Exceptionalism for most, excess for others: The legal foundation of a bifurcated criminal justice system in Denmark

Following a change in the Danish gang milieu in 2008, where ethnic minority street gangs challenged the established outlaw motorcycle gangs, the Danish government has formulated three anti-gang policy ‘packages’. To unfold the development they represent to Nordic penology, this article analyses elem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of criminology 2024-05, Vol.21 (3), p.392-410
1. Verfasser: Madsen, Mads
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 410
container_issue 3
container_start_page 392
container_title European journal of criminology
container_volume 21
creator Madsen, Mads
description Following a change in the Danish gang milieu in 2008, where ethnic minority street gangs challenged the established outlaw motorcycle gangs, the Danish government has formulated three anti-gang policy ‘packages’. To unfold the development they represent to Nordic penology, this article analyses elements of both penal exceptionalism and excess. In this article, it is shown how the packages are based on the notion of gang membership as a choice, which legitimated the development of a parallel justice system for gang members. This foundation is built upon a gang-specific subsection that allows for the doubling of gang-related sentences and for restricting prisoner rights and traditional rehabilitative treatment for gang-related convicts. The packages, however, maintained ‘a way out’ for gang members who voluntarily entered a formal EXIT program, and thus gained access to traditional penal treatment and also support for leaving the gang milieu. It is argued that the packages represent a development of intended bifurcation based on status differentiation between citizen groups, a process also observed in regard to Danish anti-ghetto policies. Thus, rather than resembling a general turn to punitiveness, the packages indicate a penological development based on penal differentiation, which raises questions about access to justice for those found wanting.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/14773708231208333
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_3041177918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_14773708231208333</sage_id><sourcerecordid>3041177918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-cdd82fd561ff1d593119a7e890ac1d6924e96e1f0b51795f73eae687af5069713</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhisEEmPwA7hF4kpH3LRNww3B-JAmcRnnKkudraMfI04l9u9JGRIHxMmW3-d9ZTuKLoHPAKS8gVRKIXmRCEh4IYQ4iiYgU4iTnKvj0Ac9HoHT6Ixoy3lABJ9ENP80uPN13-mmppbZ3rG2J3_NMAhE34Peb9DRLVtukDW41k2YDl2lRxvrLdNsVdvBGe2xYsbVbR3S2HYgXxtktCePLas79oBdq937eXRidUN48VOn0dvjfHn_HC9en17u7xaxSfLUx6aqisRWWQ7WQpUpAaC0xEJxbaDKVZKiyhEsX2UgVWalQI15IbXNeK4kiGl0dcjduf5jQPLlth9cWI1KwdPxbQqKQMGBMq4ncmjLXbhAu30JvByh8s9vg2d28JBe42_q_4Yvn6952A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3041177918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exceptionalism for most, excess for others: The legal foundation of a bifurcated criminal justice system in Denmark</title><source>Access via SAGE</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Madsen, Mads</creator><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Mads</creatorcontrib><description>Following a change in the Danish gang milieu in 2008, where ethnic minority street gangs challenged the established outlaw motorcycle gangs, the Danish government has formulated three anti-gang policy ‘packages’. To unfold the development they represent to Nordic penology, this article analyses elements of both penal exceptionalism and excess. In this article, it is shown how the packages are based on the notion of gang membership as a choice, which legitimated the development of a parallel justice system for gang members. This foundation is built upon a gang-specific subsection that allows for the doubling of gang-related sentences and for restricting prisoner rights and traditional rehabilitative treatment for gang-related convicts. The packages, however, maintained ‘a way out’ for gang members who voluntarily entered a formal EXIT program, and thus gained access to traditional penal treatment and also support for leaving the gang milieu. It is argued that the packages represent a development of intended bifurcation based on status differentiation between citizen groups, a process also observed in regard to Danish anti-ghetto policies. Thus, rather than resembling a general turn to punitiveness, the packages indicate a penological development based on penal differentiation, which raises questions about access to justice for those found wanting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-3708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-2609</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/14773708231208333</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Access ; Criminal justice ; Criminal justice system ; Differentiation ; Ethnic groups ; Exceptionalism ; Gangs ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Minority groups ; Penology ; Street gangs ; Traditional medicine</subject><ispartof>European journal of criminology, 2024-05, Vol.21 (3), p.392-410</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-cdd82fd561ff1d593119a7e890ac1d6924e96e1f0b51795f73eae687af5069713</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6848-779X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/14773708231208333$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/14773708231208333$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,21821,27926,27927,31001,33776,43623,43624</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Mads</creatorcontrib><title>Exceptionalism for most, excess for others: The legal foundation of a bifurcated criminal justice system in Denmark</title><title>European journal of criminology</title><addtitle>European Journal of Criminology</addtitle><description>Following a change in the Danish gang milieu in 2008, where ethnic minority street gangs challenged the established outlaw motorcycle gangs, the Danish government has formulated three anti-gang policy ‘packages’. To unfold the development they represent to Nordic penology, this article analyses elements of both penal exceptionalism and excess. In this article, it is shown how the packages are based on the notion of gang membership as a choice, which legitimated the development of a parallel justice system for gang members. This foundation is built upon a gang-specific subsection that allows for the doubling of gang-related sentences and for restricting prisoner rights and traditional rehabilitative treatment for gang-related convicts. The packages, however, maintained ‘a way out’ for gang members who voluntarily entered a formal EXIT program, and thus gained access to traditional penal treatment and also support for leaving the gang milieu. It is argued that the packages represent a development of intended bifurcation based on status differentiation between citizen groups, a process also observed in regard to Danish anti-ghetto policies. Thus, rather than resembling a general turn to punitiveness, the packages indicate a penological development based on penal differentiation, which raises questions about access to justice for those found wanting.</description><subject>Access</subject><subject>Criminal justice</subject><subject>Criminal justice system</subject><subject>Differentiation</subject><subject>Ethnic groups</subject><subject>Exceptionalism</subject><subject>Gangs</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Minority groups</subject><subject>Penology</subject><subject>Street gangs</subject><subject>Traditional medicine</subject><issn>1477-3708</issn><issn>1741-2609</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kE1PwzAMhisEEmPwA7hF4kpH3LRNww3B-JAmcRnnKkudraMfI04l9u9JGRIHxMmW3-d9ZTuKLoHPAKS8gVRKIXmRCEh4IYQ4iiYgU4iTnKvj0Ac9HoHT6Ixoy3lABJ9ENP80uPN13-mmppbZ3rG2J3_NMAhE34Peb9DRLVtukDW41k2YDl2lRxvrLdNsVdvBGe2xYsbVbR3S2HYgXxtktCePLas79oBdq937eXRidUN48VOn0dvjfHn_HC9en17u7xaxSfLUx6aqisRWWQ7WQpUpAaC0xEJxbaDKVZKiyhEsX2UgVWalQI15IbXNeK4kiGl0dcjduf5jQPLlth9cWI1KwdPxbQqKQMGBMq4ncmjLXbhAu30JvByh8s9vg2d28JBe42_q_4Yvn6952A</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Madsen, Mads</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-779X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Exceptionalism for most, excess for others: The legal foundation of a bifurcated criminal justice system in Denmark</title><author>Madsen, Mads</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-cdd82fd561ff1d593119a7e890ac1d6924e96e1f0b51795f73eae687af5069713</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Access</topic><topic>Criminal justice</topic><topic>Criminal justice system</topic><topic>Differentiation</topic><topic>Ethnic groups</topic><topic>Exceptionalism</topic><topic>Gangs</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Minority groups</topic><topic>Penology</topic><topic>Street gangs</topic><topic>Traditional medicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Madsen, Mads</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>European journal of criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Madsen, Mads</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exceptionalism for most, excess for others: The legal foundation of a bifurcated criminal justice system in Denmark</atitle><jtitle>European journal of criminology</jtitle><addtitle>European Journal of Criminology</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>392</spage><epage>410</epage><pages>392-410</pages><issn>1477-3708</issn><eissn>1741-2609</eissn><abstract>Following a change in the Danish gang milieu in 2008, where ethnic minority street gangs challenged the established outlaw motorcycle gangs, the Danish government has formulated three anti-gang policy ‘packages’. To unfold the development they represent to Nordic penology, this article analyses elements of both penal exceptionalism and excess. In this article, it is shown how the packages are based on the notion of gang membership as a choice, which legitimated the development of a parallel justice system for gang members. This foundation is built upon a gang-specific subsection that allows for the doubling of gang-related sentences and for restricting prisoner rights and traditional rehabilitative treatment for gang-related convicts. The packages, however, maintained ‘a way out’ for gang members who voluntarily entered a formal EXIT program, and thus gained access to traditional penal treatment and also support for leaving the gang milieu. It is argued that the packages represent a development of intended bifurcation based on status differentiation between citizen groups, a process also observed in regard to Danish anti-ghetto policies. Thus, rather than resembling a general turn to punitiveness, the packages indicate a penological development based on penal differentiation, which raises questions about access to justice for those found wanting.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/14773708231208333</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6848-779X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-3708
ispartof European journal of criminology, 2024-05, Vol.21 (3), p.392-410
issn 1477-3708
1741-2609
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_3041177918
source Access via SAGE; Sociological Abstracts; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)
subjects Access
Criminal justice
Criminal justice system
Differentiation
Ethnic groups
Exceptionalism
Gangs
Minority & ethnic groups
Minority groups
Penology
Street gangs
Traditional medicine
title Exceptionalism for most, excess for others: The legal foundation of a bifurcated criminal justice system in Denmark
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T11%3A19%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exceptionalism%20for%20most,%20excess%20for%20others:%20The%20legal%20foundation%20of%20a%20bifurcated%20criminal%20justice%20system%20in%20Denmark&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20criminology&rft.au=Madsen,%20Mads&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=392&rft.epage=410&rft.pages=392-410&rft.issn=1477-3708&rft.eissn=1741-2609&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/14773708231208333&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3041177918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3041177918&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_14773708231208333&rfr_iscdi=true