilience loss estimation. As such, contingencies in the probabilistic post-earthquake repairs are incorporated and the empirical judgments on the recovery parameters are largely circumvented. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a comparative study between two “dry” connected PCFs and one RCF designed as alternative structural systems for a prototype building. The results from the risk quantification indicate that the PCFs show reduced loss hazards and lower expected losses relative to the RCF. Particularly, the PCF equipped with energy dissipation devices at the “dry” connections largely reduces the expected economic loss, downtime, and resilience loss by 29%, 56%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the RCF.</description><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Downtime</subject><subject>Dynamical Systems</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake construction</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquake resistance</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Economic impact</subject><subject>Economic models</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Energy dissipation</subject><subject>Energy exchange</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Limit states</subject><subject>Precast concrete</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Recovery</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Repair</subject><subject>Resilience</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Structures</subject><subject>Technical Papers</subject><subject>Vibration</subject><issn>1671-3664</issn><issn>1993-503X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKw0AUhoMoWKsP4G7A9ejccpmlFG9QEKQLd8N0cqJTm0mck2Ld9UH05fokJkRw5eocON__H_iS5JyzS85YfoWcF0xSJhQVQim6PUgmXGtJUyafD_s9yzmVWaaOkxPEFWOZEjKbJPAE6NceggPqg2ti20TbQUkQPNbekejxjVhEQKwhdKSpSBvBWeyIa4KL0AGpoq0ByYfvXsl-91XGz_3uezgHcJ1vAp4mR5VdI5z9zmmyuL1ZzO7p_PHuYXY9p05kRUfLXGpw2tpCV8It05xxy7QTWvGUiVRUucq0kMtcFpCmxVJqp3ihOZPagi3lNLkYa9vYvG8AO7NqNjH0H41kA1nwXPQUHykXG8QIlWmjr238NJyZQaYZZZpephlkmm2fEWMGeza8QPxr_j_0AxoteuA</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Wu, Chenhao</creator><creator>Tang, Yuchuan</creator><creator>Cao, Xuyang</creator><creator>Wu, Gang</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections</title><author>Wu, Chenhao ; Tang, Yuchuan ; Cao, Xuyang ; Wu, Gang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c268t-d739ec9aa89f2cb5701a09c294150252f746923b738e558b39c41891039aead3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Downtime</topic><topic>Dynamical Systems</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake construction</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquake resistance</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Economic impact</topic><topic>Economic models</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Energy dissipation</topic><topic>Energy exchange</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Limit states</topic><topic>Precast concrete</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Recovery</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Repair</topic><topic>Resilience</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Structures</topic><topic>Technical Papers</topic><topic>Vibration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Chenhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuchuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cao, Xuyang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Gang</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Chenhao</au><au>Tang, Yuchuan</au><au>Cao, Xuyang</au><au>Wu, Gang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration</jtitle><stitle>Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib</stitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>425</epage><pages>403-425</pages><issn>1671-3664</issn><eissn>1993-503X</eissn><abstract>A resilience-incorporated risk assessment framework is proposed and demonstrated in this study to manifest the advantageous seismic resilience of precast concrete frame (PCF) structures with “dry” connections in terms of their low damage and rapid recovery. The framework integrates various uncertainties in the seismic hazard, fragility, capacity, demand, loss functions, and post-earthquake recovery. In this study, the PCF structures are distinguished from ordinary reinforced concrete frame (RCF) structures by characterizing multiple limit states for the PCF based on its unique damage mechanisms. Accordingly, probabilistic story-wise pushover analyses are performed to yield story-wise capacities for the predefined limit states. In the seismic resilience analysis, a step-wise recovery model is proposed to idealize the functionality recovery process, with separate considerations of the repair and non-repair events. The recovery model leverages the economic loss and downtime to delineate the stochastic post-earthquake recovery curves for the resilience loss estimation. As such, contingencies in the probabilistic post-earthquake repairs are incorporated and the empirical judgments on the recovery parameters are largely circumvented. The proposed framework is demonstrated through a comparative study between two “dry” connected PCFs and one RCF designed as alternative structural systems for a prototype building. The results from the risk quantification indicate that the PCFs show reduced loss hazards and lower expected losses relative to the RCF. Particularly, the PCF equipped with energy dissipation devices at the “dry” connections largely reduces the expected economic loss, downtime, and resilience loss by 29%, 56%, and 60%, respectively, compared to the RCF.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x</doi><tpages>23</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1671-3664 |
ispartof | Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 2024-04, Vol.23 (2), p.403-425 |
issn | 1671-3664 1993-503X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_3041898172 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Civil Engineering Comparative analysis Comparative studies Concrete Control Downtime Dynamical Systems Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Earthquake construction Earthquake damage Earthquake resistance Earthquakes Economic impact Economic models Economics Empirical analysis Energy dissipation Energy exchange Fragility Geological hazards Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Limit states Precast concrete Probability theory Recovery Reinforced concrete Repair Resilience Risk assessment Seismic activity Seismic hazard Structures Technical Papers Vibration |
title | Resilience-incorporated seismic risk assessment of precast concrete frames with “dry” connections |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T23%3A57%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Resilience-incorporated%20seismic%20risk%20assessment%20of%20precast%20concrete%20frames%20with%20%E2%80%9Cdry%E2%80%9D%20connections&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20Engineering%20and%20Engineering%20Vibration&rft.au=Wu,%20Chenhao&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=425&rft.pages=403-425&rft.issn=1671-3664&rft.eissn=1993-503X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11803-024-2244-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3041898172%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041898172&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |